TOP 7 FACTS THAT PROVE MONKEYPOX (MPOX) IS A SCAM

1. Monkeypox first appeared outside a lab, in the Congo, during a period of "intensified effort to eliminate smallpox."

I.e. monkeypox first appeared outside a lab only after the initiation of a smallpox vaccination campaign.
2. Clinical distinction between smallpox and monkeypox, both in monkeys and in humans, is not possible.

Preben Christian Alexander von Magnus, a Danish virologist who was known for his research on influenza and polio vaccinations, is credited with confirming the existence of the monkeypox virus.

In a 1959 paper, which first described the virus, von Magnus et al. noted that "Clinical distinction between smallpox and monkeypox, both in monkeys and in man, is not possible."

Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea (@DrAnaMihalcea) describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how she—as well as other doctors and researchers—has found "self-assembling nanotechnology" in dental anesthetics, insulin, and people's blood.

Mihalcea, an internist with a PhD in pathology, notes that there is a concerted effort to deploy nanotechnology on the population via the healthcare system, highlighting one particular document produced by the U.S. Army, dubbed "Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD." The document notes that "One can...assume that aspects of cyborg capabilities will be enabled through the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, or any number of emerging technologies."

Furthermore, Mihalcea notes that this plan to merge humans with nanotechnology stems from the idea of transhumanism, which, she says, stems from eugenics. @DrAnaMihalcea @LauraLynnTT Link to Cyborg Soldier document:



Note the document discusses "neural implant technology" consisting of "nanoparticles that can be directed through an external force." wespenrevideos.com/wp-content/upl…

"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product [EUA C19 jabs] here as this product here ['fully approved' C19 jabs]...? Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."

"[T]here is a...coup going on, and...the coup is worldwide." (1/5)

Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a resigned former Army officer and American constitutionalist, describes for Ryan Cristian (@TLAVagabond) how the military, under the leadership of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, pulled off a con of sorts when it mandated the COVID-19 injections for the military. Miller highlights the fact that the COVID injections that the FDA (supposedly) approved were never made available to the military, and therefore it was an EUA product that was mandated by Austin—something that is illegal.

"I think at...top levels of government, I think they were knowingly complicit," Miller tells Cristian. Miller, who recently published a viral post here on X showcasing a "Declaration of Military Accountability" that acts as a clarion call for the American people to "do everything lawfully within [their] power to stop the willful destruction of [their] military by its own leadership," adds: "I think the Secretary of Defense [Lloyd Austin] was smart enough that when he put out his initial memo...it [was] far less problematic than actually what happened."

Austin said in his initial COVID-injection mandate memo, Miller says, that "'fully FDA approved products will...be used.'" Miller notes, "when you look at that, it's like, OK, we may not like this, but legally, this is far less problematic than the actual implementation, which, of course, was only possible if you're using EUA products, because there were no fully FDA approved products."

"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product here as this product here, or at least something that could be interchangeably used in place of it?" Miller asks rhetorically. "Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."

The resigned former Army officer, who left the military due to the COVID-injection mandate, adds that "it's much bigger than just the military, it's much bigger than just the United States...I think, to some degree, there is a...coup going on, and I think the coup is worldwide."

Miller goes on to say:

"Wars don't always look the way that we kind of have come to think that wars look. And a coup doesn't always necessarily consist of a singular one-and-done event. And I think what's happening in our country, [and] you could also extrapolate across the world...I think we're in the midst of kind of ongoing coup. And that ongoing coup, which I think has been decades in the making, maybe longer, is punctuated by like, certain discrete events. But none of those singular events is a full one-and-done coup like [you'd normally] think of."

Miller adds:

"[W]e're in the midst of something far more subtle. And it's far more incrementalist. But it doesn't mean that there aren't kind of these, singular events that kind of move us into a deeper phase of the coup. I think COVID was one of those. I think 9/11 was one of those. And I don't think you get to a COVID without a 9/11 two decades prior." (2/5) Note that Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) has said that "our military establishment...are the professional brainwashers" and it brainwashed gov't employees into thinking the C19 jabs are safe/effective.

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1787555843497476562

(1/9) OB/GYN and functional medicine practitioner Dr. Margaret Christensen describes for @ChildrensHD a huge list of C19 jab-related illnesses she's observed, including:

For women:

"women with all kinds of abnormal bleeding"
"ovarian cysts"
"massive...heavy bleeding episodes."
"massive amounts of infertility."
three fetal deaths (even though Christensen doesn't do obstetrics currently)
"very abnormal placentas"
postmenopausal bleeding that's "bizarre"

For men:
"Unbelievably low testosterone levels"
"significant changes in sperm morphology"
"libido issues"
depression

In both men and women, Christensen highlights: "excessive brain fog"
cardiovascular events from heart attacks to strokes
"bizarre blood clots"
"horrendous" mental health challenges
neurodegenerative changes
rapid onset dementia
"massive amounts of autoimmune issues" including recurrence of infections and new infections @ChildrensHD (2/9) Here is a list of 7 studies that show ample evidence of the COVID-19 injections negatively affecting women’s menstrual cycles:

sensereceptornews.com/?p=3908

🚨H1N1 Bird Flu 'Vaccines' Linked to Alarming Safety Signals in VAERS for 'Intra-Uterine Deaths' (Stillbirths), Spontaneous Abortions, and Decrease in Key Human Reproduction Hormone (1/5)

(Are the 'bird flu' vaccines actually covert infertility injections?🤔)

In this discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. pharmaceutical researcher and scientist Craig Paardekooper describes an analysis he did concerning H1N1 bird flu "vaccines" and their rates of adverse events reported to VAERS. He describes how he discovered alarming safety signals for "intra-uterine deaths" (stillbirths), spontaneous abortions, and a decrease in a key human reproduction hormone dubbed "hCG."

In this first clip, Paardekooper says that the two bird flu vaccines with reports in VAERS (the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) "have the absolute highest and strongest safety signal for intra-uterine death." Paardekooper notes this means "the baby is being destroyed while it's in the womb, after conception, while it's a fetus."

For the two H1N1 vaccines analyzed, Paardekooper says that one has a safety signal of 119, while the other has a safety signal of 64. On average, Paardekooper notes that this amounts to "100 times greater [incidence] than other vaccines for causing intra-uterine death." I.e. stillbirths.

From a report Paardekooper published on this analysis:

"The incidence of stillbirth with H1N1 Bird Flu vaccine has a confidence interval where the upper limit is 253.8, and the lower limit is 119.51. This means that there is a 95% chance that the incidence of still birth will be higher than 119.51 times. It also means that 5% of the time it will even be higher than 253.8 times."

Paardekooper adds that both of the H1N1 flu "vaccines" in VAERS also use the same toxin, which adds confirmation that they are indeed responsible for the safety signal.

The fact both "vaccines" use the same toxin is "confirmation, because you have the two toxins belonging to the same drug...It's like they confirm each other," Paardekooper says. Paardekooper also links the H1N1 vaccines in VAERS to spontaneous abortions, which he notes "is another criteria for lower birthrate." (2/5)

"Both of the H1N1 vaccines come [out] at the top, again," Paardekooper says in regard to incidence of spontaneous abortion. He describes that he's found they're five to six times more likely to be associated with this adverse event signal versus other vaccines in VAERS.

🚨REMINDER: THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAS SPENT **$20 TRILLION** OF U.S. TAXPAYER MONEY THAT IS UNDOCUMENTED AND UNACCOUNTED FOR (1/5)

In this clip from a recent episode of the Children's Health Defense series, Financial Rebellion, Investment banker and former HUD official Catherine Austin Fitts describes how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has spent $20 trillion of taxpayer money (between 1998 and 2015) that has gone undocumented and unaccounted for. Fitts also highlights the fact that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has done the same with $1 trillion of taxpayer money.

Fitts starts out her overview of "the missing money" by noting that in 1994 the New York Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Reserve (the Fed) bought shares in the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). The investment banker notes that the Bank of International Settlements "is the central bank of central banks in Switzerland and operates above the law...[as] they have sovereign immunity and enjoy it in many respects and they can receive and hold money secretly [and] can keep money on their balance sheets secretly."

Effectively, Fitts says, the U.S. government buying those shares "made their relationship with the BIS much closer..."

The investment banker goes on to note that in October 1995 a budget deal in U.S. Congress "basically crashed and burned" and "it was then that...the president of one of the largest pension funds said to [her], 'They'—whoever 'They' is—have given up on the country and are moving all the money out starting in the Fall." Fitts says it was that Fall, October 1997, "when money started to go missing from HUD, as well as the Department of Defense."

As of today, Fitts says, "there's...$20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 missing from DOD and $1 trillion missing from HUD."

"The other thing that started to happen when that money started to go missing...was what I call the Great Poisoning..." Fitts adds. "Literally, it was the next month after the budget deal crashed that OxyContin was approved and the HUD predatory lending started and the pill mill started and really, the targeting of the low-income neighborhoods started, including the roundups coming from the private prison movement."

"Undocumentable adjustments then skyrocket[ed]," Fitts adds.

Cut to 2001, and "the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference at the Department of Defense...[announcing] that the Department of Defense was missing $2.3 trillion..."

Fitts was told that one of the offices at the Pentagon that was blown up was the location for the office of Naval Intelligence Research Group, which was investigating the missing money.

"The rest is history," Fitts says. "The Patriot Act had passed, and then the DOD got huge appropriations and nobody really cared about the missing money."

Then, in 2015, the DOD financials came out and "it was the greatest missing money in one year [ever]. The DOD was missing $6.5 trillion in a year..."

At that point, Fitts says, Dr. Mark Skidmore, who was a professor and expert in budgeting at Michigan State University, thought she "must be wrong" because "the Department of Defense can't be missing 10-plus times its total budget in a year." Lo and behold, when he investigated the DOD's financials, he found that "actually, [she] was right."

Fitts subsequently asked that Skidmore have his students do a complete survey "of all the financial statements in all the years from fiscal 1997 to 2015."

He and his students got the total missing money to $21 trillion. They subsequently published a report in 2017, at which point Skidmore and Fitts discovered that "the amount of money missing from the U.S. Treasury was the same amount as the total debt of the United States."

Cut to 2018, and Fitts notes that during the theatrical hearings held during the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress—including both the Senate and the House, Republicans and Democrats—along with the Trump White House "got together and issued a policy called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56." (Fitts refers to it as FASAB 56 or, phonetically speaking, 'Faz-B 56.')

"[W]hat FASAB 56 says, very short and simple, is basically the government can keep secret books as a matter of administrative policy, thus refusing to obey all the financial management rules and regulations and laws, including the constitutional provisions for disclosure of financial operations," Fitts says. She adds that "they extended it, along with the classification laws, to private companies and banks doing business with the federal government, which means when you look at the U.S. securities market, the large cap section of the U.S. market...most of the disclosure is meaningless. You have no idea how the money works at many of these companies and the government because they're so intertwined."

Interestingly, the investment banker adds that "the COVID-19 operation could never have happened without that [FASAB 56], because it put the Department of Defense, and [other federal government] agencies in a position to, essentially, access an unlimited amount of secret money."

Fitts says somebody once told her that FASAB 56 is "a wet dream" as it allows for "secret money for secret operations."

"I think it was one month after FASAB 56 passed that suddenly Moderna magically raised $500 million. Quite a coincidence," Fitts adds. Here is a clip from the 2001 Rumsfeld speech to which Fitts refers. (2/5)

Rumsfeld says: "Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, WE CANNOT TRACK $2.3 TRILLION IN TRANSACTIONS." (Emphasis added.)

REMDESIVIR—VENTILATORS —ISOLATION—AND THE 'HOSPITAL HOMICIDE' OF MORE THAN 500,000 AMERICANS SINCE 2020

Here's a reminder that hospitals have been turned into "killing fields" since the beginning of COVID, deploying deadly protocols that have murdered 500K+ Americans. 🧵 (1/16)

While the death and destruction caused by the COVID bioweapon injections has, rightfully, earned an enormous amount of attention from the alternative media, it's important to note that just as many people—if not more—have been killed by what's been deemed by some as COVID "murder protocols" in the hospitals. Murder protocols that have, in the U.S., been put into place by federal "health" agencies, and reinforced with massive payouts.

In this first clip, we learn from electrical engineer and citizen investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) that these "hospital homicides" (Beaudoin's term) now account for more than 500,000 dead Americans. Indeed, Beaudoin says that "the hospital homicides might be greater" than the number of people killed by the COVID injections in the U.S.

Beaudoin, who has pored through approximately 5% of the death certificates in the U.S. from the years 2019 through 2023, highlights an excess of acute renal failure (or sudden kidney failure) deaths as particularly staggering. He says that there have been 153,000 excess acute renal failure deaths **alone** in the last three years, which can likely be chalked up to some combination of remdesivir, vancomycin, and baricitinib.

Remdesivir, which many have come to associate with death and illness, is an antiviral drug shown to be deadly in clinical trials and linked to renal failure specifically*.

Baricitinib is a "Janus kinase JAK inhibitor" and is considered an "immunomodulator." Medical News Today notes, "If your kidneys don’t work well, [baricitnib] could build up in your body."

Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat infections and has also been linked to acute renal failure**.

Beaudoin notes that while he's not sure which individual drug, or which combination of drugs, is most responsible for the excess renal failure deaths in the U.S. over the last three years, "all the data is sitting on government computers and the government is purposely not looking at it, because they killed more than 150,000 excess people more than normal in the last three years by acute renal failure alone."

Furthermore, Beaudoin highlights ventilators as a murder mechanism. "[P]eople were put on ventilators, they got lung infections, they weren't treated for bacterial infections, and they died," he says. He notes that sometimes patients were given vancomycin, but that "kills the kidneys if you give too much."

Putting a finer point on things, Beaudoin says, "with regard to all of the [COVID] hospital protocols, I call it murder, because at some level, somebody knew what they were doing." While he doesn't blame the doctors themselves, he does say that whoever developed the protocol knew that it would kill patients.

*//** Supporting studies provided in last post of thread. "There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced...this happened synchronously everywhere...where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people." (2/16)

In this clip from an interview with Matthew Ehret (@ehret_matthew), Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt), a scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor, describes how his study of all-cause mortality has led him to conclude that COVID hospital protocols have been responsible for an enormous amount of death.

Note that while Beaudoin has been studying death certificates, and Rancourt has been looking at all-cause mortality, they've both arrived at the same conclusion in this context.

"There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced. And the all-cause mortality surged in a rapid peak that lasted only a month or two, and this happened synchronously everywhere where there was a hotspot, it happened at the same time—where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people," Rancourt tells Ehret. The scientist notes that one of the "main things" that killed people was putting them on ventilators, "which are extremely deadly and increase the chance of getting a bacterial infection in the respiratory tract, and so on..."

Rancourt notes that there were "huge spikes in mortality that did not spread" in 2020, but were, rather, "synchronous with the announcement of the pandemic where they got the go ahead and...apply these protocols and do what they did in hospitals."

Indeed, Rancourt says that "the big hospitals that followed this kind of militaristic new approach, without thinking, were killing fields, basically."

"The places where they didn't do this [the murder protocols], or they didn't do it as aggressively, or they didn't have large hospitals where they applied these protocols just military style, you did not get these peaks," the scientist adds.

LUMEN STREAMERS — RUBBERY CLOTS — AND THE 'DIED SUDDENLY' PHENOMENON

Here Are Six Key Insights into the Now-Infamous 'White, Fibrous Clots' and How They Act as Slow, Stealthy, and Sudden Killers in Those Who've Taken the COVID Jabs (1/7)

1. THE CLOTS FORM OVER TIME (UP TO YEARS) IN PEOPLE'S BLOOD VESSELS

Although the now-infamous "white fibrous clots"—sometimes referred to as "rubber band clots" or "rubbery clots"—first brought to light by embalmer @r_hirschman (via @RealDrJaneRuby) are obviously killing a great many COVID-injected people, it's unclear exactly how they're often able to grow undetected. In this brief thread, however, we have several key insights from physicians and others as to how the clots grow stealthily before they murder their unsuspecting victims.

First up, we have radiologist Dr. Phillip Triantos in discussion The Blaze Senior Editor Daniel Horowitz (@RMConservative) showing ultrasound images of what he believes are the white fibrous clots forming inside the blood vessels of (still living) COVID "vaccinated" people.

The first trio of ultrasound images Triantos presents shows a man who was "genetically jabbed three times" who developed what Triantos assumes is one of the white, fibrous clots. The radiologist notes the man was injected in 2022, and, by 2024, the clot has "gotten a little bigger...[and] a little longer." He notes the clot has "taken its time" growing in the lumen (the cavity of a blood vessel).

Next, Triantos shows another patient who has in one of their blood vessels a "long, string-like clot." Triantos notes that he has seen these types of clots prior to the rollout of the COVID injections, but says they're "typically...chronic clots that people have had for a long time" as opposed to the novel white fibrous clots, which are "presenting acutely."

Triantos also shows some of the white fibrous clots that Hirschman pulled out of the veins and arteries of a body, which Triantos says "[look] very similar" to the clots he's seeing in ultrasounds.

Finally, in this clip, Triantos notes one specific case where these white fibrous clots acted as a killer, highlighting the death of a 25-year-old man in his area (somewhere in Alabama) who took the Moderna injection for work. "[T]wo years...after his shot he ended up passing away from a huge embolus in chest..." the radiologist says. (An embolus is a blood clot.) 2. THE CLOTS FORM AS "STREAMERS" IN THE CAVITIES OF BLOOD VESSELS

With Triantos' ultrasounds of the white fibrous clots in mind, listen to the way Dr. Shankara Chetty describes them:

[I]magine a streamer in the lumen of the vessel...and, it's not occluding blood flow, but it's stuck to the vessel wall, and that streamer is growing. So what happens is you've got some process that's [happening] on the vessel wall that's triggering...a catalytic process that's going to cause this fibrinous clot to constantly elongate."

Chetty goes on to say:

"When I look at what we see with the clots, we're seeing a mixture of the fibrinous and the traditional clot...but when you look at the fibrinous clot, it tends to be one long strand, and you've got...natural clots attached to it," Chetty tells Dr. Phillip McMillan (@vejon_health) and Triantos. "So you've got two processes...you got the fibrinous structures that are forming and you got those fibrinous structures causing turbulence in blood flow, which actually causes this normal clotting around it."

Chetty goes on to say that "as the fibrinous clot elongates, it doesn't occlude the lumen—it's flapping around like a streamer [stuck to] the lumen wall and the blood is flowing past it. So you don't see it. It's there and it keeps growing, but it keeps causing more and more normal coagulation around it and the longer it grows, the longer the clot. But it hasn't occluded the vessel. And, because it needs this turbulence to have coagulation around it, it will occur in slow-flowing areas of the body."

Chetty expounds further:

"So as this fibrinous clot grows through a polymerization process, where it keeps getting proteins from your system sticking on to it and growing it, it also acts as a foreign body in the vessel creating turbulence, and it's that turbulence that causes the blood to start to clot around it, until eventually the pressure cannot push through, and it eventually just blocks up. So, depending on when it blocks up, you can get a short strand, or you can get a very long [clot], like they're pulling out two-feet clots from patients' leg veins and things like that."

Are Unidentified 'Death Squads' Being Used to Kill Patients in Hospitals with Remdesivir and the Like? (1/3)

"[T]here was this kind of strange 'death squad' that I am starting to believe were actually hired specifically to do this work, because the people I've spoken to, the relatives and friends of victims, the way they've described them, they're not like you're average doctor or nurse. They're cold and they're sadistic and they're unpleasant. Sometimes they won't even speak. Some have been reported not to have any identification or name badges..."

In this clip from an interview with Peter McIlvenna (@HeartsofOakUK) writer, producer, and presenter Jacqui Deevoy (@JacquiDeevoy1) describes a support group of approximately 142 people who have "absolutely horrendous stories about...how their loved ones were murdered in NHS [National Health Service in England] settings," including in hospices, care homes, and hospitals."

Deevoy, who set up the support group following the production of a 2021 film dubbed 'A Good Death?' (co-produced with David Icke's 'Ickonic' platform/studio), says "the stories are just unbelievable," as "you don't expect your loved one to go into a care home or hospital and be murdered, which is what's happening."

The writer goes on to note that "we kind of sugarcoat it slightly by calling it 'involuntary euthanasia,' but 'involuntary euthanasia,' I don't know why that phrase really exists, because that is murder." Deevoy adds, "If someone is being euthanized, being...killed, against their will, surely that's murder. I can't see why it's called anything else."

"If we drugged a loved one to death, no matter what state they were in, whether they were terminally ill or not, we would be arrested and probably jailed," Deevoy says. "But when a doctor or nurse does it, it seems to be okay. And I don't really understand that."

Deevoy goes on to say that "It's hard to believe that doctors and nurses could be that heartless and cruel...and murderous, but I don't think it's all doctors and nurses at all. I'd say 95% of them are absolutely brilliant..."

Critically, however, the writer says "there was this kind of strange 'death squad' that I am starting to believe were actually hired specifically to do this work, because the people I've spoken to, the relatives and friends of victims, the way they've described them, they're not like you're average doctor or nurse. They're cold and they're sadistic and they're unpleasant. Sometimes they won't even speak..."

Deevoy adds, "Some have been reported not to have any identification or name badges, they've been very hard to trace afterwards in some cases—it's very, very strange, and I'm starting to wonder if these people haven't been brought in to do this. Because your average nurse or carer or doctor wouldn't be able to do it. That's not why they're doing their job. They're doing their job to help people, not to kill them." "There were people that were coming in, dressed in all-black uniforms...and they were hanging remdesivir, even without our knowledge, on these patients."

Seemingly corroborating the stories of unidentified "death squads" that Deevoy says she's been made aware of thanks to friends and family of affected patients, Nurse Erin Olszewski (@erin_bsn)—widely known for her whistleblowing after witnessing "murder" with hospital protocols at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York in 2020—described an eerily similar phenomenon in a 2024 interview with the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (@VacSafety), noting that strange people were "coming in" to the hospital "dressed in all-black uniforms" and administering remdesivir without the other nurses' or doctors' knowledge.

"There were people that were coming in [to Elmhurst Hospital], dressed in all-black uniforms...And they would come into my patients' rooms and demand that I give them their blood. And I would ask 'Where are the orders?" Olszewski says. The nurse adds, "now I know...almost four years later, that they were experimenting on patients without the patients' permission or the family's permission, and they were hanging remdesivir, even without our knowledge, on these patients."

When Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) asks, "Who were these people...?" Olszewski responds that she "[has] no idea."

A few days prior to her being fired from her position at the time, Olszewski says: "[I] went and talked to management about this [one] nurse practitioner, supposedly, [who] had no name badge, nothing, and I'm like, 'What are they doing?' Like, there's no order for this, and they're threatening me."

"She actually had threatened me in the room that...'You'll be gone soon,' and sure enough, I was," Olszewski says. "So there was more to it [the hospital murders], that we don't even know, that I don't even know."

"So you never got an answer and to this day you do not know who these people in the black suits were?" Kirsch asks.

"No," Olszewski says.

🔥"people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..." (1/6)

Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describes for Jason James (@jasonjamesbnn) how the "upper-levels of [the U.S.] military establishment" brainwashed the government, as well as the American people, into believing that things like lockdowns, masking, and the mRNA injections were necessary to defeat COVID. He highlights the fact that the National Security Council (NSC) took control of the "pandemic" response in the U.S. just seven days after it was declared a national emergency, and, echoing the work done by Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) and Katherine Watt, says that the FDA's supposed approval of the COVID injections was pure "theater."

"[W]hat happened...during the pandemic, is that...FDA, NIH, CDC, all of them, lost control of what would have been their scientific narratives. And they did that because...President Trump...handed [management of the 'pandemic'] off to the National Security Council, which militarized it, which made the pandemic no longer a pandemic, but a biowarfare attack," Risch tells James. The professor emeritus adds that the COVID injections are "not vaccines according to the government" and are, instead, "countermeasures, because it's a military approach that was adopted rather than a public health approach."

"[T]his military approach that had people in the military underneath the National Security Council, designed a response that all of our government agencies would carry out, they designed a response that would not follow public health principles," Risch notes.

Prior to the NSC's bizarre and harmful "pandemic" response plan, Risch says that prominent public health officials had said that "you don't lock down the population" and that "there's no point in closing airports [as] that won't do anything." He adds that public health officials also knew that "masks are essentially useless—for either protecting the wearer or for controlling source control, meaning keeping the wearer from spreading infection outside of the wearer."

"[A]ll of this stuff was all laid out, and then the military turned it around and did the opposite of almost everything. And so, that colored our whole response," Risch says.

Explaining further, the Yale professor says that "people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these [U.S. government] agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..."

Risch goes on to say:

"What happened is that, basically, your rank-and-file people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies, are relatively good people who believe in themselves, they believe in the science the way they see it; they believe that they think they are doing a good job, the best that they could under the circumstances, they think of themselves as wholesome, good-doing people. And they [didn't] realize that they [were being] brainwashed. That [they'd] been brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing of all of our scientific, medical regulatory systems, as well as the general public. And we know how much brainwashing has gone on through the media and all that."

"[T]his whole regime of mis-thinking, of propagandized fear and lack of recognition of what were the true issues going on, spread throughout the regulatory approval and scientific review institutions of our government," Risch adds.

Touching on the topic of the COVID injections, Risch says that the FDA's VIRBAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) committee, "thought they were doing good by approving vaccines," but were, in fact, "essentially irrelevant." Risch adds that "It was just theater to legitimize that these vaccines weren't vaccines, they were countermeasures and were going to be used anyway come hell or high water, because that's what the military at the top, the National Security Council, had decided, in advance of this whole process unfolding."

Indeed, Risch highlights the fact that the COVID injection rollout "was planned this way" and notes that "the military was involved in Event 201, the planning...sessions in September of 2019, and all the previous Event 201s..." that had taken place regularly in the years leading up to COVID.

"Why was the military involved? Because they knew the likelihood of a bioweapons attack was grossly, much larger, much higher, than a spread from some animal reservoir into humans. So they were heavily involved in the planning for this and it shows how we carried out all of the pandemic management. Because it was obviously twisted and contorted to be a military response rather than a public health response." The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed responsible for setting COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.

NSC took what was a reasonable pandemic preparedness plan, threw it out, and made a new one that they used, but is not available to the public.

Source: fema.gov/sites/default/…

"Its hard to understand why [theyd inflict] a bioweapon on...[Earth]...unless it [goes] back to population control...[vaccines are]...a great way...b/c if you think Im just getting a vaccine...then 10 years later...you try to have a child [but] cant, you dont connect those two"

Senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) and (retired) Principal Investigator at the Korea Brain Research Institute Systems Neuroscience and Movement Disorders Laboratory Dr. Kevin McCairn PhD (@NestCommander) discuss the possibility that COVID and the COVID injections, in conjunction, are a tool for mass, global depopulation. Seneff, who has four degrees from MIT, specifically notes that she's aware that "vaccines" have been used as a "stealth" tool for causing infertility before in Argentina and Africa.

There is a doctrine that says that "if you use an agent, a pathogen, it works best as a binary type weapon, which [means] you have to follow it up mass exposure using something like vaccines," McCairn says toward the beginning of the clip. "[W]hen you think about this instance of gene-transfection technologies to make [a] specific peptide, which would have that prion-catalyzing epitope, and...we know that the lipid nanoparticle is highly labile [easily broken down], and is highly inflammatory in and of itself—it's a combination of chemical and biological warfare all wrapped up in one."

If COVID/the COVID injections "[were] a weapon release, it's done, and now we have to wait and see what happens as the data rolls in," McCairn adds.

"[I]s it they're trying to develop some vaccine, or are they trying to develop biowarfare?" Seneff asks rhetorically, highlighting the evolution of her thinking on this matter. "Are we funding China to develop bioweapons?"

The senior scientist at MIT goes on to say that "it's hard to understand why they would want to inflict a bioweapon on the entire Earth's population...unless it does get back to population control."

"I was aware before of vaccines that I think were introduced for population control in Argentina and in Africa. There were those monks who found that they had included something in the vaccines that they were giving to the teenage girls that would cause them to develop antibodies to the fetus, as a 'birth control pill,'" Seneff adds. She notes that "the people [in Argentina] immediately suspected that they were trying to make them infertile. And the thing is, that's such a great way to do it, because if you think 'I'm just getting a vaccine and then ten years later...you try to have a child and you can't, you don't connect those two; so it's stealth. If you want to reduce the population without people knowing what's happening, it's a great way to do it..."

McCairn notes that he "can't dismiss that body of literature that's being put out by the tippy top of the transnational power structures and corporations [regarding a depopulation agenda]." He adds, "it's not like they hide it."

The principal investigator goes on to reference research showing that the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the COVID injections accumulate in the reproductive organs, highlighting one specific pharmacokinetic study performed in Japan that showed the LNPs going to the placenta, ovaries, etc. McCairn also highlights the late Dr. Arne Burkhardt's observations of the "expression of spike protein in reproductive organs in people who'd been autopsied after death." Here is the evidence presented by the late Dr. Arne Burkhardt, referenced by McCairn in the video clip.

Burkhardt, a renowned pathologist who had more than 40 years of experience in his field, says in this clip—referencing one autopsy of a COVID "vaccinated" male—that "spike protein is strongly expressed in the spermatogenic organ, in the testes, and you can see there are almost no spermatocytes in here, but [a strong] expression of spike protein..."

"If I were a woman in fertile age, I would not plan a motherhood from a...man who has been [COVID] vaccinated," Burkhardt adds.

🚨The National Academies of Sciences says that "it is now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...one has to say, sadly, that of 100 people who get myocarditis today, something in the range of 20 to 50% will not be among us after 10 years...this is murder."🚨

Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States—has confirmed that both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections cause myocarditis.

Estimating the rate of myocarditis post COVID injection based on a study published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease in 2022, Bhakdi says it's likely that one to two percent of injection recipients will develop the heart condition. Meaning out of every 1,000,000 injection recipients, up to 20,000 will develop myocarditis. Of that cohort, Bhakdi says, we can expect up to 50% to die within the next 10 years.

"[T]hey looked at al the literature, all the evidence" and for most conditions possibly caused by the COVID injections, "they were not completely sure and the data are still not sufficient," Bhakdi says of the National Academies injection analysis. He notes that "For myocarditis, [they said it's] now established that the myocarditis comes from the vaccination...And they wrote that further scientific investigation will not lead to any other conclusion."

This means that "any myocarditis that anyone sees in the world following vaccination is known now to be due to the vaccine," Bhakdi adds.

He goes on to highlight the paper published in Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, saying that the team, made of Thai researchers working in Thailand, "used [modern medical] techniques to see what the incidence was of myocarditis in young people, and the results were completely clear: incidence was something in the range of...1 to 2%."

One percent means if you "vaccinate" 1,000,000 people, 10,000 are going to get myocarditis," Bhakdi notes. He adds that myocarditis is a "slow killer" that will wipe out 20 to 50% of those affected by it within a decade.

He notes the injections have doubtlessly "shortened the lifespan of [affected children] by decades."

"[T]his is murder," Bhakdi says. Link to National Academies analysis:



"The report concludes that two messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, can cause myocarditis..." nationalacademies.org/news/2024/04/n…

🚨"[J]ust type in 'variant [Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease] and the COVID-19 vaccine' or 'prion disease and the COVID vaccine' into PubMed...and you'll come up with hundreds...of case studies of people who developed what they're calling 'variant CJD.' I call it prion disease..."🚨

Dr David Cartland (@CartlandDavid) MBChB BMedSci, a GMC-registered General Practitioner, describes for Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) how the COVID injections are causing cases of variant Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease (vCJD), or what he's referring to as prion disease. Variant CJD, for reference, is a neurodegenerative disorder that is rapidly progressive and always fatal. (According to the CDC vCJD is a rare, degenerative, fatal brain disorder in humans. It differs from classic CJD in that it "predominantly affects younger people, has atypical clinical features, with prominent psychiatric or sensory symptoms at the time of clinical presentation and delayed onset of neurologic abnormalities, including ataxia within weeks or months, dementia and myoclonus late in the illness, a duration of illness of at least 6 months, and a diffusely abnormal non-diagnostic electroencephalogram.")

"[J]ust type in 'variant CJD and the COVID-19 vaccine' or 'prion disease and the COVID vaccine' into PubMed or NIH websites or Google Scholar and you'll come up with hundreds and hundreds of case studies of people who developed what they're calling 'variant CJD,'" Cartland tells Poulton.

"I call it prion disease...or spike protein-opothy, which is essentially the disease of what the spike protein is doing to the body—it's multi-faceted and it's multi-systemic as well," Cartland says. He explains the disease by saying people should "think about your brain kicking off these [spike/spike variant] proteins... [that] can't go anywhere, they're just depositing in the body, this inert substance. And it's building up in plaques [in the body's organs]..."

"I'm seeing that [strange behavior] in my colleagues and friends and family...people's cognitive functions are being impaired, people's memories being impaired, people's personalities are changing, either to become apathetic and not caring about anything to quite the opposite. And what I'm witnessing most is aggression; aggressive behavior from people," Cartland says. "People aren't able to stick to tasks, you see people all over the road when they're driving or driving ridiculous speeds—in 30 miles per hour [zones] they're going 10 miles per hour..."

Furthermore, the physician says that "These [vCJD/prion disease] cases happen within a matter of days after the vaccine being administered..." Indeed, even a cursory search of Google Scholar turns up pages and pages of studies linking variant Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease to the COVID injections:

One:

Two:

Three:

Four: hivnursing.net/index.php/hiv/…
basis-mettmann.info/dokumente/1663…
ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVT…
scivisionpub.com/pdfs/possible-…

"Here's the sneaky thing: on the last day that Obama was in office, he started this whole global biosecurity agenda, with the United States giving money to countries around the world to prepare them for *the pandemic,* you know, disease X, etc." (Tweet 1/5)

Physician and writer Dr. Meryl Nass (@NassMeryl) describes for James Corbett how former President Barack Obama started the process that saw the Department of Health and Human Services' definition of "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" morph into an excuse to give total "health authority" to the supranational organization in the case of one of these so-called "emergencies." (Note that the acronym for a Public Health Emergency of International concern is PHEIC, which the WHO pronounces as "fake." See following tweet for proof.)

Nass notes that a collection of 15 attorneys general from 15 states sent a petition to the HHS, noting that the department's new definition(s) of a PHEIC "turns over sovereignty for health to the WHO and that is not within your purview..." The attorneys noted, Nass says, "that is illegal" and "You don't have the authority to do that."

The attorneys essentially said, Nass summarizes, "We do have a 10th Amendment [and] you've turned over police power to them, you don't have the right to do that."

"Where did this all start?" Nass asks rhetorically. "Here's the sneaky thing: on the last day that Obama was in office, he started this whole global biosecurity agenda, with the United States giving money to countries around the world to prepare them for *the pandemic,* you know, disease X, etc." The last day he was in office, Nass shows, his HHS "issued a rule, and it said, 'We're redefining Public Health Emergencies of International Concern."

Five definitions of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern now exist, the physician adds, "that all rely on decisions by the WHO." That means, Nass notes, that "if the WHO declares one [a PHEIC], if the WHO decides there's one... if the WHO does something else, we're [HHS] going to consider that a public Health Emergency of International Concern."

Upon receiving the petition from the 15 attorneys general, Nass says that the HHS removed none of the language giving power to the WHO, and, instead, said "we're leaving it."

The attorneys' petition "is extremely strong because it cites the Constitution, it cites case law, and talks about all the reasons why it is illegal for this type of thing to happen..." Nass says. She adds, "apparently it [HHS] needs Congress in order to be able to do that and Congress has never given it that power." Note that the WHO pronounces the acronym for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, PHEIC, as "fake."

Literally.

With the acquisition of Seagen for $43 billion, "[I]t seems like Pfizer is covering itself for most of the turbo cancers that I'm describing right now that I see skyrocketing in the general population [that's taken the C19 injections]."

Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (@MakisMD) describes for Seth Holehouse (@ManInAmericaUS) how bizarre Pfizer's acquisition of the biotech company Seagen—which produces monoclonal antibody-based therapies for the treatment of cancer—was, considering its outsized $43 billion price tag.

"Why are they overpaying for a company that's not generating more than $2 billion in revenue right now?" Makis asks rhetorically. He notes that "it's estimated that it would take a decade for Pfizer just to break even on the deal."

The oncologist asks the question, "Why would cancer, all of the sudden, be the next big thing [for Pfizer]?" He notes that "you don't see... huge spikes in cancer" and that "nothing that would justify the scaling up the production of cancer drugs in a way that you would scale up production of mRNA in a viral outbreak, and yet this is the language that he's using."

Specifically, Makis says that Pfizer "paid top dollar" for Seagen's drugs aimed at battling breast cancer, lymphomas, leukemia, colon cancer, lung cancers, and kidney cancers, amongst others. He says that these are the exact kinds of "turbo cancers" he's been seeing in people who took the C19 injections.

Makis asks another rhetorical question: "[I]s he [Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla] telling us that there's going to be such a skyrocketing of cancers in the vaccinated population that he's basically acquired this company and he intends to use Pfizer's resources and infrastructure to scale up the production of cancer drugs [to fight]... an epidemic of cancer in the population?" Here is Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla telling Jim Cramer that a new Seagen cancer-fighting drug "will come every year" and that he wants to make cancer "a chronic disease" rather than a death sentence."

Source:

"[P]eople need to understand the FDA lied, the CDC lied, these [C19 jabs] were not tested, they did not go through good manufacturing practice... and [people] are being given adulterated and misbranded products that have never been tested... that is the reality." (Tweet 1/4)

Toxicologist and molecular biologist Janci Lindsay (@JanciToxDoc) outlines for Dr. Philip McMillan (@vejon_health) and virologist and whistleblower Jennifer Smith, PhD, how the COVID injections are not—BY LAW—vaccines, but rather "countermeasures" that can be—LEGALLY—adulterated and misbranded.

"[T]hese products as they are characterized, these medical countermeasures, are allowed to be adulterated and misbranded—and will not be seen as unapproved.... so they are approved, and they will be licensed," the toxicologist and molecular biologist notes. She adds that "No cgmp [current good manufacturing practices] is required of these [injections]. No testing, no good manufacturing practices required and they will be approved." Indeed, as Janci notes, 21CFR 360bbb, which describes "Emergency use of medical products" like the C19 injections, notes the following:

"an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has authorized deviations from current good manufacturing practices under paragraph (1)."

Link: uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req…

“In 2020, when COVID was… rampant, these mothers weren’t having these babies pass away inside [their wombs]. It was only in 2021 that these numbers started increasing… as much as they did.” (Post 1/3)

Postpartum nurse and whistleblower Michelle Gershman describes for @WTPatriotsUSA how she saw a massive increase in “fetal demises” following the rollout of the C19 bioweapon injections in March 2021.

In March 2021 “those shots started rolling out,” Gershman says, and “around that time… we started having an increase in fetal demises.” (A fetal demise means the baby passes away while still inside its mother’s womb.)

Gershman notes that before March 2021, she’d see “maybe one or two fetal demises every couple of months,” but after March 2021, she “started [seeing] one or two per week.”

The RN says that she felt as if nurses were “in a trance” and what was happening felt “really evil.” The email noted there had been an “exponential increase in fetal demises” and that, because of the increase, employees would need to “brush up on… policies to learn how to handle a dead baby’s body.”

Gershman goes on to note how in September 2022, a “horrific email” was sent to herself and the rest of the staff at her hospital. The email noted there had been an “exponential increase in fetal demises” and that, because of the increase, employees would need to “brush up on… policies to learn how to handle a dead baby’s body.”

The email noted that there were 22 fetal demises in August 2022, which tied the record set in July 2021 for total number of demises in a month. In September 2022, the email noted there were seven demises in the first eight days of the month.

Along with the fetal demises, Gershman also notes in this clip that nurses are seeing an increase in blood pressure issues in mothers (including “really high blood pressure”) as well as “a lot of circulatory issues.” The RN adds that mothers are now “passing clots” and “bleeding more,” and that these things “didn’t use to happen in numbers like this before 2021.”

"What we've lived through has been a fifth-generation propaganda war fed from the top level of the U.S. security state that took command of the pandemic on day five after the emergency was declared in 2020." (Tweet 1/4)

Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describes for Gary Null of how the U.S. security state—specifically the National Security Council (NSC)—took command of the national COVID-19 response, and executed on a "scam."

"[N]othing changed in public health [in 2020]," Risch says. "What changed is who was telling the public health infrastructure what to do. And terrorizing the public health infrastructure into carrying this all out."

Risch specifically notes the U.S. public health system "Did the exact opposite of all established public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic." He offers former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky as an example of how the U.S. security state intimidated public health officials:

Walensky was told if she "didn't comply with the security state requirements of what she had to say and what her policies were, that she would be responsible for killing millions of people. And, unfortunately, she believed that," Risch says. He notes other officials were "convinced" or "threatened" to "make policies and actions that were exactly scientifically contrary to everything that was known about managing the pandemic."

As for the motivations, Risch speculates that the U.S. security state was "attempting to cover up our role in creating this virus in the first place," "shilling" for pharmaceutical companies, and enforcing a state of "fascism."
The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed responsible for setting COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.

NSC took what was a reasonable pandemic preparedness plan, threw it out, and made a new one that they used, but is not available to the public.

💉THE POISON NEEDLE AND THE LEGAL SHIELD🛡️ -Here’s How Illegal "Pseudo-Laws" Have Allowed the U.S. Gov’t to Deploy the C-19-Injection Bioweapons on Americans, and Given Legal Immunity to Those Who Administer The Kill Shots (Tweet 1/9)

Although many prominent voices in the “health freedom movement” espouse the idea that the C19 injections are pharmaceutical products, they are not. This is unequivocal. Therefore, they are beholden to no FDA regulations, and cannot be regulated by the FDA.

In a pair of videos released earlier this year, retired pharmaceutical industry R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes, in detail—with all “the receipts”—how the C19 injections are, in fact, in a class of their own, so to speak; one NOT REGULATED BY THE FDA.

In this first clip from a conversation between Latypova and writer and paralegal Katherine Watt, Latypova explains how there are three regulatory pathways for pharmaceutical drugs, which are “normal regulatory pathways, where we don’t have [an] emergency announcement.” Latypova notes that these pathways include investigational use of the product; FDA-approved drugs; investigational drugs (if you want to introduce a new drug, then you need to clinical trial it across state lines); and drugs made available under “expanded access use.”

Expanded access use, Latypova notes, is “a more recent evolution” of regulatory law, which was put into place in 1997. Since then, expanded access use has allowed for the use of experimental drugs in “desperate situations.”

The fourth regulatory pathway is the one used for the C19 injections: “EUA countermeasures under [a] public health emergency.” Latypova notes that for an “EUA under public health emergency, none of these normal [FDA regulations] apply [in an enforceable manner].” This is why Latypova and Watt refer to the supposed FDA regulation and approval of the C19 injections as “performance art.”

The injections are EUA countermeasures deployed under a public health emergency. Per the law, they cannot be regulated as pharmaceutical drugs.

Specifically, Latypova notes that there is “no requirement for [an] IRB [an institutional review board] or informed consent…” She adds, “investigational new drug regulations don’t apply, [and] clinical trial data is not required.”

Latypova notes that this is why when clinical trial investigator Brook Jackson (@IamBrookJackson) observed fraud at Pfizer’s C19-injection clinical trial sites in Texas, reported it, and started litigating, the judge dismissed her case—because any fraud that existed was “immaterial.”
“Now we have this evolution, from expanded access use… where they said, ‘We can now have a non-investigational substance and use it in [a] non-medical and non-investigational way… That makes it [an] illicit drug.”

In this clip from the same interview, Latypova describes how, by shirking all regular FDA regulations, the C19 injections effectively become illicit drugs. “Just like fentanyl,” the retired pharma executive adds.

Latypova adds, “You can easily poison somebody with a substance you can’t evaluate yourself… you don’t know whether it’s going to be efficacious or safe.”

"ESSENTIALLY WHAT [THIS] IS... [IS] UNRESTRICTED WARFARE USING PROHIBITED WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION." (TWEET 1/8)

In a new interview with Big Picture (@BigPictureWatch), former pharma R&D executive and entrepreneur Sasha Latypova breaks down how the COVID injections are being… https://t.co/hnklaKf6THtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"THE PURPOSE IS TO KILL AND INJURE [THE] CIVILIAN POPULATION. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING."

Latypova goes on to note that Operation Warp Speed (OWS) "is entirely driven by the Department of Defense and that's completely inappropriate because it's deployment of armed forces on...… https://t.co/0yCR8zWAWxtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

THE ATOMIC BOMBINGS OF HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI WERE FAKED - THE STORY WE'VE BEEN TOLD IS A MASSIVE LIE - THE ATTACK WAS EXECUTED WITH NAPALM, MUSTARD GAS, ETC. (TWEET 1/11)

Although we've all been told that the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan at the close of WWII—an… https://t.co/wcPqHKz7Nxtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In this second clip from the same presentation, Palmer discusses how much radioactive fallout should've been found at Hiroshima and Nagasaki following the "nuclear bombings," versus how much was actually found.

Looking at the gamma-ray spectrum of the soil sample from Hiroshima… https://t.co/LdolcRAfwXtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…