WOW! The legendary Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, said that the U.S. and China were working in conjunction on a "sterilization vaccine" in 2012(!!!).
She knew they were going to launch a depopulation "vaccine" 8 years before Covid kicked off!
For reference, the evidence proving the Covid injections are depopulation jabs is overwhelming. See thread:
The biggest story in history is unfolding right now, but few know about it: Dr. Francis Boyle died mysteriously right before he was set to testify against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al saying the Covid jabs are bioweapons
This case is about the extermination of our species!
Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—was set to testify in a lawsuit Dutch attorney Peter Stassen has brought against "the architects of The Great Reset."
Few know how incredible @PhdSansone is. He's the one who got Dr. Francis Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—to submit a signed affidavit claiming that the Covid jabs are literal bioweapons (See tweets 2/3/4)
@PhdSansone Francis Boyle's signed affidavit claiming that, in his expert opinion, the Covid jabs "meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction...."
Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith:
"A program called Tiberius... was provided by Palantir... the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify targets... for... Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores... So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They [could] tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your [financial situation], they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score.
"They [used] that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where [they sent] their ventilators, where [they sent] the remdesivir, and where [they sent] the vaccines that people [weren't] taking. That was the program that informed those decisions... [the] Palantir Tiberius program."
This clip of Smith (@Zowe_TKMC), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with The Real Natureboy (@NBNNatureboy) posted to Rumble on December 5, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"Then I found Whitney Webb's article talking about HHS Protect and how that was a pro—There was a program called Tiberius built into that that was provided by Palantir. This is the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify the targets, the Hamas targets for drone strikes. Same program, but it was used for a military operation, Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores.
"So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you, put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They can tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your finance, they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score.
"They also use that information since hospitals had to send, things like their, their case mix index, how many patients were there, how many ventilators. They use that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where do they send their ventilators, where do they send the remdesivir, and where do they send the vaccines that people aren't taking? That was the program that informed those decisions, was this Palantir Tiberius program. And the reason it's so nefarious is as you mentioned earlier, they have drones here in America. Our police are already using them. I checked in my state, in my county, they've had contracts since 2011 to get drones here, and they're already using them. They're saying that they're using them for, people that have firearms.
"So it's like a firearms response team, I think it's called. F.I.T. is their acronym. And so it's any person who's suspected of having a firearm, they'll send a drone out instead of a police officer because it would be dangerous for a police officer to go and get shot, but not as bad for a drone to go and get shot.
"So that's how they're framing it. Are these armed drones or are these just observational drones? I think they're just observational at this moment in time. But there is an article, peer-reviewed article actually, talking about how to deploy different Covid measures, countermeasures, and having drones deliver packages, like having drones deliver vaccines.
"It's not going to be that hard. I mean, our military already has what's called LMAMs, which are, that's their acronym for like a individually autonomous flying drone, like a swarm of them. And those are the ones that could have, I forget what their military term is. But it could be a weapon or it could be a drug."
Straight from the Palantir website:
"Palantir was commissioned in mid-2020 by [HHS] to build Tiberius, a software platform it uses to track vaccine production, distribution, and administration across the United States." palantir.com/newsroom/press…
Nov 28, 2025 • 4 tweets • 7 min read
This is the real reason America is headed toward civil war, and almost nobody understands what's happening (1/3):
"We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it: We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs."
Electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for Cornelia Rose (@FlashlightsPod) how two rulings from 2007 and 2009—Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly and Ashcroft v Iqbal—have severely hamstrung plaintiffs' ability to argue their cases in U.S. courts—particularly in regard to civil rights and discrimination lawsuits.
Now, because people with legitimate grievances can't get their proverbial day in court, justice is seeping out onto the streets. Ultimately, Beaudoin says, this will lead to civil war for America.
For reference, per Grok (asked to provide an overview of Ashcroft v Iqbal in simple language aimed at a lay population):
"In 2009, the Supreme Court decided a big case called Ashcroft v. Iqbal. A man named Javaid Iqbal sued top government officials, saying they put him in harsh detention after 9/11 because of his religion and race. The Court (in a close 5–4 vote) said that to keep a lawsuit alive, you can’t just make vague accusations or repeat legal buzzwords. You need clear, specific facts that make the claim seem realistic—not just possible, but plausible. If the complaint looks mostly like conclusions without solid facts to back them up, the judge can throw the case out early, before any evidence is gathered."
"This ruling (together with a similar 2007 case called Twombly) gave judges much more power to dismiss cases right at the start. Before, many lawsuits could move forward to the evidence stage; after Iqbal, dismissal rates jumped from around half to two-thirds or more, especially in civil-rights and discrimination cases. Courts also started using the same tough 'plausibility' test when checking if a plaintiff was actually harmed and can trace that harm to the defendant (this is called 'standing'). As a result, thousands of cases now get thrown out early for sounding too weak or speculative, making it much harder for regular people to sue the government or big companies."
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"You've got a lot of things happening in the United States and around the world. One is climate change. You bring a case. Climate change dismissed. Elections in 2020. Sixty cases were brought on behalf of the Trump campaign. Sixty. All 60 were dismissed without a substantive hearing. They didn't get to discovery. They were dismissed on the procedural stage."
"And for an example, not only my three cases, they used Ashcroft versus Iqbal, right? They used these cases against me, in all three of the cases I brought. But also from me, little old me, pro se litigant, not a lawyer, representing myself, all the way up to the— the, the states, Texas and Missouri, brought a case against Pennsylvania for the elections, saying that Pennsylvania broke its own laws. It automatically goes to the Supreme Court because it's two states against another state.
"They call it original jurisdiction. So it goes to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, dismissed, you don't have standing. And they cited Ashcroft versus Iqbal. So not only was it my cases, but all the way up to The President, and 60 cases, all dismissed. They all say you don't have standing.
"So it's elections, it's climate, it's trans in kids, it's Covid. Covid vaccines. Whatever social issue it is, you don't get any resolution in the courts. The courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution.
"So what happens, Cornelia, is civil society breaks down. You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. So we're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with, with these two cases and the way the courts are operating extremely inefficiently, dismissing righteous cases that should be heard.
"So, anyway, the summation is— This graph is the problem with the United States. And everybody's looking at the executive and legislative branches trying to solve it. That's not where the problem is. You can fix those two branches if the courts will actually hear the cases. They're not hearing them."
(2/3) "We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs... The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine...."
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
We're headed towards civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs. And what I didn't mention here, I could go through the whole history of it back to the Magna Carta, but the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the last line is you have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That is the most foundational right.
If you want to uphold your right to freedom to exercise your religion, if you want to uphold your right of freedom of speech, what are you going to do about it? You're going to go to court and sue somebody, and then the court says, nope, you don't have standing. So your foundational right, that upholds all others other than the Second Amendment that we don't want to get to. Right? We don't want to talk about violent, you know, using guns to support your right to freedom.
But if we set that aside, then the most foundational right before that is the right to petition for redress of grievances and your right to due process of law in the 14th Amendment, equal protections under the 14th Amendment, and your right to dispute resolution in the courts in Article 3, Section 2. The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine that derives authority from this very attenuated path of authority that says Article 3, Section 2 says you have a right to go to court if you have a valid complaint against somebody in another state or if it has to do with a federal law.
Nov 12, 2025 • 9 tweets • 8 min read
The most important point re: Covid and the real reason MAHA is just a psyop–failure:
"Over 90% of [the health freedom movement] is...talk about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines...[but that's] a dead end...[because the Covid jabs] are weapons."
See 🧵 for evidence
This clip is of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) taken from a conversation with Debbie Lerman and Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) posted to Rumble on November 11, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"One of my large points of frustration is the whole health freedom movement. 90% of it, over 90% of it, is people just talk about safety and efficacy of these vaccines. In my opinion, it's a dead end. And it was set up as a dead end for everyone to walk in and march in place. Until they continued the constructed digital cage and everything else that Debbie was talking about.
"The safety and efficacy discussion, as I said, is inapplicable to EUA countermeasures. It is not possible to even conduct clinical trials for EUA countermeasures because according to the law, these products are non-investigational. This is a very, very important categorization of substance of these products. If it's non-investigational, it's not possible to clinical trial it. Because clinical trial in humans is an investigation. That's how the law treats it.
"Since it's non-investigational. And in addition to being non- investigational chemical substance, the chemical substance can be freely adulterated with any poison. It is also okay to lie about it. If you are covered person using it as a covered countermeasure, meaning you following HHS and DOD orders when using it, then, as Debbie said, it's a license to kill. You can kill as many people as you want or don't want, as many as they tell you, and be fully absolved from liability. And the whole sovereign immunity of the state will be applied to absolve you from liability.
"So I just explained to you that these products are weapons. There is only one conclusion that arise from it. If it's a non-investigational can be adulterated as poison. Anybody who is injuring or killing people with them absolved from liability, they are weapons. There's no other space into which all of this falls other than it's a weapon and it's used as a weapon and the people who are using it as a weapon, are absolved from liability. Just like the soldiers in the combat field. If they kill or injure anyone."
(2/8) This video essay outlines the overwhelming evidence that shows the Covid jabs are bioweapons.
They make you more likely to get Covid and can otherwise only maim, injure, or kill.
"Nazi Germany... hid their bioweapons under cancer research and so have we... [and] a guy won the Nobel Prize... [for producing] stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite... But it only worked if...[the] animals... ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated...I think [parasites have] been weaponized."
This clip of Dr. Lee Merritt, an orthopedic surgeon who did her residency in the United States Navy and served for over 10 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, is taken from an interview posted to the His Glory TV (@HISGLORYME) Rumble channel on November 4, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"Why weren't these parasites a problem back then? And I will tell you, there's multiple factors to look at, but I think this has been weaponized. And it turns out that you, that in fact a guy won the Nobel Prize for this that you, to get— They showed that they could produce stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite. And this was also done in Japan with a different parasite. So two different groups of researchers, they showed you could do this. But it only worked if it didn't work in healthy, normal animals. It only worked in animals that either ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated.
"So let's just think about this. What is the 20th century done in America? We started vaccinating. We started vaccinating the guys going down to World War I. That was when we first vaccinated our troops. And we've been doing it to the military ever since then, at about after World War II, then we took on vaccinating our school children. And then, as I predicted years ago, I said that you people think that these vaccines and school children, you're not standing up against them because you don't think it's gonna bother you. But they're coming after everybody. And that's what they are now, right?
"They got the flu shot, the shingle shot. So vaccination does something to make you susceptible to these parasites. Not just this toxoplasmosis one, but the ones that cause cancer and all sorts of things. And what have they done about the food pyramid in the 20th century? We had the food pyramid and the bottom was all carbohydrates. So that's where we [are].
"And one last thing... I'll just say that in 1971, Nixon declared that we were going to stop the bioweapons offensive program in America. And we signed the treaty with I think 178 nations or something like that. We figured, we thought the Soviets turned around and violated it. And all sorts of people violated it. Well, probably everybody violated it, including us. But in any case, t the same time that we signed that treaty, he converted Fort Detrick, the bioweapons lab. He took it to HNHS to be part of the National Cancer Institute. And that happened in Nazi Germany. They hid their bioweapons under cancer research, and so have we."
Reference for the claim that a guy (Johannes Fibiger) won the Nobel Prize for discovering that a nematode can cause stomach cancer:
Oct 17, 2025 • 4 tweets • 5 min read
Oncologist Dr. William Makis:
"Every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer...[the] spike protein [is] integrating into...tumor cells...& Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is...excited about this...he's...stated that one-third of all people will get cancer, guaranteed"
This clip of Dr. Makis (@MakisMedicine), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio) posted to The Shannon Joy Show Rumble channel on October 16, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"I think every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer. And we don't know right now which are the main drivers of cancer. My personal, hypothesis is that it's the damage to the immune system that is driving the cancer. I think we're seeing extensive immune system damage across the board in the vaccinated population, because they get infected more often. So they keep getting Covid and they'll say, well, I got my sixth or seventh shot, Covid shot, and I've gotten Covid five times, six times now.
"They keep getting sick. They keep getting sick with other infections like influenza. They keep getting viral, reinfections, you, know, with Epstein Barr virus and HSV, herpes simplex and so on. They get shingles, so their immune systems are damaged and destroyed. And this is happening to kids as well. The kids are also getting damaged immune systems. I think that's going to be one of the big drivers of cancer.
"But the work that Kevin McKernan is doing is in terms of the DNA contamination of the vaccines, the SV40 promoter, and the plasmids that have contaminated the vaccines because of the mass manufacturing process that Pfizer and Moderna are using, and they are still using. He's actually now discovering, the vaccine component, so the DNA contamination, which has a spike protein integrating into cells. And he's finding it in cancers, in tumor cells. This is actually where the research is right now is there's already several papers coming, tested the tumor. They did genetic testing on the tumor and they found the vaccine component integrated into the tumor cell and it's in all the tumor cells.
"But they're going to say, well, you know, it's just one case and it's anecdotal and all this, or it's a couple of cases and it's anecdotal. But this is where I think the the research is being focused to prove that, yes, this genetic therapy, because it's not a vaccine. And I posted about this recently. This was from the SEC filings of Moderna. They stated this is a gene therapy, it's not a vaccine.
"[And] it's contaminated. So it's got all kinds of genetic junk in there. It's not just the modified mRNA, it's got the DNA contaminations. It's got DNA mRNA Hybrids, it's got double-stranded RNA hybrids. It is literally a cocktail of genetic junk encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle, which itself is quite toxic, that is delivering this genetic junk all over our body. It's dumping it into the bone marrow. So we're seeing leukemias and blood cancers like multiple myeloma. It's dumping it into the brain, crossing the blood–brain barrier, because it's a lipid particle, crosses very easily.
"And I'm seeing brain cancers, the most aggressive brain cancers you can imagine, the glioblastomas. It's dumping it into the ovaries and testicles. We're seeing ovarian and testicular cancers. It's dumping it into the kidneys. I'm seeing kidney cancers. And so wherever this genetic material goes and it doesn't stay in the arm, that was the big lie. I think that was one of the biggest lies that people should go to jail for, for the rest of their lives. Who created this, this monstrosity.
"And it doesn't stay in the arm. About 75% of it is in the bloodstream within a couple of hours. And it's delivering this genetic junk with the lipid nanoparticles all over the body. And the most shocking situation that no one's talking about, and I've talked about this, put out a few articles on this, is it crosses the placenta and it's dumping the genetic material into the fetus and the fetus takes it up, and now I'm seeing cancers in fetuses, in utero. These babies are deliver, are, are developing tumors in the womb. And so there was a case not that long ago of, of triplets being born. I think the first one had a tumor that, that grew in utero and then through the placenta, transferred it to the second one. So the second one developed cancer a few months after being born. I mean, these are horror stories, Shannon. These are absolute horror stories.
"This MRNA technology needs to be halted and banned. It needs to be banned. I don't care if they're going to try to investigate it for the next 20 years and try to figure out what went wrong. This is extremely dangerous. It's got to be banned because we're going to be overtaken completely with cancer.
"And you know, Pfizer and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is actually super excited about this and he's publicly stated that one third of all people will get cancer guaranteed. And that he's going to scale up production of cancer drugs and mRNA cancer vaccines the way he scaled up production for Covid vaccines."
Full source video: rumble.com/v70dqla-cancer…
Oct 12, 2025 • 22 tweets • 30 min read
THE GAZA METHOD: What Has Come for Palestinians Will Soon Come for Us All
A 🧵 describing how the violence, AI-targeting systems, drone warfare, biometric refugee camps, land grabs, and digital IDs being deployed in Gaza will imminently enslave the Western World. (1/22)
This thread is inspired by a Substack article authored by Tarik Cyril Amar titled “The Gaza Method” and published on February 2, 2024 (see thread’s second-to-last tweet). I first heard about this idea (that, as Amar says, “The mass murder in Gaza outlines a pattern, a set of tools and measures of extermination, subjugation, and expulsion that are ready for export and will be in high demand...like so much else of Israel’s spying, policing…and murder skills and tech [are]....”) via former Assistant Secretary of HUD and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts, who has noted that “Gaza is a method” in numerous interviews since the publication of Amar’s Substack article.
In this clip from an interview with Jorn Luka posted to Luka’s eponymous YouTube channel in July 2025, Fitts notes that “Palestinians [have been used] to prototype the 15-minute cities and now [they’re being used] to prototype [a] land grab. And if we let this happen…this is not going to stop [there].”
Fitts adds, “If we let this go down… it's going to keep happening around the world because this is not a one-off situation; this is a prototype, and that's why the Palantir technology [being used] is relevant. So I think the most important thing [to consider] is will the world let this happen? … Because the message is going to be, ‘Okay, if you look at how we're controlling [Palestine] and you look at how we're propagandizing or we're mind controlling [everyone], we can now get away with this. And if we can now get away with this, then we can roll this out worldwide.”
Source video for clip: youtube.com/watch?v=FoAX4F…
(2/22) “My plan calls for the creation of a new international oversight body—The Board of Peace…and one of the people that wants to be on the board is the U.K. former Prime Minister Tony Blair.” — Donald Trump, September 29, 2025
Roughly a year-and-half after Amar’s “The Gaza Method” post and three months after Fitts’ interview with Luka, U.S. President Donald Trump announced at a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair would be appointed to the newly minted “Board of Peace,” billed as a “new international oversight body” tasked with governing Gaza’s transitional government as Israel withdraws from the Palestinian territory (1).
"[Covid] was a taking... Every 80 to 120 years... the central banking–warfare model... resets...[and] the currency changes... [and] plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset."
This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (@HowseLive) posted to the WorldviewTube (@WorldviewTube) Rumble channel on October 9, 2025.
---------------Partial transcription of clip----------------
"[Covid-19] was a taking... Our economic model, which is about to be revised dramatically, is called the central banking warfare model. Central banks print money and, and the military and intelligence make sure that everybody takes it and they police the system. Every 80 to 120 years since the central banking warfare model has been operating, we go through resets. So it's like flushing the system and each time it gets flushed, the currency changes.
"So the last big reset, we had a reset during the Spanish flu. So plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset. You know, it gives you emergency power.
"In 2018, the central bankers met in Jackson Hole, where the G7 central bankers meet every. And they reviewed a plan from the BlackRock Investment Institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, and it's called the Going Direct Reset. And literally they, I'm sorry, that was in 2019. August 2019. In 2018, they had just agreed to a policy called FASAB 56, which we need to discuss to understand the federal budget and credit, what's really happening there. But then they proceeded back into, their desks in September and the Going Direct Reset began.
"Of course, the big part of that reset came with the powers, that the pandemic provided, which is you inject $5 trillion, and I'm going to grossly oversimplify just to make it clear. You inject $5 trillion of money supply directly. Instead of going to the reserve track, you go directly into the financial institutions in the market. At the same time, you shut down Main Street.
"So think of the economy as publicly traded companies, big corporations, and then small businesses and farms. Okay, so we inject 5 trillion, most of it going here, and then we shut down Main street, which means now the big guys can not only pick up huge market share, but they can go shopping and pick up a lot of real estate and assets. And because you're shut down and you have no income, right?
"This is a squeeze play. Right? So it's the big guys versus the small guy. There was one estimate at the end. We created 500 new billionaires and we shut down basically 35% of the small businesses in the country. And San Francisco it was 49%. So if you look at consolidating the economic and political control, it was fantastically successful."
Here's the Going Direct Reset plan as outlined by BlackRock in Aug. 2019:
It notes that "Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders." blackrock.com/corporate/lite…
Sep 16, 2025 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
🚨Max Blumenthal exposes Susie Wiles' connection to the Netanyahu gov't.
-Wiles worked on Netanyahu's 2020 reelection campaign
-Helped isolate Trump to be fed "Mossad talking points"
"We're unmasking... the biggest foreign influence infiltration operation in American history that is basically taking control of an administration that says it's America first and is taking us to a very dangerous place."
"How crazy is that? America first. And your chief of staff literally worked for a foreign leader? What's going on here?"
This echoes perfectly what former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Catherine Austin Fitts said about the Trump administration in April of this year.
Fitts said "[Trump] is reporting to the Netanyahu syndicate..."
Dr. Kirk Moore's case was dismissed because it was being revealed that the COVID-jab campaign was being treated as "AN ENCOUNTER WITH THE ENEMY." (Direct quote)
CDC/BARDA testimony also reveals DOD officials were at facilities of all 6 jab manufacturers with whom BARDA was contracted. (BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, is an HHS agency that funds and supports the development of medical "countermeasures.")
This testimony, given by former CDC Immunization Program Public Health Advisor Chris Duggar and Deputy Assistant Secretary at BARDA Gary Disbrow, was revealed as Trump's DOJ was attempting to prosecute hero–physician Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K), who gave out saline shots instead of death jabs to patients who didn't want to get jabbed. Moore faced 35 years in prison for saving American lives before Trump's DOJ dropped the case against him. Now we know why!
Also revealed:
1.) The contracts between the military and jab manufacturers are CONFIDENTIAL.
DIRECT QUOTE from one of the attorneys, speaking to the judge:
"It’s the Department of Defense that entered into the contract with the pharmaceutical companies, it was the military... these are military contracts. Which is one of the reasons they want this confidential, because I don’t think they want people to know that, for whatever reason, … I don’t think military documents are even covered by FOIA as far as I understand it.
"So, I think that even the Government’s motion conceded it, because that’s one of the things [it] did not want to come out in trial. I mean maybe it was on an email that I got or on the motion, but the Government’s specifically trying to protect that from disclosure, so I think they would concede it."
2.) Military personnel were at the facilities of the jab manufacturers, including Moderna's:
Attorney: "Interesting. Okay. But you're relying on what the manufacturer is telling you about what they did in the manufacturing process because you don't have people on the ground at Moderna, right?"
Disbrow: "No, we did have people in plant."
Attorney: "Military people?"
Disbrow: "Correct."
3.) Also highlighted that Palantir helped to develop the "distribution plan" for the jabs:
DIRECT QUOTE from Disbrow:
"The distribution plan was developed by Department of Defense logistics personnel as well as Palantir, to track hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines as well as the ancillary kits."
Note that this clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) is taken from a discussion with Dr. Drew (@drdrew) posted to Rumble on September 2, 2025.
(2/3) Link to the quoted material from the testimony given by Disbrow and Duggar:
The 'head of the snake' are the owners of The Bank of International Settlements 🐍 & because the dollar's collapsing, we get democide (1/6)
"All these policies & democide...[is because] they... are trying to reset [the] currency to something else...likely a digital currency."
In this clip from an interview with Wayne Peters of What's Up Canada? (@WhatsUpCanadian) posted to Rumble on July 2, 2025, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) gives a snapshot of who is the proverbial "head of the snake" when it comes to the global crimes that have been committed in the name of Covid.
While many "awake" people are satisfied to stop the buck with Tony Fauci or Bill Gates, Latypova fingers the real prime mover of the crimes against humanity that have been committed in the West since 2020: The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Even more specifically, Latypova notes that the culprits are **whoever owns the Bank of International Settlements.**
For reference, here's Grok's take on the BIS when asked for the 100% factual take on the central bank for central banks given from a "conspiracy theorist's" point of view:
"The Bank for International Settlements (BIS), founded in 1930 and headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, is an international financial institution owned by 63 member central banks, representing countries that collectively account for about 95% of global GDP. Its primary role is to promote monetary and financial stability by facilitating cooperation among central banks, acting as a bank for central banks, and conducting research on global economic issues. It hosts meetings, provides banking services like gold and currency transactions, and supports forums like the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which sets global banking standards.
"Conspiracy theorists often view the BIS as a secretive, unaccountable entity controlling global finance, manipulating economies through its influence over central banks, and advancing a shadowy agenda for a centralized world government—claims rooted in its closed-door operations and historical ties to controversial events like facilitating gold transfers during World War II, though no evidence supports these grandiose assertions."
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"I would agree with the statement that the head of the snake is the Bank of International Settlements, which is not in Geneva, it's in Basel. So that actually is the head of the snake, or rather not the bank itself, but the owners of that bank, who are secret and they may or may not be in Geneva or Basel or even in Switzerland. We don't know.
"And the, and the problem, the problems we are all having and why this is being unleashed on us right now, specifically, like the timing is because the, the dollar is collapsing as the reserve currency internationally. And because of that, because all the governments are deeply in debt to essentially BIS. Where it goes after that, we don't know.
"Then, you know, all these policies and democide and so forth, they essentially are trying to reset that currency to something else. Something else meaning likely the digital currencies or digital tokens from the government, programmable. And so because of that necessity, they need to eliminate a lot of population and you know, transfer everyone into this control grid that they're building."
(2/6) Note that H.G. Wells outlined the "Open Conspiracy" for "A New World Order" in 1944, which the BIS owners are now executing on perfectly.
Part of the plan is to have only two banks in the world, the BIS and the World Bank, and to deploy—what amounts to—a digital currency.
From their plans:
"No central bank save the Bank of International Settlement and the World Bank shall be allowed to operate. Private banks will be outlawed. Remuneration for work performed shall be under a uniform predetermined scale throughout the One World Government.
"There shall be no wage disputes allowed, nor any diversion from the standard uniform scales of pay laid down by the One World Government. Those who break the law will be instantly executed. There shall be no cash or coinage in the hands of the non-elite. All transactions shall be carried out by means of a debit card which shall bear the identification number of the holder. Any person who in any way infringes the rules and regulations of the Committee of 300 shall have the use of his or her card suspended for varying times according to the nature and severity of the infringement.
"Such persons will find, when they go to make purchases, that their card is blacklisted and they will not be able to obtain services of any kind. Attempts to trade "old" coins, that is to say silver coins of previous and now defunct nations, shall be treated as a capital crime subject to the death penalty. All such coinage shall be required to be surrendered within a given time along with guns, rifles, explosives and automobiles. Only the elite and One World Government high-ranking functionaries will be allowed private transport, weapons, coinage and automobiles.
"Look at what Pfizer did [with the Covid jabs]; my assessment of that is it's serial killing...[and] you don't come back from mass atrocity...[but] this [was] a military intelligence operation. This operation was run by the military, and Pfizer absolutely had permission." (1/4)
This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a Trueman Show Podcast (@TruemanshowNL) posted to YouTube on July 3, 2025.
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"There are companies that absolutely, they're serial killers. I mean, and that's the problem I have when I want to look at the, say, if you look at sort of the discussion in the United States about reforming pharma, my attitude is it's like reforming the Russian mob. Are you kidding me? We're not going to. There's a point at which there's a point of no return.
"And these companies, in my experience, I mean, if you look at what Pfizer did, my assessment of that is it's serial killing. I mean, you don't come back from mass atrocity, right? You don't reform. I mean, what do you do with a serial killer? You put them in prison for life or you give them the death penalty. But you don't think you can reform them and let them keep running around. What's hard about that?
"It's always hard to imagine, like, on which level they know about the evil that they're doing. They absolutely know. It's, you know, something. I've run large enterprises. You know, I've run private companies. I've run government agencies. You know, it's hard to engineer a mass atrocity. It takes a lot of work. It takes a lot of planning. You know, you gotta put stuff in the vials. You gotta run. I mean, this is a big job. You can't just do this by accident. Do you know what I mean? This is not like a spontaneous combustion. This is a major, major operation.
"You know, but it was also, you know, it's been clear in the United States, Debbie Lerman just published a book called The Deep State Goes Viral. And she does a remarkable job, as did Katherine Watt, at proving this is a military intelligence operation. This operation was run by the military, and Pfizer absolutely had permission to not meet any of the FDA requirements.
"There was a whistleblower who brought a whistleblower suit that lost because they said the government wasn't defrauded. The government ran the fraud. That was the judge saying, no, the government wasn't defrauded. They were in charge of the fraud. They approved the fraud. This was an engineered fraud."
(2/4) Recall that Army General Gus Perna was THE CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER FOR OPERATION WARP SPEED.
In this video, Perna describes how "OWS [was] a partnership between HHS, DOD, and the other federal organizations to develop and deliver COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics."
"Science is driving all of our decisions, we are not cutting any corners with respect to safety and efficacy. We need to do this the right way," Perna says. He notes that the supposed COVID "vaccines" were set to go "through the same rigorous trials that [are done] for every pharmaceutical."
"We have worked with the manufacturers to help them scale up operations in order to produce vaccines and therapeutics. WE HAVE PURCHASED AND SECURED THE SUPPLIES NEEDED TO DELIVER AND ADMINISTER THE DRUG," Perna adds. (Emphasis added.)
"Everything from the vials that hold the vaccine, to the syringes and needles that will be used to put shots into arms." Perna notes that OWS would utilize the DOD's "planning and logistics expertise" and that the department would function "across the supply chains, FROM MANUFACTURING TO DELIVERY." (Emphasis added.)
"But commercial industry, not the military, will physically ship and distribute the vaccines to your local areas," Perna adds, highlighting a "whole-of-America" approach.
Jul 5, 2025 • 10 tweets • 8 min read
Hyper-critical point—there was no COVID "pandemic." Excess mortality began *AFTER* the pandemic declarations (1/9)
Former Pfizer VP Michael Yeadon:
"[Our governments] were lying to you...by misusing a test [PCR] that doesn't measure what it says [it does]."
Yeadon, an expert in the area of allergies and respiratory therapeutics who spent more than 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry (including years as a vice president at Pfizer), describes in this clip taken from an interview published to the Oracle Films (@OracleFilmsUK) Rumble channel on July 3, 2025 an UNDENIABLE FACT: there was no COVID "pandemic."
This is not up for debate.
As Yeadon notes, the "pandemic" was declared *AND THEN* the excess deaths started. As the pharma insider notes, this is not how emergencies work. One does not declare a building is on fire, and then the building catches fire.
THIS. IS. MADNESS. See supporting evidence there was no COVID "pandemic" in the following 8 tweets.
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"In order for an emergency to be declared, like a fire or like a shark approaching a public beach, a holiday beach, would you agree with me, ladies and gentlemen, that before you would call out the fire engines, you'd probably be smelling smoke somewhere. Someone would be, or a smoke alarm will go off. Before you would call shark alerts and get everybody off the beach, you'd think someone would have seen a fin. Yeah. Or someone in a helicopter said, hey, I can see some sharks approaching the beach.
"What I'm telling you is before an emergency is called, there is already an event at some level that someone is able to see, to detect and warn you about. And you think, oh, that was really good that they warned us in the case of the pandemic. That nice man at the WHO, Tedros, clever he may be, but he's not a fortune teller. He doesn't have foresight, he hasn't got long range binoculars, he's not got a time machine.
"In order to declare a pandemic, which I think he did in 2020 March, whatever it was, he has to have some evidence of that. There's a little problem, ladies and gentlemen. Not just me, but Denis Rancourt, Denis Rancourt in Canada and many other researchers have looked for signs of illness, respiratory illness, which surely would be growing somewhere in a small way, in order that the who, from their esteem's exhaustive position, could aggregate all that data and go, oh, my word, it looks like there's something like a pandemic beginning.
"There is nowhere in the world that you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic, ladies and gentlemen, they called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic. Because they were lying to you. They were lying to you. Then they created the. We, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic, by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR. There's literally. What we had is a pandemic a rollout of the test. It's as simple as that.
"Increased number of cases, everywhere was a pandemic of a rollout of a rubbish test. It's not a mistake. They knew it was rubbish. They designed it to be rubbish. They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness. And then when people died, they said, oh, they had Covid. They literally did that. And then, I'm afraid, medical procedures in care homes and hospitals led to people being killed.
"But this is old news. You've heard all this before, but I just wanted to tell you, you can't have an emergency without some sign of that emergency emerging somewhere. You need that information as a leader to say. I'm afraid, folks, I've got bad news. There's an emergency coming. Batten down the hatches for these pandemics. They just lied to you. Nothing was happening. If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic. And then the data started arriving which was fraudulent. So it's as simple as that."
(2/9) In the U.S., the Public Health Emergency for COVID was declared on January 31, 2020.
The National Emergency, on March 13, 2020.
Per the CDC's all-cause mortality tracker, ***THERE WAS NO EXCESS DEATH UNTIL MARCH 28, 2020.***
Jun 27, 2025 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, May, 2025: "The incidence of [colorectal] cancer [has been] increasing the last several years *significantly,* particularly among younger people."
What Bourla does not say is that mRNA jabs, including Pfizer's, cause colorectal cancer—see tweets 2 & 3.
This clip is of Bourla touting Braftovi (encorafenib), a targeted cancer drug used to treat colorectal cancer.
So Pfizer has helped to create the "significant" rise in colorectal cancers, particularly among younger people, and now it's going to profit off the harm with more "treatment."
(2/3) Dr. James Royle describes how colorectal cancers have taken off since the COVID-injection rollout:
"Middle aged & elderly people are presenting w/ out-of-the-blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable & die within weeks or months"
Bob Malone is now pushing Flublok—a "vaccine" made using cells from the fall armyworm, a moth species 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮
"This is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product."
-----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"Regarding the Flublok product, this is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product. This is a cell-based influenza vaccine that represents, really a, great example of innovative biotechnology, in my opinion. This, this technology offers key advantages relative to historic influenza vaccine products, in that egg- and other cell-based products require adaptation of influenza strains and their antigens to the cell culture or egg culture environment.
"So you end up with a vaccine product that is, in some cases, potentially clinically significantly different from the actual circulating antigen. Whereas with the Flublok technology, with baculovirus technology in general, they're able to go straight from sequence to manufactured protein in a much shorter time frame without the need for adaptation. This is a key advantage."
Flublok's webpage features a wolf in sheep's clothing—can't make this crap up...
And, of course, no "gold-standard" science here. Flublok was tested against Fluarix (a quadrivalent standard-dose vaccine), not any kind of placebo....
Jun 26, 2025 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
Deborah Birx (now on Palantir's board):
"If you lived in [rural areas], your [COVID] death rate was 3 to 4 times [higher]...[because] they didn't have... remdesivir...you wonder why they used ivermectin—because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet." (1/5)
This clip of retired Army colonel Deborah Birx, who was parachuted in to run the Coronavirus Task Force under Trump 1.0 by the National Security Council (see tweet 4) says that Americans living in rural areas died at rates three to four times higher than Americans living in urban areas because they lacked access to testing and remdesivir. Furthermore, she notes that they turned to ivermectin because they didn't have doctors; they had veterinarians.
Note that remdesivir is enormously deadly, and it's always been known as enormously deadly (see tweet 2 and 3). In large part because the "antiviral" destroys the liver.
Furthermore, note that ivermectin is a Nobel Prize–winning drug that has been administered to *billions* of people over the last couple of decades. (Per sources summoned by Grok—check for yourself.)
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"And when I got pulled back for Covid, I was devastated to see what happened. Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher rates in rural, areas than any other counties in the United States. If you lived in the central valley of California, your death rate was three to four times what the urbans were. And that's because they didn't have the same resources. They didn't have testing, they didn't have remdesivir. Everything that you had in the cities, they didn't have in rural areas.
"And I went rural community by rural community. And then you wonder why they used Ivermectin. Because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet. And these. That's how things happen. And we just. And then we're like, oh, my God. And I'm like, yeah, oh, my God. This is on us. This is on us. For the last 40 years, watching this stuff just go away."
(2/5) Remdesivir was a key tool used in the COVID "hospital homicide" protocols that slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Americans:
Here's how Palantir's "KILL CHAIN" programs were used to target and "EXECUTE" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators.
"They identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on [their 'threat risk score'] and [that's how they] determined [who]...to execute...with their AI kill-chain Gotham program."
This clip of author, former medical coder, and whistleblower Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to Rumble on June 17, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"So there was a program called HHS Protect during Operation Warp Speed, was part of Operation Warp Speed. That's where I think most of the public-facing infrastructure began. Although I was looking into Operation Stargate, and I'm seeing documentation on CIA databases that say it's more than 10 years in the making. So, definitely it's, it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two, Trump administration.
"But, so this HHS Protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC specifically, all partnered with Palantir. And then Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a Threat Risk Score. And then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes.
"So I want to make this point about AI, because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both 3M and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic there are programs and you can rename them whatever you want, but it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like your program, Epic, might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, it might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program.
"So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's, it's just a function really. And HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a Threat Risk score. And that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you, that was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the zip code where you were and how compliant areas were.
"And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the Unlimited Hangout, she wrote a article covering this program, HHS Protect, and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity and they thought, you know, you're higher risk if you're certain ethnic groups. So of course that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect to execute.
"So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius and then it executes the threat or tells, does an AI decision making process and decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures. Which was your vaccine, your remdesivir and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this. And that is how they identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're going to execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program."
Recall that Operation Warp Speed Chief Operating Officer Army General Gus Perna said that "Palantir...[was] such a great teammate...[because it gave him] access to all the information [he] might need."
DEBORAH BIRX REMINDERS: 1. Birx is a retired Army colonel; 2. came from USAID (a CIA cutout); 3. hired to run Coronavirus Task Force by the Deputy National Security Advisor; 4. "parachuted in" to run the Task Force; 5. National Security Council created US COVID policy
(1/5)
Debbie Lerman: "On January 27, the President's Coronavirus Task Force was formed. The Task Force was initially led by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and coordinated through the National Security Council. On February 28, a very important date, the Task Force transitioned to the Office of the Vice President, meaning it's no longer under the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Now it's under somebody else...[but] it's led by...the Office of the Vice President.
"The Office of the Vice President is where they put the Task Force...the coordinator of which was Deborah Birx, as I said before, who came from USAID, and she was placed there by the National Security Advisor to President Trump [Matt Pottinger]. He himself says... we brought Deborah Birx over...."
This clip and the one in the following tweet of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) and Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, are from a Flashlights podcast (@CorneliaMrose) posted to Rumble on June 2, 2025.
(2/5) Lerman: "So on January 27, this Task Force was formed.... That was not a secret. When it was transitioned—the transition—that was the part that was not advertised. So it existed. Deborah Birx was, like, parachuted in on the 27th of February. And that's when the whole thing transitioned. But when she was parachuted in, all they said was, 'Oh, she's a public health expert. She, you know, worked on AIDS in Africa. [But] she worked for USAID, which we all know now what that is—it's a CIA cutout."
May 26, 2025 • 4 tweets • 5 min read
"I worked for several years... to understand what was happening with the injections... they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies... [Like]... tagging livestock... if you get... nanoparticles into the... body, you're creating... an organic barcode." (1/3)
Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), describes for Danny Jones (@KONCRETE) how she believes that the mRNA injections serve as a platform for installing "operating systems" in people's bodies in order to build out the so-called "Internet of Bodies" by "basically [make it] easier [for people's bodies] to interact with telecommunications and digital technology."
Fitts notes that she's been working for "several years" with "a group of doctors and scientists" trying to understand "what was happening with the injections" and has arrived at this purpose as one of the central reasons they were rolled out.
Fitts likens these operating systems to "organic barcodes."
"It's not sci-fi at all," Fitts says. "It's...like...they're tagging livestock... if you've ever studied livestock management, a lot of this makes a lot more sense: They are tagging all the livestock... if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode."
Furthermore, Fitts notes that Moncef Slaoui, the former head of the vaccines department at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021 "was a brain-machine interface expert."
Indeed, in tweet 2/3 you'll hear Slaoui discuss "microchips or nanochips" that can be implanted in the body that would allow for the "understand[ing] [and] read[ing] [of] the electrical language that nerves" use to talk to organs.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"My guess is, because I worked for several years with a group of doctors and scientists trying to understand what was happening with the injections. And I absolutely believe that they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies. Operating systems?
"If you listen, there's a great clip from right at the beginning of the pandemic when the chief scientist officer at Moderna says, we're installing an operating system in people's bodies. And he's describing something that can be used plug and play for future vaccines. But if you look at all the material on the Internet of Bodies, you're talking about putting materials in people's bodies that make them basically easier to interact with, with telecommunications and digital technology.
"It's not sci-fi at all. It's not just like they're. They're tagging livestock. I mean, if one of the things that really helps you to understand what this looks like. I live in a farming community in the United States. And if you've ever studied livestock management. A lot of this makes a lot more sense.
"They are tagging all the livestock, but this is simply a way of, you know, if you, if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode.
"I strongly recommend you. We just published, Patrick Wood at Technocracy News. I was the moderator. We just published, the second, symposium called omniwar, and this one is called the Battle for the Brain, and it gets into the Internet of Bodies. Here's what I believe, and I'm not a scientist, so don't ask me to explain this at all, but, if you look at all the patents and research and other work done on the Internet of Bodies, you know, it is clear that there are mysterious ingredients in the food, there are mysterious ingredients in the spray, there are mysterious ingredients in the injections. And the question is, what are those for? And I think it's very intentional. I don't think it's an accident.
"And I think one of the goals is, as the chief scientist officer at Moderna said, is to Is to install an operating system in your body. That's pretty dark. Yes, it's very dark. So go to the Purdue. Go to the Purdue Engineering website to the Internet of Bodies and look at the whole Internet of bodies.
"And then so they authorized Operation Warp Speed, which, remember, it's a military program. And who did they put in charge of it? But they put the former head of research at GSK, who is what, a brain-machine interface expert. The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed that Trump appointed was a brain-machine interface expert."
(2/3) Head of Operation Warp Speed and former vax head at GSK Moncef Slaoui in 2015:
"Our body uses...electric signals...traveling to our nerves...[and] our concept let's us understand, read, [that]...through microchips or nanochips that we would implant..."
Moncef Mohamed Slaoui, a Moroccan-born Belgian-American researcher who served as the head of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021, tells an audience at the Aspen Institute in 2015 that he and his colleagues were working on "microchips" or "nanochips" that could be implanted into people's bodies. Once implanted, the nanochips would be able to "read" and "understand" the "language" of the nervous system.
"[T]he concept [is one] of hijacking this [nervous system] language, which, in fact, exists in our biology, and not only the language, but the conduit of the language, which is the nerve, and now taking the nerve, and helping the nerve write a different language; a different message to the organ they're controlling," Slaoui tells the audience. "All our organs, which are mostly involved in our chronic diseases, are controlled by peripheral nerves, and so...our concept let's us understand, read, the electrical language that nerves—just as they come to the spleen, or... the pancreas, or G.I. tract, get to that nerve—read what they're telling our organ, and if you read that something is wrong, correct it."
Slaoui goes on to say that the way he and his colleagues are doing that is "through microchips or nanochips" that would be "implanted" on nerves, so that they may be "very close to [their target] organ."
Slauoi adds, "there would be no compliance issue because they [the implants] would be there with the patients all the time."
