-Celia Farber, "an investigative historian of deep-fake virus agendas, from 'HIV' to 'Covid-19'": "Absolutely." (1/6)
In this clip from an interview with Tina Griffin (@Ctr_CultureMom), Celia Farber (@BarrierTruth), one of the most experienced investigative reporters on the planet in regard to the HIV/AIDS saga, describes how HIV as the cause of AIDS has been a scam. Farber, who has conducted decades of research into this topic, notes that scientists originally thought that a retrovirus as the cause of AIDS was "BS." Farber also notes that Robert Gallo's research assistant "tested the blood sample in question [supposedly linking HIV to AIDS and] found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing."
Regarding Robert Gallo's now-famous (or infamous...) 1984 media announcement linking HIV to AIDS, Farber says the following:
"The man who stood before hundreds of cameras at a press conference in 1984 was Robert Gallo, wearing tinted dark aviator glasses and saying...that he had found the cause of AIDS in his lab, that it was a great moment for American science and virology. And those scientists who I interviewed over the coming years, one of them, for example, the doctor Harvey Bialy, the editor of Biotechnology, he said, 'I didn't go to that conference. None of us went to that conference. We just said, oh, a retrovirus as if the cause of AIDS, that's just more Robert Gallo BS. We're not [going]...that'll never fly. That's just Robert Gallo being Robert Gallo.' And he [Gallo] was known as a low-ranking, corrupt, and corruptible scientist who was always very ambitious, very domineering and manipulative, who always was trying to attach his laboratory discovered viruses to novel diseases, sometimes as far as away as Japan. [Gallo would say,] 'Oh, this one causes this rare leukemia. This one causes that.' So he was known for that."
(For reference, Robert Gallo is an American biomedical researcher known for his role in the—supposed—discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. In 1984, Gallo was a researcher at the National Cancer Institute.)
"The real scientists," Farber notes, "didn't even go to the press conference, never dreamed it [Gallo's retrovirus explanation] would fly. But what was there that day was the cameras, the media, and they had been given the memo, let's call it, [not to] question this. Within, I believe, it was 24 hours, it went from the probable cause of AIDS has been found in The New York Times to the cause of AIDS has been found."
Farber adds, "I would say within 72 hours, you were an evil, homophobic, terrible, crazy person if you wondered, 'Did Gallo prove it? What proof did he have?' He not only had no proof, we had the opposite of proof."
Contrary to what Gallo was espousing at the time, Farber says that "his lab assistant had tested the blood sample in question, found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing. It was a big nothing-burger, and he said so in his report, but he was scared."
Farber adds:
"You can see that, you can see the documents I'm talking about. Gallo crosses out what his lab assistant wrote, 'nothing here,' and reverses it and says that it's [the blood sample] full of retrovirus, the cause of AIDS, the pathogenic, etcetera. So that fraudulent, reverse-engineered original data by Gallo that he fraudulently drummed into existence went in as the four foundation papers in Science Magazine. And from henceforth, all the hundreds of millions, later billions into the trillions that went into fraudulent deadly AIDS research always reference those four papers. So they just build a floor of fraud and then the rest is history."
(2/6) Note that HIV as the cause of AIDS was completely picked apart and exposed as fraudulent science in the documentary film House of Numbers. (Farber was interviewed in the film.)
DEAR DOGE (@DOGE): If you really want to "ensure [our] tax dollars will be spent wisely," find the $20+ TRILLION the Department of Defense has stolen from American taxpayers. (1/7)
In this clip from a recent interview with Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio), investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts notes that if the incoming Trump administration "really wanted to reform the Deep State," it would start with the $21 trillion of missing taxpayer money; $20+ trillion of which has been stolen by the Department of Defense.
Fitts describes a "financial coup" that began in the U.S. in 1998, when the Deep State began disappearing U.S. taxpayer money from the federal government's coffers.
"In fiscal 1998 HUD was missing $59 billion dollars in the first year. And then by 9/11, the federal government, mostly DOD, was missing approximately $4 trillion dollars," the former HUD official says. "Then, when 9/11 happened, the day before 9/11, [Secretary of Defense under the George Bush administration] Donald Rumsfeld got up and confessed that the DOD was missing $2.3 trillion. And then 9/11 happened, and everybody sort of forgot about the missing money."
"I kept saying," Fitts adds, "we've got to pay attention to
the missing money because, essentially, most of this is
being financed out of our pension funds and retirement funds. And if we don't address this, we won't have enough money to meet our obligations under the retirement system unless we lower life expectancy.
And in fact, a lot of the Great Poising started at the same time."
Regarding this Great Poisoning—that is, increasing environmental toxins, injecting people with toxins via "vaccines," and debasing the food supply—Fitts adds:
"If you look at U.S. life expectancy, when the financial coups started, life expectancy started to fall and diverge with the other 19 industrial top industrial countries. And that accelerated with the pandemic. And what we are watching is a systematic lowering of life expectancies,
which is part of dealing with this financial problem.
So if you can't balance the books with full funding, you
balance the books by lowering the drain that the population is taking out of the out of the retirement system."
Furthermore, Fitts notes that "[We] have not seen the
new or the incoming administration talk about the money that's missing from the federal government." The investment banker also says that the quarantine camps that have been built in New York State have nothing to do with quarantining sick people, and, instead, are there to imprison anybody in finance who would dare to speak up about this multi-trillion-dollar theft and fraud by the U.S. government.
Regarding that topic, Fitts says:
"Well, what it's very funny when [New York State attorney] Bobbie Anne Cox told me about her litigation, I said, 'Bobbie, that has nothing to do with health. That has to do with you're the New York Fed, and you need to make sure that every financial person and hedge fund manager does what you tell them to do. And if they don't, you need to be able to kidnap them.'
"That's what that health regulation is about...You can't afford for one hedge fund manager to implode the entire international financial system. Do you really want a hedge fund manager standing up on the Solari show or The Shannon Joy show and talking about how they've just laundered out another trillion through the BIS [Bank of International Settlements] and they're stealing it?"
(2/7) Note that the Pentagon has just failed its 7th audit in a row:
"The Pentagon on Friday failed its seventh audit in a row, with the nation’s largest government agency still unable to fully account for its more than $824 billion budget, though officials stress they are making good progress toward a clean audit in 2028."
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not." (1/5)
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record [re: the COVID jabs] and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients."
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (@MdBreathe), a physician who is board-certified in both Otolaryngology and Sleep Medicine, describes for Michael Farris (@CoffeeandaMike) how Casey and Calley Means (@CaseyMeansMD)(@calleymeans) and their "food group" refuse to go on record regarding the COVID injections. Casey and Calley Means have become burgeoning stars of the MAHA—Make America Healthy Again—movement, appearing on blockbuster platforms such as Joe Rogan's podcast and the Tucker Carlson Network; yet, for some reason, they largely focus on food as opposed to "vaccines."
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means, and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not," Bowden tells Farris. The physician says that she has spoken with Calley on the phone twice, yet "he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why...I'm trying to give him some sort of purity test [regarding the COVID injections]."
Bowden notes that she's also DM'd Casey Means here on X multiple times, but hasn't received any response.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]," Bowden says. "They truly believe that the COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market...[or] maybe they are being influenced by...Big Pharma. Maybe Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious."
Furthermore, Bowden says that "Dr." Marty Makary (@MartyMakary), who has also become a MAHA centerpiece, will also not come out on record regarding the COVID injections. In fact, as of August 2023, Makary was still telling *pregnant women* to get the enormously dangerous jabs.
Partial transcription of clip:
"I mean, COVID is a big litmus test. And if you are
quiet on it, that's all I need to know. I mean, even that's what's frustrating about the Calley and Casey Means,
and their little group. Their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots.
"And I have pushed I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking them just to go on record, and and he will not. And I don't understand
that because it's there's, you know, there'll be a lot
of support for that. And I told him, I said, we support your message. We just want you to support ours in kind.
And and why he can't or they can't do that is bizarre.
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking
about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients. And he seems to have the ear of Trump and Kennedy, which is concerning.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]. They truly believe that COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market. That's that's how you would that's sort of interpreting that on the surface. Maybe they are being influenced by, you know, Big Pharma. Maybe their their Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That that's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious.
"I DM'd her. She's an ENT. She went to Stanford,
which I did too. And I reached out to her several times, friendly. You know, saying, hey. You know, I said I love your book. I I'd love to connect. Zero response. Sent her a couple other messages. No response, which is odd...
And then I yeah. And I had phone conversations with
her brother because her her brother didn't like me calling out the the fact that they weren't talking about COVID. So he wanted to have a phone conversation with me, but I still can't get him to talk about COVID.
"Well, the first one [phone call] was very heated.
It was... I don't think it was very productive. And the second one was calmer. But it was a lot of it just didn't have I wanted you know, he could have said what I was hoping he would say was, "Okay. We are we are pushing food because we're trying to get Trump in office, and we feel like this is a way to do that more effectively. And if we talk about the vaccines and we're we're scared we're gonna, you know, push off voters.' Right? That's what I was hoping he would say. He didn't say that. I mean, he just he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why he, you know, thinks that I'm trying
to give him some sort of purity test and he's not going to do that. And I just said, you know, this the analogy is, you know, my my primary message is about COVID and the pandemic, but I talk about other things like the trans movement. I talk about other things, you know, abortion. I talk about other things I authentically feel like, you know, that I authentically believe in even if
it's not directly related to COVID. And I said, that's what
I don't understand with you. If you authentically believe
in COVID or against the COVID shots, then why can't you just state that?
"And and if you do that on Twitter, that's all you need to do. I mean, even, you know, a few things. It doesn't have to be, you know, your whole message at all. It's just it's just indicative if you say nothing about it, that there's a
there's a reason behind that."
(2/5) Note that Dr. Bowden's concerns regarding Casey and Calley Means—and their MAHA "food group"—seem to echo the same concerns Dr. Peter McCullough has described previously:
"I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients [in the COVID jabs] have something to do with loading the equivalent of an operating system in your body... they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the internet." (1/5)
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes for Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) how she believes that the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) can only serve one (or both) of two purposes: to either poison people or inject into their bodies "mysterious ingredients."
These "mysterious ingredients," Fitts notes, she believes are likely to be the components required to hook people's bodies up to the cloud and the internet—in effect, creating "an operating system" in people's bodies.
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]," Fitts tells Hunter. "That's because they wanna get mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients. For the other, it's because they wanna poison you."
"We're just about to come out with, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes [author of “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations and The War for Technocracy, Volume 1] called Omniwar," Fitts says. "And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of Things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet."
Fitts adds: "It's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?...And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each person, one person at a time and use AI and software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control."
Partial transcription of clip:
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]. That's because they wanna get
mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients.
For the other, it's because they wanna poison you.
"Those are the only two reasons for giving anybody a COVID-19 shot or any mRNA shot. So, you know, I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients
have something to do with loading the equivalent of an
operating system in your body.
"We're just about to come out with a, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes called Omniwar. And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet.
"It's quite, I mean, it's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?
"This is omniwar is World War 3. We are in a war.
And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each
person, one person at a time and use AI and
software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control.
If they can essentially create money that runs the fiscal side of the house and can manage people at a one-on-one level, then you can control the entire globe one person at a time. That's what they're up to. You have to read Omniwar. It's great."
(2/5) NOW, plenty of people think the nanotech-in-the-jabs thing is bogus. HOWEVER, there are some very odd videos that need splainin'.
Like this one from physician Dr. David Nixon showing "robot arms" assembling "organized chip structures" in the contents of Pfizer's jab.
Oct 17 • 6 tweets • 6 min read
WOW! Military whistleblower data shows that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. (1/5)
Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a former Battalion Commander in the U.S. Army, describes for Michael Nevradakis of Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) some disturbing facts revealed by "The Remdesivir Papers"—a document assembled by an anonymous U.S. military whistleblower (known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay) and investigative journalist J.M. Phelps (@JMPhelpsLC). The document divulges data derived from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System (JTS) that's not otherwise not available to the public.
The Remdesivir Papers asks the question: "Are U.S. military treatment facilities and others hiding, or manipulating, the deadly results of clinical trials and more surrounding the controversial drug [remdesivir] purported to be a treatment for COVID-19?"
In this clip, Miller notes that the NIAID—that is, the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (the government agency that Anthony Fauci used to head)—sponsored four trials for remdesivir—an antiviral drug patented by the pharma giant Gilead—which found the drug "resulted in a minimal positive effect on instances of all-cause mortality and serious adverse side events when compared to the administration of a placebo" (quote from The Remdesivir Papers) despite "significant methodological questions that we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials" (Miller's wording).
A fifth trial, however, was conducted by Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA) in conjunction with Gilead.
"Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead agreed to provide remdesivir for the treatment of DOD personnel exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the causative viral pathogen of COVID-19," The Remdesivir Papers notes.
Note that while Miller says that "of those 941 individuals that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died," The Remdesivir Papers states something slightly different: it evinces data that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. Meaning not all 941 service members were administered remdesivir.
Despite this caveat, it is still extraordinary—and extraordinarily disturbing—that of the 941 service members who (supposedly) died of/with COVID between March 2020 and March 2024, 64% were given remdesivir.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Now in addition to those four trials that were sponsored by NIAID, there is a fifth trial that is mentioned in the remdesivir papers, but this one was sponsored by the military, specifically a unit out of Fort Detrick, Maryland that is known as the US Army
Medical Research and Development Command.
It sponsored a trial. We know that that trial was conducted. However, there is no information that
is publicly available about the findings of that clinical trial.
"So we might ask ourselves, why? So we have these
four trials from NIAID. They appear to present remdesivir in at least a minimally positive light, but there seem to be some significant methodological questions that
we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials.
So we take those four trials. We then look at them alongside this fifth trial sponsored by a military unit, and yet there's no publicly available data. Why?
"Now in addition to all of that, with these five trials, we
then have information that comes directly from a military whistleblower who presents information that tells us that over a four-year period from March
of 2020 to March of 2024, a significant number
of people in the wider military community were administered remdesivir. And of those 941 individuals
that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died.
That's a, uh, that's a death rate of 64%.
"So what caused their deaths? Was it the remdesivir directly? Were there other factors? Should we know?
Should we at least be asking questions? And can we trust the fact that the DOD has not been forthcoming with this information?"
@BradMiller1010 A link to The Remdesivir Papers:
"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12)
DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Del Bigtree (@delbigtree) on a recent episode of The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) how the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) cause immense, all-encompassing damage to the human reproductive system—specifically the female reproductive system.
In fact, Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction... [i.e.] the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce."
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And [that's why] I say 360-degree damage, it's [because] they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body [and] that includes the placenta."
Wolf goes on to note that "not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and... creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen."
"I've called this Mengele science and I say that advisedly," The Pfizer Papers editor adds. "[There are] charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. Twelve thousand (12,000) women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. Eighty-five-hundred (8,500) are passing tissue. Ten-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. Eighty-five-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, [these are charts] showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale."
Partial transcription of clip:
"In the documents. But what really jumps out is that you'd expect that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents would be concerns about respiratory reactions because this is ostensibly a respiratory infection, COVID. But there's very little about that. And the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction. Completely centered on that. And the 360-degree ways in which this injection damages the human ability to reproduce.
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And it's when I say 360-degree damage, it's they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned,
traverse every membrane in the human body. So that includes the placenta. So not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and making it more creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get, nutrients and oxygen.
"And so, some of the midwives that we've interviewed and Dr. James Thorp (@jathorpmfm), a fetal maternal medicine specialist, who's one of the few who's spoken out, they are independently confirming that there are nettings of calcifications now in vaccinated women's placentas that keep the baby from growing to term. And also they have to deliver babies early, as a result.
"A midwife named Ellen Jasmer sent me photographs
and independently confirmed by another midwife showing that placentas now vaccinated women are like flat and not well provided with blood vessels as
opposed to the I mean not to get graphic but a baby needs like a cushy well provided with blood vessels
placenta to grow and come to term. And so the placentas are in such terrible shape that, maternal deaths are up 40% because women are hemorrhaging. the placentas are falling apart. Let alone the babies, are suffering as well. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles,
go into the babies in utero and degrade the membranes around the testes of baby boys in utero if their moms are vaccinated. And that degrades the Sertoli cells
and Leydig cells, which are the factories of masculine development, masculine hormones. So we don't know when those babies turn, you know, become adolescents
and grow up into men. Those are the hormones that turn on like deep voices, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father a child.
"So we don't know if those baby boys will even be able to grow up into normal men who can be fertile. Pfizer knew that they were destroying women's menstrual cycles. You remember that's how the price story started.
Just just people accounts of women's own bodies. Well, it turns out they didn't want women to know that that was true. There's now a 13–20% drop in live births according to government databases in Western Europe and North America. And, in the Pfizer documents, there's something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report. It's 8 pages long. And it has charts of that Pfizer was keeping.
And I've called this Mengele a science and I say that advisedly. Charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. 12,000 women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. 8,500 are passing tissue. 10-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. 85-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, this complete this chart showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale. And I was mocked and mocked and mocked and deplatformed, but now multiple peer reviewed studies have come out conceding that, yes, on average women's menses have changed if they've been vaccinated."
"And so you don't have to be a scientist. All you need is eighth grade biology to know that if women's menstrual cycles are being damaged, their fertility is being damaged. And that's what we're seeing."
(2/12) A study from 2012 showing that lipid nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
An animal study from Japan showing that the LNPs from Pfizer's C19 jab go all throughout the body, including the ovaries+testes+uterus: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…
Oct 13 • 4 tweets • 6 min read
REMINDER: Only the HHS Secretary's say-so has been necessary to get the C19 bioweapon jabs made available. The FDA "approval" process was UTTER FRAUD AND THEATER.
NO CLINICAL TRIALS ARE POSSIBLE WITH EUA COUNTERMEASURES (Proof w/ links in next 2 tweets.)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for The Tennessee Informer (@TNinformer) how nothing was required to get the COVID bioweapon injections—often falsely and wrongly referred to as "vaccines"—made available to the public (i.e. victims) save for the say-so of the HHS Secretary. As Latypova has told us for years now, the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections, as well as the FDA "approval" for the bioweapons, has been utter fraud and theater.
"[The] only way these products [the C19 jab poisons] go on the market is based on the opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. The HHS Secretary who says, 'In my opinion, they may be effective,'" Latypova says. "That's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway."
"In the US law [the HHS Secretary] does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with whoever he wants to consult," the pharma insider adds. "And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor."
Furthermore, Latypova adds, "the FDA did a bait-and-switch. The FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required."
Note that the HHS Secretary—at the time, it was Alex Azar, under Trump—declared a "public health emergency" when there were only 11 cases of "COVID" in the U.S. and no deaths. It was this "emergency" that ultimately allowed for the rollout of the C19 jab bioweapons.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Only way these products go on the market is based on opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. HHS Secretary who says, in my opinion, they may be effective. And that's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway.
"So there are ostensible reasons and then, you know, what I think the reasons are, real reasons. But, you know, people will call me conspiracist for it. but this is based on, you know, over over 3 or 4 years of
investigating this and looking into, US law going back for 200 years, to the 1700s and figuring out, you know, all
these vaccine related laws in the US.
"So the ostensible reason for this introduction of this piece of legislation, was, 'Oh, you know, if there is a really dire situation, if we get attacked with a nuclear bomb or we get attacked with, like, some really bad chemical weapons or something, then, we should have an ability for the government to roll out whatever treatments, even if they are not approved and and haven't gone through proper regulatory channels of approval, which is because of the emergency and urgency. We can just roll out anything that we have and give it to people.' And, of course, there is no way to mandate these products. It's also, in the in the law, it says that you can't mandate the use of these products. You can make them available.
"In the in the US law, no. He does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with, whoever he wants to consult. And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor. But his opinion
is enough for every man, woman, and child to be injected with these monstrosities, with these poisons.
but, anyway so, like, I'm telling you the ostensible reason was because if it's if there is a dire emergency, end of the world, we get nuclear bomb, well, you
know, we you can't require that every treatment that we were gonna offer is going to go through the clinical trials.
But you have to tell the people. Right? And you can't mandate these these things. So now you see, the FDA
did a bait and switch. FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required.
"So, here, on this slide, this is the slide, by the way, from FDA. It's not I didn't make this. This is from this comes from the FDA. This is their own flowchart of how these products go on the market. I only put the yellow
box as a notation. And, you can see that what I just said that, the this is the entire regulatory pathway of how
these products get on the market. first, you need the emergency declaration. An emergency declaration can be issued by the DOD, DHS, HHS, so they can declare some sort of emergency. In this case, we had, we had
HHS declare a public health emergency.
"And then, the HHS Secretary writes the declaration
saying that in my opinion, circumstances exist that
justify having a national public health emergency.
this declaration for COVID was made when we had maybe 11 cases in the US and no deaths. But that declaration was made based on nothing. Absolutely nothing. He said it's the end of the world. We have to and and public health emergency declaration is equivalent to declaring war on US territory legally.
Slide **FROM THE FDA** showing nothing was required to get the C19 jab bioweapons made available to the public save for the HHS Secretary's say-so.
No evidence. No trials. No proof they save lives or prevent hospitalizations. Nothing.
"Americans believe...'I'm important. I'm needed as a consumer and customer.' No. They've changed the model. They have a model where a shrinking population generates economic growth...And [BlackRock CEO Larry] Fink absolutely describes it." (1/6)
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how Mr. Global (i.e. the controllers of the world's financial, political, and military systems) have "changed the [economic] model" so that "a shrinking population generates economic growth." Fitts proceeds to show a—now infamous—clip of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink telling a World Economic Forum (WEF) audience that "AI and technology...will...be able to elevate the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations."
Fitts describes how there has been an ongoing "financial coup" in the U.S. since the mid '90s, and she has, elsewhere, outlined how the Department of Defense (DOD) has stolen $20 trillion of taxpayer money. (See tweet 2.)
Using a portion of this money, the DOD has executed on a plan to lower life expectancy in the U.S. using, in large part, the injectable bioweapons known as "COVID vaccines." (See tweet 3.)
Not only has the DOD lowered life expectancy in the U.S. by murdering lots of people with the COVID bioweapon injections, but it has also managed to lower birthrates—an effort that Fitts traces back decades, when the mass-scale robbery of the U.S. taxpayers by the DOD began. This effort to crush birthrates has been highlighted with the COVID bioweapon injections, which have horrendous effects on women's reproductive systems and their fertility. (See tweets 4, 5, and 6.)
"All throughout the financial coup, I kept saying, 'Look, if we don't deal with this and balance the books, they're gonna have to essentially lower life expectancy.' And what I described in Musings on the Department of Defense, is, in fact, fertility rates in the United States are crashing. Our life expectancy is crashing relative to the other 19 top industrialized countries."
Fitts goes on to show a clip of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink describing for a WEF audience that:
"These countries [with shrinking populations] will rapidly develop robotics and AI and technology. And it's a promise, I didn't say it's going to happen, but as a promise of all that, [it] transforms productivity...we'll be able to elevate the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations."
Fink adds: "So the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing. And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations."
Partial transcription of clip:
"We have had a financial coup since the mid '90s.
We've described it on Financial Rebellion many, many times, and I encourage you to watch some of those those shows that Carolyn and Polly and I have done
on what's happening in the financial coup. But all throughout the financial coup, I kept saying, look.
If we don't deal with this and balance the books, they're gonna have to essentially lower life expectancy. And what I described in Musings on the Department of Defense, is, in fact, fertility rates in the United States are crashing. Our life expectancy is crashing relative to
the other 19 top industrialized countries.
"Look at that bottom black line. That, you know, it started to diverge from the so this is the top 20 industrialized countries. The US started to diverge from the other 19 when the coup started and then, of course, dropping even more dramatically since the pandemic.
And then on the right, we see the falling birth rates.
The only one who's who's fallen, lower than the United States is China, which had the [one child] policy for many, many years. They've just reversed it. But what you see and and we have a video of Larry Fink, chairman of BlackRock, describing on how the model has changed. So many Americans believe, look. I'm important. I'm needed as a consumer and customer. No. They've changed the model. They have a model where a shrinking population generates economic growth. And so the model's changed, and Fink absolutely describes it.
Fink: "That's something that most people never talked about. We always used to think shrinking population
is a cause for negative growth. But in my conversations with the leadership of these large developed countries
that have xenophobic immigration policies, they don't allow anybody to come in, Shrinking unemployment
excuse me, shrinking demographics. These countries
will rapidly develop robotics and AI and technology.
And it's a promise I didn't say it's going to happen, but as a promise of all that transforms productivity,
which most of us think it will, we'll be able to elevate
the standard of living of countries, the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations.
"And so the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing. And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is
going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations. And so for those countries that
have rising populations, the answer will be education and so rapidly developing. For those countries that do not have a foundation of rule of law or education, they're gonna be left that's where divides gonna get more and more extreme.
Fitts: "So I've been working for years to try and understand why they're destroying education in the United States. And I after looking at that, I thought, oh, that's why."
Fitts describes how the Department of Defense has stolen $20 trillion of taxpayer money. In part so it can slaughter Americans en masse and lower life expectancy. (2/6)
REMINDER: The U.S. military-industrial complex is behind the lethal poisons known as "COVID vaccines" that have maimed and slaughtered tens of millions of people (at least) around the globe. (1/6)
While MAHA clowns continue to focus on Froot Loops and pesticides as the bane of America's health, the adults in the room like retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) focus not only on the true existential threat to Americans' health—the COVID injections and all other "vaccines"—but also one of the key perpetrators of the COVID crime—the biggest crime in human history—the U.S. military-industrial complex.
In this clip from Ask Dr. Drew (@drdrew), Latypova explains how pharmaceutical companies all selected the spike protein for their COVID "vaccines"—and the mRNA platform in the case Moderna and Pfizer—because they are all, in essence (in this context, at least), fronts for the U.S. military-industrial complex.
"The choice of the mRNA platform was driven by the U.S. government because...Moderna is a U.S...military company," Latypova says. "It was funded by DARPA, by BARDA, and by the Department of Defense. And they've thrown huge amounts of money behind it, both from the formation of the company in, around 2010, 2011 up until COVID when they gave them these huge contracts without the company ever producing any product before."
But, Latypova notes, Moderna doesn't even manufacture its own "vaccines." In fact, a company most people have never heard of is responsible for the manufacturing: National Resilience.
"It [all] comes back to who owns the mRNA platform; who is going to benefit from it," the pharma insider says. "And we now have a whole company [who will benefit]. It's also a U.S. government company. It's backed by the CIA, Scott Gottlieb [is even] on the board of directors: It's called National Resilience, [and it is] the manufacturer of these juices for everyone."
"This National Resilience behemoth, which bought up a whole bunch of biological manufacturing facilities from pharma companies, [which crank] out these shots, [owns] their IP, [and is getting] their royalties, getting the profits," Latypova says. It is, in fact, National Resilience that is sending the COVID "vaccines" to companies such as Pfizer and Moderna who then "rebadge" them as "vaccines" for "Omicron, Delta, whatever."
"The interests are held by those people, so they need to be questioned," the pharma insider notes. "We need to question those members of the board of director of National Resilience, of Moderna, of Pfizer, you know, about their interest and who are they tied to. And you will see very quickly that it all comes back...to the CIA, the DOD, and the U.S. government, who is pushing this."
Partial transcription of clip:
"Well, so it's a very interesting question. Why everyone went that way even for the IP reasons. Different pharma companies wanted to compete with each other. The intellectual property situations typically drive them
to use different mechanisms, not the same. The choice of mRNA platform was driven by the US government because mRNA, Moderna is a US government, specifically military company. It was funded by DARPA, by BARDA, and by the Department of Defense. And they've thrown huge amounts of money behind it, both from the formation of the company in, around 2010, 2011 up until COVID when they gave them these huge contracts without the company ever producing any product before....
"As I said, it comes back to who owns that platform, who owns the mRNA platform, who is going to benefit from it. And we now have, a whole company. It's also a US government company. It's backed by the CIA, Scott Gottlieb on the, on the board of directors. It's called National Resilience, who is the manufacturer of of these juices for everyone. So they get cooked up in this National Resilience behemoth, which bought up a whole bunch of biological, manufacturing facilities from pharma companies, cranking out these shots, owning their IP, getting their getting their royalties, getting the profits, sending this to everyone who then, you know, rebadges it into Pfizer, Moderna, Omicron, Delta, whatever.
"But the interests are held by those people, so they need to be questioned. We need to question those members of the board of director of National Resilience, of Moderna, of Pfizer, you know, about their interest and who are they tied to. And you will see very quickly that it all comes back...to the CIA, the DOD, the the U.S. government who is pushing this. Otherwise, there is no explanation."
In this WaPo article from July 2020, dubbed "How a secretive Pentagon agency seeded the ground for a rapid coronavirus cure," it's explained how DARPA—or the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is a U.S. government agency responsible for the development of new technologies for use by the military—has quietly been seeding the ground for the United States to produce a rapid cure for a pathogen like covid-19 FOR YEARS." (emph added)
"Established years before the current pandemic, the program was halfway done when the first case of the novel coronavirus arrived in the United States early this year," the article says.
Oct 1 • 4 tweets • 6 min read
🔥MIND-BLOWING REVELATION🔥 Please stop and think about the implications of what's explained here. (1/3)
THIS is why it's IMPOSSIBLE to "vaccinate" against anything.
THIS is why "vaccines" are the PERFECT POISONS.
THIS is why eugenicists like Bill Gates love "vaccines."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for James Delingpole (@JMCDelingpole) how "vaccines," essentially, work in the exact opposite way as we're told they do—meaning it's literally impossible to make a vaccine that does anything but poison somebody.
While we're told that "vaccines" work by giving us a small amount of a toxic substance—e.g. a bacteria or virus— in turn allowing us to create immunity against future infections, what the injections actually do is make us vulnerable to said toxins. Furthermore, "vaccines" prime our bodies to react badly to *anything* that's injected into us, including benign substances like milk or egg proteins. Hence the proliferation of allergies, such as allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, peanuts, etc.
Incredibly, Latypova explains how this has been known since 1913, when Charles Richet—a French physiologist and self-proclaimed eugenicist—won a Nobel Prize for figuring out that injecting animals with toxins primes them for harmful or deadly reactions if they encounter the same toxins in the environment, even in small amounts. He called these reactions "anaphylactic" reactions, but said that these reactions also included allergies.
After researching this topic and analyzing Richet's work, Latypova says she's come to the conclusion that "everybody who is...closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate." The pharma insider adds, "It's impossible to vaccinate for anything. And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment."
"It's the most ingenious way of poisoning," Latypova says.
"The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and limit our reproduction because, you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing climate change," Latypova adds. "They're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable. It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people because it's for the greater good. So what started with Richet continues today."
Partial transcription of clip:
"One of the historical examples, Katherine [Watt] and I
ran into, and and this became a huge, epiphany for me is, Charles Richet, who was a French researcher in that in that time. So he worked in early 1900s. In 1913, he was given Nobel Prize for this work, and he is credited with the work on anaphylaxis, although he wasn't the only one, but so he received the Nobel Prize. And so that that to me, you know, opened so much kind of I was like, of course. You know, why didn't I see this before? But, basically, you know, when you look at this work and then when you look what preceded and what went after,
you kind of understand a few things.
"First of all, everybody who is, let's say, closely familiar with this history and work cannot think that it's possible to vaccinate. It's impossible to vaccinate for anything.
And Richet has demonstrated it conclusively and was given Nobel Prize for it...because he figured out how to
poison everyone by sensitizing them to the most commonly occurring things in their environment. It's the most ingenious way of poisoning.
"He was a committed eugenicist. And at that time, you
know, everyone should realize, eugenicism was a fashionable society attitude. So, you know, all the well-to-do classes were subscribing to it. The web the the good breeding was always, you know, promoted. And, at the time, the sentiment was, well, how can we help the poor being less dirty and less numerous? Make them less humorous. And AKA kill them. Because this side of them is so offensive to us when we ride our horses through the park and, you know, and then there's like them. What can we do about it? And what can we do about it became into let's figure out how to control
their, overbreeding because they tend to reproduce
reproduce too much, and they tend to live in crowded conditions, and they tend to have poor hygiene and no sanitation.
"So instead of working on those issues, they will decide, oh, let's vaccinate them. And, actually, the same same thing continues with Bill Gates in Africa and India for the same reason. And, you know, but but all of these
thoughts extended now to us, to normal people.
"Now all of the globalist and this, you know, elites, I don't call them elites, but they all think of us that way. That's, you know, that's what people need to understand. The eugenicists never went away. They all still think that way. They all still think that they should poison us and and limit our reproduction because,
you know, we're polluting the earth now. We're causing the climate change. Whatever those ideas are, but they're brainwashing themselves and their followers into thinking that this is actually acceptable.
It's acceptable to poison people. It's acceptable to sterilize people. It's acceptable to lie to people,
because it's for the greater good. You know? So what what started with Richet continues today."
"Through studies involving dogs... Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."
"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)." (Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)
"I wanted to believe for the longest time that it [the COVID injections] wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is."
DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes how the Pfizer documents related to primary source COVID-injection "clinical trial" data released under court order, as well as related medical literature, evince an effort to execute a "depopulation agenda" with the jabs. Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes these documents in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, says that the COVID injections stand as "the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history."
"The Pfizer papers...have a specific focus on destroying reproduction," Wolf says. "I wanted to believe for the longest time that it wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is."
"They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles," Wolf adds. "They knew the lipid nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They determined that the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure, quote unquote, to the vaccine."
The author and CEO adds that "vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick," and she refers to this experiment as "Mengele science."
Partial transcription of clip:
"I haven't gone into detail about the headlines from the Pfizer documents, but I guess people can read the book for that, you know, except to say that it is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history, unfortunately. And the Pfizer papers do have a specific focus on destroying reproduction. So that's why I wanted to believe for the longest time that it wasn't a depopulation agenda, but ultimately the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is. They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles.
They knew the lipid nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They determined that the deaths of
fetuses were due to maternal exposure, quote unquote, to the vaccine.
"They knew that, vaccinated women who were nursing
their babies were making the babies sick. There are charts. This is why I say Mengele science. They're just charts showing this many thousands of babies are vomiting. This many thousands of babies have edema, which is swollen flesh. This many thousands of babies have convulsions. You know, one baby died of multi-organ system failure. from nursing vaccinated moms and to this day, I'm sure in the Netherlands, all over Europe, all over the world, no one's telling vaccinated moms that they can risk their babies' lives by nursing them. But Pfizer knew.
"Pfizer, knew in one section of the Pfizer documents there's an over 80% percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. Pfizer knows there's something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women. And if they do, they use two reliable forms of contraception. They knew that the injection doesn't stay in the injection site, but it travels all over the body within 48 hours. Accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, the liver, crosses the blood brain barrier, which causes a lot of brain damage type reactions you're seeing and accumulates in the ovaries.
they knew that it was damaging the hearts of minors and our lawyer's FOIA, meaning Freedom of Information Act, documents from the White House showing a scramble in April of 2021 to cover this up. But they just kept going that summer and into the next year, propagandizing parents to vaccinate their minors, knowing they were injuring or killing them."
@naomirwolf Here are three studies that support Wolf's claims about the COVID-injection contents biodistributing throughout the body. (And, specifically, the ovaries.)
"[There's] $20 trillion missing from the Department of Defense [and] it is the [DOD] that...rolled out...the COVID injections. So...the institution that laundered the money out of our retirement savings [balanced] the books by lowering life expectancy."
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD
series Financial Rebellion how the Department of Defense has stolen $20 TRILLION of taxpayer money and is now "balancing the books" by lowering life expectancy via the COVID bioweapon injections (commonly, and wrongly, referred to as "vaccines").
Leading into this clip, Fitts is describing a study conducted by Mark Skidmore—a professor in the Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics at the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources at Michigan State University—which found, via a survey, that approximately 278,000 Americans had been killed by the COVID bioweapon jabs in the first year alone after their rollout.
Skidmore, Fitts notes, also confirmed via a survey he conducted with his graduate students at MSU that $20 trillion in "unauthorized spending" had been reported by the Department of Defense (DOD) between 1998 and 2015.
Fitts notes:
"[Regarding] the $20 trillion missing from the Department of Defense, it is the Department of Defense that was doing Operation Warp Speed that rolled out and implemented the COVID injections. So it's not surprising that the institution that laundered the money out of our retirement savings would balance the books by lowering life expectancy. That's exactly what's happened."
Partial transcription of clip:
"The anecdotal feedback that Jennifer was describing matched up with the professional survey that Skidmore had done. And that's when I know we were really looking at a killer injection and something that was in my opinion personally designed to produce deep population. One of the interesting things about the Skidmore survey was Skidmore had done a survey of
the money missing from the Department of Defense
and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. That's how I first started to work with him in 2017.
"We published his survey of the $21 trillion missing from the federal government. And during that period, he would always say to me, why do you never give up on the story of the financial mismanagement of the federal government and the federal government being in violation of the laws? And I said, because this is essentially using the Treasury as a laundry to launder out our money from our retirement accounts. And if we don't do something about this, the only solution, the only way to balance the books is to lower life expectancy. And so if we don't balance the books, they're going to lower life expectancy. And sure enough, when the COVID injections came around, it was Doctor.
Skidmore who helped prove that in fact, yes, they're lowering life expectancy.
"Interestingly enough the $20 trillion missing from the Department of Defense, it is the Department of Defense that was doing Operation Warp Speed that rolled out and implemented the COVID injection. So it's not surprising that the institution that laundered the money out of our retirement savings would balance the books by lowering life expectancy. That's exactly what's happened."
Full video: rumble.com/v5bxwq9-killer…
Aug 22 • 7 tweets • 4 min read
"Most COVID-19 vaccines showed very detrimental effects to the sperm directly...Novavax was very...toxic...But Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca showed similar effects."
"Structures were [also] found [in the semen]...spirals, ribbons, [and] filaments..." (1/6)
Practicing physician Dr. Young Mi Lee, who specializes in obstetrics and gynecology and is also a reproductive endocrinologist, describes for physician Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea (@DrAnaMihalcea) some of the findings related to the COVID injections' effects on sperm quality discussed in a paper Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy (Professor of Applied Linguistics, Okinawa Christian University) recently had published in The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
(NOTE: I did my best to transcribe Dr. Lee's comments. Best to listen to the interview for yourself.)
"Most of COVID-19 vaccines showed very detrimental effects to the sperm directly, [but] it depends on the
brand of COVID-19 vaccine...Through our experiment, Novavax was very rapid and direct[ly] toxic [versus the] other vaccines," Lee says. The physician adds, however, that "Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca showed, similar
effects—[they also had] detrimental effects on the sperm."
Lee notes, for example, that when she incubated semen taken from a man who'd taken Pfizer's COVID injection, there was only 10% motility after 10 minutes. For reference, semen taken from an "unvaccinated" man, as well as a man who'd received a flu "vaccine," both had motility rates of 70% at the 10-minute mark.
After two to three hours, there was 0% sperm motility in any of the samples taken from men who'd been injected with one or another COVID jab. (Note sperm motility is the ability of sperm to move efficiently through a female's reproductive system to reach and fertilize an egg.) After this same time period, Lee notes that semen samples taken from the "unvaccinated" man, as well as the man who'd taken a flu "vaccine," were "still healthy."
Lee also notes that one COVID "vaccine"–injected man had a "good" semen analysis, but in his sample the physician found "structures," including "spirals, ribbons, [and] filaments." (2/6)
"The [injected man's] semen quality was excellent, but in the semen those kind of artificial...structures were found," Lee says. She notes the structures included "spirals, ribbons, entangled filaments... artificial structures like that."
Aug 14 • 8 tweets • 5 min read
TOP 7 FACTS THAT PROVE MONKEYPOX (MPOX) IS A SCAM
1. Monkeypox first appeared outside a lab, in the Congo, during a period of "intensified effort to eliminate smallpox."
I.e. monkeypox first appeared outside a lab only after the initiation of a smallpox vaccination campaign. 2. Clinical distinction between smallpox and monkeypox, both in monkeys and in humans, is not possible.
Preben Christian Alexander von Magnus, a Danish virologist who was known for his research on influenza and polio vaccinations, is credited with confirming the existence of the monkeypox virus.
In a 1959 paper, which first described the virus, von Magnus et al. noted that "Clinical distinction between smallpox and monkeypox, both in monkeys and in man, is not possible."
Aug 6 • 5 tweets • 5 min read
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea (@DrAnaMihalcea) describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how she—as well as other doctors and researchers—has found "self-assembling nanotechnology" in dental anesthetics, insulin, and people's blood.
Mihalcea, an internist with a PhD in pathology, notes that there is a concerted effort to deploy nanotechnology on the population via the healthcare system, highlighting one particular document produced by the U.S. Army, dubbed "Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD." The document notes that "One can...assume that aspects of cyborg capabilities will be enabled through the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, or any number of emerging technologies."
Furthermore, Mihalcea notes that this plan to merge humans with nanotechnology stems from the idea of transhumanism, which, she says, stems from eugenics.
@DrAnaMihalcea @LauraLynnTT Link to Cyborg Soldier document:
Note the document discusses "neural implant technology" consisting of "nanoparticles that can be directed through an external force." wespenrevideos.com/wp-content/upl…
Jun 23 • 6 tweets • 5 min read
"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product [EUA C19 jabs] here as this product here ['fully approved' C19 jabs]...? Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."
"[T]here is a...coup going on, and...the coup is worldwide." (1/5)
Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a resigned former Army officer and American constitutionalist, describes for Ryan Cristian (@TLAVagabond) how the military, under the leadership of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, pulled off a con of sorts when it mandated the COVID-19 injections for the military. Miller highlights the fact that the COVID injections that the FDA (supposedly) approved were never made available to the military, and therefore it was an EUA product that was mandated by Austin—something that is illegal.
"I think at...top levels of government, I think they were knowingly complicit," Miller tells Cristian. Miller, who recently published a viral post here on X showcasing a "Declaration of Military Accountability" that acts as a clarion call for the American people to "do everything lawfully within [their] power to stop the willful destruction of [their] military by its own leadership," adds: "I think the Secretary of Defense [Lloyd Austin] was smart enough that when he put out his initial memo...it [was] far less problematic than actually what happened."
Austin said in his initial COVID-injection mandate memo, Miller says, that "'fully FDA approved products will...be used.'" Miller notes, "when you look at that, it's like, OK, we may not like this, but legally, this is far less problematic than the actual implementation, which, of course, was only possible if you're using EUA products, because there were no fully FDA approved products."
"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product here as this product here, or at least something that could be interchangeably used in place of it?" Miller asks rhetorically. "Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."
The resigned former Army officer, who left the military due to the COVID-injection mandate, adds that "it's much bigger than just the military, it's much bigger than just the United States...I think, to some degree, there is a...coup going on, and I think the coup is worldwide."
Miller goes on to say:
"Wars don't always look the way that we kind of have come to think that wars look. And a coup doesn't always necessarily consist of a singular one-and-done event. And I think what's happening in our country, [and] you could also extrapolate across the world...I think we're in the midst of kind of ongoing coup. And that ongoing coup, which I think has been decades in the making, maybe longer, is punctuated by like, certain discrete events. But none of those singular events is a full one-and-done coup like [you'd normally] think of."
Miller adds:
"[W]e're in the midst of something far more subtle. And it's far more incrementalist. But it doesn't mean that there aren't kind of these, singular events that kind of move us into a deeper phase of the coup. I think COVID was one of those. I think 9/11 was one of those. And I don't think you get to a COVID without a 9/11 two decades prior."
(2/5) Note that Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) has said that "our military establishment...are the professional brainwashers" and it brainwashed gov't employees into thinking the C19 jabs are safe/effective.
(1/9) OB/GYN and functional medicine practitioner Dr. Margaret Christensen describes for @ChildrensHD a huge list of C19 jab-related illnesses she's observed, including:
For women:
"women with all kinds of abnormal bleeding"
"ovarian cysts"
"massive...heavy bleeding episodes."
"massive amounts of infertility."
three fetal deaths (even though Christensen doesn't do obstetrics currently)
"very abnormal placentas"
postmenopausal bleeding that's "bizarre"
For men:
"Unbelievably low testosterone levels"
"significant changes in sperm morphology"
"libido issues"
depression
In both men and women, Christensen highlights: "excessive brain fog"
cardiovascular events from heart attacks to strokes
"bizarre blood clots"
"horrendous" mental health challenges
neurodegenerative changes
rapid onset dementia
"massive amounts of autoimmune issues" including recurrence of infections and new infections
@ChildrensHD (2/9) Here is a list of 7 studies that show ample evidence of the COVID-19 injections negatively affecting women’s menstrual cycles:
🚨H1N1 Bird Flu 'Vaccines' Linked to Alarming Safety Signals in VAERS for 'Intra-Uterine Deaths' (Stillbirths), Spontaneous Abortions, and Decrease in Key Human Reproduction Hormone (1/5)
(Are the 'bird flu' vaccines actually covert infertility injections?🤔)
In this discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. pharmaceutical researcher and scientist Craig Paardekooper describes an analysis he did concerning H1N1 bird flu "vaccines" and their rates of adverse events reported to VAERS. He describes how he discovered alarming safety signals for "intra-uterine deaths" (stillbirths), spontaneous abortions, and a decrease in a key human reproduction hormone dubbed "hCG."
In this first clip, Paardekooper says that the two bird flu vaccines with reports in VAERS (the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) "have the absolute highest and strongest safety signal for intra-uterine death." Paardekooper notes this means "the baby is being destroyed while it's in the womb, after conception, while it's a fetus."
For the two H1N1 vaccines analyzed, Paardekooper says that one has a safety signal of 119, while the other has a safety signal of 64. On average, Paardekooper notes that this amounts to "100 times greater [incidence] than other vaccines for causing intra-uterine death." I.e. stillbirths.
From a report Paardekooper published on this analysis:
"The incidence of stillbirth with H1N1 Bird Flu vaccine has a confidence interval where the upper limit is 253.8, and the lower limit is 119.51. This means that there is a 95% chance that the incidence of still birth will be higher than 119.51 times. It also means that 5% of the time it will even be higher than 253.8 times."
Paardekooper adds that both of the H1N1 flu "vaccines" in VAERS also use the same toxin, which adds confirmation that they are indeed responsible for the safety signal.
The fact both "vaccines" use the same toxin is "confirmation, because you have the two toxins belonging to the same drug...It's like they confirm each other," Paardekooper says.
Paardekooper also links the H1N1 vaccines in VAERS to spontaneous abortions, which he notes "is another criteria for lower birthrate." (2/5)
"Both of the H1N1 vaccines come [out] at the top, again," Paardekooper says in regard to incidence of spontaneous abortion. He describes that he's found they're five to six times more likely to be associated with this adverse event signal versus other vaccines in VAERS.
Jun 10 • 6 tweets • 6 min read
🚨REMINDER: THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAS SPENT **$20 TRILLION** OF U.S. TAXPAYER MONEY THAT IS UNDOCUMENTED AND UNACCOUNTED FOR (1/5)
In this clip from a recent episode of the Children's Health Defense series, Financial Rebellion, Investment banker and former HUD official Catherine Austin Fitts describes how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has spent $20 trillion of taxpayer money (between 1998 and 2015) that has gone undocumented and unaccounted for. Fitts also highlights the fact that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has done the same with $1 trillion of taxpayer money.
Fitts starts out her overview of "the missing money" by noting that in 1994 the New York Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Reserve (the Fed) bought shares in the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). The investment banker notes that the Bank of International Settlements "is the central bank of central banks in Switzerland and operates above the law...[as] they have sovereign immunity and enjoy it in many respects and they can receive and hold money secretly [and] can keep money on their balance sheets secretly."
Effectively, Fitts says, the U.S. government buying those shares "made their relationship with the BIS much closer..."
The investment banker goes on to note that in October 1995 a budget deal in U.S. Congress "basically crashed and burned" and "it was then that...the president of one of the largest pension funds said to [her], 'They'—whoever 'They' is—have given up on the country and are moving all the money out starting in the Fall." Fitts says it was that Fall, October 1997, "when money started to go missing from HUD, as well as the Department of Defense."
As of today, Fitts says, "there's...$20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 missing from DOD and $1 trillion missing from HUD."
"The other thing that started to happen when that money started to go missing...was what I call the Great Poisoning..." Fitts adds. "Literally, it was the next month after the budget deal crashed that OxyContin was approved and the HUD predatory lending started and the pill mill started and really, the targeting of the low-income neighborhoods started, including the roundups coming from the private prison movement."
"Undocumentable adjustments then skyrocket[ed]," Fitts adds.
Cut to 2001, and "the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference at the Department of Defense...[announcing] that the Department of Defense was missing $2.3 trillion..."
Fitts was told that one of the offices at the Pentagon that was blown up was the location for the office of Naval Intelligence Research Group, which was investigating the missing money.
"The rest is history," Fitts says. "The Patriot Act had passed, and then the DOD got huge appropriations and nobody really cared about the missing money."
Then, in 2015, the DOD financials came out and "it was the greatest missing money in one year [ever]. The DOD was missing $6.5 trillion in a year..."
At that point, Fitts says, Dr. Mark Skidmore, who was a professor and expert in budgeting at Michigan State University, thought she "must be wrong" because "the Department of Defense can't be missing 10-plus times its total budget in a year." Lo and behold, when he investigated the DOD's financials, he found that "actually, [she] was right."
Fitts subsequently asked that Skidmore have his students do a complete survey "of all the financial statements in all the years from fiscal 1997 to 2015."
He and his students got the total missing money to $21 trillion. They subsequently published a report in 2017, at which point Skidmore and Fitts discovered that "the amount of money missing from the U.S. Treasury was the same amount as the total debt of the United States."
Cut to 2018, and Fitts notes that during the theatrical hearings held during the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress—including both the Senate and the House, Republicans and Democrats—along with the Trump White House "got together and issued a policy called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56." (Fitts refers to it as FASAB 56 or, phonetically speaking, 'Faz-B 56.')
"[W]hat FASAB 56 says, very short and simple, is basically the government can keep secret books as a matter of administrative policy, thus refusing to obey all the financial management rules and regulations and laws, including the constitutional provisions for disclosure of financial operations," Fitts says. She adds that "they extended it, along with the classification laws, to private companies and banks doing business with the federal government, which means when you look at the U.S. securities market, the large cap section of the U.S. market...most of the disclosure is meaningless. You have no idea how the money works at many of these companies and the government because they're so intertwined."
Interestingly, the investment banker adds that "the COVID-19 operation could never have happened without that [FASAB 56], because it put the Department of Defense, and [other federal government] agencies in a position to, essentially, access an unlimited amount of secret money."
Fitts says somebody once told her that FASAB 56 is "a wet dream" as it allows for "secret money for secret operations."
"I think it was one month after FASAB 56 passed that suddenly Moderna magically raised $500 million. Quite a coincidence," Fitts adds.
Here is a clip from the 2001 Rumsfeld speech to which Fitts refers. (2/5)
Rumsfeld says: "Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, WE CANNOT TRACK $2.3 TRILLION IN TRANSACTIONS." (Emphasis added.)
Jun 8 • 17 tweets • 19 min read
REMDESIVIR—VENTILATORS —ISOLATION—AND THE 'HOSPITAL HOMICIDE' OF MORE THAN 500,000 AMERICANS SINCE 2020
Here's a reminder that hospitals have been turned into "killing fields" since the beginning of COVID, deploying deadly protocols that have murdered 500K+ Americans. 🧵 (1/16)
While the death and destruction caused by the COVID bioweapon injections has, rightfully, earned an enormous amount of attention from the alternative media, it's important to note that just as many people—if not more—have been killed by what's been deemed by some as COVID "murder protocols" in the hospitals. Murder protocols that have, in the U.S., been put into place by federal "health" agencies, and reinforced with massive payouts.
In this first clip, we learn from electrical engineer and citizen investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) that these "hospital homicides" (Beaudoin's term) now account for more than 500,000 dead Americans. Indeed, Beaudoin says that "the hospital homicides might be greater" than the number of people killed by the COVID injections in the U.S.
Beaudoin, who has pored through approximately 5% of the death certificates in the U.S. from the years 2019 through 2023, highlights an excess of acute renal failure (or sudden kidney failure) deaths as particularly staggering. He says that there have been 153,000 excess acute renal failure deaths **alone** in the last three years, which can likely be chalked up to some combination of remdesivir, vancomycin, and baricitinib.
Remdesivir, which many have come to associate with death and illness, is an antiviral drug shown to be deadly in clinical trials and linked to renal failure specifically*.
Baricitinib is a "Janus kinase JAK inhibitor" and is considered an "immunomodulator." Medical News Today notes, "If your kidneys don’t work well, [baricitnib] could build up in your body."
Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat infections and has also been linked to acute renal failure**.
Beaudoin notes that while he's not sure which individual drug, or which combination of drugs, is most responsible for the excess renal failure deaths in the U.S. over the last three years, "all the data is sitting on government computers and the government is purposely not looking at it, because they killed more than 150,000 excess people more than normal in the last three years by acute renal failure alone."
Furthermore, Beaudoin highlights ventilators as a murder mechanism. "[P]eople were put on ventilators, they got lung infections, they weren't treated for bacterial infections, and they died," he says. He notes that sometimes patients were given vancomycin, but that "kills the kidneys if you give too much."
Putting a finer point on things, Beaudoin says, "with regard to all of the [COVID] hospital protocols, I call it murder, because at some level, somebody knew what they were doing." While he doesn't blame the doctors themselves, he does say that whoever developed the protocol knew that it would kill patients.
*//** Supporting studies provided in last post of thread.
"There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced...this happened synchronously everywhere...where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people." (2/16)
In this clip from an interview with Matthew Ehret (@ehret_matthew), Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt), a scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor, describes how his study of all-cause mortality has led him to conclude that COVID hospital protocols have been responsible for an enormous amount of death.
Note that while Beaudoin has been studying death certificates, and Rancourt has been looking at all-cause mortality, they've both arrived at the same conclusion in this context.
"There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced. And the all-cause mortality surged in a rapid peak that lasted only a month or two, and this happened synchronously everywhere where there was a hotspot, it happened at the same time—where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people," Rancourt tells Ehret. The scientist notes that one of the "main things" that killed people was putting them on ventilators, "which are extremely deadly and increase the chance of getting a bacterial infection in the respiratory tract, and so on..."
Rancourt notes that there were "huge spikes in mortality that did not spread" in 2020, but were, rather, "synchronous with the announcement of the pandemic where they got the go ahead and...apply these protocols and do what they did in hospitals."
Indeed, Rancourt says that "the big hospitals that followed this kind of militaristic new approach, without thinking, were killing fields, basically."
"The places where they didn't do this [the murder protocols], or they didn't do it as aggressively, or they didn't have large hospitals where they applied these protocols just military style, you did not get these peaks," the scientist adds.
May 29 • 5 tweets • 6 min read
LUMEN STREAMERS — RUBBERY CLOTS — AND THE 'DIED SUDDENLY' PHENOMENON
Here Are Six Key Insights into the Now-Infamous 'White, Fibrous Clots' and How They Act as Slow, Stealthy, and Sudden Killers in Those Who've Taken the COVID Jabs (1/7)
1. THE CLOTS FORM OVER TIME (UP TO YEARS) IN PEOPLE'S BLOOD VESSELS
Although the now-infamous "white fibrous clots"—sometimes referred to as "rubber band clots" or "rubbery clots"—first brought to light by embalmer @r_hirschman (via @RealDrJaneRuby) are obviously killing a great many COVID-injected people, it's unclear exactly how they're often able to grow undetected. In this brief thread, however, we have several key insights from physicians and others as to how the clots grow stealthily before they murder their unsuspecting victims.
First up, we have radiologist Dr. Phillip Triantos in discussion The Blaze Senior Editor Daniel Horowitz (@RMConservative) showing ultrasound images of what he believes are the white fibrous clots forming inside the blood vessels of (still living) COVID "vaccinated" people.
The first trio of ultrasound images Triantos presents shows a man who was "genetically jabbed three times" who developed what Triantos assumes is one of the white, fibrous clots. The radiologist notes the man was injected in 2022, and, by 2024, the clot has "gotten a little bigger...[and] a little longer." He notes the clot has "taken its time" growing in the lumen (the cavity of a blood vessel).
Next, Triantos shows another patient who has in one of their blood vessels a "long, string-like clot." Triantos notes that he has seen these types of clots prior to the rollout of the COVID injections, but says they're "typically...chronic clots that people have had for a long time" as opposed to the novel white fibrous clots, which are "presenting acutely."
Triantos also shows some of the white fibrous clots that Hirschman pulled out of the veins and arteries of a body, which Triantos says "[look] very similar" to the clots he's seeing in ultrasounds.
Finally, in this clip, Triantos notes one specific case where these white fibrous clots acted as a killer, highlighting the death of a 25-year-old man in his area (somewhere in Alabama) who took the Moderna injection for work. "[T]wo years...after his shot he ended up passing away from a huge embolus in chest..." the radiologist says. (An embolus is a blood clot.)
2. THE CLOTS FORM AS "STREAMERS" IN THE CAVITIES OF BLOOD VESSELS
With Triantos' ultrasounds of the white fibrous clots in mind, listen to the way Dr. Shankara Chetty describes them:
[I]magine a streamer in the lumen of the vessel...and, it's not occluding blood flow, but it's stuck to the vessel wall, and that streamer is growing. So what happens is you've got some process that's [happening] on the vessel wall that's triggering...a catalytic process that's going to cause this fibrinous clot to constantly elongate."
Chetty goes on to say:
"When I look at what we see with the clots, we're seeing a mixture of the fibrinous and the traditional clot...but when you look at the fibrinous clot, it tends to be one long strand, and you've got...natural clots attached to it," Chetty tells Dr. Phillip McMillan (@vejon_health) and Triantos. "So you've got two processes...you got the fibrinous structures that are forming and you got those fibrinous structures causing turbulence in blood flow, which actually causes this normal clotting around it."
Chetty goes on to say that "as the fibrinous clot elongates, it doesn't occlude the lumen—it's flapping around like a streamer [stuck to] the lumen wall and the blood is flowing past it. So you don't see it. It's there and it keeps growing, but it keeps causing more and more normal coagulation around it and the longer it grows, the longer the clot. But it hasn't occluded the vessel. And, because it needs this turbulence to have coagulation around it, it will occur in slow-flowing areas of the body."
Chetty expounds further:
"So as this fibrinous clot grows through a polymerization process, where it keeps getting proteins from your system sticking on to it and growing it, it also acts as a foreign body in the vessel creating turbulence, and it's that turbulence that causes the blood to start to clot around it, until eventually the pressure cannot push through, and it eventually just blocks up. So, depending on when it blocks up, you can get a short strand, or you can get a very long [clot], like they're pulling out two-feet clots from patients' leg veins and things like that."
2. Clinical distinction between smallpox and monkeypox, both in monkeys and in humans, is not possible.
