"There's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe...." (1/5)
DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Stephanie Locricchio (@StephLocricchio) during a recent Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) interview how "the centerpiece" of the harms that Pfizer's and Moderna's COVID injections cause is "reproductive damage." Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "there's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe...."
--------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"I wanna leave your audience knowing is that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents isn't even all of those hideous problems, deaths, injuries. The centerpiece is reproductive damage. And Pfizer and this injection damages human reproduction in a 360-degree manner. It comes at human reproduction, especially female reproductive health, in multiple ways. And the testing of reproductive damage and the highlighting of reproductive damage and poisoning of babies, nursing from their moms' now poisoned breast milk, is so central in the Pfizer documents that, as we say in the tech world, it's not a bug, it's a feature.
"There's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe, especially where most of the damage is targeted. And I guess what I'll just say, you know, brief notes from how does it damage reproduction.
"The lipid nanoparticles, the ingredients bio-distribute throughout the human body in 48 hours, including accumulating in the ovaries if you're a woman. So first injection, some lipid nanoparticles, which are industrial fats, come into your ovaries. Second injection, more. Third injection, first booster, more. And we've seen no mechanism by which these materials leave the ovaries. So you're just literally blocking your ovaries with every injection. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta, so babies in utero aren't growing to term. I literally haven't heard of a full term baby since '20 '21 in my immediate circle. They they need to be delivered early because the placentas, you know, can't grow.
"Midwives are independently sending me images of flattened placentas pancaked, you know, unnaturally flattened placentas that are discolored. They can't provide babies with nutrients or oxygen when they're in utero. People, like doctor James Thorp, fetal maternal medicine specialist, are reporting high levels of chromosomal and other abnormalities in babies because lipid nanoparticles get into the babies. The lipid nanoparticles degrade the myelin, I'm sorry, the sheath around the testes in baby boys in utero and degrade the Sertoli cells and Leydig cells that turn on adult masculinity. So we don't even know if these babies are gonna grow up at adolescence and adulthood to be normal men with secondary sex characteristics, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father children.
"There's a section of Pfizer documents that shows an 80% miscarriage rate. There's a section of Pfizer documents that shows that they told vaccinated men not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women. And if they did, to use two reliable forms of contraceptives. So Pfizer, to this day, knows that there's something in the semen of vaccinated men that could be injurious to either women or to a zygote or a fetus, but they're not telling us what they're worried about. But they do define exposure to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse, skin contact, and inhalation, which does confirm a lot of anecdotal concerns people had about shedding.
"There's this report, like a spreadsheet, that was sent in something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report, on April 20th, 2021 to the White House. And it shows a chart of women damaged menstrually, like 15,000 women bleeding every day, 10,000 women bleeding twice a month, 7,500 women with no periods all at all, meaning no fertility, 10-year-old girls bleeding upon receiving an injection. 85-year-old women bleeding upon receiving an injection. Agonizing cramps, like disabling cramps, hemorrhaging, passing tissue, horrific conditions. And they just, you know, note this, as if this is the deliverable.
"And there's also a chart that shows babies getting very sick from nursing vaccinated moms. This many babies vomited. This many babies had edema, which is swelling of tissue. This many babies...had convulsions. One baby died of convulsions, from nursing a vaccinated mom. You know, these babies have failure to thrive. And they just write up these charts, and they noted that two babies died in utero due to, quote, maternal exposure to the vaccine, end quote.
"And they sent this to the White House and to doctor Walensky, as I mentioned, in April 20th, 2021. Three days later, doctor Walensky gave a press conference from the White House telling the pregnant women of America or the women who wanted to get pregnant or who had gotten pregnant, there's no bad time to get a COVID injection, excuse me, before you get pregnant, during your pregnancy, or after your baby is born. And she had this document in her hand. By the way, three days after we ran that report, she resigned."
(2/5) Note that these results—declining birthrates in the West—are perfectly in line with what the architects of this worldwide crime against humanity outlined in their 1944 "Open Conspiracy" for a "New World Order" game plan document.
"At least 4 billion 'useless eaters' shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, start-ing with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world's population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question."
Dec 30, 2024 • 59 tweets • 60 min read
THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵
(Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.)
Thread index:
Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers
The injections—
-Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression
-Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome”
-Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout
-Are associated with increasing rates of cancers
Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections.
Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination.
Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers.
Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections.
NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon.
—-----------------------
DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.”
In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months.
Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s.
“When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.”
Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.”
“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.”
Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”
(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.”
In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.”
Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.”
The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.”
Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase.
“Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.
Dec 20, 2024 • 4 tweets • 5 min read
Why *21 days* between mRNA jabs? To maximize the probability of anaphylactic reactions!
"The reason the manufacturers wanted the 21 days...is because they wanted to document [the rate of reactions]...They knew they were gonna set off...massive death and injury." (1/4)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Iron Will (@IronWillRpt) how the manufacturers of the mRNA COVID injections chose the 21-day-long period between jabs in order to maximize the probability of eliciting anaphylactic reactions in recipients. Citing the work of Nobel Prize winner (and eugenicist) Charles Richet, Latypova notes that this period of time—approximately three weeks—is ideal for causing a severe anaphylactic reaction in a person.
"Charles Richet discovered that interval," Latypova says. "It's not always 21 days, but 21 days happens to be, like, a most likely period of time. But...it's several weeks usually—from first injection to the second injection of the same toxin or protein."
Describing the work of Richet, a French physiologist who won the Nobel Prize in 1913 for his work on what he dubbed "anaphylaxis," Latypova says the following:
"[Richet] did these experiments extensively, and he was injecting different types of toxins and observing [recipients]. So observing when that really severe anaphylaxis [reaction occurs]. [And] he said, first, he would inject some kind of a protein, and then the animal [who received] the first injection may have a mild reaction or not even react at all. So they may have nothing. And then after 21 days, typically, if he injected in some of the animals—but not all, in some, it's usually a percentage, something like 10 to to 15%—some of them would develop extreme severe reactions even to a very, very minute dose of the same protein.
So, like, in the first reaction, it was a larger dose. The second reaction, even a tiny, tiny, minute dose would set off this huge, huge anaphylactic shock or illness, and some of them would die. And this was found with all vaccinations at that time. He also even writes about other attempts at vaccinations, for anthrax in animals. He reported the same issues. So about 10, 15% of them died because of the anaphylactic reactions. He even reported that at the same time, different researchers were attempting this on themselves, and some of them killed themselves, with this method."
Latypova then goes on to describe on oddity with "vaccine" researchers: They don't mind poisoning themselves and their loved ones (sometimes fatally) for their research.
"[With] a lot of these vaccine crazy obsessed scientists, in fact, there are documented examples where they killed their children, grandchildren, and still did not recant and continued to do the same [thing]. Peter Hotez...he poisoned his daughter. She has autism from vaccines, and he's super pro-vax. So that's a very typical attitude amongst these people. They're insane. Unfortunately, they have a lot of power and money, and so they act on their insanity. But we need to understand exactly what's going on here."
Latypova goes on to describe why the mRNA injections are so much more dangerous than traditional "vaccines."
"I'd say they are much more dangerous than traditional vaccines because they also contain all kinds of novel technologies. And, as I said before, the reason the manufacturers want the 21 days between two injections is because they want to document this. And the mRNA platform was new in humans. It wasn't used in humans before. And so...they knew they were gonna set off death and injury, massive death and injury. They knew, absolutely knew. There was no question about it. All they wanted to do is document how much anaphylaxis they're causing...so that then they would, you know, try to dial it back, dilute, do whatever.
So later on, we find that not as many anaphylactic reactions are recorded as the for the initial wave. So they just needed to document how many people are having this reaction. That's all...They knew that this is going to happen."
(2/4) "Through studies involving dogs... Richet demonstrated...[that after] an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."
"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)." (Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)
HOW NATO/THE IC CONTROLLED THE GLOBAL COVID RESPONSE. FREAKIN' MIND BLOWING🤯🤯🤯
"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything...the whole response...[was] NATO... Why... NATO?... They treated [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. A global war." (1/5)
Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (@Honest_Medicine) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) how NATO and the Intelligence Communities from countries like the U.S. were in charge of the global COVID "pandemic" response. Lerman, who has done extensive research into the matter, notes that President Trump was "absolutely 100% not in charge," and says he even pegged Coronavirus Task Force member Deborah Birx as "the [real] problem" because "Birx was representing the national security state within the Trump administration and within the task force."
"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything," Lerman tells Lindley. "As we know, Trump switched from saying 'it [COVID] was nothing' to saying that 'it was terrible,' you know, that we had to lock down. Then a month later, he said, 'We have to stop locking down.' The way he was talking was—or the way he was tweeting was—very interesting because he would tweet things...in all caps, [like] WE MUST OPEN UP. Right?
"[But] he's the President of the United States. You don't have to tweet, 'We must open up.' You tell everybody in your administration, 'We're gonna open up now.' If he can't do that, something's wrong. Right? He was not in charge."
Lerman goes on to say that "in Scott Atlas's book...he wrote about his time on the [COVID] task force, which was not at the beginning, so he wasn't there for the how it started, but he was there in about August [of 2020]. He did say[, however] that when he talked to Trump, Trump said to him, 'We all know who is actually the problem, and it's not Fauci. The problem is Deborah Birx.' [And that was] because Deborah Birx was representing the National Security State within the Trump administration and within the task force."
Lerman goes on to discuss the role that NATO—the intergovernmental military alliance of 30 North American and European countries, established to ensure a collective defense, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all—played in orchestrating the "pandemic" response.
"How can NATO be responding to a naturally occurring virus? Right? Why...NATO? NATO is a military alliance. The only way I believe they could have invoked NATO is because they treated it [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. [A] global war."
Lerman explains:
"They treated it that way. Whether it was...a lab leak or not, whether it was an engineered virus or not—I believe it was both of those things—but even if you don't believe that, it doesn't matter because that's what they use[d]. They said [that's what it was], and then they use[d] all the laws, all the treaties, all the agreements. There's memoranda of understanding in terms of bioweapons amongst various countries—they can invoke all of that in order to enforce a uniform response. And [that's the] uniform response...I'm now discovering in other European countries. So we now have the Dutch minister of health coming out and saying that we were actually following NATO orders during COVID. She literally said those words. And the intelligence agencies of Holland were in charge of the response. So it was exactly the same."
Furthermore, Lerman says that "we have the German RKI [Robert Koch Institute] leak, which [is] the public health institute, like HHS, that was supposed to be in charge. We also have leaked documents that show that they were also following orders from some NATO connected people, as opposed to public health officials. The public health officials, again, were just sort of the liaison between the national security apparatus and the public."
"And when you asked about the US military," Lerman adds, "[the] military industrial complex, because the U.S. is now the global superpower...in the West and as far as in Europe, and the anglosphere in the Americas, we're it. And so our military industrial complex is the military industrial complex of the West, pretty much. And so we are what fuels NATO. And so we have demilitarized Europe in a sense...so that we could be, you know, the military power in the West."
Lerman goes on to say:
"The COVID response...really crystallized how much the national has now been subsumed into the global governance structures [and] military industrial complex, which is now kind of on a global scale. So it's an interesting paradox for the military industrial complex because what did it used to do? The U.S...the military industrial complex...[used to] gain strength, gain money, gain power by doing regime changes. Which they're still doing. I mean, we see Syria. Right? And we see the Ukraine. They're doing it. But [before,] they had the whole Communist Bloc to justify their existence. Right? We have a threat. It's a mortal threat. It's an existential threat. We don't really have existential threats like that anymore. So they have to define other existential threats.
"So a virus, which we all knew was not a threat to almost anyone, all of the sudden becomes an existential threat because they decide that it is—or they define it as a bioweapon or a bio-terror attack. So actually the solution, which is the existence of this giant global biodefense industrial complex, the solution defines the problem. Like...[the way I] describe it is COVID was gonna happen whether it was SARS CoV-2 or something else. Another virus."
(2/5) Note that what Lerman describes perfectly aligns with what German journalist Paul Schreyer described in his seminal presentation showing how the COVID response had been planned by key globalist players for 20 years.
"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans...the hospitals are killing zones...I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals." (1/5)
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how there is "an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans." Fitts notes that she traveled to 26 states in 2024 and had her subscribers tell her about "loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals."
"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans," Fitts says. "I just think, you know, that the hospitals are killing zones. People are being intentionally killed. And, you know, we saw that great video from Jacqui Deevoy about how it's happening in the UK[, too]."
Fitts goes on to say:
"But out on the [Children's Health Defense] bus, [you got] stories...about people being killed, and when we were doing our Financial Transaction Freedom Tour—I was in 26 states, you know, driving all over the place. I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones or, you know, friends and family, who were literally killed by the hospitals. It's frightening."
(2/5) Here's a thread describing how doctors and nurses are slaughtering Americans in the hospitals using the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocol.
Based on death certs, John Beaudoin estimates 500K+ Americans have been killed this way.
"Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5)
Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (@Honest_Medicine) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention."
"The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention."
Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force."
"Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council."
"And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition."
Lerman goes on to say:
"Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine.
"What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health.
"So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."
(2/5) Indeed, we can look at government documents and see Lerman is correct: it was the National Security Council that was in charge of COVID policy. Fauci and everyone else at HHS were essentially administrators:
Dec 15, 2024 • 5 tweets • 5 min read
March 5, 2020—THE PENTAGON—**not Moderna or Pfizer**—talks about the "vaccines" it's developing for COVID & how "terrible things" can happen; "you may end up doing mass vaccination campaigns with a vaccine that could cause a significant amount of problems." (1/5)
Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, describes during a March 5, 2020 press conference at The Pentagon how "the science" behind making a "vaccine" can "go very quickly," but there are "vaccines" that can "cause harm."
"Just recognize that part of [our] hesitation I mean, the science can go very quickly. But you at first don't wanna do harm. Right?" Michael tells the press. "And, you know... obviously... vaccines can can cause harm, and they provide benefits. So that mixture is something you always have to look at. And so part of the hesitation to say, 'Oh, we can get a vaccine quickly,' is you need to make sure that it's really safe."
Michael goes on to say: "If you test the vaccine in 1,000 people, but one in 10,000 people is gonna have something terrible that happens. Until you get to those numbers, you may end up doing mass vaccination campaigns with a vaccine that could cause significant amount of problems. So...this needs to be a constant reassessment of the risk and the benefit."
Michael goes on to draw a ridiculous parallel between the "vaccines" for COVID and the "vaccines" for Ebola deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo:
"The other thing I would tell you, and this is sort of a really good benchmark, we were the first people that tested the vaccine that eventually got licensed by Merck... for for Ebola. Okay? That vaccine was first tested by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Five years later, it was approved by the US FDA. In the meantime, half a million souls were vaccinated with it largely in Africa during especially during the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
"So, you know, again, that was a risk–benefit assessment. The leadership in the DRC said, 'Okay. We know it's not approved yet by European medicines, um, uh, or by the US FDA, but we have a terrible outbreak of Ebola, which is highly fatal.' And so decisions were made to use that under, um, emergency use authorizations. And so, you know, there's always that kind of debate, but I think that's a good benchmark for vaccines."
(2/5) Recall that Army General Gus Perna was THE CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER FOR OPERATION WARP SPEED.
In this video, Perna describes how "OWS [was] a partnership between HHS, DOD, and the other federal organizations to develop and deliver COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics."
"Science is driving all of our decisions, we are not cutting any corners with respect to safety and efficacy. We need to do this the right way," Perna says. He notes that the supposed COVID "vaccines" were set to go "through the same rigorous trials that [are done] for every pharmaceutical."
"We have worked with the manufacturers to help them scale up operations in order to produce vaccines and therapeutics. WE HAVE PURCHASED AND SECURED THE SUPPLIES NEEDED TO DELIVER AND ADMINISTER THE DRUG," Perna adds. (Emphasis added.)
"Everything from the vials that hold the vaccine, to the syringes and needles that will be used to put shots into arms." Perna notes that OWS would utilize the DOD's "planning and logistics expertise" and that the department would function "across the supply chains, FROM MANUFACTURING TO DELIVERY." (Emphasis added.)
"But commercial industry, not the military, will physically ship and distribute the vaccines to your local areas," Perna adds, highlighting a "whole-of-America" approach.
Dec 13, 2024 • 17 tweets • 15 min read
This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread)
"[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring.
"The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.)
"The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.)
(For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.)
"On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.)
"So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?"
Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically: "We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?"
Latypova goes on to note:
"What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.)
"At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?"
Latypova concludes:
"So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.")
"And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."
(2/17) "There has been receipt of the [SARS-CoV-2] virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with." — Army Col. Wendy Sammons-Jackson, March 5, 2020
Here is the conference to which Latypova refers in the clip from her Mic Meow interview. A transcription of Sammons-Jackson's remarks regarding "growing" the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" to have "stocks available" is below:
"There has been receipt of the virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's, um, they're also doing, um, characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus, um, impacts, um, our the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, um, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit."
Also note that Army Brig. Gen. Michael J. Talley, commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, who led the March 5, 2020 conference, references the film Outbreak. (I note this because that film was clearly used as propaganda in order to prime people for the COVID scamdemic.)
Dec 11, 2024 • 9 tweets • 7 min read
DON'T LET MAHA GASLIGHT YOU: It's not the food, water, or air: the chronic disease epidemic is due to the bloody "vaccines" (1/9)
"['Vaccines' are] ticking time bombs...you inject something that turns the immune system against your own body, and it's progressive."
Inventor, scientist, and author of the seminal "Control Group study" Joy Garner describes during an interview with Vaccine Choice Canada (@VaccineChoiceCA) how "vaccines" are responsible for the chronic disease epidemic in the U.S. In this clip, Garner highlights the association of "vaccines" with a wide range of diseases and conditions, including autism, diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, etc.
Critically, Garner notes that these diseases occur at a rate of less than 1% in "unvaccinated" Americans, despite the fact they still partake in unhealthy habits, including eating junk food, using cell phones, and consuming alcohol.
Firstly in the clip, Garner notes that babies who receive the "Vitamin K shot"——an injection **supposedly** given to newborns to prevent a rare but serious bleeding disorder by aiding in blood clotting—are associated with a rate of autism of 2%; when babies receive both the K shot and "pregnancy vaccines" via their mother, however, that rate shoots up to "over 5%."
Garner notes that in adults (aged 18 and over) is where she and her colleagues "saw [a] really extreme variation in long-term health outcomes, because ['vaccines'] are like ticking time bombs." She notes that when a person receives a "vaccine," they "inject something that turns [their] immune system against [their] own body, and it's progressive."
"It can get very aggressive if you continue to vaccinate, and you can suddenly end up with something that's gonna kill you right away or that disables you right away," Garner adds. She notes, for example, that she and her colleagues "could not find a single arthritic person over the age of 18 who was entirely unvaccinated."
"This means...that cancer, arthritis, diabetes, things like this, severe diseases, are non-existent [in the 'unvaccinated'] because we just couldn't find them in our sample."
Garner notes, "We had a very robust sample of that population of interest [the 'unvaccinated']...[And] the risk of any of these diseases could not possibly be more than...well under 1%. [For diseases like] heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis."
"That's the baseline what our natural health is supposed to look like, even if we're eating bad food, even if we're drinking and smoking," Garner adds. She goes on to say:
"I got to know these entirely unvaccinated families. Just because they knew that vaccines in particular were a bad idea, and they didn't trust their doctors, they didn't trust the government, they didn't trust the FDA or the CDC, doesn't mean they weren't enjoying themselves. They're having a beer. Their kids are running around with sugary popsicles and candy bars and cell phones. And I'm like, they're so healthy, and the explanation was, you know, 'I don't worry about their diet. I don't worry [because] they don't have allergies...I'm not worried about whether or not there might be few fumes coming out of my new flooring or, you know, the wrong clothing or whatever. They're not fragile. They're so robust. They never get sick. Or when they do, it lasts for 24 hours and they're all better.'"
(2/9) Pharma insider Sasha Latypova has found the explanation for why "vaccines" are so detrimental: they work exactly IN THE OPPOSITE WAY we're told they do.
Instead of priming our immune systems to protect us, they prime our bodies for disease:
THE FATAL FLAW OF THE HEALTH FREEDOM MOVEMENT—it must admit the C19 op is planned genocide largely executed by the US military-industrial complex (1/9)
"We've uncovered the scheme of the crime...it has nothing to do with science or medicine or public health. It's...genocide."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how much of the health freedom movement still refuses to admit that the COVID operation (my term) was premeditated genocide and not just a public health response rife with supposed mistakes. Latypova notes that while many of the members of the health freedom movement are willing to say COVID was a "mismanaged health event," they won't come out and espouse the truth: that the COVID operation was, in fact, a "crime" and a "genocide."
"My biggest frustration today, and over the years, is with all sides of [the health freedom movement] trying to position this whole situation as a scientific debate or medical issue or even a public health issue. The deluded side thinks it's a virus and it's a pandemic. The side that's ostensibly health freedom side says...'Oh, yeah, it's a pandemic, but [it's just a] mismanaged public health issue.'"
"[But] it's an intentional poisoning," Latypova notes, referencing the COVID injections. "Even in 2021, I knew it was an intentional poisoning. [And] since then we've uncovered the whole scheme of the crime, the whole nature of the crime, and it has nothing to do with science or medicine or public health. It's a...genocide."
Latypova goes on to say that "if you're a truth-seeker...you have to move as the new data comes in; you have to make additional conclusions...[and yet]...the health freedom [movement]...will come to a certain point, but [go] no further." The pharma insider notes, "that's a hallmark of brand building to get political power versus seeking the truth....They [somehow] can't get past this point that this is a mismanaged health event."
Describing a key part of how the COVID genocide was committed, Latypova notes the following:
"We used to have a public health policy prior to 2018, 2019. We had a public health policy, which dealt with things like pandemics. Now, assume that this is a valid point—I personally believe pandemics do not exist, but even if you assume that this is a valid point and the government should have a policy for such situations... the policy said that Department of Health and Human Services is in charge of the policy, which is reasonable. And it also [called for] fairly reasonable public health measures, such as masking wasn't advised. There was... some quarantine measures or some advisory to stay home if you're sick, you know, some normal... public health advice. [But there were] no mandates of vaccines or anything like that.
"Now that policy was documented. [But] somehow in 2020, or maybe late 2019 or 2020, it's not clear when, [a] switch happened; that policy was replaced by a brand new policy....[one] that all of a sudden put the National Security Council in charge of pandemic policy. And that's a shocking switch. And still, only a few authors have commented on it."
Latypova goes on to say:
"The first person who identified this was Debbie Lerman, to my knowledge, and she is a journalist writing [for the Brownstone Institute]. And so she wrote several articles about it. I found the documents...referenced. She and I also found additional documents after that. So, in charge of the whole policy is the National Security Council. [And the] National Security Council is an advisory body to the President of the United States, and consists of heads of military and intelligence; it does not have any representatives from Health and Human Services on the council...[And] this has been known now for at least two or three years.
"[Yet still] everybody is pinning [the COVID crimes] on Anthony Fauci. And I'm not defending him. He's a Mengele type, and he should be prosecuted for what he did both during the AIDS [crisis] and all the years that he's done similar crimes. But he wasn't in charge of this [COVID] policy. He [was at] NIH, NIAID, and, again, had nothing to do with the policy...He was part of designing certain things, and he was an advisor; HHS played an advisory role. So, obviously, he was involved in designing certain things, and he is clearly the spokesperson for the cabal. But it's not his policy. It's the [policy of the] National Security Council [and U.S.] military and intelligence."
(2/9) The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed ****in charge of**** COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
Dec 7, 2024 • 6 tweets • 7 min read
"Now we have excess deaths and potentially lower fertility rates...and [for] South Korea, we looked at preliminary data: It looks like an extinction-level event going on there [and] that, over time, the economy will collapse." (1/6)
Former BlackRock fund manager and founding partner at Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) describes for Dr. Kelly Victory (@DrKellyVictory) on Ask Dr. Drew (@AskDrDrew) how the COVID injections' association with excess deaths and "potentially lower fertility rates" are contributing to an "extinction-level event" happening in South Korea.
"Now we have excess deaths and potentially lower fertility rates...and [in] South Korea, we looked at preliminary data, [and] it looks like an extinction-level event going on there [and] that over time the economy will collapse," Dowd says.
"[And] sure enough," he adds, "South Korea is in the news: they declared martial law. We suspect that was to cover up a currency crisis and a collapsing stock market because their central bank came out immediately and provided as much liquidity as needed."
Dowd goes on to say that the effects of the COVID injections "have real-world consequences long-term for a lot of these economies; they don't collapse overnight, but it's definitely not good."
Providing her own point of view on the issue of the COVID injections having negative effects on fertility, Victory says that "we have we clear pathophysiology that explains why these mRNA injections might be the cause. With regard to men, we know that males who receive the injections show lower sperm counts and lower sperm motility, for example." She adds, "We know that...the shots cause you to form antibodies that [are] very, very similar—almost identical—to a protein that is critical for the formation and development of the placenta."
Dr. Victory adds, "if you get one of these shots and you develop antibodies to the spike protein, at the same time, you are developing antibodies to a forming placenta, which may well explain why we're seeing increased rates of miscarriage or failures of women to be able to get pregnant in the first place."
(2/6) South Korea "vaccinated" ~88% of its total population with the COVID injections by August 2023; for ages 18 and up, rates were between ~90 and ~99%.
"My speculation on [UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson's murder] is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of [an ongoing DOJ investigation], and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company." (1/6)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) speculates on a recent episode of The Shannon Joy Show (@ShannonJoyRadio) as to the real reason UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was recently murdered. Highlighting a gargantuan ransomware attack that targeted the health insurance and benefits corporation—which is a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare Group—earlier this year, Latypova notes that "there's ongoing...litigation about that," which has already cost the company "several billion dollars"—not including whatever forthcoming settlement there may be.
"[Thompson's] the CEO of the company that processes most of the Medicare and Medicaid claims, all kinds of insurance claims, in the United States," Latypova notes. "About a year ago, there was a breach of data. They got hijacked, ransomware. They had to pay a ransomware bribe and that also went sideways. There was a data breach exposed, about hundred million Americans [had] their healthcare data, their Social Security numbers [exposed]. And so there's litigation ongoing about that. They already spent several billion dollars on that litigation, and that's before even the settlement."
Latypova goes on to say that UnitedHealthcare is "also under investigation by the Department of Justice, which [is] also looking into all of this. And so [Thompson] was meeting with the investors, walked out in the morning, and then was gunned down right after that." The pharma insider adds, "my speculation on this is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of this, and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company."
"Because it's such a huge company, such huge data that they're processing, they have to be connected to the same cabal...that's running this whole global thing," Latypova adds, referencing the ongoing global COVID operation (my term).
(2/6) In May of this year, UnitedHealthcare Group CEO Andrew Witty testified before Congress regarding the ransomeware attack. Change Healthcare, the hacked division of UNH, processes $1.5 TRILLION in medical claims annually.
Witty—the CEO of the company that had revenues of $324 billion in 2023—apologized over the attack, which took place because one or more employees was/were not using two-factor authentication and had their credentials stolen by the hackers.
🔥🔥"All chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of vaccines. It's not because of what you eat...We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children."🔥🔥 (1/5)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Michael Farris (@CoffeeandaMike) how it is LITERALLY NOT POSSIBLE TO VACCINATE people—against anything, for any reason. Latypova highlights the work of Nobel Prize winner—and eugenicist—Charles Richet, which showed conclusively that anytime a protein—of any type—is injected into a person's bloodstream, it primes their body for an anaphylactic reaction the next time they're injected with (or even, possibly, consume) that protein.
Richet "quickly realized that you don't have to inject a toxin to produce [anaphylaxis]," Latypova says. "You can inject safe things like milk, like, corn, soy derivatives, albumins, gelatin. So anything that you think is safe to eat, if you inject it, a protein directly into the bloodstream, you can produce this effect."
Latypova notes: "This is how people have lactose intolerance. All the peanut allergies are because of this. The Alpha-gal, this effect [meat allergies] it's another type of allergy that's because of the gelatin injections. And so there's a variety of different reactions. They all boil down to the same thing: You got injected with the protein directly into the bloodstream."
"So all chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of the vaccines. It's not because of what you eat," the retired pharma executive adds. She goes on to say:
"To produce the same damage through food, you need decades, and you need really bad habits. And you sometimes you might not even get But with one shot of a newborn, you can produce this effect for life. So that's why I'm saying, all this debate about food, throw it out of the window doesn't matter. We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children through this. The food effects are secondary."
Furthermore, Latypova says that "the work of Charles Richet and his Nobel Prize definitively says that it's not possible to vaccinate. Vaccination is not possible. There are no safe vaccines." She adds:
"You can't do it because we have this fundamental law of nature that works against it. You can't inject proteins directly into the bloodstream. And everybody denies it. The whole medical establishment denies that this exists, that this knowledge is available. They deny it. They call it different names. They give it different categories. They hide the data. They ban us everywhere. They say we're cranks and anti-vaxxers, and we're just crazy, and we're killing grandma. And so this whole establishment is working as one unit to suppress this information."
This is why food is the new focus among the (usurped) freedom health movement, Latypova notes.
"That's why they're telling you, 'Oh, it's food...you need to ban corn syrup ban dyes or you know? And that's why in California, they label everything with proposition 65 so that you think that everything around you causes cancer. And that's not true. Cancer is caused by injections through the same mechanism. So, anyway, so that's what I want people to understand. And I wrote several articles about it. I linked Richet's work...As I said, you can find his book and you can read about it and it will become extremely clear what's going on. And that's why, you know, it's so important to stay on the vaccines and not get into these diversions of, you know, let's ban different types of food."
(2/5) Indeed, when we look at "vaccinated" vs. "unvaccinated" Americans, we find that the "unvaccinated" are FAR healthier—in every respect. This would not be the case if food were the problem re: chronic diseases.
"They [hospitals] murdered a lot of people. MORE THAN A MILLION [1,000,000] PEOPLE. The CARES Act...is basically a solicitation of fraud." (Emphasis added.)
In this clip from a recent Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Live (@VacSafety) video electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for a Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy in New Hampshire how deadly COVID "treatment" protocols implemented by the CARES Act—signed into law by President Trump in March 2020—resulted in the deaths of more than a million (1,000,000) Americans.
Note this testimony was given in April of 2024 and that the deadly COVID protocols continue to this day in the hospitals.
---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"I can look at CMS(.)gov. Okay? You go to CMS(.)gov and look for NCTAP. That's a COVID payout plan, and you'll find that Olumiant, which is baricitinib, or Veklury, which is remdesivir, has a 20% adder to the entire hospital bill," Beaudoin tells the NH COVID committee. "They murdered a lot of people. More than a million people.
So the CARES Act...is basically a solicitation of fraud.
Walter E. Williams said it, but probably also said by Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, if you subsidize something, you'll get more of it. And since they subsidized COVID being put on a death certificate, thinking somehow they're convincing the people that that's gonna save people. How is that gonna save somebody? But that's what they did.
"People being put on ventilators, that's an 86% kill rate. 86% of people die, get put on ventilators. And they did it to people who whose vital signs were normal, and they died."
@VacSafety As Beaudoin notes in the clip, hospitals are rewarded a 20% "add-on payment" if they use VEKLURY (remdesivir) or Olumiant (barcitinib).
Remdesivir is known to be wildly toxic—see tweet after next.
-Celia Farber, "an investigative historian of deep-fake virus agendas, from 'HIV' to 'Covid-19'": "Absolutely." (1/6)
In this clip from an interview with Tina Griffin (@Ctr_CultureMom), Celia Farber (@BarrierTruth), one of the most experienced investigative reporters on the planet in regard to the HIV/AIDS saga, describes how HIV as the cause of AIDS has been a scam. Farber, who has conducted decades of research into this topic, notes that scientists originally thought that a retrovirus as the cause of AIDS was "BS." Farber also notes that Robert Gallo's research assistant "tested the blood sample in question [supposedly linking HIV to AIDS and] found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing."
Regarding Robert Gallo's now-famous (or infamous...) 1984 media announcement linking HIV to AIDS, Farber says the following:
"The man who stood before hundreds of cameras at a press conference in 1984 was Robert Gallo, wearing tinted dark aviator glasses and saying...that he had found the cause of AIDS in his lab, that it was a great moment for American science and virology. And those scientists who I interviewed over the coming years, one of them, for example, the doctor Harvey Bialy, the editor of Biotechnology, he said, 'I didn't go to that conference. None of us went to that conference. We just said, oh, a retrovirus as if the cause of AIDS, that's just more Robert Gallo BS. We're not [going]...that'll never fly. That's just Robert Gallo being Robert Gallo.' And he [Gallo] was known as a low-ranking, corrupt, and corruptible scientist who was always very ambitious, very domineering and manipulative, who always was trying to attach his laboratory discovered viruses to novel diseases, sometimes as far as away as Japan. [Gallo would say,] 'Oh, this one causes this rare leukemia. This one causes that.' So he was known for that."
(For reference, Robert Gallo is an American biomedical researcher known for his role in the—supposed—discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS. In 1984, Gallo was a researcher at the National Cancer Institute.)
"The real scientists," Farber notes, "didn't even go to the press conference, never dreamed it [Gallo's retrovirus explanation] would fly. But what was there that day was the cameras, the media, and they had been given the memo, let's call it, [not to] question this. Within, I believe, it was 24 hours, it went from the probable cause of AIDS has been found in The New York Times to the cause of AIDS has been found."
Farber adds, "I would say within 72 hours, you were an evil, homophobic, terrible, crazy person if you wondered, 'Did Gallo prove it? What proof did he have?' He not only had no proof, we had the opposite of proof."
Contrary to what Gallo was espousing at the time, Farber says that "his lab assistant had tested the blood sample in question, found no retroviral activity, no retroviral particles, no cause of AIDS, no AIDS virus, nothing. It was a big nothing-burger, and he said so in his report, but he was scared."
Farber adds:
"You can see that, you can see the documents I'm talking about. Gallo crosses out what his lab assistant wrote, 'nothing here,' and reverses it and says that it's [the blood sample] full of retrovirus, the cause of AIDS, the pathogenic, etcetera. So that fraudulent, reverse-engineered original data by Gallo that he fraudulently drummed into existence went in as the four foundation papers in Science Magazine. And from henceforth, all the hundreds of millions, later billions into the trillions that went into fraudulent deadly AIDS research always reference those four papers. So they just build a floor of fraud and then the rest is history."
(2/6) Note that HIV as the cause of AIDS was completely picked apart and exposed as fraudulent science in the documentary film House of Numbers. (Farber was interviewed in the film.)
DEAR DOGE (@DOGE): If you really want to "ensure [our] tax dollars will be spent wisely," find the $20+ TRILLION the Department of Defense has stolen from American taxpayers. (1/7)
In this clip from a recent interview with Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio), investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts notes that if the incoming Trump administration "really wanted to reform the Deep State," it would start with the $21 trillion of missing taxpayer money; $20+ trillion of which has been stolen by the Department of Defense.
Fitts describes a "financial coup" that began in the U.S. in 1998, when the Deep State began disappearing U.S. taxpayer money from the federal government's coffers.
"In fiscal 1998 HUD was missing $59 billion dollars in the first year. And then by 9/11, the federal government, mostly DOD, was missing approximately $4 trillion dollars," the former HUD official says. "Then, when 9/11 happened, the day before 9/11, [Secretary of Defense under the George Bush administration] Donald Rumsfeld got up and confessed that the DOD was missing $2.3 trillion. And then 9/11 happened, and everybody sort of forgot about the missing money."
"I kept saying," Fitts adds, "we've got to pay attention to
the missing money because, essentially, most of this is
being financed out of our pension funds and retirement funds. And if we don't address this, we won't have enough money to meet our obligations under the retirement system unless we lower life expectancy.
And in fact, a lot of the Great Poising started at the same time."
Regarding this Great Poisoning—that is, increasing environmental toxins, injecting people with toxins via "vaccines," and debasing the food supply—Fitts adds:
"If you look at U.S. life expectancy, when the financial coups started, life expectancy started to fall and diverge with the other 19 industrial top industrial countries. And that accelerated with the pandemic. And what we are watching is a systematic lowering of life expectancies,
which is part of dealing with this financial problem.
So if you can't balance the books with full funding, you
balance the books by lowering the drain that the population is taking out of the out of the retirement system."
Furthermore, Fitts notes that "[We] have not seen the
new or the incoming administration talk about the money that's missing from the federal government." The investment banker also says that the quarantine camps that have been built in New York State have nothing to do with quarantining sick people, and, instead, are there to imprison anybody in finance who would dare to speak up about this multi-trillion-dollar theft and fraud by the U.S. government.
Regarding that topic, Fitts says:
"Well, what it's very funny when [New York State attorney] Bobbie Anne Cox told me about her litigation, I said, 'Bobbie, that has nothing to do with health. That has to do with you're the New York Fed, and you need to make sure that every financial person and hedge fund manager does what you tell them to do. And if they don't, you need to be able to kidnap them.'
"That's what that health regulation is about...You can't afford for one hedge fund manager to implode the entire international financial system. Do you really want a hedge fund manager standing up on the Solari show or The Shannon Joy show and talking about how they've just laundered out another trillion through the BIS [Bank of International Settlements] and they're stealing it?"
(2/7) Note that the Pentagon has just failed its 7th audit in a row:
"The Pentagon on Friday failed its seventh audit in a row, with the nation’s largest government agency still unable to fully account for its more than $824 billion budget, though officials stress they are making good progress toward a clean audit in 2028."
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not." (1/5)
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record [re: the COVID jabs] and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients."
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (@MdBreathe), a physician who is board-certified in both Otolaryngology and Sleep Medicine, describes for Michael Farris (@CoffeeandaMike) how Casey and Calley Means (@CaseyMeansMD)(@calleymeans) and their "food group" refuse to go on record regarding the COVID injections. Casey and Calley Means have become burgeoning stars of the MAHA—Make America Healthy Again—movement, appearing on blockbuster platforms such as Joe Rogan's podcast and the Tucker Carlson Network; yet, for some reason, they largely focus on food as opposed to "vaccines."
"What's frustrating about Calley and Casey Means, and...their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots...I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking [him to] just to go on record, and he will not," Bowden tells Farris. The physician says that she has spoken with Calley on the phone twice, yet "he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why...I'm trying to give him some sort of purity test [regarding the COVID injections]."
Bowden notes that she's also DM'd Casey Means here on X multiple times, but hasn't received any response.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]," Bowden says. "They truly believe that the COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market...[or] maybe they are being influenced by...Big Pharma. Maybe Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious."
Furthermore, Bowden says that "Dr." Marty Makary (@MartyMakary), who has also become a MAHA centerpiece, will also not come out on record regarding the COVID injections. In fact, as of August 2023, Makary was still telling *pregnant women* to get the enormously dangerous jabs.
Partial transcription of clip:
"I mean, COVID is a big litmus test. And if you are
quiet on it, that's all I need to know. I mean, even that's what's frustrating about the Calley and Casey Means,
and their little group. Their food group is they will not go on record to talk about the COVID shots.
"And I have pushed I've had two conversations with [Calley] Means on the phone asking them just to go on record, and and he will not. And I don't understand
that because it's there's, you know, there'll be a lot
of support for that. And I told him, I said, we support your message. We just want you to support ours in kind.
And and why he can't or they can't do that is bizarre.
"I've also reached out to Marty Makary, who is a pancreatic surgeon who's talking about this food issue, and I've asked him to go on record and can't get that from him. In fact, he had a tweet in 2023 talking
about how he recommends the COVID shots for pregnant patients. And he seems to have the ear of Trump and Kennedy, which is concerning.
"There's a couple options [why they won't speak out about the COVID injections]. They truly believe that COVID shots are safe and effective, and they don't think that they should be taken off the market. That's that's how you would that's sort of interpreting that on the surface. Maybe they are being influenced by, you know, Big Pharma. Maybe their their Big Pharma has asked them to come in and distract everybody. That that's another possibility. But either way, you know, the fact that they can't make any kind of statement about it one way or the other is suspicious.
"I DM'd her. She's an ENT. She went to Stanford,
which I did too. And I reached out to her several times, friendly. You know, saying, hey. You know, I said I love your book. I I'd love to connect. Zero response. Sent her a couple other messages. No response, which is odd...
And then I yeah. And I had phone conversations with
her brother because her her brother didn't like me calling out the the fact that they weren't talking about COVID. So he wanted to have a phone conversation with me, but I still can't get him to talk about COVID.
"Well, the first one [phone call] was very heated.
It was... I don't think it was very productive. And the second one was calmer. But it was a lot of it just didn't have I wanted you know, he could have said what I was hoping he would say was, "Okay. We are we are pushing food because we're trying to get Trump in office, and we feel like this is a way to do that more effectively. And if we talk about the vaccines and we're we're scared we're gonna, you know, push off voters.' Right? That's what I was hoping he would say. He didn't say that. I mean, he just he just basically kept talking about food and doesn't understand why he, you know, thinks that I'm trying
to give him some sort of purity test and he's not going to do that. And I just said, you know, this the analogy is, you know, my my primary message is about COVID and the pandemic, but I talk about other things like the trans movement. I talk about other things, you know, abortion. I talk about other things I authentically feel like, you know, that I authentically believe in even if
it's not directly related to COVID. And I said, that's what
I don't understand with you. If you authentically believe
in COVID or against the COVID shots, then why can't you just state that?
"And and if you do that on Twitter, that's all you need to do. I mean, even, you know, a few things. It doesn't have to be, you know, your whole message at all. It's just it's just indicative if you say nothing about it, that there's a
there's a reason behind that."
(2/5) Note that Dr. Bowden's concerns regarding Casey and Calley Means—and their MAHA "food group"—seem to echo the same concerns Dr. Peter McCullough has described previously:
"I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients [in the COVID jabs] have something to do with loading the equivalent of an operating system in your body... they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the internet." (1/5)
Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes for Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) how she believes that the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) can only serve one (or both) of two purposes: to either poison people or inject into their bodies "mysterious ingredients."
These "mysterious ingredients," Fitts notes, she believes are likely to be the components required to hook people's bodies up to the cloud and the internet—in effect, creating "an operating system" in people's bodies.
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]," Fitts tells Hunter. "That's because they wanna get mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients. For the other, it's because they wanna poison you."
"We're just about to come out with, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes [author of “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations and The War for Technocracy, Volume 1] called Omniwar," Fitts says. "And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of Things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet."
Fitts adds: "It's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?...And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each person, one person at a time and use AI and software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control."
Partial transcription of clip:
"There are only two reasons that I know of that anybody would wanna give you an mRNA shot, including the COVID-19 [shot]. That's because they wanna get
mysterious ingredients in your body. You know, there's lots of questions about the mysterious ingredients.
For the other, it's because they wanna poison you.
"Those are the only two reasons for giving anybody a COVID-19 shot or any mRNA shot. So, you know, I've always suspected that the mysterious ingredients
have something to do with loading the equivalent of an
operating system in your body.
"We're just about to come out with a, in the beginning of November, a new big publication by David Hughes called Omniwar. And in it, David goes, through all the DARPA and NASA and Harvard sort of technology and patents and research on how to integrate our bodies into the Internet of things. So they're literally trying to get components into our body to hook us up to the cloud and the Internet.
"It's quite, I mean, it's quite gruesome, but you need to understand that that is the level of control these guys want. I mean, think about it. Bill Gates made a fortune loading an operating system into your computer and then making you update it constantly because of viruses. It's the same model. Right?
"This is omniwar is World War 3. We are in a war.
And you have to understand that the way the globalists intend to centralize control is not by collapsing countries, but if they can literally get control of each
person, one person at a time and use AI and
software to control them, you know, forget the sovereign governments. This is how you take control.
If they can essentially create money that runs the fiscal side of the house and can manage people at a one-on-one level, then you can control the entire globe one person at a time. That's what they're up to. You have to read Omniwar. It's great."
(2/5) NOW, plenty of people think the nanotech-in-the-jabs thing is bogus. HOWEVER, there are some very odd videos that need splainin'.
Like this one from physician Dr. David Nixon showing "robot arms" assembling "organized chip structures" in the contents of Pfizer's jab.
Oct 17, 2024 • 6 tweets • 6 min read
WOW! Military whistleblower data shows that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. (1/5)
Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a former Battalion Commander in the U.S. Army, describes for Michael Nevradakis of Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) some disturbing facts revealed by "The Remdesivir Papers"—a document assembled by an anonymous U.S. military whistleblower (known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay) and investigative journalist J.M. Phelps (@JMPhelpsLC). The document divulges data derived from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System (JTS) that's not otherwise not available to the public.
The Remdesivir Papers asks the question: "Are U.S. military treatment facilities and others hiding, or manipulating, the deadly results of clinical trials and more surrounding the controversial drug [remdesivir] purported to be a treatment for COVID-19?"
In this clip, Miller notes that the NIAID—that is, the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (the government agency that Anthony Fauci used to head)—sponsored four trials for remdesivir—an antiviral drug patented by the pharma giant Gilead—which found the drug "resulted in a minimal positive effect on instances of all-cause mortality and serious adverse side events when compared to the administration of a placebo" (quote from The Remdesivir Papers) despite "significant methodological questions that we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials" (Miller's wording).
A fifth trial, however, was conducted by Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA) in conjunction with Gilead.
"Headquartered in Foster City, California, Gilead agreed to provide remdesivir for the treatment of DOD personnel exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the causative viral pathogen of COVID-19," The Remdesivir Papers notes.
Note that while Miller says that "of those 941 individuals that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died," The Remdesivir Papers states something slightly different: it evinces data that 64% of the 941 service members who died of/with COVID in military treatment facilities/other civilian facilities between March 2020 and March 2024 were "treated" with remdesivir. Meaning not all 941 service members were administered remdesivir.
Despite this caveat, it is still extraordinary—and extraordinarily disturbing—that of the 941 service members who (supposedly) died of/with COVID between March 2020 and March 2024, 64% were given remdesivir.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Now in addition to those four trials that were sponsored by NIAID, there is a fifth trial that is mentioned in the remdesivir papers, but this one was sponsored by the military, specifically a unit out of Fort Detrick, Maryland that is known as the US Army
Medical Research and Development Command.
It sponsored a trial. We know that that trial was conducted. However, there is no information that
is publicly available about the findings of that clinical trial.
"So we might ask ourselves, why? So we have these
four trials from NIAID. They appear to present remdesivir in at least a minimally positive light, but there seem to be some significant methodological questions that
we might ask ourselves about the conduct of the trials.
So we take those four trials. We then look at them alongside this fifth trial sponsored by a military unit, and yet there's no publicly available data. Why?
"Now in addition to all of that, with these five trials, we
then have information that comes directly from a military whistleblower who presents information that tells us that over a four-year period from March
of 2020 to March of 2024, a significant number
of people in the wider military community were administered remdesivir. And of those 941 individuals
that were administered remdesivir, 601 of them died.
That's a, uh, that's a death rate of 64%.
"So what caused their deaths? Was it the remdesivir directly? Were there other factors? Should we know?
Should we at least be asking questions? And can we trust the fact that the DOD has not been forthcoming with this information?"
@BradMiller1010 A link to The Remdesivir Papers:
"The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction....the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce." (1/12)
DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Del Bigtree (@delbigtree) on a recent episode of The HighWire (@HighWireTalk) how the COVID bioweapon injections (my term) cause immense, all-encompassing damage to the human reproductive system—specifically the female reproductive system.
In fact, Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "The centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction... [i.e.] the 360-degree ways in which this [COVID] injection damages the human ability to reproduce."
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And [that's why] I say 360-degree damage, it's [because] they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse every membrane in the human body [and] that includes the placenta."
Wolf goes on to note that "not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and... creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get nutrients and oxygen."
"I've called this Mengele science and I say that advisedly," The Pfizer Papers editor adds. "[There are] charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. Twelve thousand (12,000) women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. Eighty-five-hundred (8,500) are passing tissue. Ten-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. Eighty-five-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, [these are charts] showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale."
Partial transcription of clip:
"In the documents. But what really jumps out is that you'd expect that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents would be concerns about respiratory reactions because this is ostensibly a respiratory infection, COVID. But there's very little about that. And the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents is all about sex and pregnancy and menstruation and human reproduction. Completely centered on that. And the 360-degree ways in which this injection damages the human ability to reproduce.
"All their focus is on reproduction. The centerpiece of their focus is reproduction. And it's when I say 360-degree damage, it's they knew, because it's been known for 10 years, that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned,
traverse every membrane in the human body. So that includes the placenta. So not only are they blocking women's ovaries with this material, but they knew that they were degrading the placenta, that the lipid nanoparticles are compromising placentas and making it more creating calcifications, making it more difficult for the babies in utero to get, nutrients and oxygen.
"And so, some of the midwives that we've interviewed and Dr. James Thorp (@jathorpmfm), a fetal maternal medicine specialist, who's one of the few who's spoken out, they are independently confirming that there are nettings of calcifications now in vaccinated women's placentas that keep the baby from growing to term. And also they have to deliver babies early, as a result.
"A midwife named Ellen Jasmer sent me photographs
and independently confirmed by another midwife showing that placentas now vaccinated women are like flat and not well provided with blood vessels as
opposed to the I mean not to get graphic but a baby needs like a cushy well provided with blood vessels
placenta to grow and come to term. And so the placentas are in such terrible shape that, maternal deaths are up 40% because women are hemorrhaging. the placentas are falling apart. Let alone the babies, are suffering as well. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles,
go into the babies in utero and degrade the membranes around the testes of baby boys in utero if their moms are vaccinated. And that degrades the Sertoli cells
and Leydig cells, which are the factories of masculine development, masculine hormones. So we don't know when those babies turn, you know, become adolescents
and grow up into men. Those are the hormones that turn on like deep voices, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father a child.
"So we don't know if those baby boys will even be able to grow up into normal men who can be fertile. Pfizer knew that they were destroying women's menstrual cycles. You remember that's how the price story started.
Just just people accounts of women's own bodies. Well, it turns out they didn't want women to know that that was true. There's now a 13–20% drop in live births according to government databases in Western Europe and North America. And, in the Pfizer documents, there's something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report. It's 8 pages long. And it has charts of that Pfizer was keeping.
And I've called this Mengele a science and I say that advisedly. Charts that show 15,000 women have two menses a month. 12,000 women are not bleeding at all. You know, 10,000 women are hemorrhaging agonizingly. 8,500 are passing tissue. 10-year-old girls menstruating upon being injected. 85-year-old women menstruating upon being injected. I mean, this complete this chart showing this complete ruination of women's health at industrial scale. And I was mocked and mocked and mocked and deplatformed, but now multiple peer reviewed studies have come out conceding that, yes, on average women's menses have changed if they've been vaccinated."
"And so you don't have to be a scientist. All you need is eighth grade biology to know that if women's menstrual cycles are being damaged, their fertility is being damaged. And that's what we're seeing."
(2/12) A study from 2012 showing that lipid nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
An animal study from Japan showing that the LNPs from Pfizer's C19 jab go all throughout the body, including the ovaries+testes+uterus: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…
Oct 13, 2024 • 4 tweets • 6 min read
REMINDER: Only the HHS Secretary's say-so has been necessary to get the C19 bioweapon jabs made available. The FDA "approval" process was UTTER FRAUD AND THEATER.
NO CLINICAL TRIALS ARE POSSIBLE WITH EUA COUNTERMEASURES (Proof w/ links in next 2 tweets.)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for The Tennessee Informer (@TNinformer) how nothing was required to get the COVID bioweapon injections—often falsely and wrongly referred to as "vaccines"—made available to the public (i.e. victims) save for the say-so of the HHS Secretary. As Latypova has told us for years now, the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections, as well as the FDA "approval" for the bioweapons, has been utter fraud and theater.
"[The] only way these products [the C19 jab poisons] go on the market is based on the opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. The HHS Secretary who says, 'In my opinion, they may be effective,'" Latypova says. "That's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway."
"In the US law [the HHS Secretary] does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with whoever he wants to consult," the pharma insider adds. "And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor."
Furthermore, Latypova adds, "the FDA did a bait-and-switch. The FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required."
Note that the HHS Secretary—at the time, it was Alex Azar, under Trump—declared a "public health emergency" when there were only 11 cases of "COVID" in the U.S. and no deaths. It was this "emergency" that ultimately allowed for the rollout of the C19 jab bioweapons.
Partial transcription of clip:
"Only way these products go on the market is based on opinion of one person: the HHS Secretary. HHS Secretary who says, in my opinion, they may be effective. And that's it. That's the entire regulatory pathway.
"So there are ostensible reasons and then, you know, what I think the reasons are, real reasons. But, you know, people will call me conspiracist for it. but this is based on, you know, over over 3 or 4 years of
investigating this and looking into, US law going back for 200 years, to the 1700s and figuring out, you know, all
these vaccine related laws in the US.
"So the ostensible reason for this introduction of this piece of legislation, was, 'Oh, you know, if there is a really dire situation, if we get attacked with a nuclear bomb or we get attacked with, like, some really bad chemical weapons or something, then, we should have an ability for the government to roll out whatever treatments, even if they are not approved and and haven't gone through proper regulatory channels of approval, which is because of the emergency and urgency. We can just roll out anything that we have and give it to people.' And, of course, there is no way to mandate these products. It's also, in the in the law, it says that you can't mandate the use of these products. You can make them available.
"In the in the US law, no. He does not have to give any reasons. It's only his opinion. He can consult with, whoever he wants to consult. And by the way, the HHS Secretary is a lawyer. He's not a doctor. But his opinion
is enough for every man, woman, and child to be injected with these monstrosities, with these poisons.
but, anyway so, like, I'm telling you the ostensible reason was because if it's if there is a dire emergency, end of the world, we get nuclear bomb, well, you
know, we you can't require that every treatment that we were gonna offer is going to go through the clinical trials.
But you have to tell the people. Right? And you can't mandate these these things. So now you see, the FDA
did a bait and switch. FDA and HHS and, you know, everybody involved, did a bait-and-switch. So these products went on the market using this EUA countermeasures pathway where nothing is required.
"So, here, on this slide, this is the slide, by the way, from FDA. It's not I didn't make this. This is from this comes from the FDA. This is their own flowchart of how these products go on the market. I only put the yellow
box as a notation. And, you can see that what I just said that, the this is the entire regulatory pathway of how
these products get on the market. first, you need the emergency declaration. An emergency declaration can be issued by the DOD, DHS, HHS, so they can declare some sort of emergency. In this case, we had, we had
HHS declare a public health emergency.
"And then, the HHS Secretary writes the declaration
saying that in my opinion, circumstances exist that
justify having a national public health emergency.
this declaration for COVID was made when we had maybe 11 cases in the US and no deaths. But that declaration was made based on nothing. Absolutely nothing. He said it's the end of the world. We have to and and public health emergency declaration is equivalent to declaring war on US territory legally.
Slide **FROM THE FDA** showing nothing was required to get the C19 jab bioweapons made available to the public save for the HHS Secretary's say-so.
No evidence. No trials. No proof they save lives or prevent hospitalizations. Nothing.
