Post

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Aug 6

Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea (@DrAnaMihalcea) describes for Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson (@LauraLynnTT) how she—as well as other doctors and researchers—has found "self-assembling nanotechnology" in dental anesthetics, insulin, and people's blood.

Mihalcea, an internist with a PhD in pathology, notes that there is a concerted effort to deploy nanotechnology on the population via the healthcare system, highlighting one particular document produced by the U.S. Army, dubbed "Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD." The document notes that "One can...assume that aspects of cyborg capabilities will be enabled through the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, or any number of emerging technologies."

Furthermore, Mihalcea notes that this plan to merge humans with nanotechnology stems from the idea of transhumanism, which, she says, stems from eugenics.

@DrAnaMihalcea @LauraLynnTT Link to Cyborg Soldier document:

Note the document discusses "neural implant technology" consisting of "nanoparticles that can be directed through an external force." wespenrevideos.com/wp-content/upl…

@DrAnaMihalcea @LauraLynnTT Lots of studies on nanotechnology and dental anesthetics/implants:

1:

2:

3: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jun 23

"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product [EUA C19 jabs] here as this product here ['fully approved' C19 jabs]...? Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."

"[T]here is a...coup going on, and...the coup is worldwide." (1/5)

Brad Miller (@BradMiller1010), a resigned former Army officer and American constitutionalist, describes for Ryan Cristian (@TLAVagabond) how the military, under the leadership of Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, pulled off a con of sorts when it mandated the COVID-19 injections for the military. Miller highlights the fact that the COVID injections that the FDA (supposedly) approved were never made available to the military, and therefore it was an EUA product that was mandated by Austin—something that is illegal.

"I think at...top levels of government, I think they were knowingly complicit," Miller tells Cristian. Miller, who recently published a viral post here on X showcasing a "Declaration of Military Accountability" that acts as a clarion call for the American people to "do everything lawfully within [their] power to stop the willful destruction of [their] military by its own leadership," adds: "I think the Secretary of Defense [Lloyd Austin] was smart enough that when he put out his initial memo...it [was] far less problematic than actually what happened."

Austin said in his initial COVID-injection mandate memo, Miller says, that "'fully FDA approved products will...be used.'" Miller notes, "when you look at that, it's like, OK, we may not like this, but legally, this is far less problematic than the actual implementation, which, of course, was only possible if you're using EUA products, because there were no fully FDA approved products."

"Do I believe there was willful collusion between the FDA and DOD to misrepresent this product here as this product here, or at least something that could be interchangeably used in place of it?" Miller asks rhetorically. "Yes, I believe that was willful collusion."

The resigned former Army officer, who left the military due to the COVID-injection mandate, adds that "it's much bigger than just the military, it's much bigger than just the United States...I think, to some degree, there is a...coup going on, and I think the coup is worldwide."

Miller goes on to say:

"Wars don't always look the way that we kind of have come to think that wars look. And a coup doesn't always necessarily consist of a singular one-and-done event. And I think what's happening in our country, [and] you could also extrapolate across the world...I think we're in the midst of kind of ongoing coup. And that ongoing coup, which I think has been decades in the making, maybe longer, is punctuated by like, certain discrete events. But none of those singular events is a full one-and-done coup like [you'd normally] think of."

Miller adds:

"[W]e're in the midst of something far more subtle. And it's far more incrementalist. But it doesn't mean that there aren't kind of these, singular events that kind of move us into a deeper phase of the coup. I think COVID was one of those. I think 9/11 was one of those. And I don't think you get to a COVID without a 9/11 two decades prior."

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1787555843497476562

(2/5) Note that Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) has said that "our military establishment...are the professional brainwashers" and it brainwashed gov't employees into thinking the C19 jabs are safe/effective.

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1787555843497476562

(3/5) Note that the *literal* CEO of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) was U.S. Army General Gus Perna.

Also note that Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act was originally dismissed as the govt ordered a “large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration **that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices ('GCP') or related FDA regulations."** (Direct from the ruling.) In Pfizer's deal with the DOD, the DOD asked for a "demonstration" of a "prototype."

Source:

Source: iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df…
iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df…

Read 6 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jun 13

(1/9) OB/GYN and functional medicine practitioner Dr. Margaret Christensen describes for @ChildrensHD a huge list of C19 jab-related illnesses she's observed, including:

For women:

"women with all kinds of abnormal bleeding"
"ovarian cysts"
"massive...heavy bleeding episodes."
"massive amounts of infertility."
three fetal deaths (even though Christensen doesn't do obstetrics currently)
"very abnormal placentas"
postmenopausal bleeding that's "bizarre"

For men:
"Unbelievably low testosterone levels"
"significant changes in sperm morphology"
"libido issues"
depression

In both men and women, Christensen highlights: "excessive brain fog"
cardiovascular events from heart attacks to strokes
"bizarre blood clots"
"horrendous" mental health challenges
neurodegenerative changes
rapid onset dementia
"massive amounts of autoimmune issues" including recurrence of infections and new infections

@ChildrensHD (2/9) Here is a list of 7 studies that show ample evidence of the COVID-19 injections negatively affecting women’s menstrual cycles:

sensereceptornews.com/?p=3908

@ChildrensHD (3/9) A study published in the journal Science Advances finds that 42% of surveyed women with regular menstrual cycles bled more heavily than usual after being "vaccinated" against COVID-19:

sensereceptornews.com/?p=8977

Read 9 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jun 11

🚨H1N1 Bird Flu 'Vaccines' Linked to Alarming Safety Signals in VAERS for 'Intra-Uterine Deaths' (Stillbirths), Spontaneous Abortions, and Decrease in Key Human Reproduction Hormone (1/5)

(Are the 'bird flu' vaccines actually covert infertility injections?🤔)

In this discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. pharmaceutical researcher and scientist Craig Paardekooper describes an analysis he did concerning H1N1 bird flu "vaccines" and their rates of adverse events reported to VAERS. He describes how he discovered alarming safety signals for "intra-uterine deaths" (stillbirths), spontaneous abortions, and a decrease in a key human reproduction hormone dubbed "hCG."

In this first clip, Paardekooper says that the two bird flu vaccines with reports in VAERS (the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) "have the absolute highest and strongest safety signal for intra-uterine death." Paardekooper notes this means "the baby is being destroyed while it's in the womb, after conception, while it's a fetus."

For the two H1N1 vaccines analyzed, Paardekooper says that one has a safety signal of 119, while the other has a safety signal of 64. On average, Paardekooper notes that this amounts to "100 times greater [incidence] than other vaccines for causing intra-uterine death." I.e. stillbirths.

From a report Paardekooper published on this analysis:

"The incidence of stillbirth with H1N1 Bird Flu vaccine has a confidence interval where the upper limit is 253.8, and the lower limit is 119.51. This means that there is a 95% chance that the incidence of still birth will be higher than 119.51 times. It also means that 5% of the time it will even be higher than 253.8 times."

Paardekooper adds that both of the H1N1 flu "vaccines" in VAERS also use the same toxin, which adds confirmation that they are indeed responsible for the safety signal.

The fact both "vaccines" use the same toxin is "confirmation, because you have the two toxins belonging to the same drug...It's like they confirm each other," Paardekooper says.

Paardekooper also links the H1N1 vaccines in VAERS to spontaneous abortions, which he notes "is another criteria for lower birthrate." (2/5)

"Both of the H1N1 vaccines come [out] at the top, again," Paardekooper says in regard to incidence of spontaneous abortion. He describes that he's found they're five to six times more likely to be associated with this adverse event signal versus other vaccines in VAERS.

The WHO has previously developed anti-fertility "vaccines" and published research "with the specific aim of targeting human reproduction in order to produce depopulation." (3/5)

In this third clip from Paardekooper's presentation to Kovess, et al., he notes the fact that the WHO has previously—openly—developed an anti-fertility vaccine and even published the research "with the specific aim of targeting human reproduction in order to produce depopulation."

These were stated as the "overt aims," Paardekooper says of one study published in 1987, which had the goal of achieving "fertility regulation."

Furthermore Paardekooper notes that the WHO has already previously deployed a covert infertility-causing injection in Kenya. The scientist notes that the developers of the injection took the toxoid for tetanus and chemically bound it to the hCG protein—that is, human chorionic gonadotropin, which is a hormone produced by the placenta that is found when a woman is pregnant.

The infertility injections, Paardekooper notes, had the immune system attack the tetanus antigen, but simultaneously attack the hCG protein.

Paardekooper notes that these vaccines literally caused generated antibodies "to attack the baby [in the womb] and destroy it." He adds that these antibodies "rip[ped] the baby apart," resulting in stillbirth.

Furthermore, Paardekooper notes that hCG is responsible for the production of progesterone, without which "women would be infertile."

If a woman takes this kind of injection, the scientist says that she "loses the ability to have children, and any children she does have at the time of or after vaccination are destroyed anyway. So it kind of covers both bases."

What we need to worry about is the fact that these H1N1 injections "will cause...further infertility across the globe" and may render birds and cows "vaccinated" against bird flu infertile, Paardekooper says. He adds that "If this does have an infertility effect, and they go and vaccinate all the birds and the cows, especially in poor countries, where people rely on these [animals] for food, you can imagine that those birds won't be laying any eggs that can become birds and the cows will become sterile."

This is a "serious risk" because "if it causes sterility in bird stock and cow stock," Paardekooper says, "huge numbers of people will suffer malnutrition and starvation in the world."

Read 6 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jun 10

🚨REMINDER: THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HAS SPENT **$20 TRILLION** OF U.S. TAXPAYER MONEY THAT IS UNDOCUMENTED AND UNACCOUNTED FOR (1/5)

In this clip from a recent episode of the Children's Health Defense series, Financial Rebellion, Investment banker and former HUD official Catherine Austin Fitts describes how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has spent $20 trillion of taxpayer money (between 1998 and 2015) that has gone undocumented and unaccounted for. Fitts also highlights the fact that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has done the same with $1 trillion of taxpayer money.

Fitts starts out her overview of "the missing money" by noting that in 1994 the New York Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Reserve (the Fed) bought shares in the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). The investment banker notes that the Bank of International Settlements "is the central bank of central banks in Switzerland and operates above the law...[as] they have sovereign immunity and enjoy it in many respects and they can receive and hold money secretly [and] can keep money on their balance sheets secretly."

Effectively, Fitts says, the U.S. government buying those shares "made their relationship with the BIS much closer..."

The investment banker goes on to note that in October 1995 a budget deal in U.S. Congress "basically crashed and burned" and "it was then that...the president of one of the largest pension funds said to [her], 'They'—whoever 'They' is—have given up on the country and are moving all the money out starting in the Fall." Fitts says it was that Fall, October 1997, "when money started to go missing from HUD, as well as the Department of Defense."

As of today, Fitts says, "there's...$20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 missing from DOD and $1 trillion missing from HUD."

"The other thing that started to happen when that money started to go missing...was what I call the Great Poisoning..." Fitts adds. "Literally, it was the next month after the budget deal crashed that OxyContin was approved and the HUD predatory lending started and the pill mill started and really, the targeting of the low-income neighborhoods started, including the roundups coming from the private prison movement."

"Undocumentable adjustments then skyrocket[ed]," Fitts adds.

Cut to 2001, and "the day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference at the Department of Defense...[announcing] that the Department of Defense was missing $2.3 trillion..."

Fitts was told that one of the offices at the Pentagon that was blown up was the location for the office of Naval Intelligence Research Group, which was investigating the missing money.

"The rest is history," Fitts says. "The Patriot Act had passed, and then the DOD got huge appropriations and nobody really cared about the missing money."

Then, in 2015, the DOD financials came out and "it was the greatest missing money in one year [ever]. The DOD was missing $6.5 trillion in a year..."

At that point, Fitts says, Dr. Mark Skidmore, who was a professor and expert in budgeting at Michigan State University, thought she "must be wrong" because "the Department of Defense can't be missing 10-plus times its total budget in a year." Lo and behold, when he investigated the DOD's financials, he found that "actually, [she] was right."

Fitts subsequently asked that Skidmore have his students do a complete survey "of all the financial statements in all the years from fiscal 1997 to 2015."

He and his students got the total missing money to $21 trillion. They subsequently published a report in 2017, at which point Skidmore and Fitts discovered that "the amount of money missing from the U.S. Treasury was the same amount as the total debt of the United States."

Cut to 2018, and Fitts notes that during the theatrical hearings held during the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress—including both the Senate and the House, Republicans and Democrats—along with the Trump White House "got together and issued a policy called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Statement 56." (Fitts refers to it as FASAB 56 or, phonetically speaking, 'Faz-B 56.')

"[W]hat FASAB 56 says, very short and simple, is basically the government can keep secret books as a matter of administrative policy, thus refusing to obey all the financial management rules and regulations and laws, including the constitutional provisions for disclosure of financial operations," Fitts says. She adds that "they extended it, along with the classification laws, to private companies and banks doing business with the federal government, which means when you look at the U.S. securities market, the large cap section of the U.S. market...most of the disclosure is meaningless. You have no idea how the money works at many of these companies and the government because they're so intertwined."

Interestingly, the investment banker adds that "the COVID-19 operation could never have happened without that [FASAB 56], because it put the Department of Defense, and [other federal government] agencies in a position to, essentially, access an unlimited amount of secret money."

Fitts says somebody once told her that FASAB 56 is "a wet dream" as it allows for "secret money for secret operations."

"I think it was one month after FASAB 56 passed that suddenly Moderna magically raised $500 million. Quite a coincidence," Fitts adds.

Here is a clip from the 2001 Rumsfeld speech to which Fitts refers. (2/5)

Rumsfeld says: "Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, WE CANNOT TRACK $2.3 TRILLION IN TRANSACTIONS." (Emphasis added.)

In 2018, the Pentagon FAILED its first-ever audit. (3/5)

Source:

From the article:

"'We failed the audit, but we never expected to pass it,' Deputy Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan told reporters, adding that the findings showed the need for greater discipline in financial matters within the Pentagon."reuters.com/article/us-usa…

Read 6 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jun 8

REMDESIVIR—VENTILATORS —ISOLATION—AND THE 'HOSPITAL HOMICIDE' OF MORE THAN 500,000 AMERICANS SINCE 2020

Here's a reminder that hospitals have been turned into "killing fields" since the beginning of COVID, deploying deadly protocols that have murdered 500K+ Americans. 🧵 (1/16)

While the death and destruction caused by the COVID bioweapon injections has, rightfully, earned an enormous amount of attention from the alternative media, it's important to note that just as many people—if not more—have been killed by what's been deemed by some as COVID "murder protocols" in the hospitals. Murder protocols that have, in the U.S., been put into place by federal "health" agencies, and reinforced with massive payouts.

In this first clip, we learn from electrical engineer and citizen investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) that these "hospital homicides" (Beaudoin's term) now account for more than 500,000 dead Americans. Indeed, Beaudoin says that "the hospital homicides might be greater" than the number of people killed by the COVID injections in the U.S.

Beaudoin, who has pored through approximately 5% of the death certificates in the U.S. from the years 2019 through 2023, highlights an excess of acute renal failure (or sudden kidney failure) deaths as particularly staggering. He says that there have been 153,000 excess acute renal failure deaths **alone** in the last three years, which can likely be chalked up to some combination of remdesivir, vancomycin, and baricitinib.

Remdesivir, which many have come to associate with death and illness, is an antiviral drug shown to be deadly in clinical trials and linked to renal failure specifically*.

Baricitinib is a "Janus kinase JAK inhibitor" and is considered an "immunomodulator." Medical News Today notes, "If your kidneys don’t work well, [baricitnib] could build up in your body."

Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat infections and has also been linked to acute renal failure**.

Beaudoin notes that while he's not sure which individual drug, or which combination of drugs, is most responsible for the excess renal failure deaths in the U.S. over the last three years, "all the data is sitting on government computers and the government is purposely not looking at it, because they killed more than 150,000 excess people more than normal in the last three years by acute renal failure alone."

Furthermore, Beaudoin highlights ventilators as a murder mechanism. "[P]eople were put on ventilators, they got lung infections, they weren't treated for bacterial infections, and they died," he says. He notes that sometimes patients were given vancomycin, but that "kills the kidneys if you give too much."

Putting a finer point on things, Beaudoin says, "with regard to all of the [COVID] hospital protocols, I call it murder, because at some level, somebody knew what they were doing." While he doesn't blame the doctors themselves, he does say that whoever developed the protocol knew that it would kill patients.

*//** Supporting studies provided in last post of thread.

"There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced...this happened synchronously everywhere...where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people." (2/16)

In this clip from an interview with Matthew Ehret (@ehret_matthew), Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt), a scientist, social theorist, Physics PhD, and physics professor, describes how his study of all-cause mortality has led him to conclude that COVID hospital protocols have been responsible for an enormous amount of death.

Note that while Beaudoin has been studying death certificates, and Rancourt has been looking at all-cause mortality, they've both arrived at the same conclusion in this context.

"There were hot spots of deaths immediately after the pandemic was announced. And the all-cause mortality surged in a rapid peak that lasted only a month or two, and this happened synchronously everywhere where there was a hotspot, it happened at the same time—where the hospitals followed the treatment protocols and basically killed people," Rancourt tells Ehret. The scientist notes that one of the "main things" that killed people was putting them on ventilators, "which are extremely deadly and increase the chance of getting a bacterial infection in the respiratory tract, and so on..."

Rancourt notes that there were "huge spikes in mortality that did not spread" in 2020, but were, rather, "synchronous with the announcement of the pandemic where they got the go ahead and...apply these protocols and do what they did in hospitals."

Indeed, Rancourt says that "the big hospitals that followed this kind of militaristic new approach, without thinking, were killing fields, basically."

"The places where they didn't do this [the murder protocols], or they didn't do it as aggressively, or they didn't have large hospitals where they applied these protocols just military style, you did not get these peaks," the scientist adds.

"It was not COVID that was killing...patients, it was the complete...medical mismanagement of COVID. It was the remdesivir, ventilator, death—wash, rinse, repeat."

"The only place anybody was dying was in our hospitals. And it's because they were dying of the treatments." (3/16)

While Beaudoin and Rancourt's research gives us more of a bird's eye view of the "hospital homicide" phenomenon during the COVID era, we also have first-hand accounts from nurses, such as this one from Critical Care RN, whistleblower, and Founder/Executive Director of Nurse Freedom Network Kimberly Overton (@Kimberly_NFN).

In this clip from an interview with Peter Santilli (@petersantilli), Overton describes how it was not COVID killing people in hospitals, but rather the (federally distributed) treatment protocols themselves.

"They kept telling us all of our patients were dying of COVID—it was not COVID that was killing any of these patients, it was the complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID. It was the remdesivir, ventilator, death, wash, rinse, repeat," Overton says. The critical care RN adds, "This is what we were seeing over and over happen in these hospitals and I'm far from the only nurse that can tell you this."

"Listen," Overton says, "if they were dying of the virus alone, why weren't we pulling bodies from homes? Why weren't we pulling bodies from off of the streets? ...The only place anybody was dying was in our hospitals. And it's because they were dying of the treatments."

The whistleblower adds: "The remdesivir was poisoning people. We were shutting down their organs, we were placing them on ventilators, then they kept getting secondary bacterial infections, and they [were] succumbing to those. They [were] getting blood clots because they [were] not being ambulated properly."

"We couldn't even get doctors and PT [physical therapists] up on the floor to ambulate patients," Overton says. "People were too afraid, it was mostly just the nurses. And then the doctors would...come and look through the glass windows of the ICU and take the nurse's report..." (Note that ambulate means to move a patient around, or have them walk around.)

"We were intubating patients not because they were in distress, but in an effort to contain the virus," Overton adds. "They were pushing for early intubation knowing that...80% or more of those patients that were placed on a ventilator never made it off."