A ballot expert asked me to count all ballots, grouped by precinct, ballot type, and style and compare it to the recount.
And see how well the recount went. A good recount should have minor differences between the two machine counts.
In Fulton County, the counts barely resembled each other. Only a small handful of precincts had their ballots recounted properly.
Here's a few examples. This will be a multi-post tweet.
This is precinct 03I. The absentee and advanced voting was very close, but if you voted in-person during election day, your votes didn't count in the recount. This happened in multiple precincts.
Here are some more precincts where the election day ballots are missing.
There are some precincts that simply mixed their advanced voting and election day ballots together (they look the same). So even though there is are many missing ballots for Election Day, you can easily see that they were just mislabeled as Advanced Voting. Not an issue.
It is extremely rare to find a 'correct recount' precinct, but there are a few out there. Grats to this one county for getting it right.
This calculation wasn't difficult, so I'd be thrilled to have other ballot experts confirm the data by using a pivot table on the excel cast vote record data and see for yourself!
I just got another invite from Emerald Robinson for an interview today! So I needed to make up a quick graphic to show the missing ballot images in Fulton County.
I'm trying to show that a 'computer glitch' isn't the likely cause of missing ballot images from the recount. How would individual batches be deleted, while most of them remain?
And how would 51 out of 307 random images from batch 26 be available, but the rest is not.
Does the graphic make sense? Or do I need to add more details? Thanks!
Few more slides - This is the source of the missing ballots.
And these are the duplicate scanned ballots for those tabulators. The fact that most of the duplicate ballots come from these tabulators is significant.
Here's an update from the Crowd Sourced request from last week!
One of my good twitter followers messaged me late last week. He was able to get a bit more information about the Houzz data breach last week and discover the username of Joe Biden's email account on the website Houzz that was breached back in 2018.
He was able to identify that the email address belong to 'Robert.l.peters@pci.gov' (a known Biden alias) to the user name
First: Robert
Last: Hunter
User Name: bluehen1965
As far as I'm aware, this user name hasn't been discovered to date and could lead any investigators to find more covert messaging.
If you search the internet for the user name 'bluehen1965', it is apparently a reference to the name of Joe Biden's 1965 University of Delaware year book.
The Houzz profile link
Doesn't show much, other than a few pictures in his wishlist.
Does the fact that Hunter used 'robert.l.peters' email address on this account mean that Hunter and Joe were both sharing access to this email?
Georgia Governor Brian Kemp has signed a bill mandating that all absentee ballots be counted by 8 PM on election night.
Why is this important?
First image is a graph of when absentee ballots were scanned in Fulton county. They were still scanning absentee ballots on Nov 7th. The 'orange' on the graph is the on-demand ballots.
But the more curious issue were the 'on demand absentee ballots' that they printed locally. Most of those ballots were scanned together two days after the election.
These ballots would have been printed and mailed out to voters weeks before the end of the election, and would have been randomly mixed in with the regular mail in ballots. But strangely, most of them were grouped together.
And if you go thru the ballots on demand, Joe did very well. I marked the Donald Trump votes in green.