Will Tanner Profile picture
Aug 15 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Why did the Rhodesians wear short shorts?

Other than the FALs, the shorts might be the most distinctive part of the Bush War, but few know why they wore them

So we’ll explore that in the short 🧵👇 Image
It all boils down the nature of the Bush War

This wasn’t the Eastern Front, with huge, mechanized armies opposing each other along a defined front

Rather, it was (somewhat) more like Vietnam and the Malaysian Emergency, with light infantry on light infantry conflict defining most of the war

Commie guerrillas on one side and the Rhodesians, in units like the RLI, SAS, RAR, and Selous Scouts on the otherImage
So, the Rhodesian infantry units were often trying to track and ambush guerrilla units through the thick Rhodesian bush

This wasn’t England…it was thing, briar territory of the sort that is hellish to slug through, particularly if you’re trying to jack your way through it Image
So the Rhodesians didn’t want their men trying to hack and tromp through the bush

But they found that that is just what the soldiers would do if they were wearing thick pants and heavy leather boots

So they had to remove that ability to tromp through the heavy bush to get them to stop doing itImage
That involved taking away their heavy pants and boots

They were given, instead, the characteristic short shorts and canvas shoes…can’t tromp through thick briars in shorts. You’ll get scratched up

Instead, you have to do what the guerrillas would do and follow trails, without making noise, and sneak up on the enemyImage
As Tim Bax describes in Three Sips of Gin, that strategy quite worked

The Rhodesians, because they could no longer tromp, were much better at following the enemy and ambushing them, rather than getting weighed down and ambushed like US troops in Vietnam Image
So, that’s why they wore the distinctive short shorts!

If you enjoyed this thread, please rt it and drop a comment with your favorite pics of Rhodies in short shorts! Image
And read more about Rhodesia here:

theamericantribune.news/p/why-rhodesia…
Oh, and @WBSApparel is making Rhodie short shorts. Check em out!
@WBSApparel And many thanks to @DonShift3 for reposting a similar thread this am that reminded me to write about this, one of my favorite tidbits of history from the Bush War

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Tanner

Will Tanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Will_Tanner_1

Aug 17
It was said, particularly of Prime Minister Ian Smith's generation, that the Rhodesians were "more British than the British"

That sounds great, but how did they get there? How did a formerly company-run country in the middle of Africa become so British?

Immigration policy 🧵👇 Image
As a reminder, the British South Africa Company, headed by Cecil Rhodes, conquered the territory that would become Rhodesia in 1890

The group that did so was called the "Pioneer Column". From then until 1923, Rhodesia was ruled by the BSAC as a company province

It then began administrating itself in 1923, and did so under the British aegis until 1965, when it declared independenceImage
It was over that 1890-1920 policy that it first established its culture, then over the 1920-65 period that it solidified that and grew in size

It was through immigration policy that Rhodesia became quite British, though in Africa, rather than either going native or, like South Africa, becoming an amalgamation of European culturesImage
Read 10 tweets
Aug 16
Orania and Escaping Decline: What Americans Must Know

As America declines toward crime and chaos, Americans ought look to those places that have already experienced decline, namely South Africa. More importantly, we must learn how to escape it

Orania is a great example 🧵👇Image
First, remember what South Africa is like: as of 2023, it had a higher per capita crime rate than Somalia

It has 80 murders daily, a farm murder a week, a r*pe every four minutes, and two or three riots a day. Meanwhile, there are 3 welfare dependents for every net taxpayer

What once was a relatively prosperous and safe society is a pigsty of crime and chaos; there are safe places, of course, but on the whole, the country is quite poor and dangerousImage
But then there is Orania

There's no murder, no r*pe, no welfare dependents, no riots, no carjackings, no farm murders

It is an island of old world-style stability and an entrepreneurial, small-scale of life in an incredibly dangerous country that is falling apart at its seams Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 15
Those who want the Cold War to have been about fighting communism look at the nuclear arsenals and Reagan Era guerrilla support to pretend that’s what happened the whole time

But it quite obviously didn’t. China fell, MacArthur was sacked for wanting to demolish Red China, Vietnam was lost by the French and then by us, pretty much all of Africa went Red, and South America went socialist if not communist

Further, we supplied the Soviets with grain throughout the tiresome endeavor, after having given them immense material and secrets during WW2Image
So, if we were fighting communism, those proxy wars abroad were largely lost

It was Churchill who saved Greece from communist domination, much to America’s displeasure

We then forced England and France to abandon their empires, even after they won wars in them (ex: Algeria and Malaysia) and those post-colonial countries turned to communismImage
Similarly, regions wee claimed to care about or fight in largely went left

Western Europe went socialist, Iberia fell to socialism, Africa was ruled by chaos or communism, and America, until Reagan, largely fell to communists because America found the anti-communists too unpleasantImage
Read 7 tweets
Aug 14
Many in America, whether on the left, right, or center, claim that “civil war is coming”

The claim can make a bit of sense, as tensions are high, but is likely very wrong

If America is to have unpleasantness in that mold, cultural revolution is more likely than civil war
🧵👇 Image
As a reminder, the US and English Civil Wars, to which observers point when claiming tensions will lead to civil conflict, are quite different than today

For one, there were two clear sides: the Progressive Roundheads and the Cavaliers

Further, there had been years of preparation by both sides. Militias drilled and organized into functional units, arms were stored for group rather than personal use, etc. the player were serious rather than bloviating

And, finally, each side had a goal in mind. The cavaliers wanted the king’s authority to be respected, the roundheads thought Parliament ought be superior, the Yankees wanted slavery gone and states under the federal yoke, and the Confederates wanted the old federal system and states’ rights to be respectedImage
So, in each case there were two diametrically opposed sides that organized for war under the aegis of serious people with real goals in mind

They weren’t just bloviating commentators with no real goal in mind and even less on the ground organization Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 14
Another thing we must learn/remember from Rhodesia's story is that most of what you have been taught about the Cold War is false

While America sometimes opposed the USSR, it often used the left, NOT the right, to do so, and destroyed the old empires

I'll explain in the 🧵👇
Image
This is often one bit of criticism I get from my Rhodesia threads: people argue that the explanation for the West's destruction of Rhodesia, which is that democracy/egalitarianism compelled "us" to do it, makes no sense

"After all," they argue, "America worked with all manner of far-right dictators in the Cold War. Why would DC care about Ian Smith? It can't have been about democracy, it has to have been something else"Image
That argument is quite wrong for a few reasons

First, there are only a couple of examples. Temporarily Rhee in South Korea, but he was later pushed out in exchange for "liberal democracy." To some extent, Reagan worked with rightists like Pinochet in Argentina, the Contras, and rightists in El Salvador

But, that misses the forest for the trees. For one, Reagan came after Rhodesia, and so his san(er) policies aren't directly relevant. Further, his administration was attacked for working with the Contras and the fight against communism in South America was smeared as a vivacious "dirty war."Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 13
The real question is "why?" Why would the Cold War West ally with the communists to destroy a thriving republic in Southern Africa?

It makes no sense, at first glance, particularly given the resources at stake

But it makes a bit more sense upon close inspection 🧵👇
Image
Remember, Rhodesia had no apartheid system. It simply had propertied voting, and if they had the requisite amount of property, white and black alike could vote

So it wasn't a "racist" country, wasn't communist, wasn't a dictatorship. It was just an Anglo country with a pre-Reform style voting system in South AfricaImage
Beyond that, it was highly successful

It was the breadbasket of Africa.

It had a thriving industrial sector.

It was at the forefront of agricultural science (regenerative agriculture of the sort those like @untappedgrowth now follow was developed by Selous Scout founder Alan Savory

It was quite freeImage
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(