My thoughts on this new finding? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
"The consumption of BW [bottled water] is associated with heightened risk for certain health conditions," such as:
- hypertension (+5% increased risk)
- diabetes (+9%)
- GI ulcers (+21%)
- kidney stones (+17%)
1/10
This was a very large cross-sectional study that looked at a national population, conducted by Italy's census agency. They controlled for covariates including socioeconomic status, age, and gender, then clustered and stratified the population as appropriate.
Solid methods!
2/10
Analysis is *conceptually* straightforward:
- They built models to understand how bottled water + EACH confounding variable interacts to impact health outcomes.
- They combined those models into one big model to analyze all the variables together for each possible outcome.
3/10
In this sample, slightly over half of the population usually drank bottled water. Bottled water consumption was also associated with lower socioeconomic status (less education, less economic resources), showing that this is yet ANOTHER issue where wealth=health.
4/
For all four of the examined health outcomes, individuals with any one of those conditions (diabetes, ulcers, kidney stones, hypertension) were more likely than not to regularly consume bottled water.
Moreover, although the difference wasn't significant for hypertension...
5/
The prevalence of bottled water consumption was higher among individuals with these chronic conditions than among individuals without these chronic conditions—even after controlling for sex, age, economic resources, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol, and physical activity.
6/
Here's how you interpret the stats (using ulcers stats):
- The higher prevelance of BW drinkers among those with ulcers is statistically significant (unlikely to be due to random variation).
- BW drinkers are 21% more likely to have ulcers than someone who doesn't drink BW.
7/
What's it mean? First, note that these results don't show a *causal* link, only a *strong association* between habitual BW consumption and these chronic conditions.
Not *causal* = Maybe people with these conditions consume BW because of their condition, or simply prefer BW!
8/
Importantly, these results generally line up with what we would expect to see, however, based on previous research. Micro- and nanoplastics have been found to cause all kinds of issues with biological tissues in vitro!
9/10
Bottled water "has been found to be a possible major source of exposure" to microplastics. "Policymakers and public health institutions can no longer delay initiatives aimed at reducing plastic production, consumption, and use..."
I'm genuinely baffled how this is unclear, but this study is in reference to water in disposable plastic bottles.
If something is unclear, I provide the source for clarity! But I also refer to microplastics in the thread, so like... I can't *read* for you!
12/10
I welcome questions and criticisms!
I only take issue with ONE thing: A reply to the first tweet in a thread which asks a question that I made sure to address within the thread (or which is *also* addressed in the screenshot in the first tweet).
Just read the damn thing!
13/10
Some of these replies are absolutely baffling. Holy fuck.
I can't read things for you!
14/10
While I don't know how the specifics of this paper would apply to that situation, it's just generally true that reusable water bottles are better constructed than disposable plastic bottles. Durability is a factor in microplastic concentrations
As with anything, the dose makes the poison. If your organs are exposed to toxins only occasionally, they're more likely to be able to clear out the contaminants and repair any damage than if they were exposed constantly.
Reusable plastics are definitely at the *least concerning* end of the spectrum. A very large portion of the microplastics in a container come from mechanical abrasion (i.e. the friction of the contents), and hard plastics are more resistant to this type of wear!
All else being equal, I’d expect the total plastic particle content of bottled water to be something like
Smart Water [least] < Aquafina (when it’s in the same bottles as Pepsi) < All the super cheap plastic bottles that most bottled water comes in [most]
19/10
Other beverages in plastic containers will likely also contain some level of microplastics, but to a lesser extent if the bottle is better constructed. At the bare minimum, I’m going to avoid bottled water that comes in super cheap bottles with no structural integrity!
20/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s talk about systemic risk from negligent public health: Catastrophe doesn’t require population-wide illness.
The worst case isn’t sickness. Worst case is infrastructure collapse due to overstressed resources.
You know power plants need stable power to operate?
1/many
If there is a widespread disruption in the service area of, e.g., a nuclear power plant, it shuts down for safety. Massive blackouts like in 2003 or in Spain this year are caused by safety systems!
If too much trips out at once, it has a ripple effect across the grid 2/
In 2003, it took 2 days to fully restore most power. The infrastructure is 20 years older than it was back then and higher demand creates risk of cascading failure.
As of 2003, recommendations from blackouts in 1965, 1977, 1982, 1996, and 1998 had not been implemented. 3/
If Florida drops vaccine mandates, society is probably officially over. I really, really, really don’t think most people get that herd immunity is the only thing keeping measles from ripping through the population, and a measles infection wipes out all pre-existing immunity
1/3
Measles specifically infects the cells that are responsible for “remembering” which pathogens your body has encountered before. So they ALL get wiped out, and all you’re left with is cells that remember your measles infection and nothing else.
2/3
Every infection, vaccination, and other pathogenic exposure you’ve ever had? Your body no longer knows how to detect them after a measles infection. The only immunity you’ll be left with is immunity to measles. That’s it. Open season for every other pathogen encountered.
3/3
Can I say something? I have a BA in psych, a BPhil in linguistics, and went to grad school for cognitive psych. My research, including an undergrad fellowship, was on the cognitive relationship between written and spoken language…
Audiobooks are NO DIFFERENT than reading print.
In the last hour, there have been a dozen replies from people nitpicking the first tweet
The topic of discussion is "do audiobooks 'count' as reading?," and the answer is "Audiobooks are NO DIFFERENT than reading print."
Maybe read the thread before arguing with it? lmfao
And for all those people with indignant responses who want to nitpick every detail, the fact that so many people hold THIS exact view—that audiobooks are somehow “cheating”—is the ENTIRE point. It leads to people who would benefit from audiobooks depriving themselves the medium
That's not to say that it's impossible to use solid-state media for long-term storage. It's just that anything with durability guarantees gets prohibitively expensive quickly. Spinning hard drives—as well as DVDs and Blu-ray discs!—are your friend.
2/
- The way data is stored in solid-state media makes it much more susceptible to bit rot than other media.
- In a spinning hard drive, the moving parts are the most common point of failure.
- When you burn a DVD, that shit is fairly permanent.
3/
I wish people would understand that insurance underwriters have armies of actuaries calculating risks, and if an insurance company drops you, it's because things have changed in such a way that insuring you will take more out of the financial pool than you're putting in
1/
It sucks, but it's a direct result of the fact that humans are widely inhabiting locations that are rapidly becoming impossible to inhabit safely. If you can't find insurance for your home, it means there's a high likelihood you'll need to move soon anyway.
2/
You get insurance so that you can replace all of your stuff in the event of a disaster. When the insurance company effectively says "the risk of disaster is so high that insuring you would almost certainly cause us to lose a lot of money," it ALSO means your life is in danger
3/
So here’s the thing about some of the subtle neuro damage related to SARS-CoV-2 infection that I think a lot of people miss: some of the known deficits are correlated with things like impulsiveness and poor emotional control, so we might expect to see deficits there are well
1/
Consider how impatient people seem to be on the road in the last couple years relative to the 2010s, and I think we have a perfect example of where this is LIKELY already manifesting.
2/
This impact is particularly insidious for the person experiencing it, because poor impulse control, by definition, doesn’t really come on gradually. My biggest concern is how interactions under these circumstances will play out if this impact continues to become more common
3/