Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture
Aug 19, 2024 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/Do questions about brainstem anatomy cause you to suddenly get a case of locked in syndrome?!

Do you try to localize the lesion or just wait for the MR?

Wait no more!

Here’s a thread about the brainstem Rule of Four to help you localize brainstem lesions! Image
2/The hallmark of a brainstem lesion/syndrome is:

(1) Ipsilateral cranial nerve deficit

(2) Contralateral body deficit (be it weakness, sensory loss, or ataxia) Image
3/You can remember this because often your head has certain feelings that opposite the feelings in your heart/body.

Similarly, the cranial nerve deficit can be the opposite of the body deficit

This split between head and body is key for recognizing brainstem syndromes Image
4/There is a medial & lateral organization to the brainstem blood supply.

Medially, there are paramedian vessels & laterally long circumferential branches

As a result of this design, you tend to get medial & lateral brainstem syndromes depending on where the occlusion is! Image
5/There are 4 rules of 4 to help us to localize brainstem lesions.

Rule 1: Four structures that are Medial that begin w/M

This helps us tell if the lesion is medial

It's medial if there's contralateral motor weakness or loss of light touch, vibration & proprioception Image
6/Rule 2: Fours structures on the Side that begin w/S

Involvement of these structures tells us that it is a lateral lesion

Results in contralateral loss of pain & temperature sensation Image
7/Motor is anterior.

Motor involvement tells you if the lesion is anterior or posterior.

So now we can localize not only medial & lateral, but anterior & posterior! Image
8/Rule 3: Motor/medial cranial nerves divide into 12

This helps us know which CNs are medial & which are lateral

If the cranial nerve can divide into 12, then it's a motor nerve and it's medial. This means a medial lesion! Image
9/Rule 4: Four CN in the pons w/4 above the pons & 4 below

Helps to localize superior/inferior in the brainstem by which CN is involved

CNs are like mile markers along a highway--they let you know how far along you are Image
10/There are 4 CNs in each section (medulla, pons, & above the pons).

Counting up from 12, we see 9-12 are in the medulla, 5-8 in the pons, and 1-4 above the pons.

So depending on what CN is involved, we know if the lesions is in the pons, below the pons or above the pons! Image
11/So for every brainstem lesion, you can now do 3 things:

1. Find where it is along the length of the brainstem using CN involvement
2. See if it’s ant or post based on whether motor is involved
3. Determine if it’s med or lat based on type of sensory deficit & CN involvement Image
12/Now you can localize brainstem lesions in all 3 planes based on their clinical presentation!

Localization is actually quite complex, but the Rule of Four is a great foundation!

Hopefully now when confronted w/a brainstem syndrome, you will no longer be locked in! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lea Alhilali, MD

Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teachplaygrub

Jan 27
1/The hardest thread yet! Are you up for the challenge?

How stroke perfusion imaging works!

Ever wonder why it’s Tmax & not Tmin?

Here’s what to know from @theAJNR SCANtastic!

ajnr.org/content/47/1/28Image
@TheAJNR 2/Perfusion imaging is based on one principle: When you inject CT or MR intravenous contrast, the contrast flows w/blood & so contrast can be a surrogate marker for blood.

This is key, b/c we can track contrast—it changes CT density or MR signal so we can see where it goes. Image
@TheAJNR 3/So if we can track how contrast gets to the tissue (by changes in CT density or MR signal), then we can approximate how BLOOD is getting to the tissue.

And how much blood is getting to the tissue is what perfusion imaging is all about. Image
Read 19 tweets
Jan 19
1/Do you get a Broca’s aphasia trying remember the location of Broca's area?

Does trying to remember inferior frontal gyrus anatomy leave you speechless?

Don't be at a loss for words when it comes to Broca's area

Here’s a 🧵to help you remember the anatomy of this key region! Image
2/Anatomy of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is best seen on the sagittal images, where it looks like the McDonald’s arches.

So, to find this area on MR, I open the sagittal images & scroll until I see the arches. When it comes to this method of finding the IFG, i’m lovin it. Image
3/Inferior frontal gyrus also looks like a sideways 3, if you prefer. This 3 is helpful bc the inferior frontal gyrus has 3 parts—called pars Image
Read 13 tweets
Dec 5, 2025
1/They say form follows function!

Brain MRI anatomy is best understood in terms of both form & function.

Here’s a short thread to help you to remember important functional brain anatomy--so you truly can clinically correlate! Image
2/Let’s start at the top. At the vertex is the superior frontal gyrus. This is easy to remember, bc it’s at the top—and being at the top is superior. It’s like the superior king at the top of the vertex. Image
3/It is also easy to recognize on imaging. It looks like a big thumb pointing straight up out of the brain. I always look for that thumbs up when I am looking for the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 1, 2025
1/To call it or not to call it? That is the question!

Do you feel a bit wacky & wobbly when it comes to calling normal pressure hydrocephalus on imaging?

You don’t want to overcall it, but you don’t want to miss it either!

Let me help you out w/a thread about imaging in NPH! Image
2/First, you must understand the pathophysiology of “idiopathic” or iNPH.

It was first described in 1965—but, of the original six in the 1965 cohort, 4 were found to have underlying causes for hydrocephalus.

This begs the question—when do you stop looking & call it idiopathic? Image
3/Thus, some don’t believe true idiopathic NPH exists.

After all, it’s a syndrome defined essentially only by response to a treatment w/o ever a placebo-controlled trial.

However, most believe iNPH does exist--but its underlying etiology is controversial. Several theories exist Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 21, 2025
1/Time to go with the flow!

Hoping no one notices you don’t know the anatomy of internal carotid (ICA)?

Do you say “carotid siphon” & hope no one asks for more detail?

Here’s a thread to help you siphon off some information about ICA anatomy! Image
2/ICA is like a staircase—winding up through important anatomic regions like a staircase winding up to each floor Lobby is the neck.

First floor is skullbase/carotid canal. Next it stops at the cavernous sinus, before finally reaching the rooftop balcony of the intradural space.Image
3/ICA is divided into numbered segments based on landmarks that denote transitions on its way up the floors.

C1 is in the lobby or neck.

You can remember this b/c the number 1 looks elongated & straight like a neck. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 4, 2025
1/The 90s called & wants its carotid imaging back!

It’s been 30 years--are you still on NASCET?

Feeling vulnerable about plaque vulnerability?

This month’s @theAJNR SCANtastic has what you need to know about carotid plaque

ajnr.org/content/46/10/…Image
2/Everyone knows the NASCET criteria:

If the patient is symptomatic & the greatest stenosis from the plaque is >70% of the diameter of normal distal lumen, patient will likely benefit from carotid endarterectomy

But that doesn’t mean the remaining patients are just fine! Image
3/Yes, carotid plaques resulting in high-grade stenosis are high risk

But assuming that stenosis is the only mechanism by which a carotid plaque is high risk is like assuming that the only way to kill someone is by strangulation. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(