Will Tanner Profile picture
Aug 19 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Yes, this is actually happening in Britain, but it’s not new or innovative

The Bolsheviks did the same thing

A short 🧵👇 Image
First, as a reminder for those who don’t know what is going on, riots in Britain started after an Islamist butchered three young English girls and the government, currently headed by socialist Labour PM Starmer, did pretty much nothing

Years of frustration about immigration, legal and illegal, turned to riots

Starmer responded by cracking down on the English for protesting and now is locking up people for even retweeting posts siding with the rioters

So, now, Starmer is letting actual criminals out of jail so that Englishmen who simply don’t want their daughters murdered can be stuffed into prisonImage
This is horrifying, but it’s not new

When the Bolsheviks acceded to power, they opened up the jails and freed all the violent criminals.

General Wrangel describes this happening in Crimea, and Gustav Krist, the Austrian prisoner of war who wrote Prisoner in the Forbidden Land describes the same thing happening in Central Asia

After the prisoners were free, the Bolsheviks established the Red GuardsImage
Image
The Bolsheviks weren’t freeing prisoners because they had kind hearts or disagreed with the idea of prison. They went on to kill tens of millions in prison camps, as we all know

Rather, it was about establishing control over the population. It’s a whole lot harder to think about the political system when you’re starving and having to deal with a huge crime wave, after all, the the freed prisoners create the anarchic conditions in which Bolshevism thrivesImage
There’s not really much else to say about it other than that the Bolsheviks thrived on the anarchic conditions their prison policies created, then went on to fill the prisons right back up, only this time with political prisoners rather than real criminals

Solzhenitsyn described the communist attitude toward crime quite well:Image
So, that’s what Starmer is now doing.

Like the Bolsheviks, he’s letting real criminals go free do that the prisons can be crowded with political prisoners whose only crime is having a different opinion of immigration than he does

The state sees that as necessary because crime isn’t a threat to its rule, whereas an angry populace of competent people could beImage
Ok apparently the butcher was Rwandan rather than an Islamist

Whatever. He’s not an Anglo or Norman and so ought not be there

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Tanner

Will Tanner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Will_Tanner_1

Sep 17
This meme is going around in an attempt to attack the right over its immigration stance, framing the narratives about mass migration as absurd

In fact, the claims are true, and the existence of one enables the other, quite disastrously for Americans

I'll explain in the 🧵👇 Image
The recent reports from groups like @America_2100 about what is going on in Springfield, Ohio showed this to be true

20,000 Haitians didn't just randomly show up in Springfield (nor do migrants generally just show up anywhere)

Rather, they were attracted there by job postings NGOs showed only to Haitians, brought into the town by NGOs, supported in their lifestyles by NGOs, and then told to work for the low wages (relative to American wages) provided by those jobs, supported in doing so by gobs of NGO money
Examples of that same general story happening across the country abound: what generally is the case is that the government is using tax dollars to heap cash on NGOs, which then use it to enrich themselves and subsidize the invaders

The Springfield Haitians NGO got hundreds of millions; now apply that across thousands of 501c3s using donor and taxpayer dollars to subsidize the migrants, legal and illegal, as the same story is true of pretty much every town in America and the NGOs operating in it to flood it with migrantsImage
Read 7 tweets
Sep 16
You often hear it said in American politics that we need to "return to the Founders" politically

Funnily enough, nearly everyone saying that would absolutely hate what it would mean, but it would indeed solve our issues

It would essentially mean turning into Rhodesia...🧵👇
Image
Image
What would a return to the Founders mean, and how's it related to Rhodesia?

Well, as I've written about before, Rhodesia was essentially the last old-style Western country that limited the franchise, only allowing property owners to vote

Critics call that "undemocratic," which it is, but it's how the West operated when it rose to prominence. Though America lacked a King, it was similar, under the Constitution, to the British in that only those with a requisite (and large) amount of property could vote for their representatives, and the popular house in the legislature was restrained by an "aristocratic" branch meant to be composed of the best, or the Lords in England and the wealthy who were elected by the state legislatures in AmericaImage
That landed voting system is what originally made America great, namely by keeping it from making disastrously bad decisions in the early days, when one false step could have meant disaster. It's also what made England prosperous and stable as the rest of the continent buckled under

Importantly, the franchise for all white males only came under Jackson, after the danger point of the British taking over was past (those rowdy new voters proceeded to trash the White House while partying). And a really universal franchise only came in the 20th century, at which point no one could invade America...other than the illegal immigrants "our democracy" is now letting in.Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 15
The thing to understand about mass migration is that it's not just terrible, bringing the 3rd World's worst here, though it is, or a wage suppressant for the American working class, though it is

It's also a long-term weapon meant to punish and destroy conservative areas🧵👇
The above video is quite good, so thanks to @WesternLensman

What should really be added is that the Haitian situation makes yet more aspects of the crisis clear: namely, that it's not just about illegal migrants and that it's about more than electoral control

The Haitians are brought here intentionally and helped to stay. For example, the Biden-Harris Administration's
CHNV program lets 30,000 migrants EACH MONTH from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela apply for asylum. When approved, they're granted Medicaid and food stamp benefits, at the cost to the Treasury of over $3 billion in just the past year. They want to expand it by $1 billion more

Under the ridiculous "humanitarian programs" of Biden and Harris, NGOs are paid obscene amounts to "settle" the Haitians in American communities, such as in Springfield, by their thousands

So it's intentionalImage
And the Haitians the Biden-Harris Regime is expending egregious amounts on bringing here, to name just one of the many groups, are being used to destroy conservative America

Do you know that about 81% of the Haitian invaders have been plopped down in areas that voted Trump in 2020?

That might be to change the voting patterns of the areas through birthright citizenship and fraud, but it's also probably meant to punish those areas for having the temerity to not vote for the gay race communism candidate

I found the graph from @fentasylImage
Read 8 tweets
Sep 14
Civilization, British historian Kenneth Clark noted, "however complex and solid it seems, it is actually quite fragile. It can be destroyed."

Indeed that's true, and now we in the West are seeing it

But there's a key ingredient Clark leaves out that I'll explain in the 🧵👇 Image
First, here's the full quote of Clark's that I found after reading a 🧵on the subject by @thinkingwest (it's linked at the end). Clark said:

“What happened?

It took Gibbon six volumes to describe the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, so I shan’t embark on that. But thinking about this almost incredible episode does tell one something about the nature of civilisation.

It shows that however complex and solid it seems, it is actually quite fragile. It can be destroyed.



What are its enemies?


Well, first of all fear — fear of war, fear of invasion, fear of plague and famine, that make it simply not worthwhile constructing things, or planting trees or even planning next year’s crops. And fear of the supernatural, which means that you daren’t question anything or change anything.

The late antique world was full of meaningless rituals, mystery religions, that destroyed self-confidence. And then exhaustion, the feeling of hopelessness which can overtake people even with a high degree of material prosperity.

There is a poem by the modern Greek poet, Cavafy, in which he imagines the people of an antique town like Alexandria waiting every day for the barbarians to come and sack the city. Finally the barbarians move off somewhere else and the city is saved; but the people are disappointed — it would have been better than nothing.

Of course, civilisation requires a modicum of material prosperity—

What civilization needs:

confidence in the society in which one lives, belief in its philosophy, belief in its laws, and confidence in one’s own mental powers. The way in which the stones of the Pont du Gard are laid is not only a triumph of technical skill, but shows a vigorous belief in law and discipline.

Vigour, energy, vitality: all the civilisations—or civilising epochs—have had a weight of energy behind them.

People sometimes think that civilisation consists in fine sensibilities and good conversations and all that. These can be among the agreeable results of civilisation, but they are not what make a civilisation, and a society can have these amenities and yet be dead and rigid.”Image
To a great extent, that is true. A society weighed down by old rituals it no longer understands and lacking in vitality and vigor isn't one that will long survive.

But it misses the other key ingredient: Civilization requires doing whatever is necessary to preserve it, however brutal or unkind. Put more pithily, civilization requires giving the legion a free hand with which to deal with the barbariansImage
Read 13 tweets
Sep 13
One of the most criminally underknown and underrecognized Great Men of history is Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew

Many vaguely know of Singapore and that he built it, but not how he did so

Why? Because his success is a rebuke to our democratic views 🧵👇
As a reminder, Lee's accession to power came alongside the semi-controlled demolition of the British Empire in the wake of its disastrous Eastern losses in WWII and the beginning of the Cold War

Singapore was attempting to separate from Malaysia, which was better armed, larger, and more populous, and had to contend not only with that external threat, but with the internal specter of labor-supported communism and ethnic division between the Malays, Chinese, and othersImage
Further, as Singapore attempted to get on its feet, it had to do so from a position of economic backwardness

The British had built some industry there, but the land was quite poor and desperately in need of improvement and investment

Further, it needed stability, not internal bickering between ethnic groups and social classesImage
Read 12 tweets
Sep 12
This is one of the stupidest, most mendacious claims of the faux Christian, "shithole socialist" talking points

God doesn't command you to import infinity violent foreigners into your country

In fact, the Bible is against doing so and describes it as a "disaster" 🧵👇 Image
First, having foreigners invade you is actually a punishment levied for not obeying God...not a commandment of His

Deuteronomy 28:43-45 provides, "Foreigners who live in your land will gain more and more power, while you gradually lose yours. They will have money to lend you, but you will have none to lend them. In the end they will be your rulers. All these disasters will come on you, and they will be with you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and keep all the laws that he gave you."Image
Image
If God was pro-Great Replacement, why would he make it happening a curse for forgetting his commands?

No, it's quite clear that mass migration is a punishment from God, a curse for forgetting his commandments...which would make sense given that generally atheistic in practice America and Europe are suffering the worse from this Biblical plagueImage
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(