Post

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1825750233235497005

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 30

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

#10 - Joe Rogan says he thinks Candace Owens is RIGHT about Brigitte Macron.

“Macron’s married to a man! A man who b*tch-slapped him in a private jet!”

“I think she [Candace Owens] is right.”

“At the end of the day, the first thing you have to say is, ‘What kind of a 40-year-old dates a [15]-year-old? That’s crazy!”

Source Video: youtube.com/watch?v=0O6o0l…

(See the next 9 stories below)

#9 - Nevada Health Official Caught Admitting to Breaking the Rules to Give Illegal Immigrants Benefits.

Hidden camera footage exposed Deshaun E. Mack, a Nevada DHHS specialist, admitting he routinely “twists and turns” the rules to help illegal immigrants get taxpayer-funded benefits.

In footage released by @JamesOKeefeIII’s team, Mack describes how he bypasses eligibility guidelines to provide emergency medical coverage, knowingly approving 12 months of benefits even when it’s not technically allowed.

“I get them emergency medical all the time,” he says. “I just approve them for 12 months because I can.”

He also openly admitted that immigration status isn’t a barrier for him. “Even undocumented people from Mexico and things; I can still get them benefits.”

This raises serious questions about how many other officials may be “bending the rules” behind closed doors.

#8 - Senator Ron Johnson stuns Tucker Carlson when he reveals he cured his acid reflux disease with a natural solution called betaine HCl.

The medical industry wants you to believe heartburn comes from too much acid.

@SenRonJohnson discovered the opposite: the real problem was not enough.

Once he started supplementing with betaine HCl, his symptoms disappeared. No more reflux. And he only remembers to take it half the time.

He says it worked better than anything doctors ever gave him.

Why? Because hydrochloric acid is exactly what your stomach is supposed to produce in the first place.

Sometimes the cure isn’t high-tech. It’s just common sense.

Read 17 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 29

Harvard is not backing down.

But Victor Davis Hanson says this isn’t about education anymore.

To Trump’s team, it’s no different than sending endless cash overseas—elite universities soaked in taxpayer money, then weaponized against the people footing the bill.

This was never a right. It was a privilege. And that privilege is about to be revoked.

🧵 THREAD

Victor Davis Hanson unpacked why Donald Trump has taken aim at Harvard University—and made clear that this is no impulsive move. It’s a calculated stand, rooted in a long list of grievances.

“Recently, Donald Trump has escalated his struggle with Harvard University,” Hanson began, setting the stage.

At the center of the clash is Harvard’s response to a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that struck down affirmative action in college admissions.

The Court ordered schools like Harvard and UNC to stop giving preference in admissions, hiring, and promotion based on race or gender.

But Hanson argued Harvard simply sidestepped the ruling.

“They were by court order to stop giving preference... what we would call DEI,” he said.

“Harvard has been skirting that, and I think the data is pretty clear... there’s no question they’ve been doing it.”

That was just the beginning.

Hanson pointed to other long-standing issues: undisclosed foreign money, often from countries like Communist China and Qatar, and campus practices that seem increasingly radical.

“There have been, in the past, graduations and dorms that have a racial basis—almost a segregation element to them,” he said.

And when it comes to speech? Hanson claimed Harvard hasn’t exactly protected the First Amendment.

“You can make the argument that they don’t fully honor the First Amendment when you have guest speakers,” he noted, describing how students are often allowed—if not outright encouraged—to shut down viewpoints they don’t agree with.

Then came the most explosive accusation: a growing climate of antisemitism.

Hanson recalled two Harvard students who assaulted a Jewish peer—one was later given a $65,000 honorarium through the law school, the other honored as a graduation marshal at the Divinity School.

“That sent the wrong message,” he said.

Given all this, Hanson said it’s no surprise Trump decided to draw a line in the sand.

And with Harvard’s $53 billion endowment, Trump made it clear—he doesn’t think taxpayers should be footing any part of their bill.

“There was a lot of cause for Donald Trump to suggest, ‘I don’t need this. The country doesn’t need this,’” Hanson said.

But Trump didn’t just stop at funding. He also took issue with Harvard’s hiring practices, calling out the ideological echo chamber in faculty ranks.

“He said, ‘Why are you hiring people from only one point of view?’—which I think is indisputable,” Hanson noted.

That’s when the backlash began.

Harvard and its allies tried to fight back—not just with legal arguments, but by recruiting prominent center-right figures to push back on Trump’s approach.

Hanson said even some of his colleagues at the Hoover Institution were asked to weigh in.

“Essentially, they’re saying: yes, Harvard’s violating the law, yes, they’re overcharging for research grants... but now Trump’s getting into micromanaging, and that’s wrong,” he explained.

It raised a key question: Is Trump simply flexing federal power—or is he pulling funding from institutions that no longer serve the public interest?

Read 8 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 29

They told you the COVID vaccine was “safe and effective.”

What they didn’t tell you is that it was “safe” from liability—and “effective” at causing stroke, infertility, and irreversible harm.

Epidemiologist @NicHulscher has been digging into the data for years. What he reveals in this interview will make your blood boil.

🧵 THREAD

The conversation with @NicHulscher and @zeee_media started with a bombshell: Pfizer's COVID-19 shot is now being blamed for causing as many deaths as World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War COMBINED.

This news comes from a disturbing study co-authored by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo.

The study revealed Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA shot may have killed over 470,000 Americans in 2021 alone.

Researchers found that individuals who received Pfizer’s injection faced a 36% higher risk of all-cause mortality—excluding COVID—compared to those who received Moderna’s shot.

The study, which is still in pre-print, analyzed data from over a million Florida Medicaid recipients. When extrapolated nationally, the estimated death toll from Pfizer’s shot alone exceeded 470,000 in just one year.

That number rivals the total U.S. military deaths from World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War—combined.

Epidemiologist called the findings “a minimal estimate,” warning the real toll could be EVEN HIGHER.

Hulscher dropped another revelation that was equally disturbing. Researchers in Turkey found that rats injected with mRNA vaccines lost over 60% of their ovarian reserve, or their egg supply.

Once those eggs are gone, they’re gone for good.

Why does it matter? Because if this effect translates to humans, we could be witnessing the early stages of a global population collapse.

That rat study is corroborated by a second study, involving over a million women in the Czech Republic, which found a 33% DROP in successful pregnancies among vaccinated women compared to the unvaccinated.

Hulscher called the findings “grave.”

He also pointed out that population control efforts are no longer a “conspiracy theory.”

Why? Because 35% of countries have already acknowledged implementing population reduction policies.

Read 7 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 29

The U.S. economy is a ticking time bomb—and Senator Ron Johnson isn’t sure how much time we’ve got left.

Why is your car insurance insane? Why is your grocery bill breaking the bank?

It all traces back to one thing: reckless government spending.

America is drowning in $37 trillion in debt, and Senator Johnson says we’re nearing the point of no return.

This is the warning D.C. insiders pray never goes public.

🧵 THREAD

Senator Ron Johnson sat down with Tucker Carlson, and the interview opened with a moment that exposed just how clueless Congress really is about America’s finances.

“I just asked my colleagues, ‘Hey, anybody know how much we spent last year in total?’ Dead silence,” Johnson said.

He continued, “Understand the federal government is the largest financial entity in the world. We, in theory, are the 535 members of the board of directors. And nobody really knows in total how much the federal government spent because we never talk about it.”

That lack of accountability, Johnson explained, has let Congress quietly move nearly a trillion dollars in spending (on things that should be optional) into the “mandatory” category, so they no longer get reviewed or debated.

He then laid out the math. And these numbers that should terrify anyone paying attention:

• 2019 spending: $4.4 trillion

• 2024 spending: Over $7 trillion

• 2025 projected spending: $7.3 trillion

• Current revenue: Around $5.1 trillion

• Structural deficit: Approximately 6%

• Yearly deficit: Roughly $2.2 trillion

So, that’s a 66% INCREASE in spending in just six years.

“We’re almost $37 trillion in debt,” Johnson warned. “We’re spending $7 trillion, and CBO (Congressional Budget Office) projects over the next 10 years, we will add another $22 trillion to the debt.”

And that’s if nothing goes wrong. “If interest rates start creeping up… just one percentage point, add another $4 trillion,” he said.

Read 17 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 29

Tucker Carlson’s Face Drops as Ron Johnson Reveals What Cured His Acid Reflux Disease

Modern medicine wants you to believe heartburn comes from too much acid.

But after years of pharma pills, Sen. Ron Johnson still found no relief.

Then he discovered something called hydrochloric acid, and once he started taking it, everything changed.

Watch him explain in this must-see clip. Tucker Carlson’s reaction says it all.

🧵 THREAD

Before we dive in, do yourself a favor and bookmark this post. 👆

There aren’t just one but two shocking health claims here that were never supposed to get out.

Let’s roll the clips.

It all started when Carlson asked why Americans keep getting sicker, even as healthcare costs skyrocket.

That’s when Johnson opened up about his personal experience with statin drugs—and what happened after he stopped taking them.

He told Carlson that his severe dizzy spells vanished the moment he quit statins.

Tucker Carlson was astonished. “What?!” he exclaimed.

The dizzy spells weren’t the only thing that went away.

@SenRonJohnson explained that he’s had “a number of health conditions that just improved as a result” of stopping statins.

One possible way Johnson believes statin drugs may have harmed him is through his sudden loss of hearing. It’s difficult to prove, but he can’t help but wonder if the statins played a role.

Even more concerning, many doctors in the alternative health space are now suspecting that statin drugs could be associated with dementia.

Carlson responded to the claim, saying, “That’s really scary right there.”

Senator Johnson declared that the medical establishment would never admit statins cause dementia—even if it were true—because they’re the most commonly prescribed drugs in America, and there’s too much money at stake.

“That’s a multi-billion dollar industry right there,” he said.

Read 14 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 29

The media spun it as an “ambush.”

But Victor Davis Hanson just tore that narrative to shreds——revealing the real reason South Africa’s Ramaphosa asked to meet President Trump.

It wasn’t about optics. It was about leverage.

That's when Hanson dropped a brutal prediction about what’s coming next.

🧵 THREAD

“It was an ambush.”

That was the headline when South African President Cyril Ramaphosa met with Donald Trump at the White House.

But Victor Davis Hanson says that narrative falls apart the moment you look closer.

“Ambush,” he explained, means a surprise attack from a hidden position.

“That was not an ambush. Mr. Cyril Ramaphosa… wanted that meeting with Donald Trump. He requested it. And when he came in, he was prepared to refute Donald Trump.”

In fact, Hanson pointed out, the press had been giddy beforehand.

They expected Ramaphosa to deliver a public dressing-down—what they didn’t expect was that Trump came just as prepared, if not more so.

“Trump was ready for the bill of goods,” he said, “and had his own bill of goods.”

So why was Ramaphosa so eager to sit down with Trump?

According to Hanson, it was solely about protecting an economic advantage—and salvaging a relationship that was quietly unraveling behind the scenes.

“He wanted to meet Trump because he had a free trade agreement with the United States,” Hanson explained, “with NO tariffs placed on South African agriculture. Everything. Metals, everything.”

South Africa wasn’t just benefiting from favorable trade terms. The country was also running a $9 billion surplus and still collecting half a billion dollars in U.S. foreign aid.

“And in addition to that,” Hanson added, “he was getting $500 million in foreign aid from the United States.”

Yet despite the benefits, Ramaphosa’s government wasn’t exactly acting like an ally.

His ambassador had gone on record calling Trump a white supremacist in a video stunt Hanson described as “performance art.”

The fallout was swift: Secretary of State Marco Rubio expelled the ambassador.

In Hanson’s view, this meeting was Ramaphosa’s attempt to smooth things over—but not out of respect. It was about survival.

And it was too little, too late.