🧵Another fake report by @HRW — now claiming Israeli attack on Hodeida possibly war crime because UN officials said there is no military activity at port. But UN report HRW cites contradicts claim; evidence shows Houthis smuggle arms and launch attacks from port. Analysis: 1/
HRW claims IDF attack was “indiscriminate” meaning port was not used for any military purpose & disproportionate. How does HRW know port was not used for military purposes? UN staff & Yemenis said so. That’s literally the only evidence HRW can muster! 2/
Is it true UN “never found evidence of a Houthi military presence" at port? FALSE. HRW themselves cite UN report (S/2023/130) contradicting claim. HRW conveniently omits. Clause 35 recounts how port was used by Houthis in 2022 to detain a UAE vessel. A clear military use. 3/
UN recounts in Paragraph 36 a May 2022 attack by Houthi military vessels (“three skiffs carrying armed men”) in the area of the port of Hodeida – the only port in the area. The crack research team at HRW seems to have not read the report they cite. 4/
Same UN report describes military parade at Hodeidah and specifically notes this violated agreement not to use city for "military manifestation." HRW cites UN official claiming Hodeida NEVER had military presence as core evidence but claim is contradicted in a UN report! 5/
HRW also ignores many confirmed reports showing how Houthis used area of Hodeida port to fire missiles at ships. Here is an AP report from Jan 2024. The willful blindness by HRW is breathtaking. It's not research, just virulent anti-Israel propaganda. 6/
In June 2024, per Al Jazeera, “small watercraft” of Houthis hit a civilian Greek ship “near Red Sea port of Hodeidah” (war crime anyone?) Where could those “small watercraft” have come from? Obviously the nearby port of Hodeidah where the attack occurred. HRW ignores. 7/
Iran has been caught often using fishing boats and cover of humanitarian aid to smuggle weapons to Houthis. Only Iran/Houthi/Hamas/Hezbollah apologists like HRW would deny this. It’s preposterous to rely on UN officials to certify that Hodeidah is not used for arms smuggling. 8/
According to US military, these transfer of weapons violate Security Council Resolution 2216 which HRW claims the Houthis are adhering to. The shoddy and dishonest HRW report does not bother to note rampant violation by Iran & Houthis to smuggle ballistic missile components. 9/
The Arab coalition against the Houthis has also stated that their intelligence shows the Houthis smuggle weapons via Hodeidah port. So it's not just an Israeli claim. HRW omits this aspect of Houthi activity at Hodeidah as it would demolish claims of Israeli war crimes. 10/
HRW also inanely ignores that oil is a key strategic asset by any military. It’s stupid to have to explain this. Houthis fired ballistic missiles at Israel. Israel has every right to harm Houthi capacity to wage war. But HRW’s fake experts claim hitting oil is not legal. 11/
Geneva Convention considers oil a legitimate military target since they “make an effective contribution to military action” both for its use by military and revenue for regime. The US hit Iraqi & Syrian oil based on this. HRW omits since it demolishes their fake claims. 12/
22 paragraphs into HRW report (of 23) they admit Iran supplies missiles to Houthis. But they don’t say how missiles are delivered. If not Hodeida then which port? Their whole analysis is fabrication and speculation to libel Israel, so they won't offer this key information. 13/
HRW confidently claims even if port was a military target, attack was disproportionate. HRW fails to explain their assessment of “anticipated military advantage” vs “expected” harm to civilian objects. HRW ignores that stopping missiles attacks was an Israeli "advantage." 14/
Fake NGO @HRW fabricates int’l law to claim Israeli war crimes. HRW lies about use of Hodeidah port by Houthis for military as UN reports, plays dumb on how Iran ships missiles to Yemen, pretends oil is not a legitimate target, fakes analysis of proportionality. Pure junk. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵CRITICAL: New study claiming 75,000 violent deaths in Gaza—30,000 more than Hamas reports—is deeply flawed. It is not credible to claim 40% of total deaths went unreported when even Gaza’s MoH admits families overreport deaths for compensation. Plus other flaws. Analysis: 1/
Study contradicts itself: it admits Gazans overreport deaths for compensation, even with FALSE claims and bereaved families receive benefits—which a senior MoH official confirmed. But we’re also expected to believe 30,000 deaths weren’t reported by Gazans? It does not add up. 2/
The study itself admits fatalities may have been overreported to surveyors in hopes of compensation—but then narrative gives no explanation for how its headline claim of 30,000 underreported deaths squares with Gazans tending to overreport deaths. 3/
🧵Haaretz has a long record of fabricating or distorting news to push an anti-Zionist agenda. Its publisher, Amos Schocken, admitted the paper sees itself not as a journalistic outlet but as a tool to "shape Israel"—especially for foreign audiences. 1/ honestreporting.com/haaretz-admits…
Schocken and many of its editors have long espoused deep anti-Zionist views, desires for Zionism to "collapse" and lauded Palestinian terrorists as freedom fighters–as Schocken did in 2024. He backtracked when called out but this world view permeates every issue. 2/
Here is one of the current editors who wrote "In the collapse of Zionism, we shall find solace." Should someone who writes this be considered a trusted journalist on issues related to Israel? 3/
🧵A new “study” claiming 188,000 Gazan children (out of 377,000 total Gazans) were “disappeared” is easily proven FAKE — because the WHO vaccinated 603,000 children up to age 10 in 2025! This is MORE children this age than pre-war per Palestinian Bureau of Statistics. Detail: 1/
WHO has been vaccinating Gazan children in Gaza for polio in multiple rounds for months. This ended in Feb 2025 reaching 603,000 children under age 10, and this was not 100% coverage. This was reported in detail by the WHO, see press release below. 2/
See birth data from Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. Total births in Gaza for 10 years ended 2022 were 577,000 – well below the 603,000 up to age 10 vaccinated in Gaza by the WHO. So no mass “disappearance” – but GROWTH in child population. 3/ pcbs.gov.ps/statisticsIndi…
🧵Gaza “aid massacres” are fake, a Hamas ploy to harm the GHF, amplified by willing media 1/
➡️Hamas killed Gazans in many confirmed cases
➡️Key source: Hamas operative Mahmoud Basel
➡️Reports trace back to 1 Gaza reporter
➡️Claims cite anonymous “medics”
➡️Gazan witnesses lied
Critical confirmation that Hamas has killed many Gazans to pin blame on Israel and disrupt GHF: PA’s official newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida reported on June 19 that Hamas Al-Sahm "death squads" shoot civilians, citing locals, to maintain control of aid. 2/ memri.org/reports/palest…
Palestinian observers tracking events in Gaza posted corroborating evidence: Hamas’s Sahm Unit is regularly killing Gazans cooperating with GHF, and others. To Hamas, aid coordination=betrayal. These murders, are all inflated & blamed on Israeli by Hamas "health authorities. 3/
đź§µThe Foreign Minister of Iran and now the anti-Israel mob is disseminating a fake map (below) of Be'er Sheva & Soroka to claim Iran was targeting nearby military sites and did not hit hospital itself. Expect media to pick up on this. Thread below shows how it's all fake: 1/
Even the most basic Google Map search shows that this map has no connection to the real map of Be'er Sheva. Basic locations and street names are fabricated. 2/
This thread provides great detail and definitively proves the Iranian lies at the highest levels of government to hide their deliberate strike at a civilian hospital: 3/
đź§µArticle in @NYMag claims war crimes in Gaza. FIRST example of strike presented as criminal does not disclose that it targeted a Hamas commander, tunnel network (NOT the buildings) with many secondary explosions. @suzyhans why did you omit this critical information? Sources: 1/
Here is the IDF video and description of the attack. IDF does not disclose how many total combatants were killed, weapons stored, strategic value, etc. No one else knows this either, so there is no way to assess "proportionality." 2/
Airwars, which is highly biased against Israel, confirmed that this 10/25/23 strike referenced in the article is the same strike that killed the Hamas commander & tunnel. They admit "potentially secondary explosions" but its obvious from the video. 3/ airwars.org/civilian-casua…