🧵Another fake report by @HRW — now claiming Israeli attack on Hodeida possibly war crime because UN officials said there is no military activity at port. But UN report HRW cites contradicts claim; evidence shows Houthis smuggle arms and launch attacks from port. Analysis: 1/
HRW claims IDF attack was “indiscriminate” meaning port was not used for any military purpose & disproportionate. How does HRW know port was not used for military purposes? UN staff & Yemenis said so. That’s literally the only evidence HRW can muster! 2/
Is it true UN “never found evidence of a Houthi military presence" at port? FALSE. HRW themselves cite UN report (S/2023/130) contradicting claim. HRW conveniently omits. Clause 35 recounts how port was used by Houthis in 2022 to detain a UAE vessel. A clear military use. 3/
UN recounts in Paragraph 36 a May 2022 attack by Houthi military vessels (“three skiffs carrying armed men”) in the area of the port of Hodeida – the only port in the area. The crack research team at HRW seems to have not read the report they cite. 4/
Same UN report describes military parade at Hodeidah and specifically notes this violated agreement not to use city for "military manifestation." HRW cites UN official claiming Hodeida NEVER had military presence as core evidence but claim is contradicted in a UN report! 5/
HRW also ignores many confirmed reports showing how Houthis used area of Hodeida port to fire missiles at ships. Here is an AP report from Jan 2024. The willful blindness by HRW is breathtaking. It's not research, just virulent anti-Israel propaganda. 6/
In June 2024, per Al Jazeera, “small watercraft” of Houthis hit a civilian Greek ship “near Red Sea port of Hodeidah” (war crime anyone?) Where could those “small watercraft” have come from? Obviously the nearby port of Hodeidah where the attack occurred. HRW ignores. 7/
Iran has been caught often using fishing boats and cover of humanitarian aid to smuggle weapons to Houthis. Only Iran/Houthi/Hamas/Hezbollah apologists like HRW would deny this. It’s preposterous to rely on UN officials to certify that Hodeidah is not used for arms smuggling. 8/
According to US military, these transfer of weapons violate Security Council Resolution 2216 which HRW claims the Houthis are adhering to. The shoddy and dishonest HRW report does not bother to note rampant violation by Iran & Houthis to smuggle ballistic missile components. 9/
The Arab coalition against the Houthis has also stated that their intelligence shows the Houthis smuggle weapons via Hodeidah port. So it's not just an Israeli claim. HRW omits this aspect of Houthi activity at Hodeidah as it would demolish claims of Israeli war crimes. 10/
HRW also inanely ignores that oil is a key strategic asset by any military. It’s stupid to have to explain this. Houthis fired ballistic missiles at Israel. Israel has every right to harm Houthi capacity to wage war. But HRW’s fake experts claim hitting oil is not legal. 11/
Geneva Convention considers oil a legitimate military target since they “make an effective contribution to military action” both for its use by military and revenue for regime. The US hit Iraqi & Syrian oil based on this. HRW omits since it demolishes their fake claims. 12/
22 paragraphs into HRW report (of 23) they admit Iran supplies missiles to Houthis. But they don’t say how missiles are delivered. If not Hodeida then which port? Their whole analysis is fabrication and speculation to libel Israel, so they won't offer this key information. 13/
HRW confidently claims even if port was a military target, attack was disproportionate. HRW fails to explain their assessment of “anticipated military advantage” vs “expected” harm to civilian objects. HRW ignores that stopping missiles attacks was an Israeli "advantage." 14/
Fake NGO @HRW fabricates int’l law to claim Israeli war crimes. HRW lies about use of Hodeidah port by Houthis for military as UN reports, plays dumb on how Iran ships missiles to Yemen, pretends oil is not a legitimate target, fakes analysis of proportionality. Pure junk. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Reuters photo of Al-Basma IVF clinic reveals UN fabricated “evidence” to accuse Israel of striking it to “prevent births." UN argues IDF must have intentionally targeted it since nearby buildings were less damaged—but buried photo showing the opposite. UN lied. More detail: 1/
Reuters photo shows there was active combat here—perhaps a Hamas RPG cell in high rise. UN’s entire thesis collapses with this photo. There is no evidence clinic was hit by IDF. Media reports only cite clinic director who says it was an IDF shell but he was not even there! 2/
Here is a closeup of clinic. Other photos show damage inside. Bullet holes and high rise damage proves there was active combat in area. Clinic building is intact thus “targeted strike” claim is false. High rise blast indicates THAT was the likely target. UN knowingly ignores. 3/
🧵UN's fake "genocide report" accuses Israel of intentionally striking Gaza Al-Basma IVF clinic to destroy embryos to “prevent births” and "destroy future of Palestinians." This claimed attack is a key aspect of the claim. But there is ZERO evidence for any of it. Analysis: 1/
The entire evidence comes from ABC News media report from Apr 2024 regarding this incident that apparently happened in December 2023—4 months earlier. Clinic director said an Israeli shell hit the clinic but he was not there and does not even know the exact date of incident. 2/
The UN Report does not have any more information than this yet make sweeping claims! They say they looked at photos (shown in the ABC report) and claim it “most probably” was an IDF tank shell. They cite the ABC report that the IDF said it was unaware of this incident. 3/
🧵I wrote a rebuttal of UN's new "report" accusing Israel of genocide for @UNWatch It is filled with fake data, fake intent, fake evidence. It erases Hamas. 10/7 is presented as something Israel did—including taking hostages (really!). See more below 1/ unwatch.org/un-watch-rebut…
10/7 is erased. Entire incident is presented as an Israeli attack, the reader won't know what happened. Hamas is erased too. They do not exist in the report. They are only even mentioned first 8 pages deep, and only and always in the context of Israeli claims & statements. 2/
Even more evil: there is no mention that Hamas took hostages. The report deliberately erases the event and weaponizes the word to accuse ISRAEL of taking the Palestinians people "hostage." The first mention of the word is buried 27 pages deep. This is Orwellian inversion. 3/
🧵MSF survey of Gaza fatalities inadvertently reveals key data: 24% of all fatalities (~11,000) are natural, not war caused. Total deaths of 46,000 at Mar 2025 vs Hamas’ claim of 50,000. This shatters “studies” claiming far higher tolls; confirms inclusion of natural deaths. 1/
MSF reports a death rate of 0.41 per 10,000 per day in Gaza as of 3/26/25, thus totaling 46,000 fatalities since 10/7. And 76% are due to war injuries (~35,000), leaving 11,000 natural deaths—matching expected mortality (natural and infant) for this period. 2/
As of survey date, Hamas claims 50,144 deaths (see below from UN), not far off from MSF survey result. But Hamas has always claimed these were ALL war deaths, but yet in 2 years has never produced another list of “natural deaths” which based on history should be about 12,000. 3/
đź§µIPC declared famine in Gaza 3 weeks ago. By their metrics we should have 4,300 starvation deaths since then and endless images of emaciated people. Instead Hamas/UN report just 135 such deaths in 21 days (also exaggerated). A 97% difference! IPC report was deliberate fraud. 1/
Most if not all "malnutrition deaths" in Gaza are people with serious other conditions, like cancer and children with cerebral palsy. They are not dying because there is literally no food available to give them. Like this man listed as a "malnutrition death." 2/
It’s crucial to distinguish deaths from literal lack of food vs deaths from diseases classified as malnutrition even when food is available. In the USA, 23,000 died of “malnutrition” in 2023, yet no one claims they were starved to death. See thread: 3/
🧵IAGS lost credibility after railroading a Gaza “genocide” resolution with no debate and allowing ANYONE to be a voting member. More important: resolution itself is false led by its president Melanie O’Brien who discarded scholarship to libel Israel. 1/
The resolution could not muster any credible evidence of "special intent" to genocide, recycling the fake "human animals" line as core evidence. This is just the tip of iceberg on this sham resolution that debases all the "scholars" who voted for it. 3/