Better to ask for forgiveness than for permission: Ukraine's Kursk Operation has outmanoeuvred both Russia & United States.
The Biden Administration has been boxed in and forced to give tacit approval to an operation they didn't know of & are still reticent about.
1/22 🧵
If you want my full analysis on Kursk, check out my latest piece for @InsiderEng. It was submitted a week ago, so it predates the latest news. This thread will focus on the key grand strategic outcomes; no tactical or operational analysis here.
Since the beginning of the war, Ukraine has been fighting two fronts: Russia on the battlefields and intransigent western governments in the halls of power. Fear of escalation has severely limited the quantity and quality of weapons willingly provided to Ukraine.
3/22
Ukraine has been forced to comply with absurd restrictions placed on them out of fear that it would jeopardize what security assistance they do receive from the United States. Efforts by the UK to have the Biden Admin lift the restrictions have been unsuccessful.
4/22
None of Ukraine's arguments have resolved the fundamental problem: Russia is free to strike all of Ukrainian territory with impunity, but Ukraine cannot respond in kind. The Biden Administration remains adamant that "deep strikes" are both too escalatory & unnecessary.
5/22
Of course, at the end of May/beginning of June, the Biden Admin implemented an extremely limited policy change that allowed Ukraine to defend itself against attacks coming across the border from Belgorod, and later Kursk Oblasts. Long-range fires remained prohibited.
6/22
This change was really too little, too late though. Had Ukraine been granted permission sooner, they could have disrupted Russia's Kharkiv offensive before it was launched. By the time Ukraine fired its first defensive strike on Belgorod, Russia had almost culminated.
7/22
Despite indicating that the policy could be further revised, over the past 11 weeks, there has been no change. Ukraine has been put in the impossible position of having to continue fighting with 1 hand behind their back, because President Biden is afraid of Vladimir Putin.
8/22
No argument that Ukraine has made, no action they have taken — striking Russian energy infrastructure, an early ballistic missile warning radar, and other strategic targets — has been able to convince the Biden Admin that Russia will not escalate. What else could they do?
9/22
𝙀𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙆𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙠:
President Zelensky made a decision to start pushing the envelop; to test the seriousness of Biden's threats of terminating aid if they violate the conditions. The operation caught the Russians, the United States, and us analysts off guard.
10/22
The differing initial reactions from the Biden Admin and the Europeans was an interesting contrast. With the latter giving their approval, and the former's John Kirby saying they were: “reaching out to our Ukrainian counterparts to get a little bit better understanding.”
11/22
The next day, the Pentagon bizarrely claimed that: “It is consistent with our policy and we have supported Ukraine from the very beginning to defend themselves against attacks that are coming across the border.”
This is of course not true, as that policy dates to June.
12/22
The policy never permitted Ukraine to use American weapons to launch large-scale ground operations into Russia. Attacking a quiet section of the border in Kursk violates the conditions that Ukraine can only return fire or target imminent threats.
13/22
I am sure there will be no shortage of clueless individuals claiming without evidence that Ukraine was given more latitude than what was publicly disclosed, but this is obviously untrue. All evidence shows that the Admin did not know & remains skeptical of the operation.
14/22
The State Department said they were not told.
The White House said they were not told.
The Pentagon said they were not told.
15/22
In on background conversations with US government officials, the media (including NYT, and WSJ, to name a few) has been told the same thing.
16/22
If that wasn't enough already, President Zelensky himself has said that "no one knew about our preparations". He goes on to speak at length about the strategic calculus behind the operation. The primary motivation is of course the destruction of Putin's illusory red lines.
17/22
By taking the fight onto sovereign Russian territory, Ukraine has further demonstrated the hollowness of the Kremlin's nuclear sabre rattling. They have shifted the Overton Window & forced the Biden Admin top tacitly accept a new status quo in how US weapons can be used.
18/22
This was of course not without risk, but President Zelensky correctly calculated that it would be more dangerous to continue fighting with one hand tied behind the back. The strong show of support from both Europe and the US Congress has helped further box Biden in.
19/22
The task ahead for Ukraine is to maintain momentum; not just for the ongoing operation on the ground, but for the political and strategic communications campaign too. They haven’t wasted much time; they've already made a formal request to use ATACMS to hit airbases.
20/22
How President Biden responds next will be instructive to the Ukrainians on their next course of action. If the request is denied, or placed in review purgatory, President Zelensky may once again elect to ask for forgiveness rather than permission.
21/22
Churchill never actually said it, but a quote attributed to him reads: “You can depend on Americans to do the right thing when they have exhausted every other possibility.” Will Biden exhaust all possibilities? Or will he lead, and help Kyiv deliver a knockout blow?
22/22
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇺🇸🇺🇦 As President Joe Biden serves out his final weeks in office, he still has the opportunity to correct his past mistakes, and put Ukraine on better footing as we start the new year. Here's what should be done. ⬇️
🧵 1/9
If you want to read beyond these highlights, check out my latest for @InsiderEng, which explores this in more length. I also touch on the question of what we might expect from the incoming Trump Admin and the new Congress in the US.
❗🇺🇸🇨🇳 "US Army and Joint Electronic Warfare (EW) forces in the
Indo-Pacific are outnumbered, outranged, and outpowered by those possessed by the People's Liberation Army (PLA)." -Army Science Board White Paper on EW
Let's see what else it has to say?
🧵⬇️ 1/14
"there is no executive agent or proponent [for EW] designated at the highest level of the Army to ensure appropriate resourcing of critical functions, equipment, training, and staffing."
A Deputy Assistant Secretary for EW, reporting to ASA(ALT) could be created for this.
2/14
"The PLA's space capabilities closely match or exceed those of US Army Pacific (USARPAC)."
"The Army makes operational and resourcing decisions based on analytical data that supports value to the warfighter, but its EW discipline lacks this analysis capability."
In 1 week, at the end of Fiscal Year 2024, $5.925 billion in Presidential Drawdown Authority is set to expire. If this happens, it will cripple the US' ability to support Ukraine. We've seen this story before. Will Congress and the Biden Admin manage to avert disaster?
🧵⬇️ 1/20
This is a summary of my latest piece for @InsiderEng, please do check it out. This thread will also include some additional details that have been learned since the column was posted.
If you want additional context before proceeding, read my previous thread quoted below. I will have a second research thread on this topic coming in the future that will provide additional information and make corrections to this previous thread.
🇺🇸 On Friday, the State Department hit RTX (Raytheon) with a $200 million penalty for committing 750 violations of Arms Export Control Act & its associated International Traffic in Arms Regulations, including unauthorized exports to 🇮🇷🇱🇧🇷🇺🇨🇳. The details are shocking. ⬇️
🧵 1/18
The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) govern the export of defense articles via commercial transactions. Any company involved in any aspect of the defense industry is very familiar with these lengthy & strict regulations.
2/18
RTX is the third largest defense contractor in the world and the second largest in the United States. They have three main operating divisions:
Last month Kongsberg (🇳🇴) unveiled their new Mobile, Short Range Air Defense System (M-SHORAD): NOMADS.
Germany is already considering procuring it for Ukraine.
Here's what NOMADS has to offer.
🧵 1/21
𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗗𝗦: 𝗡ati𝗢nal 𝗠aneuver 𝗔ir 𝗗efence 𝗦ystem, has been developed following a 2019 contract with the @FMateriell (🇳🇴) to fulfill a mobile, short range air defense requirement for the Army. 6 vehicles were ordered with 3 already delivered & successfully tested.
2/21
NOMADS is actually a vehicle agnostic module and accompanying Command & Control (C2) suite. While Norway operates it (and Kongsberg markets it) on a FFG (🇩🇪) ACSV G5, any vehicle that meets the dimensional & payload requirements could theoretically mount it.
Ukraine is contending with the classic missile defense dilemma: interceptors are often more expensive, and certainly more scarce, than the targets they seek to destroy.
The solution?
Ukraine must be empowered by President Biden to shoot the archer, not just the arrow.
1/21
I don't know who coined this idiom, but the oldest instance I found of it in the context of missile defense is from a 1988 @SteveEngelberg article in NYT. An officer in the US Navy used it to illustrate their air and missile defense doctrine to Engelberg.
2/21
Engelberg explained: "Because missiles can be fired well before the plane carrying them is in view, American military doctrine calls for the captain to defend his ship by knocking down hostile aircraft as soon as he believes he is under attack."