Better to ask for forgiveness than for permission: Ukraine's Kursk Operation has outmanoeuvred both Russia & United States.
The Biden Administration has been boxed in and forced to give tacit approval to an operation they didn't know of & are still reticent about.
1/22 🧵
If you want my full analysis on Kursk, check out my latest piece for @InsiderEng. It was submitted a week ago, so it predates the latest news. This thread will focus on the key grand strategic outcomes; no tactical or operational analysis here.
Since the beginning of the war, Ukraine has been fighting two fronts: Russia on the battlefields and intransigent western governments in the halls of power. Fear of escalation has severely limited the quantity and quality of weapons willingly provided to Ukraine.
3/22
Ukraine has been forced to comply with absurd restrictions placed on them out of fear that it would jeopardize what security assistance they do receive from the United States. Efforts by the UK to have the Biden Admin lift the restrictions have been unsuccessful.
4/22
None of Ukraine's arguments have resolved the fundamental problem: Russia is free to strike all of Ukrainian territory with impunity, but Ukraine cannot respond in kind. The Biden Administration remains adamant that "deep strikes" are both too escalatory & unnecessary.
5/22
Of course, at the end of May/beginning of June, the Biden Admin implemented an extremely limited policy change that allowed Ukraine to defend itself against attacks coming across the border from Belgorod, and later Kursk Oblasts. Long-range fires remained prohibited.
6/22
This change was really too little, too late though. Had Ukraine been granted permission sooner, they could have disrupted Russia's Kharkiv offensive before it was launched. By the time Ukraine fired its first defensive strike on Belgorod, Russia had almost culminated.
7/22
Despite indicating that the policy could be further revised, over the past 11 weeks, there has been no change. Ukraine has been put in the impossible position of having to continue fighting with 1 hand behind their back, because President Biden is afraid of Vladimir Putin.
8/22
No argument that Ukraine has made, no action they have taken — striking Russian energy infrastructure, an early ballistic missile warning radar, and other strategic targets — has been able to convince the Biden Admin that Russia will not escalate. What else could they do?
9/22
𝙀𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙆𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙠:
President Zelensky made a decision to start pushing the envelop; to test the seriousness of Biden's threats of terminating aid if they violate the conditions. The operation caught the Russians, the United States, and us analysts off guard.
10/22
The differing initial reactions from the Biden Admin and the Europeans was an interesting contrast. With the latter giving their approval, and the former's John Kirby saying they were: “reaching out to our Ukrainian counterparts to get a little bit better understanding.”
11/22
The next day, the Pentagon bizarrely claimed that: “It is consistent with our policy and we have supported Ukraine from the very beginning to defend themselves against attacks that are coming across the border.”
This is of course not true, as that policy dates to June.
12/22
The policy never permitted Ukraine to use American weapons to launch large-scale ground operations into Russia. Attacking a quiet section of the border in Kursk violates the conditions that Ukraine can only return fire or target imminent threats.
13/22
I am sure there will be no shortage of clueless individuals claiming without evidence that Ukraine was given more latitude than what was publicly disclosed, but this is obviously untrue. All evidence shows that the Admin did not know & remains skeptical of the operation.
14/22
The State Department said they were not told.
The White House said they were not told.
The Pentagon said they were not told.
15/22
In on background conversations with US government officials, the media (including NYT, and WSJ, to name a few) has been told the same thing.
16/22
If that wasn't enough already, President Zelensky himself has said that "no one knew about our preparations". He goes on to speak at length about the strategic calculus behind the operation. The primary motivation is of course the destruction of Putin's illusory red lines.
17/22
By taking the fight onto sovereign Russian territory, Ukraine has further demonstrated the hollowness of the Kremlin's nuclear sabre rattling. They have shifted the Overton Window & forced the Biden Admin top tacitly accept a new status quo in how US weapons can be used.
18/22
This was of course not without risk, but President Zelensky correctly calculated that it would be more dangerous to continue fighting with one hand tied behind the back. The strong show of support from both Europe and the US Congress has helped further box Biden in.
19/22
The task ahead for Ukraine is to maintain momentum; not just for the ongoing operation on the ground, but for the political and strategic communications campaign too. They haven’t wasted much time; they've already made a formal request to use ATACMS to hit airbases.
20/22
How President Biden responds next will be instructive to the Ukrainians on their next course of action. If the request is denied, or placed in review purgatory, President Zelensky may once again elect to ask for forgiveness rather than permission.
21/22
Churchill never actually said it, but a quote attributed to him reads: “You can depend on Americans to do the right thing when they have exhausted every other possibility.” Will Biden exhaust all possibilities? Or will he lead, and help Kyiv deliver a knockout blow?
22/22
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇺🇸 In Dec 2025, the US revealed the new Government-to-Government Only List: all their most sensitive military systems only available for export via the Foreign Military Sales Program. Reforming this list has long been desired by US customers. Here it is, from A to Z:
1/24 🧵⬇️
The old "Foreign Military Sales Only List" consisted of broad and duplicate categories, and has long been a point of frustration for US customers; with a desire for more systems to be eligible for the Direct Commercial Sales Program. These changes do just that.
2/24
A/R/UGM-84 Harpoon/Standoff Land Attack Missile - Expanded Response AURs and Select Command and Launch-Control System Components
Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System - Guidance Section Components
Operationally, Epic Fury has been a success, but not without fault. Losses incurred by US & partner forces could have been minimized had the Trump Admin been more open to Ukrainian support; and the US Army more nimble in reforms.
Here are the receipts to prove it. 🧵 ⬇️
1/25
Last August the Ukrainians pitched the White House on a defense industrial cooperation deal focused on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and counter-UAS (cUAS). Ukraine has immense technical and operational expertise in this area. They made this presentation, obtained by Axios.
2/25
Ukraine even emphasized the threat Iran posed to US forces in CENTCOM. After meeting with Zelensky, Trump told his team to work on it, but they did not follow through. US officials have told Axios that this was a big mistake on the Administration's part.
After ignoring Ukraine's Aug 2025 pitch to bolster US cUAS capabilities in CENTCOM, US officials are quietly admitting they made a big mistake. Now Ukraine is deploying teams to assist US forces, and the Gulf States in countering the drone threat. Even Bibi is calling now.
2/10
Ukraine has much to share. It goes beyond any one particular system, its all the tactics, techniques and procedures that Ukraine has. It's how they integrate everything together. It's valuable knowledge born of experience, and they know what its worth.
🇮🇱 I keep seeing a lot of incorrect information about Iron Beam, so here's a short explanation. It isn't just one system, it's a family of systems, some of which are operational, and some not, including:
▶️ Iron Beam
▶️ Iron Beam-Mobile
▶️ Lite Beam
▶️ Naval Iron Beam
1/7 🧵
Iron Beam is a 100-120 Kilowatt High Energy Laser, deployed via a 20ft container, with *advertised* capability vs UAS, mortars, rockets, artillery, and cruise missiles. It is not ballistic missile defense capable.
It is possibly in "Early Operational Capability".
2/7
Iron Beam-M(obile) is a 50-60 kW High Energy Laser (HEL), transportable via a Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT). Its reference threats are UAS & loitering munitions.
I would describe Iron Beam-M as being in Initial Operational Capability (more on this later).
What is the actual purpose of theater missile defense (TMD)?
I keep seeing people who work in defense policy get this question completely wrong.
It isn't "cost effective" interception of 100% of enemy threats.
So what is it?
An explanatory thread. 🧵⬇️
1/17
A fundamental challenge in TMD is that interceptors are generally more expensive than their targets. This is compounded by the fact that most air defense doctrine calls for 2 interceptors to be expended per target to help ensure a probable kill.
2/17
At face value, this isn't cost effective, but we need to consider the cost of *not* intercepting the incoming threat, rather than just the cost of the engagement. Those who detract from or don't understand TMD seldom seem to consider this question of opportunity cost.
Should the United States launch offensive operations against Iran?
A brief munitions analysis.
The purpose of this thread is to provide context that I find currently lacking in the discourse on this question. I'm not going to address legality or broader strategy.
🧵⬇️
1/17
Over the last 2 and a half years, considerable numbers of munitions have been expended by CENTCOM against Iran & its proxies. This has included both missile defense interceptors, air to air missiles and strike weapons, including standoff missiles like Tomahawk.
2/17
Operation Midnight Hammer saw 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators employed, which was a significant portion of a limited inventory. While this was a major setback to Iran's nuclear program, they retain considerable conventionally armed missile capabilities.