The wounds are consistent with Roman crucifixion and the specifics of the Bible account: marks from the crown of thorns, stab wound in the side, lacerations on the back and bruises on the shoulders.
Culture_Crit/status/1826292272914161978
-
In crucifixion the wrists were pierced (as accurately reflected in the shroud) not the middle of the palms which is commonly supposed.
adusseus/status/1826401990957826285
Correct, according to the Jesuits.
bradzilla67/status/1826416196360581505
-
"I was an atheist who set out to prove Shroud of Turin was fake – but probing it turned me CHRISTIAN & I know it’s REAL."
"I cannot possibly understand anything else that could have produced that image."
- David Rolfe
CultureExploreX/status/1826356637302751522
-
This is yet another excellent piece of evidence that the Shroud of Turin is indeed real.
This 3D model of Jesus was created using the shroud
The statue is the three-dimensional representation, in actual size, of the Man of the Shroud, created following the precise measurements taken from the cloth.
-
Professor Creates 3D Image of Christ from Shroud of Turin [29MAR18]
“For the believer, what counts above all is that the shroud is a mirror of the Gospel. ... Whoever approaches it is also aware that the shroud does not hold people’s hearts to itself, but turns them to him.”
CoffeewClassics/status/1826350291245302002
-
Shroud of Turin is 'powerful image of God's love,' says exhibit curator [14APR22]
A new study done on the Shroud of Turin has found that the purported burial cloth of Jesus is 2,000 years old rather than several hundred years old. This is scandalous, even for some religious people who want religion to be an abstract thing. [21AUG24]
New Italian X-Ray study of Shroud of Turin CONFIRMS it dates to 2000 years ago
This debunks previous flawed carbon dating
The shroud was scientifically matched to a piece of linen known to date from the siege of Masada in 72 AD
JackPosobiec/status/1826303536482656390
-
Turin Shroud Study Claims Controversial Cloth Does Date to Time of Jesus
@CynicalPublius Yes, Google is misinterpreting the rules
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified."
This quote was fed into google.
-
I fed in the longer, complete quote
“. . . information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released by any military member, DoW civilian employee or contract employee, even if it is unclassified.”
- still misinterpreted
-
@CynicalPublius I believe that Google interprets this from an authoritative perspective. The authority is the mainstream press.
The press is using Google, and Google is parroting their thinking in answer.
The Nobel Peace Prize Committee awarded it to a Venezuelan peace activist today, and you know what she did?
Dedicated it to President Trump
- DC_Draino
[I saw this and had to check it out]
-
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the 2025 #NobelPeacePrize to Maria Corina Machado for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela
- The Nobel Prize
-
This recognition of the struggle of all Venezuelans is a boost to conclude our task: to conquer Freedom.
I dedicate this prize to the suffering people of Venezuela and to President Trump for his decisive support of our cause!