Ukraine continues to destroy Russian fuel logistics. New reports of the destruction of a ship with fuel tanks in the port of Kavkaz in Kerch. Details are being clarified. The oil depot in Proletarsk, Rostov Region, has been burning for the fifth day. After the attack on
1/13
Proletarsk, a sale of oil depots has begun in the Rostov Region, local media write. Several oil depots in different areas of the region are up for sale. In addition, two more oil refineries and an inactive oil depot are up for sale in the Rostov Region. Ukraine is
2/13
confronting a much larger enemy and the tactics that Ukraine has successfully used many times during this war are to methodically destroy logistics and attack when the army has supply problems. There is nothing new in the tactics themselves, but new technologies provide new
3/13
opportunities. Such tactics also work at a small level, when the Russians are allowed to enter a populated area, then cut off from supplies with drones and artillery, and then destroyed one by one. So, on a general level - Ukraine methodically took out air defense, after
4/13
which it was easier to attack oil storage facilities and airfields. Solving one problem after another. It is unlikely that the operation in the Kursk region is the place of Ukraine's main attack. Its goal is to liberate territory, not to seize new ones. While Putin is not
5/13
ready to withdraw forces from the Pokrovsk direction, parts of the troops have already been sent from the Zaporizhzhya and Kherson regions to stop the Ukrainians in Kursk. Is it possible that Ukraine is planning a new offensive in the Zaporizhzhya region? It is possible,
6/13
but this is not certain. The Armed Forces of Ukraine have not yet introduced into battle most of the brigades formed by the new mobilization. Not all Western equipment has been introduced either. Ukraine is accumulating resources. A maximum of 10,000 Ukrainian soldiers are
7/13
operating in Kursk. Some of whom are still in Ukraine as reinforcements. During the war, theories have repeatedly surfaced that it would be most advantageous to strike in the Zaporizhzhya region, but inflated expectations led to failure. The offensive in 2023 did not work
8/13
out. Will the Ukrainians be able to do it now and will they risk going through the heavily mined and fortified areas of the Zaporizhia region now with larger forces and different tactics? It still remains a very difficult task. The Kursk operation is ongoing, and we have
9/13
even gotten used to the idea that Ukrainian troops are occupying Russian territory. Who would have thought of this a month ago? Ukraine has begun to advance into the Glushkovsky district, where they have cut off up to 2,000 Russian troops from supplies across the Seim River
10/13
Another 300 square kilometers of territory may soon be taken by Ukraine. The total area of the Kursk region, where fighting is currently underway, already exceeds 1,350 square kilometers. The operation is going well. We must remember that Ukraine is also suffering losses,
11/13
the Ukrainian civilian population is constantly under shelling. Russia is trying to stop the offensive in Kursk, this time by bombing its own cities. However, autumn is approaching and in about 2 months the fighting will be more difficult to conduct due to the weather and
12/13
muddy roads. Is Ukraine preparing another blow? Most likely, but at the moment no one except the Ukrainian General Staff knows where the next strike will be. And that's for the best. Let Ukraine surprise us once again.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russian actions around NATO borders and within its territories are becoming increasingly aggressive, and talk of a possible Russian attack on alliance members is growing. Russia is testing reactions to provocations, and so far NATO has responded with restraint. This is
1/17
understandable, since a downed aircraft could serve as a casus belli for Russia. Moreover, it will give propaganda an opportunity to call people to rally around the national leader Putin to confront the “NATO threat” with which Russians have been frightened for years.
2/17
However, for dictatorships, a restrained response often serves as a signal to act. There is no doubt that Russia cannot compete with NATO economically or militarily in the long run, but today NATO lags behind both Ukraine and Russia in the tactics of new-generation warfare.
3/17
Russia is frightened by the upcoming potential supply of American weapons, such as Tomahawk missiles, to Ukraine. It's difficult to predict what actions will follow the statements from White House officials, but the shift in rhetoric is indeed alarming Russia. Instead of the 1/6
usual threats Lavrov issued at the UN in response to the plan to shoot down Russian aircraft violating its borders, Peskov was reserved in his comments. "The question remains: who can launch these missiles, even if they end up on Kyiv regime territory? Can only Ukrainians 2/6
launch them, or should the American military do so? Who assigns the targeting missions to these missiles—the Americans or the Ukrainians themselves? And so on. Therefore, a very thorough analysis is needed here. We have certainly heard the statements; they are very serious, 3/6
Russian publicist and blogger Yulia Latynina, who was placed under personal sanctions by Ukraine for participating in anti-Ukrainian propaganda, is receiving hundreds of thousands of euros for her Estonian structures, writes Postimees. This activity raises questions
1/15
considering how dramatically Latynina’s rhetoric has shifted over the years of full-scale war: from outright condemnation of the war she moved to ideas of Slavic unity and criticism of Ukrainian resistance. Yulia Latynina is a Russian publicist, writer, and video blogger.
2/15
She became known in the late 1990s as a journalist and as the author of science fiction novels and industrial detective stories. Latynina worked as a journalist for Novaya Gazeta and Echo of Moscow. On Gazprom’s radio station she hosted the popular program “Access Code.”
3/15
Many people ask why Estonia did not shoot down the Russian MiGs that violated Estonian airspace. It’s very simple. Here is the list of Estonian air-defence assets we have available — ZU-23-2 23mm anti-aircraft cannons, Mistral man-portable surface-to-air missile launchers, 1/6
and Giraffe AMB fire-control radars. The Estonian sky is guarded by NATO air forces on a rotational basis. Right now those are Italian F-35s. Our approach to the Russian threat and Italy’s approach differ greatly. If an Estonian pilot were behind the stick of an F-35, they 2/6
would fire after the first warning without hesitation; Italian air crews will think ten times before shooting down a Russian aircraft over Estonian territory. This is not a criticism of the Italians — they are our loyal allies — but they try to avoid escalation over someone 3/6
Small arms manufactured in Russia and their ammunition are being sold to Italian criminal groups, reportedly using Russia’s shadow fleet, Italian outlet Linkiesta writes. Journalists found that new weapons without serial numbers, produced between 2010 and 2020 - including 1/6
assault and sniper rifles - are entering Italy from Russia. This is not a case of erased serial numbers but, according to a source cited by the publication, genuinely new weapons leaving the factory already unmarked. The small arms supplied to Italian groups are said to be 2/6
produced at the Tula Arms Plant. Linkiesta notes that weapons without serial numbers can be removed from factories only with state approval, and this is corroborated by a 2023 Europol report stating that the emergence of new unmarked weapons on the market indicates “forms of 3/6
The EU is preparing to transfer most of the frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. The scheme is being developed so that the funds are handed over without formal confiscation. The EU plans to use the frozen assets held in depositories to purchase zero-interest EU bonds, with the 1/5
proceeds directed to Kyiv. Russia would only be able to reclaim the assets if it agrees to pay reparations to Ukraine. The amount in question is around €170 billion. Significantly, countries like Germany, along with France and Belgium—previously concerned that seizing 2/5
Russian assets could undermine trust in the euro as a reserve currency—are now supporting the plan. These fears have eased against the backdrop of political turmoil in the US and the weakening of the dollar. Moreover, with Washington’s reluctance, especially Trump’s 3/5