Funniest thing going on today is Nick Fuentes is mad at Candace Owens because her antisemitic conspiracies have included so many obvious factual errors that he says it’s making the other people who hate Jews look bad…
I’m not even joking. 😂😂😂
I’m not even joking. 😂😂😂
“You can’t really go hard like that and stake the reputation of you and everyone else, and then get it wrong.. really severely.. over and over”
Jokes aside, part of what is going on here is fear of audience capture and who antisemites follow/believe:
There are different sub-groups of antisemites (Neo-Nazis, Islamists, Lefitsts). Most of them all end up agreeing on a conspiracy about a secret cabal of Jews that is responsible for every single bad thing that happens in the world, but they all cite different types of evidence and underlying conspiracies to justify the claim. That’s where they end up clashing.
So for example, some Neo-Nazi “intellectuals” came up with this theory that the elites are all part of this small 18th century religious cult called Frankists (which actually died out). That those cult members replaced real Jews. That’s what Candace Owens has been actively promoting. But the thing is that the Frankists openly rejected Jewish texts like The Talmud (most of them also eventually converted to Christianity).
Meanwhile, a different group of antisemites (mix of Islamists and other Neo-Nazis) like to claim that there is a secret cabal of Jews that does bad things but it’s motivated by The Talmud (they don’t actually understand what The Talmud is and instead quote out of context arguments within it and distort them to show those as evidence).
These two conspiracies can’t co-exist. The Frankists explicitly rejected the Talmud. So if they are the secret cabal, they can’t be motivated by it. So someone like Fuentes understands that by popularizing conspiracy 1, Owens is undermining conspiracy 2. And thus also driving away the audience from those who promote conspiracy 1.
There are different sub-groups of antisemites (Neo-Nazis, Islamists, Lefitsts). Most of them all end up agreeing on a conspiracy about a secret cabal of Jews that is responsible for every single bad thing that happens in the world, but they all cite different types of evidence and underlying conspiracies to justify the claim. That’s where they end up clashing.
So for example, some Neo-Nazi “intellectuals” came up with this theory that the elites are all part of this small 18th century religious cult called Frankists (which actually died out). That those cult members replaced real Jews. That’s what Candace Owens has been actively promoting. But the thing is that the Frankists openly rejected Jewish texts like The Talmud (most of them also eventually converted to Christianity).
Meanwhile, a different group of antisemites (mix of Islamists and other Neo-Nazis) like to claim that there is a secret cabal of Jews that does bad things but it’s motivated by The Talmud (they don’t actually understand what The Talmud is and instead quote out of context arguments within it and distort them to show those as evidence).
These two conspiracies can’t co-exist. The Frankists explicitly rejected the Talmud. So if they are the secret cabal, they can’t be motivated by it. So someone like Fuentes understands that by popularizing conspiracy 1, Owens is undermining conspiracy 2. And thus also driving away the audience from those who promote conspiracy 1.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
