In one of the most important lines in the books, Gandalf offers insight into this virtue by highlighting its opposite: “Despair,” he says, “is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt. We do not.”
As long as you don't know how things will end, you'd better fight on.
Gandalf is hardly the most upbeat and chipper fellow. At one point he confesses that the whole campaign might have been just a “fool’s hope.” And yet he presses forth. He will go till he can go no more.
Most all the characters will face the test.
Denethor is the best example of one who fails. In his considerable wisdom, he becomes convinced that Sauron will win and the only reasonable thing to do is to lay down on a burning funeral pyre—and even to take your son with you.
His approach will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
To be fair, there’s every reason for Denethor to come to this conclusion. So hope requires something beyond a purely rational calculation. This is why it is a theological virtue.
Theoden similarly doesn’t see much chance of prevailing in this war, but he at least thinks it’s worthwhile to go down fighting.
He courts death in his great cavalry charge. This is not a perfect expression of virtue of hope, but it’s obviously far more useful than Denethor’s despair. He even accomplishes great deeds on the field that will give his people a chance.
Frodo and Sam’s journey to Mordor is the most straightforward example. Above all else, they must keep going, one foot in front of the other. Certain obstacles on their way will require a bit more finesse, but the constant challenge is to march forward every day.
When they accomplish that much, they find strange and unexpected help along the way.
Like Gandalf, Sam hardly keeps a totally positive attitude, but even in the darkest moments his dismay turns to resolve. He continues on in spite of himself.
And of course there's Aragorn. He is put through trials that would break almost all mortal men. He doesn’t pretend like there is much reason for optimism. At one point, on the search for Merry and Pip he suggests that they will press on without hope.
This is another key line because it suggests that hope is less of a feeling, as we tend to view it, and more of an action. So long as you keep moving forward, so long as you stay in the fight, you are expressing hope.
And in the end, Providence comes to the aid of those who stay in the fight. It's almost as if he wants to test you, to see if you really want his help. Those who don't want it enough will remove themselves from the fight and prove unworthy.
Those who want it will press on.
Art by:
Lucas Graciano
Joshua Cairos
Magali Villanueve
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Arthurian saga is a meditation on the virtue of loyalty.🧵
Of course the rest of the knightly virtues are embodied in these adventures, but loyalty is a special concern—the possibilities that arise when loyalty is the law, and the disasters that follow when betrayal creeps in. Kingdoms are at stake.
One of the most iconic moments in all of folklore is a simple act of loyalty. When he first approaches the sword in the stone, young Arthur Pendragon stakes no claim to be king, nor does he even understand the significance of what he’s about to do.
George Castriot Scanderbeg—
His story might as well have been written by a novelist rather than a historian—almost too wild to be believed. I've only just begun Barleti's book and it's already one of the most harrowing things I've ever read.🧵
The legend of Scanderbeg is set in motion when he, youngest son of an Albanian nobleman, is taken by the Ottomans at age eight, indoctrinated into Ottoman ways, forced to convert to Islam, subjected to all sorts of Ottoman horrors.
He is trained as a soldier and rises to the top of the sultan’s army. Scanderbeg brings the sultan victory after victory, wins public duels against foreign champions for the sultan's honor, and by all appearances the Albanian boy has become the Turks' greatest warrior.
St Louis wouldn't leave his men behind—
A 🧵 on a king's loyalty
Loyalty has a curious standing in a time like ours. We’ve been trained to see it mostly as a one-way street: something to be given by soldiers to commanders, by employees to executives, and so on.
As for what's owed by the mighty to those beneath them ... that doesn’t seem to get mentioned very often.
We also hear so many stories of abuses by authorities that loyalty starts to seem like a devious mechanism of control, designed by the powerful for the sake of power.
A couple questions struck me while watching this movie: Why do so few Arthurian adaptations work? Why does Excalibur stand out above all the rest? 🧵
In my lifetime there have been three major attempts to bring the Arthurian saga to the big screen: 1995’s First Knight (starring Sean Connery as Arthur), 2004’s King Arthur (Clive Owen), and 2017’s King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (Charlie Hunnam).
Each failed to make a claim on the hearts of viewers. The most recent one was reckoned such a commercial disaster that Warner Brothers had to cancel plans for several sequels and an expanded Arthurian Cinematic Universe.
How a real king does things—
Time to revisit one of my favorite heroic episodes from the Third Crusade. Deeds like this are why they call him the Lionheart. 🧵
After Crusader victories at Acre and Arsuf, the Saracens withdrew to Jerusalem and contented themselves with harassing their enemy’s foraging parties. In one instance, Western knights and squires found themselves trapped and badly outnumbered.
Richard, who had been busy overseeing the rebuilding of fortifications at Casal Maen, rode out when he received word of their peril.
But when he and the rescue party came upon the scene, his companions judged it hopeless and urged Richard not to try to save them.
The Song of the Cid is the national epic of Spain—the story of an exiled knight going out into the wilds of medieval Iberia with a small band of loyal followers, triumphing again and again over much larger Moorish armies, and making himself a legend.🧵
Backstory: El Cid arrives at a key moment in the Reconquista—a man "born at a fortunate hour.”
For many years the Christians had been slowly gaining back territory lost to the Moors in 711.
But following the Christian victory at Toledo in 1085, the Moors called for backup. All bets are off as masses of Almoravid jihadists come to Spain. These are far more severe than their coreligionists. They actually hated the Spanish Moors for their laxity.