South Africa is even more violent and crime-ridden than Somalia, so, how do South Africans defend themselves?
As the West, America, faces South Africanization and violent crime skyrocketing, we must learn how to fight it off
Here's a 🧵 on how South Africans do so
🧵👇
First, a bit of background on why it's important: we all know (or at least people who pay attention to the real world know) that basic self-defense things, like learning how to use a concealed pistol, how to fight, and staying alert for potential bad actors, is critical. There are a ton of great accounts on here, @DolioJ is the first that comes to mind, that know a great deal more about the traditional equipment and training side of preparation, even for extreme circumstances
But, sometimes, that's not enough. A G19 is great for if there's a mugger or two, but what if there are large gangs of people using signal jammers to break into homes and murder the inhabitants while preventing them from calling for help? What if car-jackings aren't just endemic to your city, as in DC and Atlanta, but a near certainty if you're stopped on the road, as is the case in some areas in South Africa? What if rampaging criminals of the sort @k9_reaper draws attention to are the norm rather than a shocking rarity?
That's when more intense, more creative solutions are necessary. So, that's what will discuss today
The best solution is to just not be there anymore, or at least not be where violent crime is a near-certainty
City-wise, that's what the Western Cape represents. Even better, there's Orania, a safe and defended community for like-minded people:
@DisgracedProp and I spoke about the Orania aspect recently, by the way, so check that out
But not everyone can just pack up and leave and head to the Western Cape, or make a huge change of life and move to Orania
So, for those who have to stay, South Africa has a massive private security sector. As the police can't or won't protect neighborhoods from violent criminals, private security companies are hired to do it. They patrol the areas, respond to incidents, and generally protect those who hire them from attacks, crime, and the sort of anarchy with which South Africans have to deal on a daily basis
There are now over 2.7 million private security personnel in the country of about 62 million people, compared with well under 200,000 police officers
So it's a big deal, and pretty much everyone who can hire a private security company does so.
But even private security personnel wearing plate carriers and heavily armed with rifles and pistols often isn't enough. When crime is endemic, and cities are essentially festering hives of criminality, one's home must not just be a metaphorical castle but actually be one, with even remote-controlled guns.
So, South Africa has led the way in turning suburban comes into modern-day castles
On the outer perimeter are thick walls, often of brick or concrete and topped with razor wire, electric wire, or both. There are often also spikes on top of the wall and razor wire at the base of it. The entryway is a thick metal gate
The internal perimeter is protected with motion alarms, automatic bright lights that shine on the space between the house and wall, along with often guard dogs inside the house that can alert the owners to trespassers. There are also cameras equipped with guns (video on the right), so the owner can fight off criminals remotely. I am unsure if the gun-cameras are just equipped with riot guns, or if actual firearms can be legally used as well. If anyone knows, please chime in. The video comes from @BowTiedMara
The house itself will be fortified as well with bars on the windows, metal-reinforced doors, alarms that connect to the aforementioned private security companies, guard dogs, and heavily-armed owners. Gun laws are relatively permissive in South Africa, so the full suite of semi-automatic or mechanical action weapons can be deployed
Tim Bax speaks about some of the security solutions required at the end of Three Sips of Gin, for those who want to read about it
But, even if one lives in Krak des Chevaliers, leaving is often required, particularly if you have to work at an office
That's when incredible innovations like the car flamethrower are required. It can be triggered form inside the car and torches the attempted carjacker(s) on the outside
The device has been taken off the market because of low sales but shows the ingenuity and level of force required, particularly in the sort of situations where mobs of attackers will go after a stopped car
And, finally, we have the most important thing: community mobilization
A great example of this happened during the 2021 riots. Neighborhoods were essentially under siege and risked being completely destroyed, burned down with all inside, if those inside didn't fight back
So they did, and you got stomach-churning videos like the one below, where there's a thin white line of armed civilians fighting off a Zulu bull's head in a modern-day version of Rorke's Drift. Luckily they had FALs rather than Martini Henrys
Undoubtedly I missed some of their innovations, but these are the main things outside of firearms that come to mind
So, if you have anything I missed, please drop it below so that I and others can educate ourselves and learn more about this
And if you want to learn how to defend yourself and prepare for situations like this, some great accounts on here are @k9_reaper, @DolioJ, @wayofftheres, @DonShift3, and @BrowningMachine. Again, there are definitely accounts I missed, so please drop them below as well
And here's more footage of the vigilantism that became necessary in the 2021 riots
And keep in mind, the best solution in South Africa that keeps culture, prosperity, and family members alive is Orania, which is full of incredible, hard-working people
At this point, we all know that they're doing this
Britain's locking up protesters for speaking against immigration, and American prosecutors won't lock up felons
But why do they do it?
It's the time-tested way tyrants like them win power 🧵👇
First, there are various people and interests behind this, of course
George Soros and his Open Societies Foundation are a good example: that's where woke American AGs and prosecutors who won't lock up felons get their campaign cash from
Similarly, you can bet a whole host of NGOs fund those who are letting criminals out of jail to make room for normal people who will be locked up
But it's bigger than that. It's not just that insane woke people are causing chaos
It's also that this is a repeated tactic communists, and tyrants generally, use to gain power: create chaos and then exploit stopping it to become popular and have an excuse for solidifying power and crack down on dissent
Well, what do you know, Tim Walz, the guy who let BLM torch Minneapolis, is close with Alex Soros, son of George Soros and head of the Open Society Foundation
Looks like Team Soros wants to do to America what it did to South Africa: destroy it
Lets' examine what happened 🧵👇
First, the South Africa connection to the Soros family and Open Society Foundation isn't a conspiracy theory
Rather, it's something they brag about
Here, for example, the Open Society Foundation itself describes what Soros did to fight for "democratic elections" in South Africa, proudly noting he helped Mandela accede to power
Similarly, George Soros himself gave a speech in 2003 about how he helped Mandela, advocated for "democracy" in South Africa, and did so because he wanted to turn a closed society into an open one:
I know I've now been commenting on Rhodesia quite a bit, but there are just so many elements to the story that make it worth understanding and remembering
So, now for another: the impulse behind America's Rhodesia policy very clearly shows why we're now declining and failing
🧵👇
That impulse, of course, is a very HR-style focus on the means rather than the ends
Rhodesia not only could have been, but was, the breadbasket of Africa. It also was prosperous, stable, and free
None of that mattered to the feminized communists running America. To them, all that mattered was that it wasn't a mass, liberal democracy. It was instead essentially a propertied voting republic in which it was mainly whites who had the property or education to vote or thus voted
Importantly, it didn't matter to the race-obsessed, HR-minded communists in charge of the US that there were many "mitigating" elements there
It didn't matter that half the land was set aside for Africans and that many of them had enough property to vote
It didn't matter that thousands upon thousands of Africans volunteered for units like the Grey's Scouts and Rhodesian African Rifles
It didn't matter that Ian Smith had good relations with the village chiefs or that the Rhodesian government had invested heavily in those villages
The Harris-Walz ticket is the anarcho-tyranny ticket
But that doesn’t just mean that anarchy is on the menu. It means Bolshevism is
🧵👇
A key aspect of the Russian Revolution to remember is that the Bolsheviks caused chaos to solidify their power
Before they created the Red Guard and put their boot on the neck of the Russian people, they opened up the prisons and let thousands upon thousands of real criminals out of jail and onto the streets. The criminals caused chaos and the Bolsheviks acceded to power
Of course, political opponents were not spring from the clink. They were tortured and starved to death in gulags. It was only real criminals who were let out
From there, the Bolsheviks went on to win the civil war against the whites and brutally treat the civilians under their thumb, namely they millions killed in the Holodomor
Simultaneously, they implemented their economic agenda, collectivizing farms, seizing private property, and putting their guys in charge of factories and businesses instead of the original owners
This is one of those perennial questions (though this cathedral was completed in the '60s), and the answer is quite obvious: democracy can't construct wonderous beauties like this because it's not what democracy is geared toward doing
Most of what we look at as examples of the good, the true, and the beautiful comes from well before "our democracy" became a thing
There are a few counter-examples that prove the rule, but, generally, beautiful things came before 1840 or so, with a few remnants of that Halycon Era, as Lord Ernest Hamilton termed it, being built as late as the 1920s, the so-called Indian Summer of the English Aristocracy
The best example of this is in Great Britain's country houses, particularly those in southern and northern England
Most of those beautiful buildings, some of the most marvelous and stunningly gorgeous architectural feats to ever grace the world, were originally built in the Elizabethan-Glorious Revolution Era, then updated and made the beauties they are today in the Victorian Era
Great examples of this are Highclere (Downton Abbey in the eponymous show) and Chatsworth (Pemberly in Pride & Prejudice)
This is absolutely insane, and not just because it makes zero sense logistically (at what value during the year is the asset taxed?), but because we have a clear example in recent history of pretty much this exact policy destroying an empire
👇🧵👇
First off, I know this policy technically will only apply to those with over $100 million in income
But the income tax originally just applied to the top 1% and look how that turned out…
So it’s relevant to everyone, even without thinking about the poverty and market chaos it would cause
So, with that in mind, let’s look at the example of how this would turn out : Twentieth Century Britain, which destroyed itself with an unrealized capital gains tax