Drew Holden Profile picture
Aug 26, 2024 27 tweets 15 min read Read on X
🧵Thread🧵

I was struck by the number of dubious statements and flat-out lies at the DNC.

It appears the mainstream media isn’t much interested in them, amid their jubilant, joy-full coverage. So I decided to do some fact-checking, focused on Biden’s speech.

There’s a lot. ⤵️
1. The first thing that jumped out to me was Trump’s alleged “very fine people on both sides” description of Charlottesville.

Haven’t we been over this, time and again? The context makes clear Trump didn’t mean the neo-Nazis. Even @snopes admitted it!

Yet Biden trotted it out.

Image
Image
Image
2. Biden claimed he and his admin “demonizes no one.”

What, then, about Biden’s remarks about Trump supporters? That they are “determined to destroy democracy,” practitioners of “semi-fascism,” and “a threat to the very soul of this nation.”

Is that not demonizing?

Image
Image
Image
3. Biden said he rebuilt “the middle class.”

He should take that claim up with the middle class, who aren’t exactly thrilled about Bidenomics and its corresponding inflation.

Image
Image
Image
4. One quote really stopped me cold. Biden said he had created “60 million new jobs.”

Even assuming (charitably) that he meant 16, his numbers are off by a couple million after the Labor Dept corrected their numbers.

And those figures are dubious, @zhalaschak explains:

Image
Image
Image
5. Biden claimed inflation was “down, way down.”

Put simply, this is a bald-faced lie. Inflation may be down since the 40-year record Biden increase it to. But it’s still higher than when Trump left office. Image
6. Biden claimed seniors would go from paying “$400 a month” for insulin down to $35 a month.

His first number is how much seniors currently pay *per year.* But saying “they’ll save a couple bucks” doesn’t have the same ring to it.

The @nytimes said the claim “needs context”
Image
Image
6. Cont. Apparently that “context” was just “the actual numbers” which Biden had instead made up.

What are we doing here, guys?

This was one of only 5 Biden claims the Times deigned to revisit.
Image
Image
Needless to say, I’ve got more.

7. Biden claimed he was providing high speed internet for everyone, no matter where they lived.

He isn’t. One in five Americans still lack reliable internet access. Promising to do something—it should go without saying—doesn’t mean doing it. Image
8. Biden said the U.S. is “cutting carbon emissions in half by 2030.”

Again, you can’t simply say something and have that declaration make it true.

The U.S. is meaningfully off-track from Biden’s goal, before accounting for uptick of EVs and renewable energy lagging.

Image
Image
Image
9. Speaking of EVs, Biden said the U.S. is “installing 500,000 charging stations.”

After 2 years and $7 billion, you know how many are operational?

7. Not 700. Or 7,000.

7. Total.

Again, saying you’re going to do something doesn’t mean it’s done. (H/t @washingtonpost)
Image
Image
10. Biden said his admin “kept our commitment” on student loan debt relief.

Perhaps he forgot what he had promised as a candidate, but the internet is forever. He said he’d deliver $10,000 in debt relief.

That didn’t survive contact with the Constitution.

Image
Image
Image
11. Biden said “I’m so damn old.”

My review of the evidence found that to be true.
12. Biden said Americans “are safer today than under Donald Trump.”

But the U.S. and our allies are involved in more conflicts than ever, as war rages in the Middle East and in Europe. I wrote about this back in February for @FreeBeacon
Image
Image
13. Biden called Trump a “convicted felon.”

Seriously? The President of the United States took the stage to undermine the presumption of innocence for his party’s opponent. Trump, of course, isn’t a convicted anything.

But this is how lawfare works: as a political sound bite.
14. Biden said there are “fewer border crossings today than when Donald Trump left office.”

Biden’s right that there was a surge of crossings after he was elected in 2020. But backing those numbers up to before the election, he’s still wrong.

And the bigger point of course…

Image
Image
Image
14. Cont. …the bigger point is that Biden has been a disaster on the border, allowing in a record number of illegal crossers, setting new monthly records repeatedly, and fast tracking thousands more.


Image
Image
Image
Image
15. Biden trotted out the “suckers” and “losers” comment that Trump allegedly made.

Again, for what feels like the hundredth time, there’s no meaningful evidence supporting this. Just anonymous sources. Even @nytimes took issue (again, one of their five).
Image
Image
16. Biden said “when Trump left office, Europe and NATO were in tatters.”

This is a bit preposterous, in my humble opinion. Remember that Ukraine was invaded not under Trump, but under Biden. Trump had forced NATO countries to actually invest in their own defense. @dankochis
Image
Image
17. Biden said his proposed peace deal “brought us closer” to peace between Israel and Gaza.

That peace deal has already fallen apart.
Image
Image
I’ll close with a couple of barn burners.

18. Biden said “Trump wants to cut Social Security and Medicare.”

What? Trump has repeatedly said he will do no such thing. This is how he won the 2016 nomination!

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

Image
Image
Image
19. Biden claimed Trump “will do everything he can to ban abortion.”

Again. Trump has said *the opposite* repeatedly. Vance said Trump would veto such a measure.

This is just a lie by Biden. Plain and simple.

Image
Image
Image
19. Cont. @bungarsargon makes the point far more eloquently than I can here, on The Commons at American Compass: americancompass.org/let-them-eat-j…
Is it too much to ask the press to bother to do a little fact checking for their favored candidates, after fact-checking Trump’s every word for eight years?

If Dems know they can lie heading into the election unbridled by the media, they will.

I think they’ve already started.
As is often the case, I couldn’t fit everything in a tweet thread. More at my newsletter, @Holden_Court, which you should subscribe to to support me if you like this kind of stuff. open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…
Image
@Holden_Court If you’d like to toss me a couple bucks to fund the beer required to go through this stuff with a chipper spirit, you can do that, too. paypal.com/donate/?busine…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
🧵Thread🧵

Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.

Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.

Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.

That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…Image
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.

I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.

The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.

An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(