New Lawsuit: Last fall, @Google told me @TheJusticeDept forced it to secretly turn over my comms records in 2017. Since then, @empowr_us filed 5 demands for related docs under FOIA. DOJ ignored all 5. So today, we sued.
In 2017, I led the Sen. Judiciary Cmte oversight and investigations unit through the height of the #Russiagate hysteria for then-Chairman @ChuckGrassley.
After @Google notified me in October 2023, I confirmed that DOJ/@FBI had also targeted a dozen or so other Capitol Hill attorneys’ personal accounts—from both political parties.
I also learned that DOJ obtained from the court—with no notice to Congress—annual gag orders to stop giants like @Google, @Apple, and @Verizon from telling anyone for 6 years that they had turned over the records.
Remember, these are records of Legislative Branch attorneys’ communications being turned over to the Executive Branch. In secret. With no notice. Did the court realize what it was approving?
DOJ did not flag for @Google that these were the accounts of attorneys doing constitutional oversight of DOJ. It’s just a list of email and Google voice accounts. Did DOJ hide the ball from the court too? We previously sued to unseal the filings to find out.
Our 5 FOIA demands at issue in today’s lawsuit seek those court filings too, but also other internal DOJ records about its targeting of congressional atty comms. We targeted our FOIAs to key personnel during key time frames around the subpoenas, the gag orders, and the annual renewals of the gag orders. e.g....
In the 10 months since our first FOIA, DOJ has entirely ignored its legal obligation to comply. Other than acknowledging receipt, we have heard nothing but crickets. Not one request to clarify or further narrow our request. Not even a single page of documents produced.
Here are some of the more recent demands for documents pursuant to FOIA included in this lawsuit:
And here, our most recent demand for documents targets records from earlier this year—around the time we filed our motion to intervene and unseal the underlying court filings that supposedly justified the gag orders.
There is a public interest in shining the light of day on the lengths to which the gov't went for years to keep secret its targeting of oversight attorneys on Capitol Hill.
Explains why the IRS's #wierd position is wrong—opposing #whistleblowers help to defend their actions at issue in Hunter Biden's frivolous lawsuit against the IRS.
Normally a defendant in a baseless civil suit wants it dismissed as soon as possible. Not the IRS. Not in this case, according to @TheJusticeDept.
Very odd. 🤔
It makes perfect sense for Biden to oppose. His lawyer, Abbe Lowell, has been hurling personal insults and false accusations at the #IRSWhistleblowers (and their attorneys) with reckless abandon.
But the IRS? Why block us & lay out the red carpet for plaintiffs suing the IRS?
Early in @GOBactual's 22-month suspension, the FBI determined through voice analysis he was not the source in a @Project_Veritas video, but the @FBI:
1. withheld that key fact from Congress, 2. kept O’Boyle in limbo without pay, and 3. recently revoked his clearance anyway on the eve of new congressional hearings.
Our @FBI Security Division (SecD) client, a registered Dem, is blowing the whistle on the cover-up of @GOBactual's innocence of the false charges used as pretext for yanking his clearance and paycheck.
@RepJerryNadler and @StaceyPlaskett tried to weaponized the false claims.
Our new court filing opposing @TheJusticeDept's effort to impose permanent secrecy on how it sought to hide the collection of my phone and email logs—along with the records a dozen other attorneys for oversight committees in Congress. ⬇️🧵 empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
1. Did @TheJusticeDept fail to alert the court the phone and email logs it sought belonged to Congressional oversight attorneys?
2. Did it also fail to alert the court that sought to renew the gag orders on @Google even after the leak probe that supposedly justified the subpoenas was closed?
How could gag orders possibly be justified long after the case is closed? It's reasonable to suspect it was to hide from the public the extent of its secret collection of Congressional communications records and the abuses committed in the process.
Unless the court unseals the records, you are not allowed to know.
Chairman Smith: “New documents provided by the whistleblowers show that Hunter Biden repeatedly lied to Congress in his February deposition to distance his involvement in what should be considered a clear scheme to enrich the Biden family.” gop-waysandmeans.house.gov/chairman-smith…