Garry Kasparov Profile picture
Aug 29 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Emphasizing that part of this WH fallacy is the idea there is a "Russia" at all on a strategic decision-making level. It’s a one-man dictatorship. There are no core interests except for Putin's. Only when he sees leaving Ukraine as better for his survival than war will he stop.
You cannot negotiate out of a crisis with someone whose survival depends on the crisis continuing. Either Russia destroys Ukraine with massive material and strategic gains, with NATO next, or continuing becomes a threat to Putin’s grip on power so he declares victory & leaves.
This piecemeal support from the West drags it out. Putin is happy to continue the war at this level and escalate opportunistically. He couldn’t care less about Russian lives or the Russian economy or anything else "Russia". Only the threat of an undeniable defeat will stop him.
Eventually the weight of the war & targeted and broad sanctions may cause enough hardship among elites or the people to tip Putin’s risk evaluation. But the best way to accelerate that is to let Ukraine obliterate the Russian forces that are murdering its people.
Time is not on Ukraine's side for the simple reason its people are dying every day while the masterminds in the White House and the German chancellery play diplomatic games. Russia's allies Iran, North Korea & China, plus the sanction-breakers in the free world, will continue.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garry Kasparov

Garry Kasparov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kasparov63

Aug 28
Ukraine is again proving they know how to fight a dictatorship—with surprise & aggression that creates doubt and fear in the dictator. Meanwhile, its allies continue the failed model of appeasement and diplomacy, which only emboldens the dictator. Read:
Novelty & attack are key. They force decisions all the way up to the dictator & paralyze the power vertical. In a dictatorship, everyone from conscript to general is terrified of making a decision. If it’s business as usual, the behemoth can function. Anything novel is crippling.
Decisions going to Putin is slow & produces cautious reactions. Dictators are fearful; it’s how they survive. Loss of control means death, so they only act aggressively when they are sure of a positive result. They can be wrong, of course, with disaster. So deterrence is vital.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 12
Putin has been looting Russia for over 20 years; this is just doing it on a more personal level.
Societal apathy and corruption are useful for sustaining a dictatorship. Civil society is erased and the people collectively have no power, no stake, no interests beyond survival. But that lack of resistance applies to everything, including foreign invasion.
Ukrainians would be justified in seeking out every form of revenge on Russian soil after what Russia has done to them for 10 years. Torture, rape, murder of friends and family, entire cities destroyed. But their entire value system is different. Democratic, Western.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 6
My thoughts on the Harris VP choice haven't changed now that it's been made. Walz may be charming, but not picking Shapiro reflects tactical & strategic misjudgment. Locking up PA was critical, as was having a fighter who could go toe-to-toe with the vicious attacks to come. 1/4
The honeymoon is over & it's not a primary. Shapiro would counter Harris's woke ballast. But Harris wasn't comfortable with his abilities, another poor indicator. You can't be comfortable and beat Trump. He lies, cheats, and steals. It's a street fight. 2/4
With Shapiro, I'd have bet heavily on Harris to win, maybe even a landslide. Trump will keep talking, Vance will keep doing whatever it is he does, and the Biden map was in easy reach. Now I'm not so sure. Not just because of Walz, but what it says about the Harris campaign. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1
It's a wonderful day when friends and allies are released from Putin's gulag and able to see their families again. But do not forget that exchanging regime murderers & spies for innocent hostages & political prisoners promotes Russia's production of both. 1/6
I'm especially happy to see my friend @vkaramurza again, and for @ekaramurza, whose work and dreams are coming true. That good people like Volodya and journalists like Gershkovich are turned into subjects of torture and pawns to trade by Putin's dictatorship is abhorrent. 2/6
Those cynically rating this deal ignore that it serves Putin's interests or he wouldn't do it. He killed Navalny so he wouldn't be part of it and now he confirms to his cadres of spies and thugs that they will not suffer punishment for crimes they carry out for him. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jul 25
Yesterday saw two related events, Biden's Oval Office withdrawal speech and the defacing of US symbols by violent mobs in DC. They are reflections of US weakness, invitations to US enemies to go on the attack because America is unwilling or unable to defend itself. 1/8
Biden's withdrawal was long overdue; I called for it in the WSJ in October. This appearance made it clear it's gone beyond that. He should step down asap. I can hardly be called a Harris fan, but no one could watch Biden yesterday and think he is running the country. 2/8
Biden should be treated with due respect. But the most powerful nation on Earth needs a leader, not a figurehead. Despite what he said, the US *is* at war right now, a war against dictatorships & terrorists intent on reshaping the world order, with the US as enemy number one. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Jul 22
A year ago, before the GOP primaries were over, I made a bet with a friend that neither Trump nor Biden would be taking the oath of office on Jan 20, 2025. The odds just got a lot better--for me and for the country. 1/6
I was never a Harris fan, but I'm also against closed-door decisions. Democracy works best in sunlight and a fight this late could be a catastrophe. It seems unlikely any qualified candidates will challenge her. The risk is an outsider seeking attention. 2/6
For her VP, I believe in the concrete. The lesson of 2004 (Kerry blundering by choosing Edwards over Gebhardt) is to get electoral votes in a state you need and can win. So Kelly in AZ, Shapiro in PA. Are many good candidates, and must push back to center. 3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(