I watched it so you didn't have to. Here's what happened in under 5 minutes.
🧵 THREAD
Kamala Harris's first interview as the Democratic nominee just dropped, and she brought in VP pick Tim Walz to comfort her.
Remarkably, it took her less than a minute to bring up Donald Trump, claiming Americans are ready for "a new way forward" and that it’s time to "turn the page" on Trump.
What she failed to mention is that she's literally been in power for 3.5 years.
Then something remarkable happened. CNN unexpectedly asked a good question, pressing Harris on economic issues.
Bash brought up Harris's campaign slogan, "We're not going back," and asked, “I wonder what you say to voters who do want to go back when it comes to the economy, specifically because their groceries were less expensive, housing was more affordable when Donald Trump was president.”
Harris’s response fell flat.
But the questioning didn't stop there. Bash put Harris on the spot over her shifting stance on fracking.
Harris had previously stated in 2019, "There is no question I'm in favor of banning fracking," but now she claims, “I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020 that I would not ban fracking as vice president.”
Ummm… what?
Bash pushed back on Kamala a second time, reminding her that she previously said she was in favor of banning fracking.
Then came the question about the border crisis—a glaring issue for the Biden-Harris administration.
When Bash asked why it took three and a half years to implement asylum restrictions amidst record illegal border crossings, Harris didn't hesitate to shift the blame to Trump.
Yes, this really happened.
Her administration has had nearly four years to address the border, and yet she circles back to Trump as the scapegoat.
Bash questioned Kamala on Trump’s allegations of “turning black” for “political purposes.”
After a long and awkward pause, Kamala replied that Trump’s using the “same old tired playbook” before saying, “Next question please.”
This is actually a new play that Trump developed for Kamala Harris specifically.
Tim Walz finally got his first question when his claims of serving in war crumbled on air.
In a 2018 video clip, Walz said: "We can make sure that those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at."
The truth is that Walz has never served in a war.
And when confronted on it, Walz dodged the question before blaming his misleading statement on poor English.
Then, the most important question of the night dropped. CNN’s Dana Bash asked Harris if she had any regrets about hiding Biden’s cognitive decline from the public.
Kamala said with a straight face, “No.”
Remarkably, she continued to gaslight the public even more by saying Biden is "smart" and has the "intelligence" and "judgement" to serve as president.
While you're here, don't forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and weekly news roundups each Sunday.
Next, came the most painful moment to watch of the night.
Kamala Harris broke down in tears when she recalled the day that Joe Biden told her that he was dropping out of the race.
She continued to tell an elaborate story of how she was eating breakfast when it happened. Skip this video unless you think you can handle it.
In the final moments, Kamala attempted to quell the concerns of every doubter who’s called her a “DEI hire.”
“Listen, I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender."
Thanks for reading! If you made it all the way to the end, you’re a champ.
For something a little less painful to get through, check out my thread on RFK Jr. His latest interview with Dr. Phil will literally blow your mind.
Everything you’ve been told about skin cancer and the sun is a lie.
Outdoor workers get 3–10 times MORE sun exposure yet have LOWER melanoma rates than those stuck inside.
It gets worse.
A 20-year Swedish study found that avoiding sunlight raised the risk of premature death by 60%, especially from heart disease and cancer.
They pushed sunscreen and fear while ignoring the simple truth that sun exposure mostly causes HARMLESS cancers, while sun avoidance is linked to the DEADLIEST ones.
Get ready to be re-educated about the sun. It’s time to unlearn the lies you’ve been sold.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
The healthiest kids in America are the ones the media refuses to show you.
Ask any natural doctor: they’ll tell you unvaccinated kids are more alert, happier, and calmer than their vaxed peers.
Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
The difference is so stark that one man said when he attended a Mennonite fundraiser, he saw a light in the eyes of children for the first time in decades.
The Mennonites don’t vaccinate.
And once you understand how this ties into the chronic disease epidemic, you’ll be furious that this information was hidden from you.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-heal…
A massive study across pediatric networks found that nearly half of all children receiving care had a chronic illness.
Even in the general population, one-third of American kids suffer from one or more long-term conditions. One-third.
That’s shocking.
Obesity now affects a staggering 20% of kids. Sleep and activity are deteriorating. And symptoms are worsening across the board.
Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering
This data “should shock everyone.”
🧵 THREAD
Health journalist and film producer @delbigtree has just released his new film An Inconvenient Study, which follows Bigtree’s years-long exchange with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health, a doctor who is about as pro-vaccine as they come.
In 2016, Dr. Zervos crossed paths with Bigtree, who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades: a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Dr. Zervos agreed, determined to prove Bigtree and other vaccine skeptics wrong. At the time, he vowed, “Whatever the results, they get published.”
If you thought COVID was built on a web of lies, wait till you hear what they did with Alzheimer’s disease.
While Big Pharma poured billions into failed drugs and fake plaque theories, one neurologist quietly proved the decline could be reversed.
And he did it without a single pharmaceutical.
Dr. Dale Bredesen discovered Alzheimer’s has five root causes, not one.
And when you treat those root causes, patients recover.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-al…
In 1906, plaques in the brain were identified as the cause of Alzheimer’s disease.
By the 1980s, scientists discovered that those plaques were primarily composed of amyloid proteins.
And then in 1991, genetic mutations in a protein that gives rise to amyloid beta were linked to inherited forms of Alzheimer’s disease.
EXCLUSIVE: The “Mark of the Beast” System Is Coming Sooner Than We Think
Tony Blair’s “revenge” plan is finally coming to life.
The digital ID cards Parliament killed in 2006 are back—now powered by biometrics, bank data, and programmable money.
@Lewis_Brackpool calls it “the mark of the beast system in practice,” a global control grid designed to decide what you can buy, where you can go, and when you can do it.
And driving this agenda? A Silicon Valley billionaire whose company was built for the CIA.
🧵 THREAD
The digital noose is tightening, and it’s happening in every single country, with no exception. In lockstep, the UK recently announced a mandatory digital ID to work immediately. A petition was posted online to oppose this, which garnered over a million responses in only 48 hours.
The UK government responded with essentially, “Well, we’re going to do it anyway.”
In Canada, the government is planning to cut the internet and phone service of anyone who says something they don’t like online.
And in Australia, by the end of this year, no one will be able to even conduct a simple Google search without age verification, which the eSafety Commissar Julie Inman Grant has now confirmed could be enforced by digital ID.
These countries have introduced these measures through a sustained propaganda campaign about “keeping children safe online.” And of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with keeping children safe online. It’s about instituting a social credit system that will eventually be linked to your ability to access your money.
We’re drawing parallels from these countries because similar efforts are underway in the US. COSA legislation has already passed the Senate, something we’ve been warning about for a long time.
Louisiana, for example, has enacted several pieces of legislation aimed at protecting children online, including the Secure Online Child Interaction and Age Limitation Act and HB 577. Dig deep enough, and you’ll find age verification and eventually digital ID linked to all of these efforts.
UK journalist Lewis Brackpool is the Director of Investigations at Restore Britain, and he joins us now to give us a very sobering lesson on what they’ve done in the UK and how it’s going global if we don’t fight back.
Lewis joins us now to discuss.
Lewis Brackpool began by revealing how the UK government is ignoring millions of citizens who oppose the new digital ID rollout. He said 2.8 million people signed the petition, but officials declared they’d proceed with the plan regardless—proof, he argued, of “the illusion of democracy.”
He explained that the ID system isn’t just for migrants but for every UK resident, linking directly to the NHS app and government accounts. The real danger, he said, lies in how it merges personal, health, and financial data into one centralized control grid. Even progressive journalists, he noted, now call it “a crackdown on freedom.”
It was a sobering start to the discussion—a warning of how what we call democracy can quickly morph into something far darker.