The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Aug 30, 2024 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The Awkward Kamala Harris Interview

I watched it so you didn't have to. Here's what happened in under 5 minutes.

🧵 THREAD Image
Kamala Harris's first interview as the Democratic nominee just dropped, and she brought in VP pick Tim Walz to comfort her.

Remarkably, it took her less than a minute to bring up Donald Trump, claiming Americans are ready for "a new way forward" and that it’s time to "turn the page" on Trump.

What she failed to mention is that she's literally been in power for 3.5 years.
Then something remarkable happened. CNN unexpectedly asked a good question, pressing Harris on economic issues.

Bash brought up Harris's campaign slogan, "We're not going back," and asked, “I wonder what you say to voters who do want to go back when it comes to the economy, specifically because their groceries were less expensive, housing was more affordable when Donald Trump was president.”

Harris’s response fell flat.
But the questioning didn't stop there. Bash put Harris on the spot over her shifting stance on fracking.

Harris had previously stated in 2019, "There is no question I'm in favor of banning fracking," but now she claims, “I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020 that I would not ban fracking as vice president.”

Ummm… what?

Bash pushed back on Kamala a second time, reminding her that she previously said she was in favor of banning fracking.
Then came the question about the border crisis—a glaring issue for the Biden-Harris administration.

When Bash asked why it took three and a half years to implement asylum restrictions amidst record illegal border crossings, Harris didn't hesitate to shift the blame to Trump.

Yes, this really happened.

Her administration has had nearly four years to address the border, and yet she circles back to Trump as the scapegoat.
Bash questioned Kamala on Trump’s allegations of “turning black” for “political purposes.”

After a long and awkward pause, Kamala replied that Trump’s using the “same old tired playbook” before saying, “Next question please.”

This is actually a new play that Trump developed for Kamala Harris specifically.
Tim Walz finally got his first question when his claims of serving in war crumbled on air.

In a 2018 video clip, Walz said: "We can make sure that those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at."

The truth is that Walz has never served in a war.

And when confronted on it, Walz dodged the question before blaming his misleading statement on poor English.
Then, the most important question of the night dropped. CNN’s Dana Bash asked Harris if she had any regrets about hiding Biden’s cognitive decline from the public.

Kamala said with a straight face, “No.”

Remarkably, she continued to gaslight the public even more by saying Biden is "smart" and has the "intelligence" and "judgement" to serve as president.
While you're here, don't forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and weekly news roundups each Sunday.
Next, came the most painful moment to watch of the night.

Kamala Harris broke down in tears when she recalled the day that Joe Biden told her that he was dropping out of the race.

She continued to tell an elaborate story of how she was eating breakfast when it happened. Skip this video unless you think you can handle it.
In the final moments, Kamala attempted to quell the concerns of every doubter who’s called her a “DEI hire.”

“Listen, I am running because I believe that I am the best person to do this job at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender."
Thanks for reading! If you made it all the way to the end, you’re a champ.

For something a little less painful to get through, check out my thread on RFK Jr. His latest interview with Dr. Phil will literally blow your mind.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

May 15
If you thought “Ozempic face” was bad, wait till you hear what it’s doing inside the body.

A massive study involving 16 million people found GLP-1 users had a 9.09 times greater risk of pancreatitis, 4.22 times greater risk of bowel obstruction, and a 3.67 times greater risk of stomach paralysis.

And if you’ve ever had pancreatitis, it is “quite a painful experience.”

What you’re hearing on the news about Ozempic is still too little, too late.

Here’s the story you’re not getting about Ozempic, the business model behind it, and why a growing number of researchers believe another pharmaceutical disaster is already unfolding in real time. 🧵
In early 2023, JP Morgan hosted its annual healthcare conference—a private, invitation-only event it describes as “the industry’s biggest gathering.”

The keynote speakers included the chairman of JPMorgan Chase, the CEO of Eli Lilly, and several managing directors of major healthcare venture capital firms.

The fourth keynote was Dr. Robert Califf.

His day job at the time: Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Hmm…Image
This wasn’t a public health symposium. It wasn’t an academic conference.

It was specifically designed for large investors, and its explicit purpose was to set the pharmaceutical industry’s financial priorities for the year ahead.

A pharmaceutical safety advocate named Kim Witczak obtained what she could from the conference’s public-facing website.

But what was being said behind closed doors?Image
Read 33 tweets
May 14
The world’s second most published critical care doctor says they’ve been lying to you about the sun for decades.

Dr. Paul Marik says there’s no reason to fear the sun; you should embrace it.

Because when you get adequate levels of vitamin D, your risk of cancer goes down, depression symptoms alleviate, and your immune system functions far better.

What about sunscreens? Dr. Marik advises against it because “it defeats the purpose.”

“There’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”

Similar to how Big Pharma doesn’t like the “I drug” (Ivermectin) for treating COVID-19, Dr. Marik explained they also don’t like Vitamin D for general health and well-being.

Why? Because if you are in good health and devoid of chronic disease, there’s less money to be made.

Big Pharma played us. They propagandized the masses into fearing an essential component of human life.

Here’s what they don’t want you to know about the sun vs. artificial light—and what happens when your body is cut off from natural light. 🧵
The further north humans migrated away from the equator—and away from the sun—the lighter their skin became.

That’s not cosmetic. It’s a survival adaptation.

The human body, recognizing it wasn’t capturing enough light, made itself more transparent to capture whatever remained.

We evolved to need light the way we need food.

But in our modern lives, we commute in sealed cars, work 8 hour shifts under fluorescent lights, and go home to screens in the comfort of our artificially lit homes.

And we wonder why we’re sick.Image
In a 20-year study following 29,518 women, researchers found that those who avoided the sun were 60% more likely to die—with heart disease showing the greatest mortality difference.

A separate large study found that high solar UVB exposure halved one’s risk of both breast and prostate cancer.

The data is there. And it’s been available for decades. But almost no one talks about it.

Why? Because no one profits from sunlight.Image
Read 34 tweets
May 13
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.

“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”

Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.

So, what happened?

Screens.

Dr. Jared Horvath explained:

“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”

“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”

“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”

But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.

They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty.
This isn’t a glitch.

Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.

So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.

Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.

This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.

Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.

We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”
Something unprecedented and highly concerning is happening to children’s brains.

Toddlers aren’t just watching screens—they’re being neurologically conditioned by them.

Rapid cuts, flashing colors, constant novelty.

And none of it is by accident. It is all by design.

What looks like “kid’s content” is often dopamine engineering aimed at maximizing engagement, not healthy development, no matter the damage it does.Image
Read 30 tweets
May 12
RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.

The researchers were shocked.

So they covered it up.

How?

“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are TOO YOUNG TO BE DIAGNOSED [with autism],” Kennedy explained.

Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.

Then, telling everyone it’s “safe.”

If health authorities are willing to keep a signal this alarming hidden from you, what else are they not telling you about vaccines?

Is it possible that your child’s allergies or chronic immune issues didn’t appear organically, but were triggered by vaccination instead? 🧵
The vaccine-autism fight is usually framed as one bad paper versus settled science.

Hands down. No questions.

That framing is emotionally powerful and far too small.

The question is not whether a single case series proved causation. It’s whether modern medicine has built a system that can even detect rare, subgroup-specific neurological injury.

And if it can detect it, is the system even capable of admitting it?Image
Before digging into the evidence, one thing has to be understood:

The official public-health position is that vaccines have not been shown to cause autism.

But that doesn’t end the discussion. Not even close.

It actually narrows the real question: are there vulnerable subgroups, injury patterns, or mechanisms that broad population studies are just not designed to see?

If your studies are designed to not see something, can you ever expect to see it?Image
Read 34 tweets
May 12
RED ALERT: Former COVID Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx is now calling for “widely available” PCR testing for Hantavirus, including in schools, and many people are noticing the exact same pandemic playbook that preceded the chaos of 2020.

The real red flag is not the virus itself. It’s watching the same fear infrastructure suddenly reactivate in real time—PCR testing, asymptomatic spread warnings, quarantine language, hazmat imagery, and nonstop media coverage telling the public not to panic.

Birx openly argued that viruses should be tracked through PCR testing instead of symptoms, the same testing system that used to inflate COVID case counts and justify lockdowns across the world.

At the exact same time, Fox News is now airing “deadly outbreak” coverage featuring quarantine centers, hazmat suits, and warnings about possible spread, while officials simultaneously insist there is “nothing to worry about.”

@Fynnderella1 pushed back directly, stating: “You can’t spread Hantavirus asymptomatically. Period.”

So why does this suddenly feel so familiar again?

Watch @zeeemedia's report before this escalates any further.
Health insurance in America is broken. But it doesn't have to be that way.

Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.

Now, there’s an alternative.

joincrowdhealth.com/pulse 👈

CrowdHealth is a community-powered model helping members fund nearly 100% of their medical bills at a fraction of the cost.

More than 28,000 members have been helped so far, with a 99.9% funding success rate and over $56 million in medical bills saved.

CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare.

Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months.

Go to joincrowdhealth.com/pulse and use code PULSE.
Meanwhile...

Nearly 20% of the world’s population is being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war.

Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow.

In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead.

For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world.

Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control.

The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.
Read 7 tweets
May 11
In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”

It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.

All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?

44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.

The question we have to ask is: why?

Did the evidence change… or something else? 🧵
There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.

It was treated as news.

NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.

Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.

Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.

But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/vaccine-amne…
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(