In may 2024, Russian 🇷🇺 armed forces created the "North" corps aimed at putting pressure into Sumy and Kharkiv oblasts 🇺🇦.
4 months after, all eyes are on Kursk, while Kharkiv attritional fight continues, which is not a russian defeat.
🧵THREAD🧵1/20 ⬇️
This is (was) the city of Vovchansk in Kharkiv oblast. In may 2024, a ~50k army crossed the border north of the city of Kharkiv but was stopped in central Vovchansk.
Since that time, around 12 ukrainian brigades and various battalions, worth ~20 or 30k men took position to defend the two axis of progression.
The first one is going to Lyptsi and the second one to Vovchansk.
The initial russian advance surprised many, but no me because there were no fortifications directly on the border.
Since I worked on the ukrainian fortification program, I understood there was no defenses directly on the border like it is the case everywhere, too dangerous.
As you can see on my map, there are, in fact, some fortifications on the border (which are old russian positions).
But Ukraine-Russia border is hundreds kilometers long, you can't keep men in every position.
So the main defensive line is located 5 to 10km from the border.
Thus the ukrainian armed forces couldn't hold the initial russian advance and abadnonned many positions. It was an error.
In fact, there were a few errors : the main line wasn't completed and positions were not occupied by soldiers.
But then, many people said russian objective was to capture Kharkiv city, or at least, to threaten it.
When videos came out, we only saw an infantry force with few to no armoured vehicles and tanks.
Northern corps, named "Sever" is badly equiped. MTLB, T62 and mainly infantry.
So we are here with people lying and assuming big objectives for this corps, like advancing on Kharkiv city or threatening the rear of Kupiansk front.
Then, when russian progress was halted, these same people claimed it was a clear russian defeat to advance to Kharkiv city.
They said Ukraine managed to stop the advance and were showing counterattacks in Vovchansk and Hlyboke.
This narrative is false.
Firstly, the russian corps did not even aimed at reaching Kharkiv. It was created and poorely equiped for one mission : DIVERSION.
Just look at videos, they are advancing with loafs and vans...
I believe they attacked these two places for one main reason : defensive advantage.
Rivers would be used as stop lines while forrest are good covering positions for infantry.
The city of Vochansk is also ideal to settle and hide, while the Ukrainians are trying to take it back.
The other direction is also perfect for defense : high ground, some forests, rivers and lakes, villages and positions facing south because they were dug by the russian army.
Both direction have the same advantage, high ground on the russian side. The next step was to build defenses. Ukraine targeted a few escavators but the work was done :
I mapped some of these new russian trenches :
They are used to hide and to advance to the "meat grinder", Vovchansk.
I told you, this city is disputed since may 2024.
Here is the current frontline. Ukrainian forces regained territory after succesful counter-attacks, but the russians are stil trying to push them out of the northern part of the city.
Russian FABs are raining on small towns and forest plantations around Vovchansk. They can fire these tens of kilometers from there, inside Russia without risking there air assets.
On this front, Russia managed to attract at least 10 brigades from the Donbass and elsewhere, in a place where ukraine is loosing men against poorely trained and equiped russian soldiers.
Vovchansk is an ukrainian forces magnet.
Just look at all the videos @UAControlMap volounteers located in Vovchansk et Hlyboke : it shows how the attritional fight is ongoing there.
With a 50k army, Russia managed to open a new front, attracted a few ukrainian brigades (which would have been useful in the Donbass) and opened the condition for an endless fight in Vovchansk city.
I believe this was the plan and it was successful.
However, Kursk offensive may have changed some things.
Most of the russian reinforcements are coming from Kharkiv front, this could allow ukrainian forces to use less troops into this direction or to try to take back territory all the way the recognized border.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In total, the US and Israel launched more than 26 000 munitions, while Iran retaliated with 1 725 missiles and 4 445 drones.
Here is everything you need to know about the situation in the Middle East :
🧵THREAD🧵1/20 ⬇️
I continued to map US and Israeli strikes against Iran.
In total, more than 26 000 munitions have been used as per official records, mainly hitting western and southern Iran, as well as the main cities.
Strikes against Iranian leadership :
The IRCG leadership has been hitten the most, while the political figures remained less exposed. Most Iranians linked to the high security and intelligence leadership are now dead.
Despite the smallest progress in 2 years, Russia 🇷🇺 launched a record number of airstrikes, long range drone strikes as well as drone and artillery shelling
These statistics clearly show Russia is preparing a spring offensive in Ukraine 🇺🇦
🧵THREAD🧵1/7 ⬇️
This month of march 2026 saw the smallest territorial progression of russian forces in Ukraine since april 2024.
As you can see, the progress is usually increasing in the spring and summer and decreasing for the winter. (There is a hole in summer 2025)
However, this month was also the one with the biggest amount of all kind of strikes on Ukraine.
Pourquoi la contre-offensive ukrainienne 🇺🇦 de 2023 a-t-elle échoué ? Qui est le responsable de cet échec, Zelensky ou Zaloujny ?
Cette offensive qui n'a rien achevé porte une responsabilité partagée, ses stigmates sont aujourd'hui encore visibles.
🧵THREAD🧵1/17 ⬇️
L'échec de l'offensive du sud en 2023 est avant tout l'échec de Volodimir Zelensky.
C'est lui et le pouvoir politique qui portent une grande part de responsabilité, en ayant voulu contredire ce que prévoyait le commandement militaire.
Le plan Zelensky :
▫️Contre-attaquer à Bakhmout
▫️Répartir ses troupes sur la ligne de front
▫️Attaquer à plusieurs endroits en même temps pour espérer un effondrement russe
I now mapped 350 (!) ukrainian 🇺🇦 long range drone strikes into russian 🇷🇺 occupied territory
🔹19 strikes against air-defense
🔹25 strikes against radar
🔹21 strikes against planes
🔹10 strikes against trains
🔹9 strikes against rocket/missile launchers
🧵THREAD🧵1/8 ⬇️
Thanks to the very good job done by @UAControlMap and @UkraineDailyUpd gathering data from geolocators like @99Dominik_ @moklasen @giK1893 and others...
I gathered all those long range strikes into occupied territory since the year started :
In total, 350 strikes, of which 260 strikes against warehouse, antennas, electric transformers and various unknown targets, a lot of which are houses and buildings that can eventually be filled with high value targets.
Dams and bridge targeted, drone recon, airstrike campaign, mechanized assault, Russia 🇷🇺 is slowly starting its Sloviansk-Kramatorsk offensive
I mapped more than 4 000 airstrikes from the Donets river to Hulialpole this winter and analysed the troops movements :
🧵THREAD🧵1/20⬇️
For now more than 3 years, Russia has been preparing the Sloviansk-Kramatorsk battle.
It was the objective on defeating the Bakhmut-Soledar-Siversk line in 2023, it was the objective during the Donetsk suburbs battle (2024) and the Pokrovsk battle (2025).
For 2026, Russia hopes to make strategic advances to the twin cities, from the north (which implies securing Lyman), the south (implies securing Kostiantynivka, Drujkivka and Dobropilla) and the east.
This is exactly what the data I collected is showing :