This Former NASA Engineer Has Discovered a Way To Overcome Earth’s gravity. He’s developed an engine that harnesses a new force outside of our current knowledge of physics to create thrust without propulsion.
Dr. Charles Buhler, a NASA engineer and the co-founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revealed that his company’s propellantless propulsion drive, which appears to defy the known laws of physics, has produced enough thrust to counteract Earth’s gravity.
Dr. Buhler was a NASA research scientist who worked on electrostatic discharge safety for several space programs, including the Space Shuttle and Mars Exploration. He's currently working on a project to remove dust from astronauts and equipment using electrostatic methods for NASA's Moon mission.
A machine that can move without fuel would change space travel forever, but it's impossible according to the laws of physics. And Dr. Buhle
r might have found a way to create it.
Stick with me, it is an anti-gravity Thread🧵
According to Einstein, gravity is the curving of spacetime by all the objects in it, combined with the "geodesic" (straight) motions of those objects through the spacetime.
A good analogy to help you think about this is to imagine a rubber sheet stretched taut in a frame, and you put a bowling ball in the center — the sheet stretches. Then you roll marbles on the surface of the curved rubber sheet. The marbles move in what appear to you to be curved paths, but actually, they are straight paths in the geometry of the curved sheet.
Now, to overcome is invisible force, Dr. Buhler and his team claim to have generated 1G (as in Earth's 1G of gravity) of thrust without any propellant.
If it's true, it would be revolutionary for humanity and would unleash a new era of space exploration.
In 2001, British Electrical Engineer Roger Shawyer first introduced the “impossible drive,” known as the EmDrive. It was called “impossible” because its creator purported that the drive was reactionless, meaning no propellant required—in other words, it defied the known laws of physics (specifically, the conservation of momentum).
Scientists were curious but also skeptical. They tested the EmDrive, for 20 years and finally decided it didn't work as promised.
Bonus Post!
Isn't it big news? Lue Elizondo's Attorney Daniel Sheehan Discloses We Have Working Teleportation & Anti-Gravity Technology
They’re experimenting with teleportation that has to do with way UFO move from one star to other
Dr Charles Buhler, who worked on a range of programs while at NASA, has since co-founded Exodus Propulsion Technologies, which in 2019 applied for a patent for a system that they claim can generate force using asymmetrical electrostatic pressure. According to the patent, the system generates a voltage difference across an electrically conductive surface.
"The applied voltage difference creates an electric field resulting in an electrostatic pressure force acting on at least one surface of an object. Asymmetries in the resulting electrostatic pressure force vectors result in a net resulting electrostatic pressure force acting on the object," the patent reads, adding that the invention could be used as a thruster to propel spacecraft.
[]
"The magnitude of the net resulting electrostatic pressure force is a function of the geometry of the electrically conductive surfaces, the applied voltage, and the dielectric constant of any material present in the gap between electrodes."
According to Dr. Buhler, whose team has been looking for alternative explanations for the force generated, they were able to create a large enough force for the (very small) object to overcome Earth's 1G of gravity (i.e. enough thrust to move the object off the ground in Earth's gravity) using the method.
That may sound like peanuts – but in the near-vacuum of space, you do not need a lot of thrust to accelerate (depending, of course, on the mass of your payload). If you could maintain a constant 1G of acceleration, for example, not only could you enjoy a nice artificial gravity equivalent to that on Earth, but you could reach vast distances within a human lifespan (or at least, from the traveler's perspective). But doing so would require an unimaginable amount of force beyond what we are capable of delivering with current propellants.
Dr. Buhler's claim, were it to be proven true and not the result of another force the team has not accounted for, would be huge. During tests, the team claims to have found an even more puzzling result; the device was apparently sometimes able to maintain this thrust without a constant electrical input.
[Dr. Buhler interview with @timventura]
Dr. Buhler told The Debrief that they’ve created a drive powered by a “New Force” outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity.
“The most important message to convey to the public is that a major discovery occurred,” Buhler told The Debrief. “This discovery of a New Force is fundamental in that electric fields alone can generate a sustainable force onto an object and allow center-of-mass translation of said object without expelling mass.”
He stressed that this work is unaffiliated with NASA, and that he recently presented his findings at the Alternative Propulsion Energy Conference (APEC), which is a club of engineers and enthusiasts eager to find ways to overcome the limitations of gravity and physics—and not always with the most scientifically sound methods.
[]
Video Source: ]
Dr. Buhler and his team presented their findings at a conference called Alternative Propulsion Energy Conference (APEC). This conference is a meeting of experts and enthusiasts who explore unusual ideas for space travel, like anti-gravity.
Dr. Buhler made it clear that his work is not connected to NASA or the US Government. He just wants to share his team's discovery with others who are interested in new ideas for space travel.
Dr. Buhler presented his team's research at a conference, focusing on their experiments from the last decade. He shared detailed math and steps they took to develop a new type of propulsion drive that doesn't use fuel.
They made big breakthroughs, like increasing the force generated from 0.01% of gravity in 2016 to much more in later years. Their goal is to reach "unity," where the device can lift itself against Earth's gravity. They measure force in small units, but aim to exceed 1 gravity of thrust. The team carefully ruled out other explanations for the force they measured, leading to a patented invention in 2020.
“Our materials are composed of many types of charge carrier coatings that have to be supported on a dielectric film,” Buhler told The Debrief. “Our aim is to make it as lightweight as possible, but that is sometimes difficult since the films and their coatings have to have a high dielectric breakdown strength.”
After employing these new designs, the next series of tests produced even more encouraging results. The team once again confirmed the thrust, but the new approach resulted in an order of magnitude jump to one ten-thousandth of a gravity. This was still not enough to leave the planet, but it was enough to know they were on the right track.
As the team neared their goal, they tried new and improved designs. They kept measuring the thrust and ruled out other explanations for what they were seeing.
Then, in 2022, something amazing happened. The force generated by their device suddenly increased significantly. Looking at their data, we can see that between early 2022 and November 2023, the force jumped from tiny fractions of gravity to a full Earth gravity. This means their small device (about 30-40 grams) was producing enough force to lift itself against Earth's gravity. This is a remarkable achievement!
After decades of research, Dr. Buhler says he and his team had shown unequivocally that a new, fundamental force was at work and that his devices were tapping into that force to produce thrust without emitting any mass or propellant.
“Essentially, what we’ve discovered is that systems that contain an asymmetry in either electrostatic pressure or some kind of electrostatic divergent field can give a system of a center of mass a non-zero force component,” Buhler explained. “So, what that basically means is that there’s some underlying physics that can essentially place force on an object should those two constraints be met.”
A slide from Dr. Buhler’s APEC presentation highlights just a few of the hundreds of tests his team ran on their propellantless propulsion drive between 2016 and 2023.
Dr. Buhler's claims are exciting, but we've seen similar claims about propellant-less drives before that didn't hold up to scrutiny.
For example, NASA's Eagleworks team thought they had found a way to make the EmDrive work in 2016, but later studies showed it didn't actually work. So, before we get too excited about Buhler's claims, we need to see rigorous testing and verification from multiple sources. It's possible that Buhler's team discovered something new, but it's unlikely. Let's call it an "improbable engine" for now.
Whenever the topics of anti-gravity and thrusters come up, I always go and watch this video of Bob Lazar.
Bob Lazar is saying that the technology he worked on operates based on a completely different type of physics than what we're familiar with. Normally, all our vehicles—whether planes, jets, or rockets—move by pushing something out the back, creating an action that pushes the vehicle forward. But the craft he worked on doesn't work that way. Instead, it uses something called "field propulsion," which bends space and time in front of it, causing the craft to move forward without any traditional thrust.
Do you think we already have this anti-gravity technolgy?
Video credit: @JeremyCorbell
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tucker Carlson believes that the U.S. government has entered into some sort of agreement with entities thought to be aliens, who are not extraterrestrial but rather have always been present on Earth and may be spiritual in nature.
"So there are forces. That are not human, that do exist in a spiritual realm of some kind that we cannot see and that when you think about it, sort of make you think we live in an ant farm."
Are you ready for this rabbit hole?
A thread begins.
In his 1969 book “Passport to Magonia: On UFOS, Folkore and Parallel Worlds,” Astronomer and UFO researcher Jacques Vallée argues for a “parallel universe co-existing with our own.” The idea was reiterated in Vallée’s subsequent writings. He summarized his objection in his 1990 paper “Five Arguments Against the Extraterrestrial Origin of Unidentified Flying Objects”:
1. Unexplained close encounters are far more numerous than required for any physical survey of the earth; 2. The humanoid body structure of the alleged “aliens” is not likely to have originated on another planet and is not biologically adapted to space travel; 3. The reported behavior in thousands of abduction reports contradicts the hypothesis of genetic or scientific experimentation on humans by an advanced race; 4. The extension of the phenomenon throughout recorded human history demonstrates that UFOs are not a contemporary phenomenon; 5. The apparent ability of UFOs to manipulate space and time suggests radically different and richer alternatives.
Bonus Post!
Astronomer and UFO researcher Jacques Vallée states that UFOs and related events of a paranormal nature involve visitations from other “realities” or “dimensions.”
This is a CIA secret Weapon they revealed in 1975. A battery-operated "Gun" which fired a small poison dart that would enter the target's bloodstream and kill them in mere minutes without leaving a trace. The official cause of death would always be a heart attack.
I was reading about 'Havana Syndrome,' which many believed was caused by a clandestine enemy using energy waves as a weapon. However, a later report stated there was no evidence to support this theory.
Well, until we find the real cause of Havana Syndrome. I came across information that during the Cold War, the CIA invented a secret weapon that allegedly could shoot a small poison dart to cause a heart attack, designed for assassination.
A Thread🧵
As explained in the Congressional testimony in the video. The dart from this secret CIA weapon can penetrate clothing and leave nothing but a tiny red dot on the skin.
On penetration of the deadly dart, the individual targeted for assassination may feel as if bitten by a mosquito, or they may not feel anything at all.
The poisonous dart completely disintegrates upon entering the target. The lethal poison then rapidly enters the bloodstream causing a heart attack. Once the damage is done, the poison denatures quickly, so that an autopsy is very unlikely to detect that the heart attack resulted from anything other than natural causes.
Sounds like the perfect James Bond weapon, doesn't it? Yet this is all verifiable in Congressional testimony.
The astonishing information about this secret weapon of the CIA comes from U.S. Senate testimony in 1975 on rogue activities of the CIA. This weapon is only one of many James Bond-like discoveries United States Senate Select Committee.
This Russian-born American physicist says Our Entire Universe could be a Giant Neural Network: He published a research paper that redefine our Reality: suggesting that we’re living inside a massive neural network that governs everything around us.
Dr. Vitaly Vanchurin was born in Moscow and is a professor at the University of Minnesota. He teaches theoretical physics and cosmology. Dr. Vanchurin has a master's degree and a Ph.D. in physics from Tufts University, where he studied the evolution of cosmic strings.
[]
Dr. Vanchurin's current research focuses on several complex topics, including:
- The expansion of the universe (cosmic inflation)
- The idea of multiple universes (multiverse cosmology)
- The behavior of strings in space (string theory landscapes)
- Fluids that exist in multiple dimensions
- Gravitational waves
- How light travels through the universe
Dr. Vanchurin has been in the news for his new theory about "cosmological neural networks", which is a fascinating idea that combines cosmology and computer science.
Dr. Vanchurin attempts to reframe reality in a particularly eye-opening way — suggesting that it's a "possibility that the entire universe on its most fundamental level is a neural network."
For years, physicists have attempted to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity. The first posits that time is universal and absolute, while the latter argues that time is relative, linked to the fabric of space-time.
In his paper, Dr. Vanchurin argues that artificial neural networks can "exhibit approximate behaviors" of both universal theories.
Since quantum mechanics "is a remarkably successful paradigm for modeling physical phenomena on a wide range of scales," he writes, "it is widely believed that on the most fundamental level the entire universe is governed by the rules of quantum mechanics and even gravity should somehow emerge from it."
[]
"We are not just saying that the artificial neural networks can be useful for analyzing physical systems or for discovering physical laws, we are saying that this is how the world around us actually works," reads the paper's discussion. "With this respect it could be considered as a proposal for the theory of everything, and as such it should be easy to prove it wrong."arxiv.org/abs/2008.01540
Dr. Vanchurin's paper caused debate among physicists and experts in machine learning.
The paper mainly says that: Quantum mechanics equations can help explain how systems behave when they are close to balance (equilibrium). Classical mechanics equations can help explain how systems behave when they are far from balance.
He thinks this connection is interesting and can help us better understand how the natural world works. He admits that this might just be a coincidence, but it still supports our current understanding of the physical world.
"I walked into a photo lab which was the NASA lab across the hallway. I had a secret clearance which is not that high but I was able to go into restricted areas."
"I knew someone in quarantine with the Apollo astronauts he told me that the Apollo astronauts saw crap on the moon when we landed. He said that the astronauts are told to keep this quiet."
Next, we have Dr. Ken Johnston who worked on the Apollo missions claimed that NASA knows that astronauts discovered ancient alien cities and the remains of incredibly advanced machinery on the Moon. Some of these technologies can manipulate gravity. NASA fired him
Full article👉:
He was one of the four Civilian Astronaut Consultant Pilots at NASA who trained Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins for the Apollo 11 Mission.bit.ly/3LoRrLt
These Scientists Died Under Mysterious Circumstances After Making Major Discoveries—Or Were They Silenced?
Most conspiracy theories are not true, but some situations are suspicious enough to deserve a closer look.
Scientists have made many important discoveries that have changed the world. Sometimes, people might not want these discoveries to be shared with the public.
A thread to discuss five strange cases where scientists died after making major breakthroughs in their careers.
1. Rodney Marks, Astrophysicist
Born in Geelong, Australia, Rodney Marks was a 32-year-old astrophysicist with a keen intellect, bohemian ways, and an outgoing personality. He was working at the National Science Foundation’s Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station during the winter season.
Employed by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Marks was working on the Antarctic Submillimeter Telescope and Remote Observatory (AST/RO) project, which included a 1.7-meter telescope for measuring the spectra of atomic carbon and carbon monoxide in the Milky Way.
A task that the frigid, dry atmosphere of Antarctica is ideal for. Before his death, he was working on a problem with one of the telescope receivers, which required a near-absolute-zero temperature.
According to a police statement, Marks suddenly felt unwell and experienced issues with his vision. He went to bed early but woke in the middle of the night for some antacid tablets.
Marks woke again at 5:30 am, vomiting blood. He was taken to BioMed, the base medical center, to see doctor Robert “Robo” Thompson three times over the next 10 hours as he became increasingly anxious, disoriented, short of breath, and pained.
When he went into cardiac arrest and lost consciousness, Thompson performed 45 minutes of CPR without success.Marks was declared dead at 6:45 pm on May 12, 2000.
2. Don Wiley, Structural biologist
He was a renowned Harvard biology professor at the height of his career, in peak physical condition.
Harvard called Wiley "one of the most influential biologists of his generation."
Wiley was considered an expert on how the human immune system fights off infections and had worked on AIDS, Ebola, herpes and influenza. He died on November 15, 2001 after falling off a bridge near Memphis, Tennessee. His body was found in the Mississippi River 340 miles south of Memphis a few weeks later.
3. David Kelly, Welsh scientist
Dr. Kelly was employed as a weapons inspector and expert for the British government in 2003. In the interview with BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan, Kelly revealed that the British government had found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. According to Gilligan, Dr. Kelly was an anonymous source, and Gilligan never revealed his identity.
Due to pressure, Dr. Kelly revealed himself as the source of the leak to his superiors, though he thought he was not the only one. Shortly after, someone leaked Kelly’s name to the media, and he received unwanted media attention.
Two days later, on July 17, 2003, Dr. Kelly’s body was found in his home. His left wrist had been cut, and his autopsy revealed that he had taken 29 Coproxamol tablets (a painkiller). Authorities ruled his death a suicide, but the circumstances are certainly suspicious.
This Salt Lake City Tech CEO went on a work trip to Silicon Valley, and a week later, was Found Dead after making Strange, Unusual Calls to her Parents. Her last words were: 'It's all a Game... We're in the Matrix.'
Erin Valenti was a highly accomplished 33-year-old CEO of a tech company called Tinker, which develops websites and smartphone apps.
She was known for being very smart and kind (she worked as a volunteer to fight human trafficking) with a great sense of humor and a successful career. Originally from Fairport, NY, she resided with her husband in Salt Lake City, UT.
It's a Thread!
Her company, with 120 employees mainly in Pakistan, designed, developed, and scaled technology products built for iOS, Android, and the web.
Tinker built over 700 products, including mobile apps, SaaS applications, tech-enabled marketplaces, and consumer websites for Facebook, Skullcandy, LiveNation, Pearson, MetroPCS, and emerging startups.
Before founding Tinker, she was Director of Product Development at , supervising a team of 250 engineers.Overstock.com
Her company website linked to CTRL- labs, Thomas Reardon’s “neuroscience and behavior” center.
CTRL-labs assembled scientists and technologists:
-PhDs in computational neuroscience;
-Biomechanics paired with hackers and coders;
-Experts in signal processing, machine learning, and human-computer interaction;
-Industrial designers;
CTRL- labs published:
“The future of brain-machine interfaces is non-invasive. Instead of surgical implants, CTRL- labs uses state-of-the-art detection and machine learning to read your neurons from outside the body. The first step will be technology precisely picking up the signals from inside your body to control devices outside of it with little more than natural gestures. The next step – and we are already closer than most people realize – will be reading the intention directly from your brain.”