One of the most pervasive and insane lies of the past few decades is that the American Indians were living in peace and harmony until those nasty Europeans showed up and killed them while “stealing” their land
It’s nearly totally false, and is rooted in Cultural Marxism 🧵👇
First, as to the peace loving part, it’s probably the most idiotic myth
While an occasional tribe here or there might have been less violent than others, on the whole they were quite violent
And that’s not just in conquering and subjugating other tribes, though they did that too. Its also in the bloody, sickening tortures they carried out as a matter of course
Burning people alive, raping and torturing to death peaceful European women and children, hacking apart prisoners with sea shells, bit by bit, flaying them alive, etc
And that was widespread. As @njhochman pointed out in a recent tweet, while death by homicides was the cause of 2% of deaths across Europe at the time (17th century), in some native tribes it was 50%. And that often meant being tortured to death, not just stabbed
So it wasn’t for nothing that the American Declaration of Independence called them “merciless Indian savages”
In both their dealings with Europeans and dealings with each other, stomach churning violence was a matter of course and something they developed independently, not as a result of Europeans
The Last of the Mohicans does a great job of showing just how merciless and brutal they were
It was even worse in the Aztec South, where Cortes and his intrepid men essentially walked into a Satanic horror movie
Priests would top the beating hearts of sacrifice victims, flay little girls alive and wear their skin, and sacrifice their offerings to demonic gods by the tens of thousands
Meanwhile they ruled over a vast empire with an obsidian fist, butchering locals tribes that attempted to become independent or retain their independence
The Europeans were violent too, of course, but not to the same extent as the Aztecs
So, in the North there were control wars between two sides that butchered each other, particularly after Jamestown turned into a bloodbath, and in the South the Catholic conquistadors did their best to stamp out the demonic evil they came across
All that’s to say, and this is something that @0xAlaric and @njhochman have documented quite well, the Europeans were t showing up and slaughtering proto-hippies who just wanted to smoke weed and get along, as is now portrayed
Rather, they fought bravely, at often incredible odds, against hordes of barbarians who had spent generations butchering and torturing each other and wanted to do the same to the Europeans
So, why the lie about the Indians?
For one, modern leftists can’t accept that the natives, by whom they mean whoever was there last before the Europeans, were evil and violent, more akin to demons than hippies. To them, the Europeans must always be the evil ones
But it’s deeper than that. The “why” is important too
So, why? Why must they lie about the Europeans?
Because of the whole Critical Marxism mindset
After decades of naval gazing, self-hate, and churning anti-European sentiment, they’re convinced that any form of hierarchy is evil and must be dismantled, at least if it’s European at root
That means that have to hate what Europeans did in the New World (along with everywhere else). To them, Cortes isn’t a hero for stopping mass human sacrifice. He’s evil because his couple hundred men rallied native allies and defeated a vast native empire, as clear a sign as any of natural hierarchy and civilizational superiority
And so you get the lies. They can’t admit that European culture really was better in that it was more prosperous, murder was rarer, and, in any case it won the civilizational war and dominated the New World
That would mean admitting that there is a natural hierarchy amongst civilizations and that Europe was at the top, which their Cultural Marxist beliefs mean they can’t do
So they lie and claim the Indians were peaceful and awesome and the settlers who showed up only killed peaceable women, not that they fought against bloodthirsty tribes that had long murdered each other
Much the same is true of Africa and colonialism generally, which is why the Communist and “liberal democracy” worlds united to destroy Rhodesia: theamericantribune.news/p/why-rhodesia…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They’re waging a war on smoking and drinkingbecause they want you alone and atomized
It’s not really a health thing, as shown by what else the same sorts of people allow and promote
A very short 🧵👇
First, yes there are of course health aspects to smoking. It’s awful for you (though it tends to keep you skinny and nicotine itself is a nootropic)
But these same anti-smoking activists promote marijuana, which is the green about as bad for the lungs and can lead to schizophrenia issues
Further, they promote needle issuance to drug addicts, trans surgeries including for minors, claim exercise is bad for you, and promote all manner of similarly anti-health advice
So if they were pro-health, they’d care about all that in addition to smoking and drinking
But they don’t. They just despise those traditional Western vices and promote all manner of Oriental and African degeneracy, from ganga to eunuchs
The constant refrain when you question the current state of things is that “the world is improving” and “poverty is decreasing”
That’s true, but civilization is obviously falling apart. From the perspective of human progress and flourishing, things have gotten far worse
🧵👇
First, it is true that poverty, in many respects, has decreased noticeably
The slums are still around and awful, but rarely in the way that was once common
Similarly, famine is less of a blight than it used to be and more often a result of local gangsterism and fighting than natural disaster or chance
But in pretty much every other realm things have gotten far worse from a civilizational perspective
In fact, aesthetics and caring about what they represent show why and how things are now declining
Much of the Regency and Victorian period was dominated by improvement in terms of creating an aura of grandeur through each and every aspect of life
In dress, in architecture, in art, in sculpture, in imperial possessions and the garb, literal and metaphorical, in which it and its agents were clothed, all of it was meant to create a sense of grandeur
More than that, it was meant to show refinement and accomplishment. They had come far from the Dark Ages and Wars of Religion and were proud to show it in their frock coats and country house palaces
PM Meloni of Italy now says she wants to take on the migrant crisis: "We risk becoming Europe's refugee camp . . . We need a naval blockade in Libya and to start sinking NGO ships"
NATO made the invasion happen...Gaddafi was killed to ensure migrants flow into Europe. A 🧵👇
For one, her whole rant is just absurd. The Italians have a modern air force and navy with 184 vessels, as @Babygravy9 immediately pointed out
If she really wanted to blockade Libya and sink NGO ships, 1) she could and 2) she'd have the Mandate of Heaven and eternal love from her people, who want the migrant crisis to stop
It's that she just doesn't want to do it or is to scared to do it...if she had a spine and the intent, she could just stop the migrant invasion in like a week, if that, and begin remigration
Regardless of Meloni just not wanting to solve the problem, the issue is that NATO murdered Gaddafi in 2011 in brutal fashion so that the flow of migrants from Africa into Italy and Europe would continue
Clinton infamously said "We came, we saw, he died," but she should have appended, "and so Europe will be invaded" onto the end of that, as that is what happened and she wanted to happen
First, as a reminder for those who didn't read the previous 🧵, the reason the governing regimes of the West despise @nayibbukele is that he shows citizens and subjects of such nations that the reason their countries are crime-infested hellholes is government policy, not some inexorable force of crime turning them into that despite government attempts to rectify the situation
The media hates him for a somewhat different, more ideological reason
To them, remember, "our democracy" is sacrosanct
What matters is not outcome; the regime lackeys couldn't care less if their neighborhoods are swarmed with fentanyl addicts breaking into cars
Rather, they care only about means. What they care about is that, if anything is achieved, it is achieved by "democratic means," meaning liberalism and an open society.
How did Mugabe destroy Rhodesia, turning the breadbasket of Africa into a starving hellhole wracked by hyperinflation and famine?
It's a pretty simple story, as things went just how you'd expect, but it holds a good number of important lessons for America
So, a 🧵👇 on this
Mugabe, for those who don't know, was Zimbabwe's "One Man, One Rule, One Time" dictator who came to power shortly after Rhodesia fell and then ruled for decades
He "served" as Prime Minister from 1980 to 1987, and then changed titles and ruled as President from 1987 to 2017
His presidency and prime ministership saw the formerly thriving country of Rhodesia turn into the hellish Zimbabwe, so it's worth understanding how he did that, how he turned the breadbasket of Africa into a starving disaster zone
It took about four steps. Four steps to turn a paradise into hell on Earth
It's an important question, as only he has solved the crime problem in this century
In short, it's because he used the power of the state to crush the bloodthirsty, Satan-worshipping MS-13 gang instead of tolerating it
I'll explain in 🧵👇
First, yes, the gang really is Satanic. This is what @nayibbukele told Tucker:
"They are Satanic.... They started killing more people..but as the organization grew, they became Satanic. They started doing Satanic rituals...When you interview gang members in prison...when you ask them why they aren't in the gang anymore....
"The guy asked how many people have you killed? He didn't remember how many. They asked him what is your position? He explained how he went up in position but he left the gang.
"He explains, 'I was used to kill people. I killed for territory, extortion...but I came to this house; they were about to kill a baby.' He said, 'why are we going to kill that baby?' They told him, 'because "the beast" asked for a baby, so we have to give him a baby.'
"He left the gang so he couldn't tolerate what he was seeing... So human sacrifice was a part.... There's a spiritual war and there's a physical war. If you win the spiritual war, it will reflect into the physical war. Our impressive victory was because we won the spiritual war... You said I have a three point plan..And you said the first part of my plan is to seek God's wisdom."
That was the evil with which Bukele was confronted
In the West, our "leaders" would have just done what they always do and have indeed done in the case of MS-13 and like groups: tolerate it
Even as law-abiding citizens are tortured, extorted, and murdered by thuggish gang members who use their power to prey on all manner of people, the government pretends that gangs aren't a problem and that the real problem is "racism" or whatever
Equivalents are the police tolerating the grooming gangs in Britain, where Muslim men gangr*ped girls as young as 10 and 11 for years on end, with the police knowing about it and letting them do it. In America, gangs and cartels run wild and the police just let them exist, let them kill each other and normal people