In 1985, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued Abbot v Burke, which determined that existing methods of school funding, relying on local property taxes, were unconstitutional and deprived underprivileged (read: black) students of their right to an equal education (1/7).
In 2010, the so-called Abbot districts, which benefited from the decision, received $18,850/student, $3100 more than the state average, overwhelmingly paid for by taxpayers located outside of these districts. Local tax intakes actually dropped (1973-2010) in real terms! (2/7)
Needless to say, this judicially-mandated colossal increase in funding for these districts (spending nearly tripled in real terms, from $7000 to $18,850/student in 2010 dollars 1973-2010), paid for by other NJ taxpayers, did not close the achievement gap in the slightest (3/7).
The most egregious example is Asbury Park, which in 2010 spent $23940/student ($34500 in 2024 dollars), without a single SAT taker reaching college readiness. This is because the race gap between whites/Asians and blacks/Hispanics is particularly large in New Jersey (4/7).
Abbot and its consequences are a great showcase of the following: 1) The big "Civil Rights" victories of the 70s/80s were mostly judicially mandated, not legislated, and based on totally false premises (in this case, that school achievement is mostly a function of money). (5/7)
2) Black school districts are not "underfunded". Both in New Jersey and in the country, they have more money than their wealthier and whiter peers, not less, paid for by enormous transfers from wealthier, whiter taxpayers. Chart from @AnechoicMedia_. (6/7)
3) It's yet another impressive demonstration of the fact that, in the 20th/21st century United States, educational outcomes have very little to do with money. We should stop trying to spend our way to intelligence - or do so in a way that might work, like embryo selection. (7/7)
Source: . Written in 2012, and there's some humorous-with-the-benefit-of-hindsight optimism about "education reform" closing the gap where spending did not. The Wikipedia article on Abbot districts is also good.nj.gov/education/stat…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Employers hiring people and then training them in the specific skills they require has declined as a hiring model for decades, in favor of a hiring market where employers look for people who already have those skills.
In the training/internal labor markets model, a company struggling to find specific skills will train promising entry-level employees. In the hiring market model, they can raise wages or otherwise improve conditions. In both, they can also substitute technology for labor.
Neither a hiring market nor training model for matching jobs to seekers is compatible with "skill shortages" as a concept, which implicitly assumes skills are fixed and once people with those skills run out employers can do nothing (except through immigration or schooling).
"Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (TR Fehrenbach, 1973/1995) thread of threads. Mesoamerican civilization was horrifying and very backwards by Old World standards, but unique.
Excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1995). The PRI had massively expanded higher education. These universities were entirely 'free'/self-governing and became locuses of left-wing organizing.
In 1968, security forces fired upon a massive student demonstration/riot against the Olympic Games.
By 1970 Mexico had made enormous progress; the national income increased sixfold while the death rate dropped by half. But Mexico was still struggling with foreign-exchange; the govt pursued import-substitution to improve balance-of-payments.
Thread with excerpts from the Partido Nacional Revolucionario (PNR) section of TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1995). Calles created the PNR in 1929 to institutionalize the govt and Revolution, creating a Mexican party-state.
The Calles/Obregon governments were corrupt, but never succumbed to paranoia; there was no equivalent to the Soviet or Chinese liquidations of class enemies, the press was free, and the average Mexican had nothing to fear from the govt (Red Terror against the Church aside).
Roughly 19M acres were redistributed through 1933; most land remained with latifundios. But the new latifundios were not like the old ones, they were commercial enterprises rather than social systems. The clerics, army, and latifundistas were all tamed by Calles/Obregon.
Thread with excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1995), on post-Revolutionary Mexico. To justify land reform, the revolutionaries revived the principle that expropriation was justifiable if the national interests demanded it.
The Constitutionalists defeated the Villistas in battle and assassinated the leader of the last revolutionary faction, Zapata, by treachery.
Carranza, the erstwhile leader of the victorious Constitutionalists, dug his own grave by trying to promote someone other than Obregon to the presidency after him; he was forced to flee the capital, run down, and murdered.
Excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973). The Porfiriato gave Mexico a generation of stability and development for the first time since independence. This left Mexico overdue for another civil war: the Mexican Revolution.
One problem was that the Porfirian school system had created a large, literate middle structure (not class). These educated mestizos became dissatisfied due to lack of opportunity; growth was rapid but not rapid enough to absorb them all.
The Revolution kicked off in 1910, when Diaz announced he'd won reelection with 99% of the vote. This kicked off an insurgency in Chihuahua, in the mestizo, frontier north.