Post

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1828911941672112332

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1829362819193520307

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1830639454790594594

More from @VigilantFox

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 31

🔥 CNN TRAINWRECK.

Brianna Keilar thought she had @SebGorka cornered.

Instead, she got STEAMROLLED with the facts.

Gorka said the quiet part OUT LOUD about the transgender shooter epidemic and the anti-Christian ideology that’s fueling it.

Then he dropped the HAMMER:

“Forgive me if I don’t go with CNN’s stats, okay? CNN has proven itself to be WHOLLY inaccurate…”

By the end, he even called her out for creating “live FAKE news” to her face—leaving CNN’s narrative in flames.

🧵 THREAD

What CNN thought would happen and what happened were directly at odds with one another.

When anchor Brianna Keilar sat down for an interview with Trump’s Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian Gorka, she didn’t see the headlights of a locomotive coming straight for her.

Her foot was caught between the tracks.

The topic: the recent shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Another data point on the rising curve of violence committed by unhinged transgender shooters, once again targeting Christians.

And it immediately went in the direction no one at CNN wanted it to go.

Gorka said the quiet part out loud about the transgender shooter epidemic...live, on their own network.

Not only that, he called out the anti-Christian ideology fueling these attacks.

Gorka began the unraveling of the narrative: “We have to put this incident into the broader context of what we’ve witnessed.”

First, the transgender part.

“In just the last few years, more than half a dozen attacks of a similar variety involving individuals who were confused about their gender, to put it mildly.”

Second, the attacks on Christianity.

“And then, as you mentioned, at the top of your monologue: we have the videos, we have the statements from the dead shooter that were clearly anti-Christian, just as with the transgender attack on the Nashville Christian school, in which more children were killed.”

“There is an ideological connection to multiple of these attacks where innocent children, especially Christians and Catholics, are targeted. And that is very, very disturbing.”

This was just the beginning.

Keilar, with network talking points in hand, wasn’t about to let the truth come to the surface without spin. Trying to steer the conversation back into CNN-friendly territory, Keilar reached for a stat.

“Okay. So let me ask you about this. You know, 96% of attackers—when you’re looking at the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center, looking at 172 mass attacks in the U.S. between 2016 and 2020—96% were non-trans men.”

“So I know you’re focusing on this shooter being trans. The shooter was trans…and that is certainly of note. But are you missing the bigger picture here, when you zero in on that instead of more broadly the school shooters as an epidemic—and you perhaps miss the through line that connects them all?”

It was riddled with issues and Gorka knew exactly what she was trying to do.

He shut it down immediately with one VERY inconvenient truth.

CNN was padding the numbers by lumping in inner-city gang violence to dilute the real trend. This happens all the time on networks unwilling to face the hard truths.

“Well, no, because your facts obfuscate two things.”

He called out what CNN didn’t want anyone to notice.

“You are using data based upon the predominant gun violence, which is gang-on-gang violence with zero ideological content.”

“If you remove all of that—the gang violence on the streets of Chicago, L.A., Detroit—then you come down to a much smaller data set.”

“So it’s like those who say gun violence in America causes so many deaths, and then fail to note that the majority of the stats they are using refer also to suicides by gun, which of course is not what we are talking about here today.”

He wasn’t letting her move the goalposts.

“So let’s concentrate on mass shootings at schools, specifically Christian or Catholic schools.”

“Then the data set is wholly different. So don’t conflate different data sets just to make a political point. There was an ideological content to this attack. That’s what terrorism is.”

“It’s not because somebody didn’t get the drug deal they wanted. It is an ideological message.”

This was the first time someone had called out this kind of data manipulation on live cable news.

Read 10 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 30

The truth about organ transplants is worse than anyone imagined.

Millions sign up as organ donors, never imagining the system could betray them.

But federal investigators found nearly 30% of donors showed signs of life, as surgeons prepared to harvest their organs.

Nurses say some organ donors are sedated or even paralyzed just so the organ harvesting procedures can continue.

Even more disturbing, the definition of “death” was re-engineered decades ago to make this nightmare possible.

This is what no one tells you about being an organ donor—and what really happens when someone receives an organ.

🧵 THREAD

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-c…

In case you missed it, @MidwesternDoc just released one of the most shocking reports yet.

Yes, organ transplants save lives—but the system is absolutely riddled with corruption, misdiagnosed “brain death,” and multiple cases of patients showing signs of life as their organs were about to be harvested.

This is nothing short of disturbing.

Read 30 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 30

EXCLUSIVE: Big Pharma’s War on a Cheap Cancer Treatment That Endangered Their Billions

In the 1970s, a Loyola researcher wiped out deadly tumors in mice using nothing but vitamins, enzymes, and Laetrile (B17).

The results were groundbreaking—and that’s exactly why the cancer industry buried them.

This is the cancer story they never wanted you to hear.

🧵 THREAD

Dr. Harold Manner, former biology professor and chairman of the biology department at Loyola University in Chicago, dropped a devastating discovery into the heart of the cancer establishment in the late-70s.

On September 10, 1977, he announced an 89% regression of breast tumors in laboratory mice thanks to enzymes, vitamin A, and Laetrile. Dr. Manner, a courageous pioneer researcher, said cancer is not a medical problem; it is a metabolic problem.

If it was known as far back as 1977 that metabolic therapy could effectively control breast cancer, how many lives since then have been needlessly lost, how many lives were irreversibly damaged, and how many unnecessary mastectomies were performed?

John Richardson Jr., Founder and Chief Visionary Officer of Operation World Without Cancer and Founder of the Richardson Nutritional Center, joins us today to discuss what the medical establishment doesn’t want you to know about cancer treatment.

Richardson opened with what he called “the Vault,” a 60-year paper trail exposing how Laetrile (vitamin B17) was driven out of mainstream medicine. At the center of that buried history is Loyola University’s Dr. Harold Manner, a respected researcher who dared to put the therapy to the test against breast cancer in the 1970s.

Manner quickly realized that the studies used to dismiss Laetrile weren’t science—they were sabotage. Researchers injected healthy animals with live cancer cells, guaranteeing they would die within weeks, no matter what treatment was given.

“That just doesn’t happen in real life,” Richardson stressed.

So Manner changed course. He relied on animals with naturally developed tumors and treated them with pancreatic enzymes, vitamins A, C, D, and Laetrile. And the results were absolutely astonishing. Over five years, cancers disappeared—even in mice whose tumors were half the size of their bodies.

Richardson believed this information was undeniable proof that cancer is a metabolic deficiency disease, not a random genetic curse. But instead of recognition, Manner was censored, stripped of support, and his research erased.

In other words, show that cancer can be beaten naturally, and the system will come after you.

Read 10 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 29

10 Stories They Don't Want You to Read Today

#10 - Tucker Carlson gets angry when he learns nearly 1 in 5 Americans are on antidepressants RIGHT NOW.

He couldn’t believe it.

When his guest confirmed the number referred to CURRENT prescriptions, Carlson’s reaction said it all:

First, psychiatrist Josef Witt-Doerring told Carlson that we’ve seen a 500% INCREASE in antidepressant use since the 1990s.

Carlson asked if the depression problem has gotten better or worse, and Witt-Doerring replied: “There’s more psychiatric prescribers now, there’s more drug prescribing, and the outcomes are actually getting WORSE.”

After hearing that, Carlson made this blistering statement:

“I’m just going to skip ahead to my opinion, then I’m going to pull back. But that suggests that we should BAN the drugs and IMPRISON the people selling them. That’s my personal view. But you’re the psychiatrist.”

KEEP READING: 9 MORE STORIES BELOW

#9 - Stephen Miller eloquently DEFENDS RFK Jr. as reporters try to stick their daggers in over the firing of former CDC Director Susan Monarez.

This is how you SHUT DOWN the MSM narrative on the spot.

#8 - Data from the Family Research Council shows a disturbing surge of attacks on churches in America.

Instances of hostility [including vandalism] against U.S. churches from 2018 to 2024:

• 2018–2021 combined: 286 incidents

• 2023: 485 incidents

• 2024: 415 incidents

Each of the last two years alone exceeded the previous four years combined...and together, 2023–2024 are over 3× the 2018–2021 total.

Read 11 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 29

RFK Jr. Hits the Medical Cartel Where It Hurts With Bold New HHS Announcement

This is Big Pharma and Big Medicine’s worst nightmare.

What makes them so rich is finally getting gutted.

🧵 THREAD

Imagine this: you go to your doctor, and they give you ten minutes. You say, “Hey, Doc, I got a problem. How do I fix it?”

The doctor writes you a prescription, you take it to the pharmacy, and then you take that pill for life—until you die.

This is what most people experience when they see a doctor.

But RFK Jr. is changing that with a bold new vision to improve the doctor-patient relationship for good.

He announced that he’s leading a team at HHS to overhaul the medical education system and finally put a focus on what’s been ignored for too long—nutrition training.

Read 11 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 29

EXCLUSIVE: The Lawsuit That Could Collapse the CDC’s Vaccine Empire Overnight

This could bring down the CDC’s vaccine empire once and for all.

Instead of battling at the state level, attorney Rick Jaffe went straight for the source—demanding the CDC downgrade its 72-dose childhood schedule from “mandatory” to “shared decision-making.”

If the court agrees, state mandates collapse and the CDC’s grip on parents shatters overnight.

“They want to claim the program is safe? Fine, prove it.”

🧵 THREAD

For the first time ever, a federal lawsuit challenges the CDC's staggering 72+ dose childhood vaccine schedule on the grounds that it has never actually been safety tested.

And it turns out the government's own outside advisers have been urging safety studies for nearly 25 years.

The case was filed in federal court on Friday, August 15, on behalf of Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Kenneth Stoller, and Stand for Health Freedom. The case goes right to the heart of the CDC's Childhood Immunisation Program.

Rick Jaffe, who filed the lawsuit, joins us today to discuss the case.

Rick Jaffe has spent forty years on the front lines as a healthcare lawyer. He’s defended doctors, taken on the medical establishment, and seen more than most.

But this time, his lawsuit goes after the CDC’s very foundation: the childhood vaccine schedule itself.

In preparing the case, Jaffe uncovered a fact that floored even him. Despite requiring American children to follow a 72-dose regimen, the CDC has never once tested the safety of the schedule as a whole.

Each vaccine is looked at only in isolation, and only for a few days. “You’re giving 72 doses plus medical interventions over 18 years,” he said, “and they’ve never tested the effect of the total dose.”

What makes this worse, Jaffe added, is that the National Academy of Medicine has urged the CDC to conduct these studies for more than 20 years—yet the agency has refused.

That refusal became the cornerstone of Jaffe’s case: if the CDC has never tested the very system it enforces, how can it possibly claim America’s children are being kept safe?