1. I think I know who Co-Conspirator No. 5 is any it may be why the Special Counsel delivered something secret to court on Wednesday. Conspiracies are dangerous for defendants. Evidence that would usually be kept out comes in.
2. Here is the description of Co-Conspirator No. 5 from the Superseding Indictment: 
3. I thought it was a particular person because it fit my suspicion about the Wednesday filing. A co-conspirator in certain circumstance can bind a defendant to admission they make that makes a defendant
4. criminally liable for their crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. What I was looking for is a co-conspirator who who might be dumb enough to reach out to the Kremlin during the planning of the Jan 6 attack.
5. I think I found someone who fits the bill. Someone who is facing charges for the same crimes that Jack Smith has charged against Trump. Someone I've watched for over 8 years.
7. Smith's recent filing about the evidence related to uncharged conduct reminded me of something about highly-classified information and how it is sometimes handled in criminal cases. They don't generally put it before a grand jury if they
8. can avoid it. But they can show it to the judge and then the court can create a way to disclose the facts and relevant context without the jury or the defendant ever seeing it. It's preserved for appellate courts but
9. stays secret. I think that Boris got on the line with the Russian intelligence services and we have it. And on September 10 we may learn what it is. I admit I really want this to be true. And I admit I could be wrong.
10. But when I see something and then try to figure it out and my guesses lead to confirmations, I can't help but being hopeful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
