As if it wasn’t clear already VW illustrates the giant, ticking time-bomb at the heart of Europe’s economic model.
The European economy is based on two things, industrial production and selling the past.
Selling the past includes tourism, where nice places have a history and the story increases the margins. Selling the past also includes things like fashion, perfume and luxury goods where the brand associations with history, also increases margins.
Industrial production is obviously about making things. But it is no longer about making industrial era things. Cars are a great example here. as although EVs look the same as the type of cars that Germany produces, the way they are produced and their business model and margins are totally different.
ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles are industrial era products. They have five times as many moving parts as electric vehicles and most of their margins are from expert assembly and wholesale sales to dealerships and then maintenance and replacement of these parts over time, via dealerships, who can sell at low retail margins. A vast ecosystem of companies surrounds the OEMs (car brands).
The economic model of these large industrials is based on the, ‘them and us’’, industrial era social pact between workers and owners and mimics the state itself. Industrial workers are unionised and get defined benefit pensions but there is no shared ownership or options pools and all profits go to the top, often family dynasties.
Over time, these companies become more like a family owned pension funds rather than a manufacturer. They are highly resistant to change, structurally, so they can only innovate within the existing paradigm, not for expertise reasons (BMW management went all in on electric a decade ago, but the unions pushed back) but structural ones.
People are currently blaming management for the disaster that is unfurling at VW, but this is mistaken. The entire organisation resists structural change outside of the industrial paradigm.
EVs, on the other hand, are digital era products. Their margins come from batteries and software. Asia has control of the entire battery supply chain and Asia and the US have control of the software one. Europe is nowhere. The German, French and Italian car manufacturers are like Nokia, post smartphone.
EVs are much simpler and do not need the vast ecosystem of parts suppliers or the dealerships, since the maintenance model that the dealerships depend on doesn’t work.
EVs, as digital era companies have not accrued the legacy of past workers’ pensions or family dynasty ownership and are able to offer more equity to both workers and capital markets. With interests diversified and aligned and with workers’ skin in the game (in the US style, options pool model) they are also able to change.
This is the digital era model, and all companies will eventually follow it. Digital era manufacturing is completely different and requires a complete restructuring of the manufacturing model. But this is almost impossible to achieve with existing companies unless there is massive innovation via insulated vehicles such as corporate venturing and m&a.
Germany is very, very good at making things that will not change in the digital era.But it is making the wrong things in the wrong corporate structures and with the wrong bureaucratic and fiscal incentives. It needs a massive, strategic shift to the digital era, or Europe’s manufacturing core will implode and take the rest of Europe with it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone who has tried vibe coding knows that you can get 99% of the way there then hit a 'whac-a-mole' wall of introducing three new bugs for every one fixed. At which point manual coding is easier. Here is a work around.
1. Use reasoning models like o3 to create better one shot prompts to start with.
2. Include a test harness in the prompt structure so you can lock down things into unit tests.
This is the simplest diagram I could do to explain what is happening in the world and why China has already won.
Before this, there was the mantra that 'software is eating the world'. It was true and the US beat Europe which failed to enter the digital era and build any dominant internet platforms. This was the best diagram that explained this.
But as the commanding heights of the new economy change from internal combustion engines to EVs, batteries, chips etc. China owns a majority of the manufacturing of everything.
Ok, now I understand what's going through Vance's mind. It's nuts, but this is what's happening:
Their view is that Europe is 'pathetic' and that US is sick of picking up tab for Pax Americana in Europe.
In Ukraine they flouted the idea of mineral rights to subsidise support and get a sort of instant belt and road style access to rare earths etc. for repatriated manufacturing in the US, via tariff threats.
In other words it's a half baked plan to copy China (domestic manufacturing with control of supply chains) in a rushed fashion and through protection racket style coercion. Protection racket is actually unfair as the threat is genuinely from Russia not from US.
AI creates network effects in production (software application production costs go to zero, running costs increase) - ultimately this means, infrastructure and energy, and we will need more.
But just like the telco/dotcom bust masked continued secular growth in the internet, there could be a dotcom style implosion of AI infrastructure (and this could be the first tremor).
Infrastructure overspend would be when new alliances form leaving redundancy, winners emerge driving consolidation or new more efficient architectures such as DeepSeek hinted at are released.
What is wrong with our world, in one tweet. 1. The structural change that created the Reformation (bypassing churches control of books) was replacing one (scribe/priest) to many (congregation) with more (mass duplicated printed book) to many (congregation).
2. The structural changes of the internet are larger:
few (publishers, TV channels, newspapers) to many (nations) replaced with many (everyone has a channel on the internet) to many (everyone, regardless of borders).
3. Play this simple game (30 minutes and it will explain network theory without any jargon or tech knowledge requirements) and it will show that until the network (our world post internet) settles into a small world one (largely siloed communities where people can belong to more than one, connected by just a few individuals i.e. not like twitter, where everyone is connected to everyone), there will be instability as lies will propagate more than truth.ncase.me/crowds/
Fintech is a niche internet sector that everyone thought would be huge, but outside of China it has resulted in very few platform companies like Revolut. Here’s why.
1. It’s a massive market sector that had everyone drooling but regulation means it’s not a level playing field for startups.
2. Outside of the period of ultra low interest rates it’s ultimately about balance sheet size, which is hard for startups.
3. The big product opportunities are very simple in user proposition, product terms: a bank and an insurance company.