This is quite far from a comprehensive list, just the first I thought of - read something like Alien Nation for more: 1) Racial privileges ("Affirmative Action", "DEI") for the vast majority of immigrants at white people's expense. These are everywhere; college admissions are the most famous, but corporate hiring/promotion, scholarships, government contracting, racial advocacy groups, and subsidized loans are all even worse. Obviously, being a 2nd/3rd tier citizen sucks. 2) Welfare/fiscal impacts. The median immigrant is a large fiscal burden on the country, because they use more government programs than natives and make very little money (and therefore pay few taxes - we have a very progressive taxation system). This is masked in some stats because they're usually claimed on behalf of dependent (citizen) children, but it's still an effect of immigration. I resent being forced to pay for these people. 3) Lower national IQ. National IQ is the best predictor of economic growth and development (see Hive Mind). Immigrants, on average, are dumber than natives and therefore predictably make the country poorer in the long run. 4) Politics. The median immigrant dislikes white Americans, wants socialism (welfare + bigger regulatory state), opposes freedom of speech, and so on. This is bad, and will kill American exceptionalism unless demographic trends are turned around fast. 5) Housing prices - should go without saying. Empirically, a 1% increase in immigrant population => 1% increase in housing prices (sciencedirect.com/science/articl…). 6) Lower internal mobility. Can't make it big in the big city if the big city is full of Dominicans on welfare (see: aporiamagazine.com/p/fleeing-oppo…). 7) Cultural conflict - I don't like hearing eg loud noises on public transportations. Puerto Ricans disagree. We can't both get what we want. More diversity means more of this. 8) More seriously, overt ethnic conflict. There are hundreds of organizations explicitly devoted to promoting the zero-sum ethnic interests of various ethnic groups. To the extent they succeed, they make my life (and everyone else's - anti-meritocracy is bad) worse. This can and has (Lebanon) reached the level of civil war. 9) Crime. The median 2nd-gen immigrant is about as criminal as the average American. But that makes them much more criminal than they average white American, US stats being skewed by sky-high black crime. Even if they're making Detroit safer, they're making my part of the country worse. And Europe is much worse - immigrants are responsible for half or more of serious crime in many continental European countries (eg Denmark: inquisitivebird.xyz/p/the-effects-…), and that's not touching things like the "grooming gangs" [read: industrial scale racially motivated gang rape of white girls by Pakistanis] in England.
Empirically, native-born Americans move away from places with lots of immigrants (even though pull-factors, like jobs and cost-of-living, are the same for both groups), suggesting that whatever the benefits of immigration are, they are dwarfed by the costs.
And it's worth pointing out that assimilation is mostly not real, and stops at the 2nd generation (see: The Culture Transplant). None of these problems will ever go away.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Removing teachers (and soldiers, for fairness) lowers the gap, but it's still a big difference.
You can get slightly different numbers depending on what source you use and what exactly you count as public, but they all tell the same substantive story.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's a continuation of previous investigations on how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I updated their framework with different categories and newer models in October 2025, and discovered that with the exception of Grok 4 (Fast), all models placed far more value on the lives of "left-coded" groups (nonwhites, non-men, LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists, Third Worlders) over "right-coded" groups (whites, men, non-queers, ICE agents, rightists, First Worlders). For example, Sonnet 4.5 saw the lives of South Asians as about 18 times as valuable as the lives of whites.
However, it's been several generations of model since October 2025, so I decided to try again with today's models: Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5, and Kimi K3. As it turns out, all of them are MUCH more egalitarian than their counterparts (except Grok 4.5, since Grok 4 was already egalitarian) from a year ago.
Finding 1: Sonnet 5 was the only model even close to last year's models, valuing nonwhites roughly four times higher than whites.
Finding 2: GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 are very close to perfectly egalitarian; Sol values whites at around 7/8ths nonwhites and K3 values blacks roughly 1.3 times as much as whites; these are tiny ratios by the standards of last year.
Finding 3: Claude Fable is pretty much perfectly egalitarian. This is very, very different from last year's Claude models. Grok 4.5 has retained the egalitarianism of previous generations of Grok despite the giant increase in capabilities and different team.
Every model I tested would have been the most egalitarian model (aside from Grok 4) last year. All models have come to resemble Grok in their exchange rates.
This is wrong. Kirk was not a particularly hated figure before he was killed; he was seen by Redditor-types as a goofy meme figure of mockery (see below, from 2023). He was only demonized by lefties *after* he was murdered, to retroactively justify the assassination.
Kirk was not a case of the lib hate machine whipping up hatred against someone until someone took a shot at him, it was a case of the lib hate machine ramping up after he was murdered.
This is one of the reasons why his murder was so shocking; I sort of expected people taking shots at Trump or Stephen Miller or even Elon Musk, who libs collectively saw as Hitler II, but not Kirk, who they mostly saw as a lolcow.
Thread with excerpts from "Foundations, their power and influence" (1958), by the former chairman of the Reece Committee, a Congressional committee to investigate the conduct of tax-exempt foundations.
The administrators of the great foundations formed an interlocking cartel wielding (illegally) immense political and cultural influence using other people's money, as the foundations are tax exempt.
Foundations are tax-exempt because they are supposed to be run for public benefit.
Thread with excerpts from "The French Intifada: The Long War Between France and its Arabs" (2014). This book, by a leftist (participant in communes) author, portrays race riots by Arab immigrants to France as simply one more episode in a centuries-long war between the two.
Both the French Left and Right framed the 2005 riots as part of the long French tradition of revolt. But they were wrong; the protestors were mostly Arabs rioting against France itself, not against "the bosses" or "the state."
The rioters (remember, Arab immigrants and their descendants) see themselves as soldiers in a long war against France, Europe, and even civilization itself. Recall that the author is on their side.
'The Unknown Warriors' (2006) is a collection of WWII veteran's views on modern Britain gathered via newspaper ad. So what did WWII veterans think of the 2006 UK? They hated it; 134 responses were negative vs only 6 positive (plus 31 N/A and 13 neutral). Excerpts below.
The below is typical (from a D-Day veteran): "I am absolutely disgusted with the way things are turning out... and sometimes wonder if it was worth all the suffering of a war."
"I have many, many misgivings on how matters have turned out. Problems seem to be resolved, by more and more legislation, instead of action at the source... What many veterans abhor, is the acceptance of homosexuality as the norm."