Stu Smith Profile picture
Sep 9, 2024 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
BREAKING: Joseph Edelman, a Brown University trustee, has now resigned over the future divestment vote at Brown University.

As a result, I am releasing my recording of the Wednesday meeting where the Brown Divest Coalition presented their proposal to divest from Israel.
Here is video of the full presentation below. Remember, Brown is a private university; you can't FOIA this video. Without me, this recording may not have ever gone public.

I honestly wanted a bit more time with this footage and other divestment trainings I have recorded to present this in a digestible format. The language of ESG is how many of these students are getting their foot in the door and they are being trained to exploit this. There is a lot I could say about this subject.

However, Edelman's resignation will hopefully get sizable attention, and I hope by "democratizing" this footage, you can see how ridiculous this presentation was. If you use it, please tag me so I can boost it and comment if needed.
I really enjoyed watching Professor James Kellner grill the students after their presentation. Kellner is a Professor of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology and Environment and Society. In a past life, I imagine he must have been a lawyer. He is one of the professors who is a member of the Advisory Committee on University Resources Management (ACURM).

Here he explains ACURM's duties when it comes to "social harm." In a truly golden moment, he then asks the students if they know that Brown University is not directly invested in any of the ten companies they want to divest from.
Kellner posed a philosophical question to the students about how social harm could be easily identifiable if we presume that companies are responsible for how their products are used. He used alcohol as an example of something that is widely used yet creates social harm.

President of the Undergraduate Council of Students, Niyanta Nepal, didn't engage with this thought experiment and instead focused on how strong the students feel about divestment and how personal Palestine is for the student body.

Nepal ran on a platform of divestment and even participated in the hunger strike for eight days.
Again, Kellner gets philosophical and discusses how possibly neutrality cannot exist; if so, should we consider the net good and net harm of these companies?

It sounds like Nepal, but could be another student, responds that the students are only looking at the harm.

Kellner says, "The world is more complicated than that." He uses flying on airplanes as an example of a social harm that also provides great benefits. He asks the students to consider how the university needs to consider the totality of a company.

The students once again don't engage with these questions and go back to how the student body has spoken about not wanting to be complicit and how they have proven how great the social harm is.
Kellner now asks the students about what Brown should do considering that they have received a letter from 24 Attorney Generals threatening legal action if the university divests.

Rafi Ash, the Treasurer of the Undergraduate Council of Students and Secretary of Brown/RISD Young Democratic Socialists of America, walks us through his legal analysis of the situation. He sees this as illegal and unconstitutional. He also believes these politicians are "jockeying for political power."
Kellner is such a good professor. If he is like this in the classroom, I imagine his students grow so much if they rise to the occasion.

"I appreciate that response; I'm going to push back and ask you to try again from a slightly different point of view."

Kellner walks the students through how grants work, how they "flow through other states," and how they could be jeopardized if Brown University divests.

Ash doesn't engage with this. Instead, he blames "fundamentally extremist politicians" and wants us to consider "who does the university stand for?" He sees this as an issue of academic freedom and that these students are simply questioning the university.
Major Takeaways from the Divestment Presentation

-Kellner rules and has such a great approach. We should all be blessed to have such a professor who challenges you to be your best.
-These are the best that Brown has to offer? Really?
-Volvo being one of the companies they want to divest from makes me laugh. Raise your hand if you ever rode around in that old iconic Volvo station wagon!
-One of my followers recently said, "Nobody else has coverage on events like this and it’s so important." If you agree and appreciate my reporting, buy me a coffee! See my pinned tweet to see how to show me some love.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stu Smith

Stu Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thestustustudio

Jul 30
TIL that Hasan Piker’s interviews are researched behind the scenes by Eric Hovagim, a socialist producer who now lives in China and has been featured by Chinese state media for his pro-Beijing commentary.

Shoutout to the Periphery Podcast and Noa Fears for this lovely little piece of information.
Amazing Image
Image
Here is Hasan bullying Jude in the video above because her co-host is a Hasan hater, whom I had oddly enough featured a while back for that exact reason.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 24
🧵 BreakThrough News Calls Congressional Subpoenas “the Fight of Our Life”

If the past is prologue, the BreakThrough News subpoenas may reveal something similar to NewsClick, with messaging coordinated by Neville Roy Singham, Vijay Prashad, or other leaders inside the network.

It is fully possible that, after the NewsClick investigation exposed such an extensive paper trail, the structure changed. Singham or Prashad may have relayed messaging to Brian Becker, who then told BreakThrough News staff to run with it.

BreakThrough News is also staffed by several veterans of foreign state-controlled media. Brian Becker and Eugene Puryear were not merely occasional guests on Russian state media. Both hosted programs on Sputnik, while Rania Khalek hosted Soapbox, a program produced by Maffick Media, which at the time was majority-owned by an RT subsidiary.

They are right that they have not been charged with a crime. A subpoena is not a criminal charge, and it proves nothing by itself. But that is exactly why Congress is seeking the internal communications and financial records, to determine whether BreakThrough News was truly independent or part of a coordinated political and financial network.

The central question is whether BreakThrough News was operating as a genuinely independent newsroom or as part of a coordinated political and financial network tied to Singham, Prashad, and Becker.
Here is how NewsClick allegedly operated in India, with Singham emails reportedly including a “praise China” toolkit, managed messaging, and Vijay Prashad in the loop.

Despite the spin, these are serious questions, not politically manufactured ones.
I am also partial to the framing used by Indian media, where anchors described Singham’s alleged meddling as a “smokeless war.”

It is a perfect description!
Read 5 tweets
Jul 23
🚨 DSA’s Future Leaders Say the Organization Is White Supremacist, Paternalistic, and Protecting Abusers

This Young Democratic Socialists of America meeting was really something.

These candidates are running for seats on YDSA’s national leadership body and could become some of DSA’s future leaders. Yet much of the discussion focused on what they described as the organization’s entrenched problems with white supremacy, patriarchy, anti-Blackness, racism, harassment, abusers, and its reputation as “five white guys sitting around and reading theory.”

The candidates did not confine these criticisms to a few isolated chapters. They described whiteness, racism, and “white-centered organizational practices” as problems extending across local YDSA chapters, YDSA’s national structures, and the broader DSA organization.

I do not generally think it is fair to reduce DSA to simply a “white organization.” Its membership and culture can vary considerably by chapter and region. I would describe the organization more broadly as overeducated, downwardly mobile, and arguably elitist.

That said, DSA’s national leadership does play some remarkably vicious internal games, conduct that Cliff Connolly has described as “bureaucratic freakery.” Perhaps that is the deeper dysfunction these aspiring leaders are picking up on, even if they interpret it primarily through the language of whiteness and white supremacy.

But it is still remarkable to hear so many aspiring DSA leaders portray both YDSA and the national organization as fundamentally shaped by white supremacy.

Stick around until the end to hear yours truly mentioned.
Although this call did not include the YDSA co-chair candidates, it is important to remember that YDSA’s governing body and co-chairs help shape campus organizing nationwide. The co-chairs also serve on DSA’s National Political Committee.
Sara, for example, was an influential campus organizer at Cornell and was even suspended over her pro-Palestinian activism. Those credentials helped propel her to the YDSA co-chair position.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 17
🚨 Meet the “Abolish Rent” Ideologue Teaching DSA Tenant Organizers How to Wage War on Landlords

Tracy Rosenthal co-founded the Los Angeles Tenants Union, helps politically educate DSA tenant organizers, and is currently on rent strike in New York City.

In this supercut, Rosenthal says tenants pay rent “at the barrel of a gun,” describes withholding rent as a “liberatory vision of home,” and explains how movement lawyers can use the legal system to buy tenants time.

She also endorses tactics including camping outside a landlord’s home, leaving bad Yelp reviews of their other businesses, and crashing family weddings.

As you will see, Rosenthal radically frames the relationship between property owners and tenants as inherently exploitative.

I am certainly sympathetic to anyone dealing with a bad landlord. But this goes far beyond protecting tenants from abuse. It treats the landlord-tenant relationship itself as illegitimate and pushes organizing tactics to an extreme.

Rosenthal’s ideology and organizing model increasingly permeate DSA’s tenant movement. Stick around for even more clips!
Tracy Rosenthal sees the landlord-tenant relationship itself as inherently based on “exploitation and domination.”

Over four minutes, Rosenthal describes rent as a “fine,” a “trap,” a “tribute,” and ultimately a “ransom” paid “at the barrel of a gun.”

She argues that landlords “hoard” the places where people can live and generally acquired that property only because they, their parents, or their grandparents had more money than their tenants.

Her framing assumes that a tenant’s need for housing gives them a superior claim to the property, while largely erasing the owner’s rights and the tenant’s freedom to rent elsewhere or move.

Paying rent, therefore, is not presented as a contractual exchange between a property owner and tenant. It is portrayed as exploitation enforced by the threat of state violence.

This is the ideological foundation of Rosenthal’s worldview and the logic she uses to justify the tactics that follow.
Even Tracy Rosenthal seems stunned that this worked.

In this clip, she explains that a movement lawyer used California’s bird-flu state of emergency to help stall a landlord-tenant case by invoking restrictions on rent increases during an emergency.

Rosenthal cautions that movement lawyers cannot do everything, but says they can still play a useful role.

“They’re actually not necessarily always able to win your case and meet your demands, right? Your organizing strategy is what does that, but you oftentimes do need them, otherwise, yeah, the cops will come.”

In other words, the lawyers stall while the organizers apply the pressure.
Read 7 tweets
Jul 2
🚨 Media figures rushed to fact-check Trump by insisting Democratic Socialism is not Communism.

But a majority of DSA’s national leadership is shaped by Communists, Marxist-Leninists, and members who see the org as fertile ground for radicalization.

My latest for @CityJournal!
@CityJournal The real issue is that much of the media still seems unwilling to seriously engage with DSA, read what its caucuses publish, or understand the organization on its own terms, even as it continues to punch far above its weight. city-journal.org/article/democr…
Here is DSA national co-chair Megan Romer acknowledging the revolutionary current inside DSA.

“We’re also not the only revolutionary socialists in DSA,” Romer says, pointing to MUG and “some of the Trotskyist caucuses.”

Then she goes further, saying it is “definitely a strong plurality opinion” that “you can’t reform your way to socialism” and that “at some point there has to be a hard break.”

That is the key point. A major current inside DSA rejects the idea that America can simply be reformed into socialism through normal democratic politics. In their view, socialism requires a revolutionary break.

And this is not a marginal faction. Representatives from these caucuses now make up a majority of DSA’s National Political Committee.

Have Democratic leaders really come to grips with that reality?
Read 6 tweets
Jun 24
🚨 DSA’s Democratic Party Host Body

When DSA uses the Democratic ballot line to primary actual Democrats, that’s the party surrogate model in full effect.

DSA is using the Democratic Party’s ballot line and party name while building what it hopes will become a separate socialist party inside it, whether that ends in a breakaway, a takeover, or DSA being forced out.

DSA’s euphemism for this is the “party surrogate model.” A more honest term is political parasitism, with the Democratic Party serving as the host body.

That’s why I always think of the xenomorph chestburster from Alien when describing this. DSA can dress it up however it wants, but the model is still built around using the host until it is strong enough to burst out.Image
Don’t take my word for it. Listen to DSA co-chair Siddique explain DSA’s party surrogate model himself, including the risk that Democrats may eventually try to push DSA out.

“We are trying to build the party, and in many ways we’re already doing it.”
DSA knows Democratic Party leadership hates the surrogate model. The fact that DSA can keep using the Democratic ballot line largely unopposed says a lot about who is actually being outmaneuvered here.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(