Stu Smith Profile picture
Sep 9, 2024 8 tweets 5 min read Read on X
BREAKING: Joseph Edelman, a Brown University trustee, has now resigned over the future divestment vote at Brown University.

As a result, I am releasing my recording of the Wednesday meeting where the Brown Divest Coalition presented their proposal to divest from Israel.
Here is video of the full presentation below. Remember, Brown is a private university; you can't FOIA this video. Without me, this recording may not have ever gone public.

I honestly wanted a bit more time with this footage and other divestment trainings I have recorded to present this in a digestible format. The language of ESG is how many of these students are getting their foot in the door and they are being trained to exploit this. There is a lot I could say about this subject.

However, Edelman's resignation will hopefully get sizable attention, and I hope by "democratizing" this footage, you can see how ridiculous this presentation was. If you use it, please tag me so I can boost it and comment if needed.
I really enjoyed watching Professor James Kellner grill the students after their presentation. Kellner is a Professor of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology and Environment and Society. In a past life, I imagine he must have been a lawyer. He is one of the professors who is a member of the Advisory Committee on University Resources Management (ACURM).

Here he explains ACURM's duties when it comes to "social harm." In a truly golden moment, he then asks the students if they know that Brown University is not directly invested in any of the ten companies they want to divest from.
Kellner posed a philosophical question to the students about how social harm could be easily identifiable if we presume that companies are responsible for how their products are used. He used alcohol as an example of something that is widely used yet creates social harm.

President of the Undergraduate Council of Students, Niyanta Nepal, didn't engage with this thought experiment and instead focused on how strong the students feel about divestment and how personal Palestine is for the student body.

Nepal ran on a platform of divestment and even participated in the hunger strike for eight days.
Again, Kellner gets philosophical and discusses how possibly neutrality cannot exist; if so, should we consider the net good and net harm of these companies?

It sounds like Nepal, but could be another student, responds that the students are only looking at the harm.

Kellner says, "The world is more complicated than that." He uses flying on airplanes as an example of a social harm that also provides great benefits. He asks the students to consider how the university needs to consider the totality of a company.

The students once again don't engage with these questions and go back to how the student body has spoken about not wanting to be complicit and how they have proven how great the social harm is.
Kellner now asks the students about what Brown should do considering that they have received a letter from 24 Attorney Generals threatening legal action if the university divests.

Rafi Ash, the Treasurer of the Undergraduate Council of Students and Secretary of Brown/RISD Young Democratic Socialists of America, walks us through his legal analysis of the situation. He sees this as illegal and unconstitutional. He also believes these politicians are "jockeying for political power."
Kellner is such a good professor. If he is like this in the classroom, I imagine his students grow so much if they rise to the occasion.

"I appreciate that response; I'm going to push back and ask you to try again from a slightly different point of view."

Kellner walks the students through how grants work, how they "flow through other states," and how they could be jeopardized if Brown University divests.

Ash doesn't engage with this. Instead, he blames "fundamentally extremist politicians" and wants us to consider "who does the university stand for?" He sees this as an issue of academic freedom and that these students are simply questioning the university.
Major Takeaways from the Divestment Presentation

-Kellner rules and has such a great approach. We should all be blessed to have such a professor who challenges you to be your best.
-These are the best that Brown has to offer? Really?
-Volvo being one of the companies they want to divest from makes me laugh. Raise your hand if you ever rode around in that old iconic Volvo station wagon!
-One of my followers recently said, "Nobody else has coverage on events like this and it’s so important." If you agree and appreciate my reporting, buy me a coffee! See my pinned tweet to see how to show me some love.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stu Smith

Stu Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thestustustudio

Dec 14, 2025
🚨 UVA Law Pays Anne Coughlin $375,700 to Flinch at “Police” and Hype Abolitionists as “The More the Merrier”

UVA Law professor Anne Coughlin made $375,700 in 2024. Watch how she treats the word “police” like it’s radioactive:

“I don’t wanna use the word police… some of you may be abolitionists… that’s fine, the more the merrier.”

Then she turns a law school classroom into a policy shop:

“You can insist that you get police out of traffic enforcement.”

“You are going to convince your legislators, your city councils, your police that they should cut this out. They should no longer have police in traffic enforcement.”

And she frames freedom as “being protected against the police.”

Then she tells on herself: “I’m assuming everyone violates the traffic code all the time because I do,” and says the police tell her she’s “not a threat,” which “kind of upsets” her because she wants “to be scary.”

Then comes the racial generalization:

“My students of color say to me, ‘You violate the traffic laws all the time because you’re a white woman.’”

This is not training lawyers. It’s training activists. A law school professor’s job is to teach students how to argue both sides, not hand them a preloaded ideology and call it “education.”

And yes, there’s another side she skips. Traffic enforcement is one of the main ways serious crime gets caught in real time: DUI, stolen vehicles, illegal guns, warrants, missing persons, and suspects. Stops and crashes can turn volatile fast, and civilian “ticketing” units don’t have the authority or capacity to detain, investigate, arrest, and control chaotic scenes end-to-end.

Reform is fair game, but “no police in traffic enforcement” ignores deterrence, escalation, and the evidentiary work that actually delivers public safety and justice.

And notice the move: “the court has said,” then “Justice Thomas has indicated,” so one justice’s views get treated as the Supreme Court.

If UVA Law wants to be an activist academy, say so. If it wants to be a law school, start acting like one.

Next: the UVA professor targeted by colleagues for taking a Supreme Court case that went 9–0.
For a school with a top-five reputation, the dysfunction is hard to ignore.
She’s probably at or near $400,000 by now (or will be this year). And she’s using that perch to push a corrosive ideology into the mainstream. What she’s saying here is the same playbook I’m seeing from Mamdani’s transition team. Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 3, 2025
🚨 The Melanie Yazzie “I hope you seek to dismantle the United States” clip is doing the rounds again via engagement-hunters with outdated info.

I broke this originally: she’s no longer at Minnesota; she’s now Researcher in Residence at Macalester College.
Here is her new bio as well. Image
I don’t sit on my laurels and recycle old hits unless there’s a strategy behind it. If you’re still rehashing clips from two years ago, you’re almost guaranteed to be wrong on the details.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 23, 2025
🧵 “Nationalize All the Property”: Inside the Alliance for Gobal Justice Network that Congress Just Rightfully Targeted

$54,150,822 lives rent-free in my head.

That’s how much the Alliance for Global Justice burned in 2020 bankrolling the networks that helped fuel street-level chaos.

A few weeks ago @Jim_Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee ordered AFGJ to preserve every document and communication from 2017 to today with Antifa-aligned groups and Refuse Fascism. Thursday was the deadline.

And that letter went to one of the men in this video — James Jordan, National Co-Coordinator at AFGJ (no relation to the congressman, just an inconvenient coincidence).

The speakers here may be older and a little boring. Don’t let that fool you. They’re completely open about what they want and have a respectable war chest.

Here’s what James Jordan and his AFGJ cohort were discussing last week.

“The entire government is taking steps that descend into fascism.”

“We gotta just raise up the volume, put the pressure on these pigs.”

“There is a campaign for unions to blockade military cargo to Israel.”

“Send that bourgeoisie, local bourgeoisie crying to the Cuban Gusanos in Miami.” (Gusano means “worm,” a Fidel-era slur for Cubans who fled the regime.)

“The Cártel de los Soles doesn’t exist. It’s a fabrication. It’s a complete fabrication.” (A straight-up Maduro talking point.)

“The only way… to defeat American imperialism is… a new international… and [to] nationalize all the property in the hands of the imperialists and their local lackeys.”

One speaker even claims the Puerto Rican National Guard will rebel if the U.S. moves on Venezuela. I don’t know about that, but it’s a hell of a thing to be saying into a microphone.

Do you think AFGJ actually handed over those records?
Or are they gearing up to pour some money into labor and far-left Venezuela organizing?
During FY2020, AFGJ dumped $49 million into the BLM, bail-fund, and prison-abolition lane. That kind of money doesn’t just “support movements” — it keeps people in the streets and the machinery running. Here’s how the rest of their network breaks down:

32 — Foreign policy / Latin America / “Mideast” / immigration
19 — BLM-aligned groups, bail funds, prison-abolition projects
12 — Movement-building outfits for U.S. organizing
12 — Human rights / Indigenous / environmental / labor groups
Multiple — Catch-all “justice” projects with no listed countImage
Even in their most recent FY2023 990, they’re still bankrolling more than a hundred groups. The dollar amount is smaller, but don’t be fooled — this is far more activity than almost any comparable outfit is running. Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 6, 2025
🚨 I obtained William & Mary Professor Stephen Sheehi’s What Is Decolonization? syllabus for Fall 2025 through a FOIA request.

It’s every bit as radical as you’d expect — and then some.

Let’s take a look inside. 🧵
Here’s page one of William & Mary Professor Stephen Sheehi’s What Is Decolonization? syllabus for Fall 2025.

It starts with a land acknowledgment but quickly turns into a sweeping denunciation of the university itself — blasting William & Mary for its current ties to “corporations,” “the carceral state,” “the U.S. military,” and “racial capitalism.”

In reality, these are warped claims — things like the university having a campus police force or partnerships with the military are reframed here as evidence of systemic oppression.

This isn’t a course introduction. It’s an ideological manifesto.

Course Overview is already off to the races — diving straight into “cisheteronormativity,” “ableism,” “capitalism,” and “climate disaster.”

And we’ve still got seven more pages to go. 🤡Image
Sheehi praises “elders engaged in militant direct action against colonial and imperial regimes,” describing the Arab world as “a hub of anti-colonial militancy and liberation.” Instead of highlighting the region’s scientific or intellectual achievements, the emphasis is on revolutionary struggle and resistance.

The course also shifts into identity activism — explicitly instructing students to announce their pronouns and use gender-neutral language.

It’s less a study of history and more about indoctrination where “decolonization” is redefined through militancy, Marxism, and gender ideology.Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 5, 2025
🚨 The “Behind Enemy Lines” October 7th materials openly list targets across NYC — businesses tied to the President’s family, Democratic offices, major universities, consulates, Jewish organizations, and even private companies.

"No business as usual. Escalate for Gaza." Image
Image
It’s important to note this militant network has produced similar maps for multiple U.S. cities. Below is the one for Chicago.
Here is the map for North Carolina's Research Triangle.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 4, 2025
🚨 Flag Burning at UVA Isn’t Spontaneous Activism. It’s a Strategy. Don’t Take the Bait.

Meet UVA Law Student Kirk Wolff, the organizer behind the Antifascist Tailgate and Flag Burning hosted by his group, Friends Against Fascism Organization (FAFO).

“My name is Kirk Wolff. I am a US Navy veteran and a law student at the University of Virginia, and I burned an American flag today, about 90 minutes after President Trump said that burning a flag would result in immediate arrest and imprisonment for a year.”

“The real desecration of our nation’s ideals is coming from the White House. That’s who’s desecrating the flag.”

Wolff has a long record of provocative activism and has done the exact same thing before while protesting for Palestine. The last time, UVA invoked time, place, and manner restrictions, and it quickly turned into a media frenzy over a “student threatened with expulsion for Palestine.”

Now he’s at it again, escalating as UVA melts down over being invited to join President Trump’s Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education.

Expect more of this. Wolff knows how to manufacture outrage and frame it as persecution. It’s attention-seeking designed to provoke a confrontation that he and his allies can spin into a civil rights cause. Don’t play into his hand.
Earlier this year, he managed to spark a full-blown media frenzy — even Reason took the bait. In truth, it was less about censorship or persecution and more about information-seeking gone sideways: an administrator who’d likely never dealt with something like this before, and confusion over whether explicit political advocacy is allowed near UVA’s JAG School.Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(