Historian Will Durant was not a religious man, but he believed faith was "indispensable" to a culture.
He delivered a dire warning to societies who traded faith for comfort…🧵 (thread)
Will Durant was a 20th-century American historian and philosopher most known for his 11-volume “Story of Civilization,” telling the history of both eastern and western civilizations.
His work led him to conclude that all cultures follow a predictable pattern…
Civilizations first begin with religious fervor, giving a nation strength to overcome great difficulty.
It’s their faith in a higher power that allows them to bear the initial “growth pains” that precede prosperity.
Durant writes:
“In the beginning of all cultures a strong religious faith conceals and softens the nature of things, and gives men courage to bear pain and hardship patiently.”
In Greece and Rome, for example, mythologies told of heroes who battled overwhelming adversity to accomplish their goals.
These myths inspired people to overcome struggles while offering an ideal to strive for.
He also notes that a people’s religion is actually strengthened by difficulty:
“...a firm faith will explain that it was the sins of the people that turned their gods to an avenging wrath; evil does not destroy faith, but strengthens it.”
Durant believed tough times were essential to building the character and faith of a nation.
But once success and abundance were eventually attained, the seeds of a culture’s downfall had already been planted…
“If victory comes, if war is forgotten in security and peace, then wealth grows… toil and suffering are replaced by pleasure and ease; science weakens faith even while thought and comfort weaken virility and fortitude…”
Hardships give way to hedonic pleasure seeking, dulling the strength of a people.
When there are no great struggles left, people tend to lose their religiosity, and an analytical yet nihilistic ethos dominates the culture.
Durant writes:
“At last men begin to doubt the gods; they mourn the tragedy of knowledge, and seek refuge in every passing delight.”
When faith dies, selfishness and apathy take root. People look to what they can get out of society rather than what they can contribute.
Durant sums up his observations with the famous line:
“A nation is born stoic, and dies epicurean.”
He relates the two attitudes of a civilization to two disparate schools of philosophy: the stoic school, which sought to bear hardships honorably, and the epicurean school, which taught one to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
It’s interesting that Durant posited that religion was so fundamental to a healthy society given that he was a notable critic of religion.
Nonetheless, he admitted its importance after studying the rise and fall of multiple civilizations.
He notes:
“Even the skeptical historian develops a humble respect for religion, since he sees it functioning, and seemingly indispensable, in every land and age.”
With religion on the decline in the West today, the question arises: will our civilization be able to overcome our waning faith?
Or have we already succumbed to an epicurean ethos?
If you enjoyed this thread and would like to join the mission of promoting western tradition, kindly repost the first post (linked below) and consider following: @thinkingwest
Napoleon was the best general ever, and it’s backed up by science.
A data scientist recently created a mathematical model to rank every general in the history of warfare—and it led to some surprising results.
Here’s what he found🧵
Inspired by Hannibal’s’ list of the three greatest generals (Alexander, Pyrrhus, and himself), data scientist Ethan Arsht sought to use hard data to determine a general’s abilities.
What he created was a system that could rank every notable military commander in history.
Using a method similar to those used in baseball analytics, Arsht’s system is based around “Wins Above Replacement” (WAR).
In baseball, WAR is used as an estimate of a player’s net contributions to his team.
If you like Greek or Roman classics, you can thank a monk.
Just as much as on any battlefield, Western civilization was safeguarded within the quiet confines of a monastery...🧵 (thread)
In the 6th century, the fate of western Europe was uncertain.
Barbarians had deposed the Roman emperor; age-old institutions were left decaying; the flame of civilization almost gone…
But at a monastery in Calabria, a monk named Cassiodorus toiled to keep this flame alight.
Born into an aristocratic family, Cassiodorus’ early career was a far cry from his later vocation.
He rose through the ranks of the Roman political scene, ultimately reaching Praetorian Prefect, the highest administrative role in the empire directly under Theodoric the Great.
Kenneth Clark lamented that civilization was a fragile thing.
He observed three “enemies” that could topple even the mightiest cultures—what are they?🧵
The first enemy is fear:
“fear of war, fear of invasion, fear of plague and famine, that make it simply not worthwhile constructing things, or planting trees or even planning next year’s crops. And fear of the supernatural, which means that you daren’t question anything.”
Fear paralyzes a people and stifles adventure, invention, and grand building projects.
Alexander the Great’s tomb has been missing for centuries. Over 140 official attempts have been made to locate it. All have failed.
But one rogue historian thinks he’s finally found it.
He claims everyone's been looking in the wrong place…🧵
Alexander’s body wasn’t always missing. We know that figures like Julius Caesar, Cleopatra, and Augustus visited his tomb in Alexandria during the 1st century BC.
But somewhere along the way it disappears from the record…
By the time St. John Chrysostom visited Alexandria in 400 AD, he was unable to locate the tomb and said of Alexander "his tomb even his own people know not.”
There are a few mentions of the tomb afterward, but nothing reliable, and as of today no one knows where it is.
Unlike in modern times, careless words had consequences…🧵(thread)
Dueling in the West can be traced to pre-Christian practices like the Norse “holmgang”.
A Viking-era duel, the holmgang was a legal way to settle disputes. Whether it was for honor, a legal dispute, or revenge, it was fought regardless of the parties’ social status.
Theoretically, any offended party could challenge the other party to a holmgang, whereafter the duel would be fought a few days later. Sometimes the duel would take place on a small island, or “holm”, where the practice gets its name.