Russian milbloggers are panicking, reporting on Ukraine's drone innovations. Some are so simple yet ingenious, you can’t help but think, "Why didn’t I come up with that?" Would you?
A list
1. Fast FPV drones paired with slow bombers to protect them from Russian air defense 1/
"The enemy [Ukraine] has begun pairing their slow agricultural drones, known as 'Baba-Yaga,' with [fast] FPV drones equipped with night cameras and thermal imagers. This tactic counters the anti-drone defenses set up by our [Russian] units, 2/
where machine gunners using thermal imagers play a crucial role. Now, when a team fires at the night bomber—'Baba-Yaga,' capable of carrying up to 40 kg of munitions—they are immediately targeted by FPV drones." 3/
2. Dusk drone mining
"The enemy is also actively using drones to mine roads behind our positions. 'Yagas' drop standard mines at dusk, relying on drivers not noticing and running over them." 4/
3. FPV traps
"Ukrainian FPV drones are also used more cunningly: they land near a road and wait for a target. Once a vehicle or group of people enters their field of view, the drone takes off and strikes from ambush" 5/
4. FPV drones as air defense
"Recently, the enemy has gone even further: modified FPV drones are now being deployed to hunt down our reconnaissance UAVs. 6/
Ukrainian FPV drones have been spotted at altitudes above 1,200 meters, functioning as a constant air defense system. When Russian reconnaissance UAVs enter their range, they are swiftly shot down." 7/
There were also reports of Ukrainian drones attacking Russian helicopters in flight. 8/
The effect of these techniques, low cost and asymmetric, is that Russia loses reconnaissance capabilities, making striking capabilities irrelevant
That's smart. Instead of defending against Russian attacks, make them imprecise and ineffective 9/
Source: Kasyanov on FB, Russian channel "Tsargrad" X
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Both candidates were incredibly weak on Ukraine. They blamed each other for a lack of competence and leadership, but offered no strategy for moving forward. Neither directly said if they wanted Ukraine to win
These are the quotes 1/
MUIR: "Do you believe it's in the U.S. best interests for Ukraine to win this war? Yes or no?"
TRUMP: "I think it's in the U.S. best interest to get this war finished and just get it done. [...] Negotiate a deal." 2/
HARRIS: "If Donald Trump were president [...] Putin would be sitting in Kyiv with his eyes on the rest of Europe." 3/
Russian media report over 20 Ukrainian drones intercepted over the city (though this one wasn’t) and 144 drones intercepted across Russia.
Key things:
1. Russian official media are no longer downplaying these attacks—they can’t ignore them anymore 1/
2. Explosions are happening in Moscow.
Just like in Kursk, the war has now reached Russian soil, publicly challenging the illusion that Putin has everything under control 2/
3. Moscow's airspace and airports are disrupted, with other airports across Russia shut down as well
This seems to be part of a larger campaign, similar to Ukraine's successful efforts against the Black Sea Fleet—only this time, airports are the focus of asymmetric warfare 3/
What? Lavrov now claims Russia’s war in Ukraine was never about territories and they are fine not having them, they just want peace and human treatment for Russian speaking Ukrainians.
I guess that’s why they killed so many ethnic Russians in Donbas, especially Mariupol 1/
Here is the full text. Every word is a lie.
1. There are hints suggesting that we should proceed with the idea that the territorial issue will need to be resolved based on the realities on the ground.
In their first joint public appearance, CIA Director Burns and MI6 Chief Moore stated that Ukraine's Kursk offensive has shaken Putin's war narrative, created doubts among Russian elites
Also spoke on China, the Middle East, Russia's "feral" operations in Europe, Putin’s power/
On Kursk. MI6 Chief Moore characterized the Kursk offensive as "a typically audacious and bold move by the Ukrainians" aimed at changing the dynamics of the conflict /
CIA director Burns: "[The Kursk offensive] has 'raised questions . . . across the Russian elite about where is this all headed'." /
Politico: "Zelenskyy suffers huge backlash as reshuffle triggers power-grab accusations. A parliamentary majority and martial law mean the Ukrainian president has the right to assemble his government as he sees fit, but the opposition is crying foul."
Every statement is incorrect 1/
There is no backlash because of the cabinet reshuffle in Ukraine. None. Zero.
Politico cites members of Poroshenko's party, the previous president, arguing this is a sign of a deep crises, etc. But they criticize every decision of Zelensky in a similar style. That's their job, btw 2/
Zelensky has always had a majority in the Ukrainian parliament. All these ministers have been appointed by him. There is no power grab. There is no martial law powers that allow him to form a government w/o the parliament 3/