Guy Shrubsole Profile picture
Sep 11 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
I’m shocked, shocked to hear that the ‘net zero aspiration’ for farming trumpeted by the National Farmers Union in 2019 is now ‘in doubt’

The NFU’s plan refused to consider significant land use change or dietary shift & favoured bioenergy crops instead 1/ bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
2/ The NFU’s now blaming the last Govt for not including enough ‘climate-friendly measures’ in ELMS. Look, we can all hate on the Tories. But it was the NFU that lobbied vociferously to water down ELMS - leaving the most ambitious tier, Landscape Recovery, with 5% of the budget
3/ Where I agree with the NFU is in increasing the budget for ELMS to pay for more nature restoration - rather than cut it as Treasury are rumoured to want.

But we also need far greater accountability for landowners to actually deliver nature recovery & value for money.
4/ In some cases, it would be better value for money for the public sector to acquire land itself for nature restoration - rather than spend large sums ‘renting’ environmental outcomes that too often aren’t delivered.

Why shouldn’t Natural England & National Parks own more land?
5/ The NFU has popularised the idea that landowners & farmers are ‘custodians of the countryside’ - waging a PR campaign on this since the 1970s.

The framing’s deliberate: we’re trusted stewards, so let’s prioritise voluntary action & transfers of public money - not regulation.
6/ The trouble is, ‘voluntary initiatives’ usually fail - witness the NFU now back-pedalling on its voluntary pledge of net zero farming by 2040, just 5 years after it was announced to great fanfare.

This won’t change until land use is better regulated & made more accountable.
7/ To rescue nature & bring down land use emissions, Labour can’t simply trust lobby groups like the NFU to act in good faith and self-regulate.

And the era of free public money with minimal strings attached is over.

Some farmers & landowners are great stewards. Others aren’t.
8/ So other policy levers will be essential: a Land Use Framework, tougher environmental regulations, greater support for green watchdogs, more public & community land ownership, more accountability for major landowners (public & private).

More in my book The Lie of the Land!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Shrubsole

Guy Shrubsole Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @guyshrubsole

Sep 12
REVEALED: Just 10% of Britain's National Parks are owned by the nation. 90% of the land in them is privately owned.

This means National Park Authorities are almost powerless to influence the private landowners who too often fail to steward nature 1/

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Image
2/ Some National Parks are dominated by very large estates – half of Dartmoor National Park is owned by just 15 large landowners.

Here's my map of public land ownership in National Parks:

google.com/maps/d/u/0/edi…
3/ This year's the 75th anniversary of the creation of national parks by Attlee's Labour government. But though some of the founders of Britain’s national parks dreamed of them being “owned or controlled by the nation” (Ramsay Report, 1945), things have not turned out that way. Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 4
REVEALED: Tory Environment Secretary @SteveBarclay rejected expert advice for review of climate impacts on soil fertility

Officials warned him govt's Agricultural Land Classification system is 'decades old' & will be obsolete by 2030

Story in today's Times; FOI'd docs below 1/ Image
2/ The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) system was drawn up after WW2 and grades land according to its ability to produce food - soil fertility, rainfall, climate

It was last updated in *1988* - before climate change had even registered as a political issue in the UK Image
3/ ALC maps are used in the planning system to try to protect 'best and most versatile land' (grades 1-3a) from development. The maps are also important for showing how we prioritise highly fertile land for food & can spare other land for nature (e.g. upland areas)
Read 10 tweets
Jun 12
So @TheGreenParty manifesto is now out - here's my take on their nature policies.

Most significantly, I think, is their pledge for a new Rights of Nature Act - "giving rights to nature itself".

This would be a transformative shift in how we relate to the rest of nature. 1/ Image
2/ Lawyers like @LawForNature @paulpowlesland have been calling for nature to be granted rights for years, to better defend habitats and species from destruction.

A Rights of Nature Act would transform how we currently relate to nature as mere 'property' or a 'resource'.
@LawForNature @paulpowlesland 3/ The Greens are also pledging a new Clean Air Act (something the Lib Dems have also pledged); to end the emergency authorisation of neonic pesticides (which Labour recently also pledged to do); and to meet 30x30 (a goal that is shared by the Tories, Labour & Lib Dems) Image
Read 14 tweets
Jun 11
The Tory manifesto is now out - here's my take on its nature policies.

First off, the Tories attack Natural England & the Environment Agency: "we will improve their accountability & give them clearer objectives"

Sounds like they want to gut our environmental regulators 1/ Image
2/ Earlier this year I heard a rumour that the Tories were mulling a manifesto pledge to abolish Natural England.

This clearly falls short of that, but it's part of a vicious war that the Tories have waged on NE for years - simply for trying to do its job.
3/ For eg, back in March, a group of Tory MPs proposed a Bill that would gut Natural England's powers to designate nature reserves (SSSIs). They even wrote to the Environment Secretary urging him to back it. Fortunately the election put paid to their plans
Read 18 tweets
Jun 10
The Lib Dems have now published their manifesto - here's my take on their nature policies.

First up, I'm delighted that they commit to "Protecting and enhancing our temperate rainforest". Result!

(Full manifesto here: ) Thread 1/ libdems.org.uk/manifesto


Image
Image
Image
2/ A big tranche of the Lib Dems' policies under 'Natural Environment' are about tackling sewage pollution in rivers (all those next to the red highlight below).

Fair play - sewage in rivers is a huge scandal & lots needs doing.

But sewage is only half the problem in rivers... Image
3/ Agricultural river pollution is just as big a reason for why our rivers are in such a poor state - and that only gets one line in the later 'Food & Farming' section. It's also unclear what 'supporting farmers' means here (money? regulations?). Still, glad it's mentioned... Image
Read 14 tweets
Jun 7
Buried in Labour's new nature policies is this:

'We will help coordinate nature's recovery with bodies responsible for public land and major landowners'.

This sounds anodyne but could actually be pretty significant. Here's why: 1/ Image
2/ The government is committed to 30x30 – protecting 30% of England’s land for nature by 2030. But at present it’s waaay off target - @WCLnews say the current total is about 3% of England is properly protected & managed for nature: wcl.org.uk/assets/uploads…
@WCLnews Labour has pledged to meet 30x30, alongside targets in the Environment Act 2021 – many of which also land in 2030:

But if Labour takes office it will only have 5 years to reach these targets. So, how?theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(