In recent years, asylum applications to the UK have skyrocketed - in 2023 alone, 84,425 people applied for asylum here.
But many of these applications come from safe, stable countries.
A ๐งต on some of the countries that the UK received asylum applications from in 2023...
First - the UK does not need to have an asylum system.
The system is designed to accommodate a small number of low-impact individuals from repressive or unstable countries.
It is not a tool for economic migration, or a means to escape criminal justice.
In 2023, the UK received 5,682 asylum applications from India ๐ฎ๐ณ
India is widely regarded as a safe, stable, and democratic country. It is a key economic and diplomatic partner of the UK. Millions of foreign tourists visit India each year without incident.
In 2023, the UK received 4,542 asylum applications from Albania ๐ฆ๐ฑ
Albania is a safe, stable, European country. Though its democracy is imperfect, the country is widely regarded as democratic. There is no ongoing civil or political conflict in Albania.
In 2023, the UK received 4,419 asylum applications from Turkey ๐น๐ท
Turkey is an imperfect democracy with a relatively high level of civil liberty. It is a key economic and military ally of the UK - in 2023, 3.8 million Britons visited Turkey, most without incident.
In 2023, the UK received 2,469 asylum applications from Vietnam ๐ป๐ณ
Though undemocratic, Vietnam is a safe, stable country that hosts millions of foreign tourists each year. The UK is the only European country which accepts Vietnamese asylum applications.
In 2023, the UK received 2,198 asylum applications from Sri Lanka ๐ฑ๐ฐ
Though the country has suffered economic difficulties in recent years, Sri Lanka is a safe country with some degree of democracy. The country has been at peace since the end of its civil war in 2009.
In 2023, the UK received 2,175 asylum applications from Brazil ๐ง๐ท
Though Brazil suffers a high level of petty criminality, it is a stable and consistently democratic country with no ongoing civil or military conflicts. Millions of tourists visit Brazil each year.
In 2023, the UK received 1,408 asylum applications from Georgia ๐ฌ๐ช
Georgia is a safe, stable, and largely democratic country. It is home to a growing international tourist industry, and is rated as free or mostly free by the majority of international observers.
In 2023, the UK received 1,180 asylum applications from Namibia ๐ณ๐ฆ
Namibia is one of the safest, most stable, and most democratic countries in sub-Saharan Africa. It has no ongoing civil or military unrest, and no ongoing conflicts.
In 2023, the UK received 627 asylum applications from Botswana ๐ง๐ผ
Botswana is arguably the most stable and developed country in sub-Saharan Africa. It has had no coups, no civil wars, and no conflicts since independence in 1966. It is rated 'high' on the Human Development Index.
In 2023, the UK received 359 asylum applications from the Philippines ๐ต๐ญ
Though an imperfect democracy, the Philippines is widely regarded as democratic - most of the country is safe and stable. The country is rated 'partly free' by Freedom House and it is highly developed.
In 2023, the UK received 353 asylum applications from Trinidad & Tobago ๐น๐น
The Caribbean island nation is safe, stable, and democratic. It is one of the most developed countries in the Americas, and has no outstanding civil or military unrest.
In 2023, the UK received 352 asylum applications from Morocco ๐ฒ๐ฆ
Though an imperfect democracy, most Moroccans enjoy a high degree of social and political freedom. The country is relatively safe and stable, barring the low-level conflict in Western Sahara.
In 2023, the UK received 344 asylum applications from Malaysia ๐ฒ๐พ
Though an imperfect democracy, Malaysia is widely regarded as relatively safe, stable, and democratic. It is well-developed, and a close economic partner of the UK.
It gets weirder.
In 2023, the UK received 413 asylum applications from members of the European Union ๐ช๐บ
This includes 126 applications from Poland, 61 applications from Romania, 45 applications from Hungary, and 34 applications from the Czech Republic ๐ต๐ฑ๐ท๐ด๐ญ๐บ๐จ๐ฟ
And there are also a number of applications from other safe, stable, democratic countries.
This includes 104 from the United States ๐บ๐ธ, 57 from Jamaica ๐ฏ๐ฒ, 18 from Chile ๐จ๐ฑ, 9 from Singapore ๐ธ๐ฌ, 8 from Canada ๐จ๐ฆ, and 7 from Japan ๐ฏ๐ต
Plainly, our asylum system is not working.
The UK receives thousands of spurious applications from safe, stable, democratic countries on an annual basis - one might reasonably question the motives behind these applications.
If the UK Government wants to continue offering asylum status, it should massively expand the list of countries considered 'safe' by default, and outright ban applications from other developed Western countries.
Why is taxpayer resource being spent on processing these claims?
This is plainly absurd.
If you want to check out these figures yourself, you can find them at the link below.
It's the 'Asylum applications, initial decisions and resettlement detailed datasets, year ending June 2024' dataset.
The Home Office has barred Renaud Camus, a controversial French philosopher, from entering the UK.
They claim that his presence is "not conducive to the public good".
But is that a consistent standard? Let's look at some of the people that they've allowed to come to the UK:
Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri, who is banned from preaching in Pakistan, was allowed to travel to the UK in 2016.
Qadri has celebrated the murder of politicians in Pakistan, arguing that it is legitimate to kill people who oppose Pakistan's oppressive blasphemy laws.
Qadri was a key influence on Tanveer Ahmed, a Bradford taxi driver who was convicted of the murder of another Muslim man, who he deemed insufficiently pious.
During his visit, Qadri delivered sermons at several UK mosques, including venues in Leicester, Woking, and Bolton.
Wales has quietly become a hotbed of historical revisionism, anti-white discrimination, and DEI ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ท๓ ฌ๓ ณ๓ ฟ
For decades, the Labour-led Welsh Government has pushed dangerous ideas about race, culture, and history onto an unwilling population.
A ๐งต on the disaster unfolding in Wales
But first, some context.
Since 1999, Wales has had its own parliament - the Senedd - with devolved responsibility for a number of issues.
Over time, the Senedd has received more powers from Westminster, allowing them to make decisions on things like healthcare and education.
But despite this transfer of powers, the UK press is relatively disinterested in Welsh affairs.
This has allowed successive Welsh Governments to pursue radical agendas, without the kind of scrutiny which similar policies might face if they emanated from Westminster.
Riverway Law has launched a challenge against the UK's ban on Hamas.
They argue that the Islamic terror group should be legalised in the UK. This shouldn't come as a surprise, given some of the other cases that they've supported.
A ๐งต on some of Riverway Law's recent work
In January 2023, Riverway challenged the Home Office's decision to strip British citizenship from a British Pakistani man who travelled to Syria, in order to join Al-Qaeda.
They argued that this was 'arbitrary' and 'disproportionate'. Their challenge were unsuccessful.
In September 2021, Riverway challenged the Home Office's decision to bar an Afghan man from entering the UK on national security grounds - after he had spent months with the Taliban.
They argued that the man would be at risk if he stayed in Afghanistan. They were successful.
Last July, four independent MPs were elected in heavily-Muslim seats.
They capitalised on Muslim frustration with the Labour Party's position on Gaza. Their campaigns focused primarily on winning Muslim votes.
But what have they been up to since the General Election? A short ๐งต
Adnan Hussain was elected in Blackburn - a seat held by the Labour Party since 1945.
The constituency is 47% Muslim.
Hussain won with a narrow majority of 132 seats - the Muslim vote was split between Hussain and a candidate representing George Galloway's Workers Party GB.
Hussain has spoken twenty-five times in Parliament since he was elected.
Eleven of his interventions have focused on Israel or Gaza.
He has campaigned for immediate recognition of a Palestinian state, and the immediate cessation of all arms sales to Israel.
52% of British adults are now reliant on the state for their livelihood - and YOU could be paying for it.
That's according to @ASI's inaugural State Reliance Index, which tracks the number of Britons who rely, directly or indirectly, on the state.
A ๐งต on our findings
So what does the State Reliance Index consider?
We looked at adults (1) receiving benefits or state pension, (2) employed by the public sector, (3) in higher education, or (4) who work in the private sector, but in fields which only exist because of public sector regulation.
This was a conservative estimate.
We didn't even look at every area of the private sector which receives state subsidy - and nor did we include the charitable sector, which relies heavily on state support.
In other words, the true figure could be even more than 52%.