🧵Many leading worldwide military experts affirm that Israel is complying with rules of war in Gaza – no war crimes, no genocide, no indiscriminate attacks. In sharp contrast all reports by NGOs UN ICJ ICC claiming war crimes never cite military experts. Review of 10 experts: 1/
John Spencer @SpencerGuard is the leading expert on urban warfare, at West Point the top US military academy. Spencer has written extensively how Israel’s actions to limit civilian harm are unprecedented. Like the others, he is simply pro-truth. 2/ newsweek.com/israel-has-cre…
British General Sir John McColl was Deputy Commander of NATO Forces, so his view carries weight. He wrote piece titled “I know Israel’s doing all it can to save civilians” which says it all. NGOs can’t cite NATO leaders to support their fake “reports.” 3/ thetimes.com/article/e21252…
General Mark Milley, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, defended Israel’s actions in Gaza noting the US would certainly do the same, and that there was no way around collateral damage given Hamas’ tactics. 4/ cnbc.com/video/2024/05/…
Major Andrew Fox @Mr_Andrew_Fox served in UK Army 2005-21 and lectured at Sandhurst, UK’s top military academy. Fox has spent considerable time on the ground in Gaza and with IDF leadership, noting how IDF actions comply with international law. 5/
Military experts Geoffrey Corn @cornjag1 (Chair of Military Law at Texas Tech Univ. & Lt Col US Army) and Lt. General George Smith noted Israel “consistently implements its legal obligation to avoid, whenever feasibly, [civilian deaths].” 6/ newsweek.com/beware-false-m…
Colonel Richard Kemp @COLRICHARDKEMP who led British Forces in Afghanistan also spent extensive time in Gaza with IDF. He said “No army takes more precaution than the Israel Defense Forces in order to prevent civil casualties.” 7/ ejpress.org/col-richard-ke…
Italian general Vincenzo Camporini and former Chief of the Defence General Staff, among many military leaders and experts, wrote a detailed brief to the ICC defending Israel’s action in Gaza, that they conform with the Laws of Armed Conflict, see key paragraph from document: 8/
General David Petraeus, who led US forces in Afghanistan & Iraq, has been critical of Israel’s Gaza strategy & endgame, but defended IDF action to get rid of Hamas, noted collateral damage is to be expected and Gaza is "vastly harder" than US faced. 9/ cnn.com/videos/world/2…
Lt. Gen David Deptula @Deptula_David & scholar on aerospace studies wrote: “The military activities I saw, as well as the processes and procedures followed by the Israeli military, are indicative of the IDF complying with the laws of armed conflict.” 10/ forbes.com/sites/davedept…
A group of 7 US generals, admirals, etc. (see list of names below) in an 85-page study noted Israel’s “overall compliance with the Laws of Armed Conflict.” There are many more names that could be added to this thread. 11/
A search for military experts arguing Israel is violating the rules of war in Gaza comes up empty. There is plenty of criticism of strategy, endgame & leadership, but not that IDF is deliberately killing civilians. Fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty @btselem can only fabricate & lie. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Hamas wants to kill all Jews, evidenced in word and deed across its political and spiritual leadership. Claims persist that Hamas will accept two states or some form of peace. Here is a long review of Hamas' clear genocidal intent to kill all Jews spoken by its leaders: 1/
See below from 1988 charter. In 2017 Hamas issued “A Document of General Principles & Policies” that sanitizes Jews as “Zionists” but notably and critically, the original 1988 charter was never revoked – it still stands and killing Jews has not been repudiated! 2/
In July 2018 senior Hamas official Fathi Hamad said in a speech: “we must attack every Jew on the globe by way of slaughter and killing.” His words were publicized and condemned, so he walked back his comments. All ok then, didn’t mean it, right? 3/ timesofisrael.com/hamas-distance…
🧵UK admits it is impossible to assess IDF conduct in Gaza because they do not have inside data such as “intended targets and anticipated civilian harm” (taken from UK export ban document). For this same reason all “reports” by NGOs alleging IDF war crimes are fake. Analysis: 1/
Fake NGOs @hrw @amnesty, armchair military experts and many in media do not know upfront what IDF intended to hit and expected civilian harm so they cannot assess distinction and proportionality. Here is rule per Geneva Article 51. There is no statistical measurement of this. 2/
Does it make assessing a legality of military strike very difficult? Yes. Geneva also provides wide latitude. But this does not relieve burden of NGOs and does not absolve their fakery. Like the UK, NGOs must admit that they don’t have the data to properly assess IDF action. 3/
🧵@VanityFair piece by Ta-Nehisi Coates is anti-Israel libel. He literally fakes a quote from Herzog, falsely claims Gaza pre-10/7 was a prison, falsely claims spousal law applies only to Arabs, falsely claims Israel is like "Jim Crow" and omits mention of hostages. Analysis: 1/
Topic of article is Palestinians at DNC but it's real purpose is to bash Israel. Coates claims “intention” of Gaza war is “erasing 2% of entire population of Gaza” never mind Hamas, human shields, 50% killed are combatants. His evidence for intention is a totally fake quote. 2/
Herzog never said: “There are no innocent civilians in Gaza” or any words close to this (recall that quotes must be exact). Coates thus engages in gross academic fraud. Thread below documents what Herzog actually said and how his words were twisted 3/
🧵Another fake report by @HRW — now claiming Israeli attack on Hodeida possibly war crime because UN officials said there is no military activity at port. But UN report HRW cites contradicts claim; evidence shows Houthis smuggle arms and launch attacks from port. Analysis: 1/
HRW claims IDF attack was “indiscriminate” meaning port was not used for any military purpose & disproportionate. How does HRW know port was not used for military purposes? UN staff & Yemenis said so. That’s literally the only evidence HRW can muster! 2/
Is it true UN “never found evidence of a Houthi military presence" at port? FALSE. HRW themselves cite UN report (S/2023/130) contradicting claim. HRW conveniently omits. Clause 35 recounts how port was used by Houthis in 2022 to detain a UAE vessel. A clear military use. 3/
🧵Hamas, not Israel, is the group that has stated an intent for Palestinian genocide by violating Article 6(c) of the Rome Statute. Israel stated an intent to destroy only Hamas; it is actually Hamas who calls for mass death of Palestinians (and Jews). Don't believe it? Read: 1/
Hamas leader Sinwar stated Palestinian deaths were part of his strategy against Israel, merely “necessary sacrifices” – meaning he “inflicted on the group conditions” intended for Palestinians to die in a war Hamas started. This intent is reported in @WSJ and not disputed. 2/
Deceased Hamas leaded Haniyeh was clear in an October 2023 speech about his intent for Palestinians to die: “we NEED THE BLOOD of women, children… so as to awaken our revolutionary spirit.” How much more intent can there be? 3/
🧵Australian military expert affirmed tragic death of 7 WCK aid workers was not deliberate, vindicating Israel. He assessed that unexpected gunmen were with convoy and looked like Hamas; but failures still led to mistaken attack. An important independent report, some detail: 1/
The primary reason for the IDF misidentification error was the unexpected presence of armed persons, one of whom fired his weapon into the air on the trailer of the WCK truck, which was deemed “consistent with Hamas hijacking the aid convoy.” 2/
The official Australian report by Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin noted that later on several additional gunmen moved around the WCK escort vehicles. According to the Australian assessment, IDF brigade officials “classified” the gunmen “as Hamas.” 3/