In today’s #vatniksoup I’ll introduce a Russian filmmaker, Anastasia Trofimova. She’s best-known for her latest controversial documentary “Russians at War”, and for working as a producer for Russian state-funded media outlet RT.
1/19
Soft power has been part of the Kremlin’s hybrid warfare for a long time. It refers to the “ability to get what you want through attraction rather than through coercion” and which can “be cultivated through relations with allies, economic assistance, and cultural exchanges.”
2/19
Russia has been using soft power to sow division and distrust in the West for decades. Documentaries like Ukraine on Fire offer a revisionist and pro-Kremlin view on what happened in Kyiv and in Ukraine in 2014. It was directed by the Russian master…
3/19
…propagandist and LA resident Igor Lopatonok and also featured Oliver Stone. The film was premiered at the Taormina Film Festival in Italy. GRU-connected Dutch Bonanza Media has also produced several documentaries whitewashing Russia’s crimes against humanity.
4/19
Latest addition to Russia’s soft power propaganda is Anastasia Trofimova’s documentary, “Russians at War”. The film’s public premiere was at the Venice International Film Festival, which caused a huge backlash in the West and especially in the Ukrainian community.
5/19
Trofimova is an experienced filmmaker, and she worked as a producer for Russia’s state-controlled RT for 7 years.
"Russians at War" was funded with both public and private Canadian funding, and in total it received at least 260,000 USD from these sources.
6/19
In the film, Trofimova enters Eastern Ukraine illegally and interviews Russian soldiers 180 km behind the front lines. According to The Moscow Times, the Russian soldiers were motivated by “vague patriotism”, “avenging fallen friends”, and, of course, money.
7/19
Most of the soldiers Trofimova interviewed were sent to the Bakhmut meat grinder, but somehow she missed all the violent criminals & forcibly drafted foreigners from countries such as Nepal, who were then used as meat walls by the more experienced Russian units like Wagner.
8/19
The filmmaker gave an interview to local Russian media, which provides some insights on the filmmaking process and her worldview. These excerpts were translated and published by @TriggerLRSSG, and their thread on the topic can be found here:
First of all, the Russian authorities and intelligence services have heavily cracked down on any video or audio recordings in the temporarily occupied regions. Recently, they’ve made dramatic gestures and demonstrations against any cell phone use.
10/19
Second, it is nearly impossible to go to the temporarily occupied territories in Eastern Ukraine, alone spending seven months relatively close to the front line and interviewing Russian soldiers freely about the war, without the knowledge of Russian intelligence agencies.
11/19
Trofimova also said that all of the footage she recorded passed through the authorities of the made-up state of Luhansk People’s Republic, whom Anastasia described as “very nice” and “funny”, and that she learned a lot about “political life in Ukraine”.
12/19
Trofimova also claimed that she didn’t witness any war crimes while doing the film. The main reason for this was probably that she was far away from the front lines. According to Kyiv Independent, the Russians have committed over 150,000 documented war crimes.
13/19
It also seems that Anastasia is not immune to propaganda - she’s claimed that Russia “hasn’t participated in wars for many years,” neatly forgetting wars & occupations in Transnistria (1992-93), Abkhazia (1994-96), Chechnya (1999-2009), Georgia (2008) & Syria (2015-2022).
14/19
In Venice, Trofimova also took the time to criticize Olha Zhurba’s documentary Songs of Slow Burning Earth about the war in Ukraine. According to Anastasia, she wasn’t “that much of a fan” of the ending, as it “contrasted Ukrainian kids and Russian kids,…
15/19
…with Ukrainian kids thinking about what they can do to build a better Ukraine for the future, and Russian kids were just shown as marching and singing war songs.” According to her, the film depicted Russians as ”aggressive and awful people".
16/19
I personally find Trofimova’s “both sides” narrative problematic, because in this genocidal war we can clearly name the invader (Russia) and the defender (Ukraine).
Perhaps this is due to Trofimova’s willingness to return to Russia one day.
17/19
Toronto Film Festival eventually had to cancel the screening of “Russians at War” (which they described as “a spellbinding tale of sacrifice and disillusionment in which soldiers resemble pawns in a nefarious game”) due to massive backlash from the Ukrainian community.
18/19
Trofimova has described her documentary as an “anti-war” film, which should land her around seven years in prison in Russia. So far, the Kremlin or Russian authorities haven’t made any comments on the documentary.
I personally see it as a whitewashing propaganda.
19/19
My book titled “Vatnik Soup - The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” will be published on 20 Sep 2024, you can now pre-order it from here (comes with extra goodies!):
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll cover the agenda-setting and flood of disinformation that spread on X and other platforms right after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It’s far from the first or last time a tragedy has been weaponized for political purposes.
1/18
Every major political event, especially those involving violence, attracts massive attention. In the immediate aftermath, reliable information is scarce, making it highly vulnerable to both coordinated and improvised disinformation campaigns.
2/18
As I’ve mentioned in my previous soups and lectures, in disinformation campaigns, being first with a narrative is crucial, as people often remember the first version best — psychology studies show it sets the mental schema, and later updates rarely overwrite it.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce American social media personality David Freeman, AKA Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman). He’s best known for spreading political disinformation on X and shamelessly sucking up to Trump, Putin, and other authoritarian leaders.
1/22
David is a textbook example of someone profiting from MAGA grievance politics. He uses extreme, provocative language to farm engagement on X and never hesitates to flatter anyone who might give him more exposure — or money.
2/22
But David wasn’t always like this. At some point, in his mid-40s, he even tried a real job: he trained to become a cop. He spent three years with the Metro Transit PD, but after that he either got fired or quit, and never looked back.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Russian-Estonian businessman, Oleg Ossinovski. He is best-known for his deep ties to Russian rail and energy networks, shady cross-border dealings, and for channeling his wealth into Estonian politics.
1/14
Oleg made his fortune via Spacecom Trans & Skinest Rail, both deeply tied to Russia’s rail system. Most of this is through Globaltrans Investments PLC, a Cyprus-based firm with 62% held via Spacecom and tens of millions in yearly profits.
2/14
Ossinovski’s Russian-linked ventures made him Estonia’s richest man in 2014, with an estimated fortune of ~€300M. His business empire stretched across railways, oil via Alexela shares, and Russian bitumen imports from Help-Oil, a supplier to the Defense Ministry.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Swiss/French writer, Alain Bonnet, aka Alain Soral (@officielsoral). He’s best known for his rabid antisemitism and for his pathetic support for all the worst authoritarian regimes from Russia to North Korea.
1/22
Alain’s childhood was problematic, as his father has been characterized as a “narcissistic pervert” who beat his children and did jail time for fraud. Alain himself has said he was “programmed to be a monster.” Born Alain Bonnet, he took the stage name of his sister,…
2/22
… actress Agnès Soral. She wasn’t too happy about this, commenting “How would you like to be called Agnès Hitler?”. Like many grifters, he became a pick-up/seduction artist writer, à la late Gonzalo Lira, writing books and even making a B-movie, “Confessions d’un dragueur”.
3/22
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll explain the Alaska Fiasco and how it marks the peak of Trump’s two-year betrayal of Ukraine. What was sold as “peace talks” turned into a spectacle of weakness, humiliation, empty promises, and photo-ops that handed Putin exactly what he wanted.
1/24
Let’s start with the obvious: Trump desperately wants the gold medal of the Nobel Peace Prize, mainly because Obama got one. That’s why he’s now LARPing as a “peace maker” in every conflict: Israel-Gaza, Azerbaijan-Armenia, India-Pakistan, and of course Ukraine-Russia.
2/24
Another theory is that Putin holds kompromat — compromising material such as videos or documents — that would put Trump in an extremely bad light. Some have suggested it could be tied to the Epstein files or Russia’s interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll talk about engagement farming: a cynical social media tactic to rack up likes, shares, and comments. From rage farming to AI-powered outrage factories, engagement farming is reshaping online discourse and turning division into profit.
1/23
Engagement farming is a social media tactic aimed at getting maximum likes, shares, and comments, with truth being optional. It thrives on provocative texts, images, or videos designed to spark strong reactions, boost reach, and turn online outrage into clicks and cash.
2/23
One subset of engagement farming is rage farming: a tactic built to provoke strong negative emotions through outrageous or inflammatory claims. By triggering anger or moral outrage, these posts often generate 100s or even 1,000s of heated comments, amplifying their reach.