Vatnik Soup Profile picture
Sep 13, 2024 20 tweets 10 min read Read on X
In today’s #vatniksoup I’ll introduce a Russian filmmaker, Anastasia Trofimova. She’s best-known for her latest controversial documentary “Russians at War”, and for working as a producer for Russian state-funded media outlet RT.

1/19 Image
Soft power has been part of the Kremlin’s hybrid warfare for a long time. It refers to the “ability to get what you want through attraction rather than through coercion” and which can “be cultivated through relations with allies, economic assistance, and cultural exchanges.”
2/19
Image
Image
Russia has been using soft power to sow division and distrust in the West for decades. Documentaries like Ukraine on Fire offer a revisionist and pro-Kremlin view on what happened in Kyiv and in Ukraine in 2014. It was directed by the Russian master…

3/19 Image
…propagandist and LA resident Igor Lopatonok and also featured Oliver Stone. The film was premiered at the Taormina Film Festival in Italy. GRU-connected Dutch Bonanza Media has also produced several documentaries whitewashing Russia’s crimes against humanity.

4/19
Latest addition to Russia’s soft power propaganda is Anastasia Trofimova’s documentary, “Russians at War”. The film’s public premiere was at the Venice International Film Festival, which caused a huge backlash in the West and especially in the Ukrainian community.

5/19 Image
Trofimova is an experienced filmmaker, and she worked as a producer for Russia’s state-controlled RT for 7 years.

"Russians at War" was funded with both public and private Canadian funding, and in total it received at least 260,000 USD from these sources.

6/19

Image
Image
Image
In the film, Trofimova enters Eastern Ukraine illegally and interviews Russian soldiers 180 km behind the front lines. According to The Moscow Times, the Russian soldiers were motivated by “vague patriotism”, “avenging fallen friends”, and, of course, money.

7/19 Image
Most of the soldiers Trofimova interviewed were sent to the Bakhmut meat grinder, but somehow she missed all the violent criminals & forcibly drafted foreigners from countries such as Nepal, who were then used as meat walls by the more experienced Russian units like Wagner.

8/19

Image
The filmmaker gave an interview to local Russian media, which provides some insights on the filmmaking process and her worldview. These excerpts were translated and published by @TriggerLRSSG, and their thread on the topic can be found here:

9/19

First of all, the Russian authorities and intelligence services have heavily cracked down on any video or audio recordings in the temporarily occupied regions. Recently, they’ve made dramatic gestures and demonstrations against any cell phone use.

10/19

Image
Second, it is nearly impossible to go to the temporarily occupied territories in Eastern Ukraine, alone spending seven months relatively close to the front line and interviewing Russian soldiers freely about the war, without the knowledge of Russian intelligence agencies.

11/19


Image
Image
Image
Image
Trofimova also said that all of the footage she recorded passed through the authorities of the made-up state of Luhansk People’s Republic, whom Anastasia described as “very nice” and “funny”, and that she learned a lot about “political life in Ukraine”.

12/19 Image
Trofimova also claimed that she didn’t witness any war crimes while doing the film. The main reason for this was probably that she was far away from the front lines. According to Kyiv Independent, the Russians have committed over 150,000 documented war crimes.

13/19 Image
It also seems that Anastasia is not immune to propaganda - she’s claimed that Russia “hasn’t participated in wars for many years,” neatly forgetting wars & occupations in Transnistria (1992-93), Abkhazia (1994-96), Chechnya (1999-2009), Georgia (2008) & Syria (2015-2022).

14/19 Image
In Venice, Trofimova also took the time to criticize Olha Zhurba’s documentary Songs of Slow Burning Earth about the war in Ukraine. According to Anastasia, she wasn’t “that much of a fan” of the ending, as it “contrasted Ukrainian kids and Russian kids,…

15/19 Image
…with Ukrainian kids thinking about what they can do to build a better Ukraine for the future, and Russian kids were just shown as marching and singing war songs.” According to her, the film depicted Russians as ”aggressive and awful people".

16/19 Image
I personally find Trofimova’s “both sides” narrative problematic, because in this genocidal war we can clearly name the invader (Russia) and the defender (Ukraine).

Perhaps this is due to Trofimova’s willingness to return to Russia one day.

17/19 Image
Toronto Film Festival eventually had to cancel the screening of “Russians at War” (which they described as “a spellbinding tale of sacrifice and disillusionment in which soldiers resemble pawns in a nefarious game”) due to massive backlash from the Ukrainian community.

18/19


Image
Image
Image
Image
Trofimova has described her documentary as an “anti-war” film, which should land her around seven years in prison in Russia. So far, the Kremlin or Russian authorities haven’t made any comments on the documentary.

I personally see it as a whitewashing propaganda.

19/19

Image
Image
Image
My book titled “Vatnik Soup - The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” will be published on 20 Sep 2024, you can now pre-order it from here (comes with extra goodies!):



kleart.dk/webshop/p/vatn…
amazon.com/Vatnik-Soup-Ul…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vatnik Soup

Vatnik Soup Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @P_Kallioniemi

Apr 26
What you see happening here is coordinated strategic communication by the Trump cult. Elon’s baby mama and former MAGA influencer Ashley St. Clair explained this ecosystem in a long video. They have built platforms where people can find narratives to spread and get paid for doing so.

Even though the system technically breaks the platform's ToS, this is perfectly fine for @nikitabier and the rest of the X crew, because Elon pays their salaries and this is part of his election interference machinery.Image
If you wanna know how the system works, read this:

Here’s Ashley’s video, where she explains how the system works. She was immediately attacked by various MAGA actors, which suggests that what she said hit a nerve.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 13
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce Yanis Varoufakis, a Greek economist and politician. He’s best known for rising to power at the height of the Greek debt crisis, not solving anything but endearing himself to the left, and using his fame to promote Russian imperialism.

1/20 Image
Born in 1961 in Athens, Varoufakis studied economics in the UK and built an academic career in Australia, the US, and Europe. His early work focused on game theory, political economy, and critiques of capitalism.

2/20 Yanis Varoufakis: How I became an erratic Marxist https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/feb/18/yanis-varoufakis-how-i-became-an-erratic-marxist
Presenting himself as the fearless, unorthodox economist willing to confront the EU’s “neoliberal” elites, he rose to prominence during Greece’s debt crisis. At its height in 2015, he was appointed finance minister under the left-wing Syriza government of Alexis Tsipras.

3/20 Greek PM Alexis Tsipras appoints radical economist to new government https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/27/greek-pm-alexis-tsipras-economist-yanis-varoufakis
Read 20 tweets
Mar 29
In this 8th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss complaints about US financing of NATO, in particular how the US allegedly pays for European defense, leading to calls for a US withdrawal from the Alliance — which would only make it easier for Putin to invade more countries.

1/7 A flight of French and Polish Rafale and F-16 fighter jets above a NATO flag during the opening of the exhibition “Powerful because we are united”, dedicated to the 19th anniversary of Lithuania’s 2004 accession to NATO (OTD 22 years ago), in the bastion of the Vilnius defensive wall on March 29, 2023 (OTD 3 years ago) in Vilnius, Lithuania. (Photo by Oleg Nikishin/Getty Images)
NATO by itself costs peanuts. In fact, the core of NATO is a principle, an agreement, that ideally costs nothing. The main cost is defense spending, which the US is eagerly doing anyway: Trump has just announced a 50% increase in military spending for his “Department of War”.
2/7 Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military, Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/02/21/trump-hegseth-budget-military/
Trump calls for US military spending to rise more than 50% to $1.5tn https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy59kxl2xwzo
Image
To sow division and thereby weaken the Alliance, vatniks deliberately mix up different figures, such as contributions to the NATO common budget, with defense spending. And US military spending has been huge by the sheer fact that the US is the world’s largest economy.

3/7 Newsweek falsely claiming that the US pays 68% of NATO’s budget. The real number is 15%.

Elon Musk falsely claiming that the US pays for 2/3 of European defense. In another post he claimed it was 1/4. Both made-up numbers.  https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1870903805845598428 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1870903805845598428
NATO has annual budgets and programs worth around EUR 4.6 billion in 2025 (representing 0.3% of total Allied defence spending), and up to EUR 5.3 billion in 2026. The US share for 2026-2027 is 15% of that: 0.8 billion.  Source: Funding NATO https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/funding-nato
Read 7 tweets
Mar 9
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll talk about why we’re doing this: why we think Ukraine is so important and why we believe that souping vatniks and debunking their propaganda narratives is so crucial to counter Russia’s & their allies’ wars of aggression and achieve real peace.

1/20 Image
War is expensive, and Russia is not a rich country that could afford this: Hospitals? Roads? Plumbing? No: everything into terror and destruction.

But not only that. There is a 2nd item in the Russian state budget that remains strong no matter what:

2/20
Image
Image
Image
Manufacturing support for that terror and destruction. Propaganda. Vatniks. “Innocent” travel bloggers. “Independent” journalists. “Patriotic” politicians. Russia spends hundreds of billions of rubles a year ($5 billion) on this, and that kind of money buys you A LOT of BS.

3/20 Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 2
In this second (and possibly last) Basiji Soup, we’ll explore how the Islamic Republic of Iran has prepared for a conflict with the US and Israel. We won’t cover the military aspects, but another kind of war — information warfare.

1/20 Image
In the 1st Basiji Soup, we souped the Islamic Republic, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, its support of terrorism including Russia’s, its (one-sided?) relationship with Putin, and the mass protests against it that started two months ago:

2/20
Image
The Internet blackout has been crucial in allowing the regime to cover up its massacre of the protesters and especially the scope of it, making it difficult to assess the number of victims. They went to great lengths to jam Starlink, after having made its use illegal.

3/20 Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 25
In this 7th Debunk of the Day, we’ll expose the “Chickenhawk” fallacy. The chickenhawk accusation or the “go to the front!” imperative is a dishonest attempt to silence anyone supporting Ukraine by pushing them to go fight. A barely hidden death wish, as it’s always uttered…
1/5 Image
Image
Image
…with zero regard for who you are or what your personal circumstances might be — you could already be there, on your way there, a veteran, or unable to fight. More broadly, not everyone can or should be a soldier, just as not everyone can or should be a policeman or a nurse.
2/5 Image
Image
Yet a society still needs those things to be done, and the fact that not everyone can go to medical school or fight crime does not mean that we have to surrender to invaders and criminals, nor that we cannot all have an opinion on healthcare.
3/5
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(