🚨 FULL ABC AFFIDAVIT RELEASED! 👇
County [REDACTED]
Date: September 9, 2024
Affiant [REDACTED]
I [REDACTED], being duly sworn, do hereby make the following statement under penalty of perjury:
1.) My name [REDACTED], I reside at [REDACTED], Manhattan New York.
2.) I have worked for ABC news for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions.
3.) Since the acquisition of ABC news in 1996, I have observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization. These changes suggest a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
4.) For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as candidate for President of the United States. The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer's debate that will be hosted on September 10, 2024.
- Furthermore, the Harris campaign-imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning, including:
- No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
- No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
- No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
5.) Internal Organizational Climate: I have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views towards him experience significant concerns about potential retribution.
6.) Purpose and Documentation of Affidavit: This affidavit is executed to document and provide transparency regarding the issues of fairness and impartiality in the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at ABC News.
7.) Affirmation of Documentation:
- This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, to ensure that the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
- In addition to notarizing this affidavit, I have sent a certified letter to myself, postmarked September 9th, 2024, which will remain unopened for any future investigations.
- I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes.
- Furthermore, I have sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.
- Additionally, For further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
I make these statements under the penalty of perjury and without coercion of any kind.
VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT
State of New York
[REDACTED]
I [REDACTED], being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says:
The Deponent has read the foregoing affidavit and hereby vows to the content thereof and that the same is true to deponent's own knowledge. As to the matter therein to be stated to be alleged upon information and belief and as those matters deponent believes them to be true.
Sworn to me on this 9th Day of September, 2024.
[REDACTED]
Notary Public
State of New York
County [REDACTED]
Date: September 9, 2024
Affiant [REDACTED]
I [REDACTED], being duly sworn, do hereby make the following statement under penalty of perjury:
1.) My name [REDACTED], I reside at [REDACTED], Manhattan New York.
2.) I have worked for ABC news for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions.
3.) Since the acquisition of ABC news in 1996, I have observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization. These changes suggest a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
4.) For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as candidate for President of the United States. The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer's debate that will be hosted on September 10, 2024.
- Furthermore, the Harris campaign-imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning, including:
- No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
- No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
- No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
5.) Internal Organizational Climate: I have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views towards him experience significant concerns about potential retribution.
6.) Purpose and Documentation of Affidavit: This affidavit is executed to document and provide transparency regarding the issues of fairness and impartiality in the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at ABC News.
7.) Affirmation of Documentation:
- This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, to ensure that the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
- In addition to notarizing this affidavit, I have sent a certified letter to myself, postmarked September 9th, 2024, which will remain unopened for any future investigations.
- I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes.
- Furthermore, I have sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.
- Additionally, For further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
I make these statements under the penalty of perjury and without coercion of any kind.
VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT
State of New York
[REDACTED]
I [REDACTED], being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says:
The Deponent has read the foregoing affidavit and hereby vows to the content thereof and that the same is true to deponent's own knowledge. As to the matter therein to be stated to be alleged upon information and belief and as those matters deponent believes them to be true.
Sworn to me on this 9th Day of September, 2024.
[REDACTED]
Notary Public
State of New York
I shouldn't have rushed to post, missed some important info! UPDATED: 👇
Affidavit of [REDACTED]
State of New York
[REDACTED]
Date: September 9, 2024
Affiant: [REDACTED]
I, [REDACTED], being duly sworn, do hereby make the following statement under penalty of perjury:
1.) My name is [REDACTED]. I reside at [REDACTED], New York.
2.) I have worked for ABC news for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions.
3.) Since the acquisition of ABC news in 1996, I have observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization. These changes suggest a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
4.) For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as a candidate for President of the United States. The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer’s debate that will be hosted on September 10, 2024.
1. Observations on Debate Communication: Since the debate of President Trump and Vice President Harris had been announced to be broadcast on ABC, various members of staff had expressed hope of a debate where issues that were important to everyday Americans would be discussed and there had been promises made that the candidates would be held to firm discussions regarding their proposed policy stances and that the debate would not deteriorate into an ad campaign where both candidates would simply make blanket statements without specific policy or explanation as to [REDACTED].
2. Political Position Clarification: Many employees of ABC who were looking for a fair and honest debate questioned the clear bias that is well known throughout the company. It is common knowledge that Debate Moderators as well as Chief Executive Officers of my employer are well known not to support Donald Trump; this led to several employees speaking up in regards to how fair the debate was going to be. We were given assurances that the debate would be fair and neither the Harris campaign nor the Trump campaign would [REDACTED] unfair advantage.
3. Concerns Regarding Journalistic Integrity: It is my belief that contemporary news organizations, including ABC News, no longer adhere to impartiality. The influence of commercial interests and substantial donors appears to affect news presentation, resulting in selective reporting and biased narratives. I have personally witnessed news stories being cut from programming and not reported at all due to the influence of certain [REDACTED] corporations linked to our parent company.
4. Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
- The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
- It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact-check observations that it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, the Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaigns involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
- The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning, including:
- No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
- No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
- No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
5. Internal Organizational Climate: I have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views towards him experience significant concerns about potential retribution.
6. Purpose and Documentation of Affidavit: This affidavit is executed to document and provide transparency regarding the issues of fairness and impartiality in the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at ABC News.
7. Affirmation of Documentation:
- This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, to ensure that the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
- In addition to notarizing this affidavit, I have sent a certified letter to myself, postmarked September 9th, 2024, which will remain unopened for any future investigations.
- I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes.
- Furthermore, I have sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.
- Additionally, for further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact-Checking of Donald Trump but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
I make these statements under the penalty of perjury and without coercion of any kind.
VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT
State of New York
[REDACTED]
I, [REDACTED], being duly sworn, hereby depose and say:
The Deponent has read the foregoing affidavit and hereby vows to the content thereof and that the same is true to deponent's own knowledge as to the matter therein to be stated to be alleged upon information and belief and as those matters deponent believes them to be true.
Sworn to me on this 9th day of September, 2024
[REDACTED]
Notary Public
State of New York
[REDACTED]
Affidavit of [REDACTED]
State of New York
[REDACTED]
Date: September 9, 2024
Affiant: [REDACTED]
I, [REDACTED], being duly sworn, do hereby make the following statement under penalty of perjury:
1.) My name is [REDACTED]. I reside at [REDACTED], New York.
2.) I have worked for ABC news for over 10 years in various technical and administrative positions.
3.) Since the acquisition of ABC news in 1996, I have observed significant transformations in the nature of news reporting at the organization. These changes suggest a shift from unbiased reporting to a model influenced by external factors.
4.) For the record, I do not endorse Donald Trump in his capacity as a candidate for President of the United States. The intent of this affidavit is to address concerns regarding perceived biases within news reporting within my employer’s debate that will be hosted on September 10, 2024.
1. Observations on Debate Communication: Since the debate of President Trump and Vice President Harris had been announced to be broadcast on ABC, various members of staff had expressed hope of a debate where issues that were important to everyday Americans would be discussed and there had been promises made that the candidates would be held to firm discussions regarding their proposed policy stances and that the debate would not deteriorate into an ad campaign where both candidates would simply make blanket statements without specific policy or explanation as to [REDACTED].
2. Political Position Clarification: Many employees of ABC who were looking for a fair and honest debate questioned the clear bias that is well known throughout the company. It is common knowledge that Debate Moderators as well as Chief Executive Officers of my employer are well known not to support Donald Trump; this led to several employees speaking up in regards to how fair the debate was going to be. We were given assurances that the debate would be fair and neither the Harris campaign nor the Trump campaign would [REDACTED] unfair advantage.
3. Concerns Regarding Journalistic Integrity: It is my belief that contemporary news organizations, including ABC News, no longer adhere to impartiality. The influence of commercial interests and substantial donors appears to affect news presentation, resulting in selective reporting and biased narratives. I have personally witnessed news stories being cut from programming and not reported at all due to the influence of certain [REDACTED] corporations linked to our parent company.
4. Observations Pertaining to Debate Fairness: I have noted specific instances related to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris that raise concerns about procedural fairness: The specific instances of perceived bias are as follows:
- The Harris campaign received particular accommodations, including, but not limited to, the providing of a podium significantly smaller than that used by Donald Trump and assurances regarding split-screen television views that would favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to Donald Trump.
- It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. In fact, various people were assigned to fact-check observations that it was perceived candidate Trump would make during the debate. In fact, the Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. This was done via multiple communications with the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump and Harris campaigns involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on the call.
- The Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate.
Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed restrictions on the scope of questioning, including:
- No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
- No inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco.
- No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who may be involved in her administration if elected.
5. Internal Organizational Climate: I have observed a pronounced bias against Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views towards him experience significant concerns about potential retribution.
6. Purpose and Documentation of Affidavit: This affidavit is executed to document and provide transparency regarding the issues of fairness and impartiality in the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at ABC News.
7. Affirmation of Documentation:
- This affidavit has been signed and notarized on September 9th, 2024, to ensure that the allegations set forth are formally documented prior to the debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
- In addition to notarizing this affidavit, I have sent a certified letter to myself, postmarked September 9th, 2024, which will remain unopened for any future investigations.
- I have also dispatched a Federal Express package containing this affidavit, sent on September 9th, 2024, and delivered to my residence on September 10th, 2024, which will remain unopened for potential investigative purposes.
- Furthermore, I have sent a certified letter to Speaker Mike Johnson, dated September 9th, 2024, to establish a record that the correspondence was sent before the debate commenced.
- Additionally, for further investigation, I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact-Checking of Donald Trump but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate.
I make these statements under the penalty of perjury and without coercion of any kind.
VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT
State of New York
[REDACTED]
I, [REDACTED], being duly sworn, hereby depose and say:
The Deponent has read the foregoing affidavit and hereby vows to the content thereof and that the same is true to deponent's own knowledge as to the matter therein to be stated to be alleged upon information and belief and as those matters deponent believes them to be true.
Sworn to me on this 9th day of September, 2024
[REDACTED]
Notary Public
State of New York
[REDACTED]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
