The @eSafetyOffice ordered my post taken down partly because I called Teddy Cook a woman.
Now in the appeal, before anything has even really started, the judge says we can’t call Teddy Cook a woman.
I will not be complying with this. Teddy Cook is a woman. Find me in contempt. Arrest me at the hearing. Whatever. I’m not lying for an activist judge.
The eSafety office had 5 lawyers and their general manager there for a basic Directions Hearing.
My appeal is now officially linked with X’s appeal. This case is very important and I’m not giving an inch for a cultish ideology which is harming hundreds of thousands of kids.
The federal judge overseeing my case at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal also happens to be the President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Remember the reporting of bodies of murdered indigenous children found in unmarked mass graves at residential schools in Canada?
All a hoax. Never was a single shred of evidence. Not a bone. Nothing.
Ground-penetrating radar had picked up underground ‘anomalies’ near a residential school in Kamloops, BC. They could be rocks for all we know.
But someone decided to make up a story of 215 dead bodies of children. The Washington Post reported mass graves. Reporters wrote that the bodies of 3-year-old children had been found.
All a hoax.
Soon, reports of other unmarked grave sites hosting murdered indigenous children sprang up across the country.
Not a tooth was found. Not a fingernail. Absolutely nothing to substantiate any of it.
Trudeau flew the flag in Ottawa at half mast for the better part of a year. He knelt on the unmarked grave of a non-existent body while holding a teddy bear for the cameras.
Monuments of children’s sneakers — representing the fake dead — were put up and stayed up in cities for months or years.
A teacher, @JimMcMurtry01, was even marched out of his class in front of his students, his job taken away, for telling the truth that there was no evidence nuns had murdered all of these kids.
The government has now spent $8,000,000 searching for bodies. Can’t find any.
Billions were even put aside for ‘reconciliation.’
100 churches have been burned to the ground across Canada in response.
“One hundred percent no. While it’s true that in both situations, the child experiences familial loss, adoption functions as an institution centered around the well-being of children. Third-party reproduction, including surrogacy, functions as a marketplace centered around the desires of adults.” -@Advo_Katy
1. In both scenarios, the child has experienced parental loss. In adoption, the parents seek to mend that wound. With third-party reproduction, the adults inflict the wound.
The only study comparing outcomes between adoptees and sperm-donor children reveals that adoptees fare better when it comes to identity struggles and parental trust — a testimony to the immense psychological burden of being raised by the adults who created your parental loss rather than the ones seeking to heal it.
2. In adoption, the child is the client. The goal is to find a family for every child without one. In #BigFertility, the adult is the client. The goal is to get a child for every adult regardless of the cost to that, or any other, child.
Weeks before Julie Inman Grant took action against X (previously Twitter) over footage of the stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel in western Sydney, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner curiously issued the social media giant with a take-down order over a tweet “misgendering” an Australian transgender activist.
As the author of the tweet, Canadian activist Chris Elston — better known as “Billboard Chris” sees it, it was “not my nicest tweet ever, but technically accurate,” and in the context of all the vile content available on the internet, rather benign.
Currently visiting Australia to campaign against what he views as the “irreversible harming” of gender dysphoric children through the use of puberty blockers, hormones and surgery, Mr Elston told The Australian he found the eSafety Commissioner’s action against X regarding both his tweet and footage of the stabbing as “absurd” and “politically motivated”.
The social media giant — owned by billionaire Elon Musk — is pursuing action against the eSafety Commissioner in the Federal Court, while Mr Elston, represented by the Free Speech Union of Australia, is appealing Ms Inman Grant’s decision via the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Mr Elston’s tweet, which is geo-blocked in Australia but remains visible to the rest of the world, related to Sydney-based World Health Organisation transgender health adviser and community health director at LGBTIQ+ organisation ACON, Teddy Cook.
Cook, who has not responded to a request for comment, was born with two X chromosomes, but has undergone surgery and hormone treatment and identifies as male.
The South Australian Department for Education is investigating a presentation for year 9 girls at Renmark High School, where bestiality was taught as being part of the LGBTQIA+.
Did Australian trans health expert Teddy Cook draft this presentation?
Female students said teachers at Renmark High School told them to leave their lessons and attend a presentation in a separate classroom.
Students who attended the presentation on March 22 say two staff from the Headspace centre in the neighbouring town of Berri introduced a "third-party" presenter who facilitated an hour-long presentation focused on relationships.
Parents said they were not notified about the presentation, nor was it consented to.
Students said they were left unsupervised for the duration of the presentation.
Student Courtney White, 14, said she felt confused and blindsided by the presentation.
"We had a teacher that told us to grab a chair and sit in front of the board, and then the Headspace people came in and then [the teacher] left, so then we're sitting in front of a board alone with no teachers, just the Headspace people," she said.
"The first slide of the PowerPoint on the board was 'You can see queerly now' and 'No point hiding.'"
Girls felt 'really uncomfortable.’
Fourteen-year-old Emelia Wundenberg said the presenter was graphic when referencing their own sexual preferences and spoke in sexually explicit terms about growing up and being confused about whether they idolised people of the same gender or wanted to be intimate with them.
Students say they were then given an explanation of the initialism LGBTQIA+, with each word and its meaning displayed on the screen.
"There was a slide for what the 'plus' means, and they just started randomly saying words that no-one knew, like bestiality," Emelia said.
"It was on the board when they were showing what the 'plus' meant."
The students said bestiality was then explained in detail and the presenter seemed to imply it was something practised by people who identified as LGBTQIA+.
"They said [the queer community] just accepts all of it, even though … isn't it illegal?" Emelia said.
As the talk went on multiple girls, including Courtney, began to feel uncomfortable and asked to leave the classroom to "go to the bathroom".
"We're all just sitting there like, 'What the hell? What are we doing here? Why are we learning about animals having sex with humans?'" she said.
"It was really disgusting, it was really uncomfortable."
Emelia said many of those who asked to leave the classroom did not return.