Drew Holden Profile picture
Sep 17, 2024 27 tweets 13 min read Read on X
🧵Thread🧵

The media, focused solely on Trump, haven’t seemed interested in fact checking Kamala Harris. And not for lack of opportunity.

So I decided to. Below are some false and misleading statements from last week’s debate.

I could only fit so many. But give it a read. ⤵️
For starters, I think this image typifies how the media treat the two candidates.

Dale’s sentiment here applied broadly to the rest of the media, who had eyes only for Trump. Image
So let’s look at Harris, shall we?

1. She claimed that she was the only one on the debate stage with a plan for the middle class.

That’s the type of claim the media usually says “needs context,” as the Biden-Harris admin has failed the middle class, as even CNN acknowledged.

Image
Image
Image
2. Harris claimed that Trump intends to implement Project 2025, the latest monster-under-the-bed for Democrats.

Beyond overhyping the details of the project itself, what Harris glossed over is that Trump has denounced the project, repeatedly saying he’s got no interest.

Image
Image
Image
Surely, fact checkers must’ve been climbing over one another to point out that this connection was bogus, right? That whatever else, Trump had clearly said he isn’t supportive of it?

Well, no. The media mostly ignored the claim, or counterclaimed that really he does support it.


Image
Image
Image
Image
If you’re wondering why, I have an idea. Image
Okay, back to the facts.

3. Harris claimed Trump would ban abortion nationwide.

Again, Trump has repeatedly said he won’t do this. He’s even taken heat for being too liberal on the issue from pro-life folks. But Harris keeps repeating it. And the media keeps ignoring it.

Image
Image
Image
4. Harris also said that nowhere in the country are there full-term abortions.

This simply isn’t true. As @MaryMargOlohan explains in a recent piece and thread:
5. Harris said she was tough on immigration, and would hire “1,500 new border patrol agents”

Again, this is one of those claims that, if the political shoe were on the other foot, the press would say “needs context.”

Harris supported decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Image
5 cont. And Harris led immigration for Biden.

Much as she may deny it, I’ve got the receipts. She presided over the disastrous border policies that led to record crossings.



That those facts aren’t front and center in this conversation elides the point.
Okay, not a fact check, but Harris bragged about the endorsement of Dick Cheney.

Does anyone else think it’s really weird that the Dems are hyped that the guy who lied us into the Iraq war, whom Dems wanted tried for war crimes, supports their candidate? Image
6. Harris said that Trump would “weaponize” the legal powers of the federal government against his opponents.

Again, this “needs context.” The Biden-Harris admin are doing precisely this to Trump. Isn’t it a touch rich for Harris to try to call it out?

Image
Image
Image
7. Harris claimed (repeatedly) that she had been “very clear” about her position on fracking.

Look at these screenshots, one from 2019, one from 2024, and tell me this is “clear.”
Image
Image
I mean, the press have even celebrated how she’s pivoted on this topic! Image
8. Harris bragged about her and Biden’s investment in clean energy. But is that investment going anywhere?

As I fact checked for Biden’s DNC speech, all that money has led to a grand total of 7 new charging stations, a key climate focus.

Not 7,000. Not 700. Just 7. Nationwide.
Image
Image
9. Harris said “and some died” when describing law enforcement casualties at the Capitol on Jan 6.

Whatever else you think about what happened, law enforcement personal weren’t killed as a result. To imply otherwise is dishonest. Image
10. Harris repeated the “very fine people on both sides” lie about Charlottesville.

Even Snopes, no right wing rag, has explained that this isn’t real. Image
11. In a similar vein, Harris accused Trump of saying there’d be a “bloodbath” if he lost the election.

The phrase is pulled, without context, from Trump’s remarks about the auto industry.

To apply it instead to the country is bogus, and maliciously so. Image
12. Harris claimed that “there is not one member of the…military who is in active duty in a combat zone.”

Even NYT disputed this one. Since they let most of her claims go, I’ll give them the floor:
Image
Image
13. Harris claimed she has a “plan” (again) for bringing down the cost of living.

If so, why hasn’t she implemented it in three years as VP, while her admin has spiked the cost of living with inflation and other failed economic policies?

Lovely time for “context.”


Image
Image
Image
Image
Bonus: I can’t not include the most ridiculous aspect of the debate “fact checking”: claims that Trump was wrong to accuse Harris of supporting trans surgeries for detained illegal immigrants.

Problem was, she did.

H/t @guypbenson for this terribly awkward NYT reflection. Image
And @time produced one of the most cringe-inducing corrections on record (h/t @TimMurtaugh).

Apparently @sbg1 didn’t get the memo from NYT.

And I can’t not include this “needs context” claim from NYT initially, the ‘context’ being that Trump was right, apparently.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Look, I get the protest that Trump isn’t a beacon of truth. But the American people deserve to know whether what his opponent has to say is actually accurate.

In many cases, it isn’t.
And it’s impossible to ignore how all of this intersects with the media, who regularly repeat these bogus Harris claims as gospel truth.

That they can’t do their “fact checking” with any integrity says a lot about the mission such work actually serves: furthering Dem interests.
As ever, there’s too much here to fit into a thread. Read the full write up at my newsletter, @Holden_Court, linked here: open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…
Image
@Holden_Court And if you’d like to kick me a few bucks to support the beer fund that supports my sanity by going through all of this, I won’t stop you from doing so. paypal.com/donate/?busine…
@Holden_Court If you needed more evidence that Harris’s claim #12, about the safety of our troops, was a lie: @RepJimBanks has it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
🧵Thread🧵

Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.

Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.

Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.

That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…Image
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.

I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.

The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.

An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(