This is what 23-year-old Alexis Lorenze looked like before her vaccine injury. And this is what she looks like now.
Alexis was mandated to take three vaccines against her will, and now she anticipates only having a few days to live. Her dying wish is for you to share her story.
🧵 THREAD
Alexis's heartbreaking story began when she went to UC Irvine Hospital seeking help for her condition, Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH).
She was hoping for a blood transfusion, but her doctors informed her that she wouldn’t receive any further treatment unless she was up to date on her vaccines.
Despite a history of vaccine injury and a severely compromised immune system due to her genetic condition, Alexis was given three vaccines all at once: tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia.
Within 10 minutes of receiving the injections, her body began to shut down.
According to Steve Kirsch, her symptoms were immediate and severe:
“Within 10 minutes of the 3 vaccines which were given all at the same time, Alexis went temporarily blind in both eyes, had a locked jaw, began vomiting, and then things went horribly downhill from there.”
In a plea for help that went viral, Alexis described how her entire body was covered in bruises and hematomas.
She was in excruciating pain, and despite her deteriorating condition, the hospital allegedly did little to address her life-threatening symptoms, opting instead to treat her with pain medication and Benadryl.
The doctor who mandated these shots has since disappeared from the picture, leaving Alexis without any explanation or accountability as she struggles to receive the care she needs while dealing with the consequences of an unnecessary vaccine protocol.
According to @MidwesternDoc, the case of medical blindness that happened to Alexis is an all-too-common story:
• A major in medicine is that doctors are frequently unable to recognize conditions which:
•Create cognitive dissonance for them (e.g., by forcing them to acknowledge they hurt a patient or accept that the guidelines their medical tribe gave them are flawed).
•They were not taught to identify to recognize (as there is so much complexity to a human being, the majority of physicians lack the innate capacity to see things they weren’t taught to filter for or the willing to seriously consider the significance of things which do not make sense within their cognitive map of the world).
• Because of this, physicians frequently fail to recognize a pharmaceutical injury is occurring or believe a patient who claims an injury was linked to a pharmaceutical (particularly since medical education conveniently does not train doctors to recognize these injuries and simultaneously trains them to believe anything patients report that is not backed by science is “anecdotal” and most likely a spontaneous coincidence). This in turn leads to the tragic phenomenon of “medical gaslighting” (discussed further here) something many patients understandably find infuriating.
As Alexis’s condition worsened, she was transferred to the ICU, likely due to the mounting public pressure on the hospital. However, the damage was already done.
According to @MidwesternDoc, her lab results revealed that she had developed Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), a known but rare vaccine complication where the immune system destroys its own platelets, leading to dangerous clotting and bleeding throughout her body.
@MidwesternDoc outlines the deeply troubling care Alexis received during her hospital stay, which starkly contrasts with how she should have been treated. Her severe pain, swelling, and the hematomas covering her body were largely ignored. Despite her alarming symptoms beginning right after the vaccines, the hospital attributed them to a Parvovirus infection.
To make matters worse, Alexis reported being mocked by medical staff and faced extreme delays when requesting help. The hospital even refused to transfer her due to insurance issues, leaving her in critical condition.
•She came in hoping for a blood transfusion, but was told she could not have any more treatment unless she received the vaccines.•The hospital has given conflicting messages about what vaccines she received (even though the nurse clearly told them which ones were being given).
•Alexis’s entire body is covered with the same hematomas you can see on her face and her body feels as though it is inflated. Additionally, she is in severe pain.
•The doctors have not treated her well (she claims some laughed at her, while another one stated they had never seen anything like this before) and that when she’s hit the call button for basic things she needs, it’s taken hours for nurses to get to her.
•The hospital is convinced this could not have been due to the vaccine, and instead was due to a Parvovirus infection (which a PCR test was positive for). Given that all or her symptoms started 10 minutes after the vaccines…that’s a bit of a stretch but no different from what Suzanne Humphries experienced.
•The tried to transport her out of the hospital but were unable to as she does not have the insurance to get care at another facility.
@MidwesternDoc The tragic reality is that Alexis’s situation is not unique. Vaccine injuries are frequently dismissed or downplayed, and those who suffer them often find themselves isolated and without recourse.
@MidwesternDoc In Alexis's case, the hospital's refusal to acknowledge her vaccine injury has left her in a critical state. Nurse Angela, Steve Kirsch, and others are working on measures to get Alexis to another hospital with trusted physicians to treat her vaccine injury.
@MidwesternDoc Please pray for Alexis and share her story so others don’t suffer the same fate.
You can also support Alexis by contributing to her fundraiser here on this ethical platform.
“Any neutral member of the public will be inclined to agree she was injured and that doctors are lying to protect vaccines. In short, I believe this response shows how deeply within a bubble they are as denying the injury only weakens their credibility.”
It’s been about a month since more than 3 million Epstein files were released, and what they exposed makes one thing painfully clear: we’ve been living under an illusion of government and politics for years, if not decades.
Anyone who has spent time in the conspiracy world already understands that the real power structure stretches far beyond the political theater fed to us on TV.
So who is actually at the top? Who is really pulling the strings? And what is their ultimate goal?
One person who has spent years trying to answer those exact questions is @Jay_D007, and he joins us today to dig into what feels like a real-life “Eyes Wide Shut” conspiracy. 🧵
Jay Dyer began by dismantling the idea that Jeffrey Epstein was merely a well-connected criminal who happened to brush shoulders with the powerful.
In his view, that narrative doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
He reminded viewers that Epstein openly admitted being recruited into the Trilateral Commission by “the Kissinger circles and David Rockefeller,” and even referred to himself as Rockefeller’s “legate.” That’s not the résumé of a random trafficker. It suggests proximity to “the top of the pyramid.”
From there, he linked the Epstein files to the broader power structure long discussed in alternative circles: the Rothschilds, Rockefeller interests, Bilderberg, Chatham House, British intelligence. The emails, he argued, reveal an “untouchable class” shielded by agencies including Mossad, the CIA, and British intelligence.
For Jay, this wasn’t partisan theater. This was evidence of a steering committee operating above governments, quietly shaping outcomes behind the curtain.
And when he cited emails referencing “hunting people,” he suggested it exposed something even more revealing: a belief in total immunity. They behaved as though nothing could touch them.
As @Jay_D007 put it, “You’re not David Rockefeller’s legate if you’re just some random criminal.”
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.
Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below.
Things are heating up fast in the Texas Governor’s race—and what happened over the weekend is raising eyebrows.
Turning Point USA publicly endorsed Governor Greg Abbott. Yes, that Greg Abbott—the one critics say failed to close the border under Joe Biden despite having the authority to do so, and in some cases may have even hindered efforts to secure it.
This is also the governor accused of signing off on legislation that would have created a de facto Digital ID in Texas by January 1st, 2026, had a law firm not successfully challenged it as unconstitutional. And despite that ruling, we’re now hearing the decision is being appealed—raising concerns that Abbott is still determined to push Digital ID forward.
But it gets worse.
Tyler Bowyer of Turning Point USA publicly dismissed what many see as the most viable challenger in the race: @DocPeteChambers. The backlash was immediate and intense. So intense that “Tyler Bowyer’s dismissal fuels support for Texas outsider Doc Chambers” began trending on X.
Then things escalated.
Over the same weekend, Doc Pete Chambers’ social media pages were suddenly attacked. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Event locations disappeared. Voters had no idea where to show up.
In the middle of a heated primary, cutting off a candidate’s communication with the public isn’t insignificant.
Some would call it tampering. Others would call it something even more serious.
If this were happening in any other high-profile race, every major outlet would be covering it.
@DocPete4Texas joins us now to break down exactly what happened... 🧵
Maria set the tone immediately. She said they “basically called an emergency interview” after @DocPete4Texas's campaign was hit with what she described as serious attacks. The urgency was clear from the first sentence.
Chambers then laid out what happened. As his team was posting daily campaign locations, they were suddenly locked out of Facebook. They couldn’t log in. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Voters wouldn’t know where to show up.
Then came the detail that shifted everything: another statewide campaign experienced the exact same issue at the exact same time.
At that point, it no longer felt like a glitch.
He said he activated what he called a military “net call,” switching to an alternate communications plan so supporters could manually spread event details and “stop the bleed.” In the middle of a heated primary, shutting down a candidate’s ability to reach voters doesn’t look random.
Next, Maria dismantled the claim that @DocPeteChambers “has no shot” at winning because he lacks establishment funding. She wasn’t buying it.
She pointed to the floods. When Texans were stranded, Chambers didn’t wait for institutional backing or campaign cash. He stepped in, organized rescue efforts, and coordinated resources with limited funds. He explained that relief money flowed straight to victims, including $1 million brought in by a supporter from North Carolina after Chambers had previously helped there.
That’s when he sharpened the argument. Nine other candidates are in the race against Abbott, yet only one is facing coordinated dismissal and public attacks.
He said they’re running “the most efficient campaign in the history of Texas,” and after the backlash, fundraising didn’t weaken. It exploded.
If he truly had “no shot,” none of this would be necessary.
Which is why his question lands the way it does: “Why are they not being attacked?”
The hundreds of millions of people with autoimmune disease may get more clarity in this 80-second video than they’ve gotten from years of doctor visits.
Gary Brecka flipped the narrative and asked: “What if God didn’t make a mistake?”
“What if the immune system is actually acting properly,” and it’s attacking the body for a reason, but you just have to figure it out?
He argues that, in most cases, you can trace the root cause of autoimmune disease back to four broad categories:
• mold and mycotoxins
• heavy metals
• viruses
• and parasites.
According to Brecka, if you systematically eliminate those four drivers, you’ll discover that your autoimmune disease begins to resolve because the immune system no longer has a reason to attack.
Like Brecka, @MidwesternDoc has spent years uncovering what’s really driving autoimmune disease.
If you or someone you love is suffering, don’t skip this 5-minute read. It goes deeper into what Brecka just laid out. 🧵
Autoimmune disease has become one of the most common and stubborn health crises of our time.
Millions are told that their immune system is “attacking” them.
It’s random.
It’s lifelong.
They’ll need powerful drugs forever.
And those drugs?
Often toxic. Often suppressive. Often life-altering.
But what if that entire framework itself is incomplete?
Conventional rheumatology largely treats autoimmune illness as a malfunctioning immune system.
In that case, the solution becomes straightforward: Suppress it.
Steroids.
NSAIDs.
Immunosuppressants.
Symptoms decrease, but the underlying process is frequently untouched.
When medicine focuses only on shutting down inflammation, something deeper is usually missed.
Behind the slogan, a new federal bill is quietly gaining bipartisan support, and almost no one is asking what it actually builds.
Hidden beneath the headline: mandatory ID checks, permanent audit trails, and infrastructure built to erase anonymity.
We’ve seen this before. Remember the Patriot Act? The emergency fades. But the system stays.
Digital ID first.
Then, money.
Today it’s ID for the internet. Tomorrow it’s ID to touch your own money?
Pastor Allen joins us to explain how gold protects freedom before the rules change... 🧵
Pastor Allen opened the conversation with a warning that set the tone for everything that followed. In his view, the system never moves forward without a pretext.
He said there’s always a moment of panic, a headline, a crisis that justifies the next expansion of control. As he put it, “there’s always a crisis” used to move the needle forward. Whether it was 1971 and the break from gold, 9/11 and the Patriot Act, or COVID and emergency powers, he argued that the script never really changes. Fear comes first. Control comes second.
He reminded viewers that “there’s nothing so permanent as a temporary government program,” urging people not to make life-altering decisions in a state of panic. And when officials claim something is for your “safety,” he warned, you can “bet your bottom dollar it’s for their pocketbook.”
Pastor Allen posed a question that bluntly put everything in perspective: “So you want to convince me that an elitist group of satanic pedophiles has my children’s best interest at heart when it comes to online regulation?”
He compared government oversight to strangers knocking on your door and asking to watch your kids.
Pastor Allen made it clear that protecting children is a parent’s responsibility, not a bureaucrat’s. Handing over more authority under the banner of protection isn’t wisdom but “madness,” he argues.