1) This is one of the most astonishing intelligence operations in history. It is a reworking of the story of the Trojan Horse for the digital age, and it deserves to become nearly as legendary as its iconic predecessor. If we are not utterly astounded, it is because we have seen too many James Bond and Black Mirror movies for our own good.
In real life, operations like this just don’t happen. It is at least four operations in one.
First, the Israelis thoroughly mapped Hezbollah’s supply chain.
Second, they invented a special explosive charge small enough to be inserted inside a handheld device, sophisticated enough to be remotely activated, big enough to do real harm, and yet not so prominent physically or electronically to call attention to itself.
Third, the Israelis turned themselves into a big enough link in Hezbollah’s procurement network to take physical control of the devices and rig them.
Fourth, they activated the charges simultaneously and across a very wide geographic area.
If any one of these sub-operations had been botched, the operation as a whole would have fizzled. Who else in the world could pull off such an imaginative, technically sophisticated and audacious plot?
2) It is the first mass targeted killing in history. Every one of the thousands of persons killed or maimed was selected individually, yet they were hit at the same moment. The great genius of the operation is that the Israelis relied on Hezbollah itself to select their targets for them. I can’t think of another case like this where the attackers just sat back and let the enemy perform a key part of their work for them. If we map the attacked men we map Hezbollah’s org chart, including the blinded Iranian ambassador to Lebanon who is an IRGC officer.
3) The large ratio of maimings to deaths is a sign of success. In military terms, a maiming is preferable to a death because it ties up more resources and stresses enemy systems to a much greater degree.
4) Israel’s mass targeted killing foiled Hezbollah’s human shield tactic. Whereas Israel places itself between its enemies and its public, Hezbollah, like Hamas, places the public between it and the IDF, secure in the knowledge that confused or corrupt Westerners will blame civilian deaths not on the terrorists but on Israel. To be sure, useful idiots like Josep Borrell, the
Vice-President of the European Commission will never hesitate to reward Hezbollah for its human shield policy. They will reflexively bleat condemnation of Israel for indiscriminate killing of innocents. But the thinking observer can see clearly that these are clean kills, as clean as one can possibly imagine in war.
5) Operation Grim Beeper was not only conducted within the very narrow rules of war that are imposed on Israel but on no one else, but it is also morally laudable. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization. It is an arm of Iran whose rise across the Arab world has brought death and destruction everywhere it is gained a foothold. Hezbollah worked hand in glove with Russia, Iran and the Assad regime to flatten large parts of many of the major cities of Syria. Iran and Hezbollah cannot be appeased, they must be deterred.
Unfortunately, the Biden administration believes that diplomacy and military deterrence are separate activities and that diplomacy is the morally superior one. The administration reflexively admonished Israel for Operation Grim Beeper and repeated its pious mantra, “deescalation.”
Pressure on Israel to deescalate, however, advances Iran’s and Hezbollah’s agenda. It was they who escalated on October 8, when, unprovoked, Hezbollah opened fire on Israel. That escalation was not designed to help Gazans get a two-state solution but to weaken the American alliance system and to strengthen Iran’s corridor to the Mediterranean and safeguard its nuclear weapons program.
The only deescalation that the U.S. should support is the one that will return Israeli civilians to their homes and weaken Hezbollah’s death grip on southern Lebanon. Diplomacy designed to achieve that kind of deescalation requires military deterrence. Operation Grim Beeper is the beginning of the Israel effort to restore deterrence.
6) Operation Below the Belt — I mean Grim Beeper very likely sowed mistrust between Beirut and Tehran. It quite obviously did enormous psychological damage to Hezbollah by creating confusion in the ranks, disrupting basic communications systems, and leaving everyone from top to bottom in the organization feeling exposed and wondering what Israel will pull on them tomorrow.
But if those pagers came through Iran, as a number of press reports have claimed, it also planted doubt in the Lebanese mind about the reliability of Iranian systems. Many Israeli intelligence operations, including the recent Haniyeh killing, have demonstrated that Mossad has thoroughly penetrated Iran. That penetration has now obviously become a threat to Hezbollah, which has to wonder if it can trust anything manufactured or procured by Iran.
7) Finally, be sure to tune into #Israel_Update my weekly podcast with @GadiTaub1, which you can on access on Rumble here:
President Biden violates a rule of sound statecraft. “The answer is no,” he said, when asked if he supported an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites. “[A]ll seven of us [G7 nations] agree that they have a right to respond but they should respond proportionally,” he added. 1/
Richard Nixon explains succinctly in this clip how, as vice president, he learned from President Eisenhower never to make such a statement.
Ambiguity is basic to deterrence. Keep the adversary guessing. Keep him worried about the terrible things that might happen to him. If the adversary knows that certain sites are off the target list, then he can plan better. He can concentrate his resources elsewhere.
The internet of Things Fall Apart. A new wave of explosions in Lebanon has also affected phones, radios and other devices with lithium-ion batteries: household appliances, fingerprint scanners, electronic locks, and more.
The explosions today seem to be bigger.
An electronic lock rebelled against “The Resistance.”
Dramatic. Minister Gantz issues an ultimatum to Netanyahu: develop a strategy designed to achieve six goals by June 8, or he will resign. If this wasn’t directly coordinated with the White House, it seeks to draft off of American policy.
Gantz six conditions that the strategic plan must meet: 1. Bring home the hostages. 2. Topple the rule of Hamas, demilitarize the Gaza Strip, and ensure Israeli security control. 3. Establish an American-European-Arab-Palestinian civil administration that will manage civilian affairs in the Gaza Strip and lay the foundation for an alternative in the future that is neither Hamas nor Abbas. 4. Return the Israeli residents of the north to their homes by September 1 and revitalize life in the Western Negev. 5. Promote normalization with Saudi Arabia as part of a comprehensive move that will create an alliance with the free world and the Arab world against Iran. 6. Adopt a general outline regarding reform of the military draft that will result in all Israelis serving the state and contributing to the national effort.
Netanyahu's office responded to Gantz's conditions with the following statement:
While our heroic fighters are fighting to destroy the Hamas battalions in Rafah, Gantz chooses to issue an ultimatum to the Prime Minister instead of issuing an ultimatum to Hamas.
The conditions set by Benny Gantz are polite words whose meaning is clear: the end of the war and a defeat for Israel, the abandonment of most of the hostages, leaving Hamas intact, and the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Our soldiers did not fall in vain and certainly not for the sake of replacing Hamastan with Fatahstan.
If Gantz prefers the national interest and is not looking for an excuse to overthrow the government, let him answer the following three questions:
1 - Is he ready to complete the operation in Rafah in order to destroy the Hamas battalions, and if so, how is it possible that he is threatening to dismantle the emergency government in the middle of the operation?
2 - Is he opposed to civilian control of Gaza by the Palestinian Authority, even without Abbas?
3 - Is he ready to accept a Palestinian state in Gaza and Judea and Samaria as part of the normalization process with Saudi Arabia?
The Prime Minister's position on these fateful issues is clear: Prime Minister Netanyahu is determined to eliminate the Hamas battalions. He opposes the introduction of the Palestinian Authority into Gaza and the establishment of a Palestinian state which will inevitably be a terror state.
Prime Minister Netanyahu thinks that the emergency government is important for achieving all the goals of the war, including the return of all our hostages, and expects Gantz to clarify his positions to the public on these issues.
A weapons embargo on Israel ensures that Biden can’t get either what he says he wants or what we might fairly assume he wants. A thread. 1/ Biden says he wants a hostages-for-prisoners deal/ceasefire. But by pressuring Israel he emboldens Hamas to make unrealistic demands.
2/ Biden says he wants a two-state solution with a “revitalized”Palestinian Authority (PA) in charge of Gaza. But by saving Hamas he ensures it will block Fatah (the ruling party in the PA) from gaining a foothold in Gaza. The policy is stoking a Palestinian civil war.
3/ Biden says he wants to alleviate the humanitarian suffering in the Gaza Strip but by precluding a ceasefire deal and emboldening Hamas, he prolongs the war and therefore the suffering. A speedy Israeli victory is the only pathway to anything approaching normalcy for Gazans.
Man, 71, dies of a subdural hematoma after a teen beat him outside NYC pizzeria. | I had a subdural hematoma this summer. It was very unpleasant. I had never heard of this injury before, but once you learn about it, you see it in the news all the time. nypost.com/2022/11/02/man…
What is it? A SDH is bleeding between the brain and the skull. There is no place for the blood to go so it presses against the brain. They are much more common in old people than young. Why? Because as you get older, your brain shrinks. There develops between the brain and the
skull a small gap. I’m the gap are veins. When you get a blow to the head it can jiggle the brain and sever a vein. People die of this quite frequently, perhaps more frequently than you know, because what you hear is that they died from a blow to the head. Bottom line: don’t go