Combination K Profile picture
Sep 19, 2024 13 tweets 7 min read Read on X
A thread discussing Soviet combat engineers and river crossing tactics: Image
Organized underneath the control of the Front Chief of Engineers, these units are an integral facet of the Soviet combat support system. Interestingly, akin to artillery, these units are by no means static in their formation, and will disintegrate and regroup as the mission requires.
In offensive operations engineers are tasked with clearing and denoting terrain which will allow the main body to move and deploy in a concealed and effective manner, and maintaining the momentum of these units through the removal of natural obstacles. These aims are accomplished through the use of an engineer reconnaissance network, which works to observe and locate the most efficient route of advance, taking into account pathes the enemy may not expect or prepare to defend as heavily as a more conventional axis. Engineer reconnaissance patrols are often integrated into groupings with other reconnaissance elements subordinate to the army or front. These units will survey routes which are predetermined by operational staff, confirming the efficacy of employing such an axis in the advance. They will form complex reports on the natural obstacles present, including details such as the depth and ease of crossing rivers present along the chosen route. These efforts are strikingly similar to the attention to detail applied in the mapping of Western civilian infrastructure and terrain features, which the USSR went to great lengths to engage.Image
Engineers are also tasked with the construction of command observation posts (discussed in earlier threads), gun positions, bridges, and trench systems, as well as any other important actions in preparation for the operation to unfold. Engineers will also work to prepare alternative road access for armored systems as well as airfields for front line aviation. Engineers also play a vital role in establishing mock positions, and installations, which work to deceive the enemy, unlike previously discussed actions, which are engaged at night, erecting decoys takes place throughout the day.Image
Engineering units are often quite large, seeing as divisions tend to take two routes of advance at any given time, though the more important axis will always receive a larger allocation of engineers for route clearing. Generally speaking a company is expected to be capable of clearing and preparing up to 100 kilometers in favorable weather. In regards to equipment, a typical platoon of engineers would receive an attached motor rifle platoon, a chemical reconnaissance vehicle, often a BRDM derivative, an engineer platoon, equipped with mine detecting equipment and demolition explosives, as well as a tank affixed with a dozer blade, 2 bulldozers, a tracked crane, 2 tank launched bridges and two truck launched bridges.Image
The attached motor rifle platoon is quite important seeing as these units move well ahead of the main body, and therefore require adequate escort, the platoon may see use in manual labor if such a need arises. Image
Mine clearing is an exceedingly important task, as failure to do so not only puts the main body at risk but could lead to significant delays. Mine clearing is often engaged by tanks fitted with equipment to engage such a task, this comes in the form of attached systems such as the KMT series. Engineers will assist in these efforts with Bangalore Torpedos. Due to the vulnerability of units as such actions transpire (often at a crawl of 6 kilometers per hour), artillery and smoke is employed in excess, in an offensive operation where haste is of great importance, it is not uncommon to blow through the minefield with systems like UR-77.
Soviet estimations (as defined by studies conducted in the late 60s) expect to encounter minor water obstacles every 20 kilometers, medium obstacles (often 100 or so meters wide) every 60 kilometers, and larger obstacles (as wide as 300 meters) every 150 kilometers, water obstacles larger than 300 meters in width would be expected every 300 kilometers. This would in turn mean one major crossing each day, and many minor crossings, this is problematic, as delays are seen as the first deciding factor in the death of an operation, therefore, river crossing has become one of the most important facets in the eyes of the Soviet military.Image
River Crossings are broken into 2 distinct categories, those being an unopposed crossing, which denotes a situation in which the water obstacle is without defense, and opposed crossings, which are rivers with an established defense, these tend to be tackled by motor rifle units and forward engineers. Though regardless of the type of crossing, forward detachments equipped with BMPs are preferred, these units will often see reinforcement from a tank company. If the river is heavily defended, the application of airborne forces is not uncommon, these are often taken from the attached air assault unit native to the division.Image
In regards to equipment available to engineers engaging these tasks, the MT-55 can provide crossing capabilities for obstacles 20 meters in width, which is favorable seeing as an estimated 60% of rivers along the Soviet central front fall into this range, but a division must be capable of crossing rivers up to 100 meters in width independently, this task is accomplished by the Army Assault Crossing Battalion.Image
Due to the emphasis on overcoming water obstacles, the Soviet Military has paid great attention to the application of bridge laying systems, operating far more and with greater integration when compared to NATO, this capability is only increased by amphibious ability and deep wading afforded to almost every armored vehicle. The crossing of a river is to be done in expedient fashion, forward detachments aiming for an hour maximum in ideal circumstances, entire divisions being capable of crossing in a minimum of 5 hours, and the army in 12. Crossing is conducted at crossing points, which are broken into 4 distinct assault crossing locations, 4 crossings for heavy equipment and 3 (sometimes 4) deep wading points, accompanied by often times 2 pontoon bridges.Image
To establish such points for crossing, engineers must construct them at least 2 hours prior to the arrival of units which require such elements to make a successful crossing. Only if the river is defended by an established force will engineers move with the main body of forces. Engineer reconnaissance becomes increasingly important in these situations where understanding the composition and concentration of defenses is imperative to the missions success. During this time engineer commanders feed information to the army and divisional commanders as to where an advantageous crossing point may be actualized. If the river is large enough these units will be accompanied by a maximum of 2 construction regiments which will assist in establishing points of crossing.
Anyways the thread concludes here, thank you for reading!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Combination K

Combination K Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Combination_K

Apr 8
A thread comparing the BMD-1 to the M551 Sheridan: Image
Image
In regards to armament the M551 and BMD-1 are difficult to effectively compare, and present challenges unique to their respective designs.

BMD-1 has a clear disadvantage when speaking to the volume of missiles offered to each vehicle. Prior to receiving the more advanced 9M111 and 9M113 (of which 3 were carried), BMD-1 carried four 9M14 missiles, two of which were placed on a ready rack within the turret. The other two missiles were located in the troop compartment. Loading these missiles was rather easy and did not force the gunner to expose himself to enemy fire. To do this, the gun is placed at a 30-degree angle, which allows the gunner to access the launch rail. Here the 9M14 is mounted, the fins are deployed, and the missile is ready to fire. The location of the ready racks is convenient and allows the gunner to engage these actions from his seat. To prepare the 9M14 for firing, a 50 to 55-second period is expected, which includes preparing associated elements like the guidance equipment. It is possible for an exceptionally competent gunner to engage this process in 40 seconds. This is a rather long period, which could prove problematic in combat conditions, but is offset by the ability for BMD-1 to exploit reverse slopes via the use of its hydropneumatic suspension and exceedingly small size. An additional advantage presented by this configuration is found in the event of an ambush, where the BMD-1 can quickly re-engage the enemy with its main gun after a missile has been expended. In the first two minutes of an engagement, a gunner is expected to be capable of achieving two successful loading, launching, and guiding cycles before replenishing the ready rack. If the BMD-1 is employed in a prepared defensive position, three missiles within the first two minutes is possible if the turret is turned to the left to allow the gunner to access his reserve ammunition. The speed at which one can load the 9M111 and 9M113, later supplied to BMD-1 and BMD-2, is similar when compared to the prior figures. The issue presented with this upgrade was that the gunner had to expose himself when loading the missile.Image
The M551 carries 8 missiles (some sources state 10 missiles were carried), significantly more than the BMD-1. Due to the gun launched nature of these missiles, exposing oneself to enemy fire was not a possibility. This came with its own disadvantages though, due to the extremely cramped turret, and the frequent failures experienced with the electronic breech (caused by the ten removable separate circuit boards present within the turret being shook from their beds by the violent recoil of the gun) the loader frequently found himself operating a manual crank before loading the 27kg missiles. This left him exhausted and diminished his ability to perform his role in high-stress situations. Despite this, the M551 still maintained an advantage in loading speed over the BMD-1, with a reduced re-engagement capability. This is because the HE and HEAT rounds, upon being fired, resulted in a particularly violent recoil that had the unfortunate consequence of generating a great deal of dust and smoke, which could interfere with the MGM-51's guidance system, rendering it momentarily inoperable. This compounded on a reported MTBF of fifty shots for earlier models.Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 1
🧵A thread discussing the history of Maneuver (automated command and control system): Image
Image
Overview:

In May of 1964, by decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU, and the Council of Ministers of the USSR, development began on the possibility of automating troop control systems within the Soviet military. Immediately, as a result of this request, a research group led by Colonel Fedotov at the Frunze Military Academy was established, aimed at determining if such systems would be functional from an operational + tactical standpoint. These studies concluded that if such an endeavor was to be seriously considered, automated systems and communication complexes could not exist separately. If Maneuver was to achieve complete superiority over enemy command and control, it had to be integrated alongside serious revisions to the entire C&C matrix of the Soviet Military. Work on a system that would harmonize Communications between strategic, operational, and tactical formations began at OKB-864 in Minsk. Due to the importance of Minsk Electromechanical Plant Number 864, the OKB soon became a part of the Research and Development Institute of Automatic Equipment in 1969, and in 1972, all of its efforts would shift towards R&D related to Maneuver. Yuri Dmitrievich Podrezov was appointed director of the Design Bureau and later Chief Designer of Maneuver.Image
Of course, at this time, autonomous command and control was nothing new within the Soviet military; each branch of the Armed Forces developed its own automated control systems independent of one another, and as a result, they soon found themselves struggling to organize and effectively interact. A herculean complication that the Maneuver system was to solve included unifying/harmonizing these systems into an all-arms network, which would allow for effective data transmission between ground forces, frontal aviation, and rear services. On top of this, Maneuver was to surpass foreign analogs, use entirely domestic technology, surpass domestic semi-automatic communication systems, and maintain the ability to operate in extreme temperatures between -50 degrees celsius and +50 degrees celsius. Throughout the course of fulfilling these requirements technology which was in many regards new to the Soviet Union had to be developed to facilitate the success of Maneuver, these included modern (for the time) computer graphics, digital coordinate acquisition devices, keyboards, display systems, modern data transmission equipment, codogram dialing consoles, and software for complex database management. These various sub-systems would then be unified in Maneuver and installed in divisions as well as regiments, offering 26 vehicles to commanders and their staff. At the front and army level, 100 such vehicles were present. Within regiments, Maneuver was mounted on MT-LBu, while at the operational level, Ural-375 saw use as the chassis of choice for the complex.
Read 17 tweets
Feb 13
🧵A thread discussing the theoretical foundation of Soviet small-unit tactics: Image
The Soviet platoon is organized around the senior lieutenant, who commands the unit, and is relegated to an integrated control element, where he is assisted by a deputy platoon commander who serves to relieve certain duties. Each platoon has a sniper/marksman, who provides precision and limited reconnaissance to the unit, he is not attached directly to the control element. A medic is present within each platoon, he operates as apart of the control element. Three motorized rifle squads totaling 24 in strength round out the formation. In the late 1980s/early 1990s the platoon would be expanded to 30 with the introduction of a machine gun which was attached to the control element. Each BMP or BTR has a crew consisting of a commander, who serves as the squad leader, a gunner (deputy commander), and a driver, who is the vehicles mechanic. These individuals will remain mounted throughout the course of an engagement. Those who dismount to fight on foot include a senior rifleman, a machine gunner, a marksman, a rifleman, a grenadier (RPG), and the assistant grenadier (RPG).Image
Image
Platoons are instructed to dismount and prepare for an engagement roughly 2-3km before reaching the line of contact. This is due to the fact that the enemies anti-tank systems will struggle to reliably engage BMPs or BTRs at this distance. Following this, the platoon will break a cautious march at 600 meters and assume an offensive formation, this distance is variable and based on the conditions of the terrain/nature of the engagement. 600 meters is chosen as the ideal distance as a result of the fact tactical nuclear weapons as well as chemical munitions are just as destructive to the defending party as the attackers, limiting the likelihood of their application. APCs and IFVs are to deliver fire in support of the offensive from positions that limit their exposure to anti-armor weapons (reverse slopes being favored). If the platoon is ambushed, or crossing a minefield/artificial choke point, transportation vectors will serve as mobile cover until the immediate threat has been eliminated, after which they will resume a position behind the infantry.Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 14
A thread discussing the theoretical framework of Soviet night fighting tactics (part 1) 🧵: Image
The foundation of Soviet night fighting tactics (similar to previously discussed concepts) center around predetermined "rules" for success. These include efficient light support, effective application of artillery/air attacks (fire support), sudden + decisive action, the use of varying "night conditions" to improve the actualization of surprise/stealthy maneuver, continuous cooperation between sub-units throughout the duration of the offensive, and increased tactical flexibility. These norms were defined as a result of studies involving both international and domestic experience, which demonstrated the advantages of engagements at night against an unprepared defensive force. Generally speaking units were capable of accomplishing their objectives with fewer losses when compared to similar endeavors at day, and could defeat significantly stronger enemy forces that would otherwise be impossible to reliably defeat. For this reason, night conditions were to be exploited to achieve the destruction of defensive forces, units advancing to conduct a counter offensive, or retreating formations (in a pursuit).
It is believed that under the most favorable conditions, the offensive should transpire at nightfall, this allows for darkness to be exploited for the longest period of time. Though it must be noted an offensive in the second half of the night (shortly before dawn) is considered equally as advantageous, as the vigilance of the defending force will be decreased and success can be exploited into the day. Normally these attacks would be conducted on the move, without pauses or breaks in the advance, this is done to maintain momentum and avoid the enemy preparing their defenses for a potential assault, withdrawing to occupy a secondary location or moving up reserves to reinforce the position. Conducting night offensives on the move has a number of secondary advantages, such as improving the potential for surprise, it is difficult to pinpoint where exactly the main body is, making fire support from artillery/aircraft harder to deliver accurately, and in general less engineering work is required at the front. The disadvantages of this method include a reduced window of organization, diminished time for units to study the terrain + prepared defenses, the importance placed on a covert advance, and greater vulnerability of sub-units on the march.Image
Read 17 tweets
Jan 5
A thread discussing the theoretical framework of Soviet urban combat doctrine at the sub-unit level: Image
The organization and conduct of an offensive to capture a city or parts of a city are radically opposed to the means in which one conducts offensive maneuvers under normal conditions, and become increasingly unconventional if nuclear weapons have been employed prior to the battles transpiration. In Soviet writing about this concept, nuclear munitions are seen as the most efficient means to achieve a decisive victory over forces defending a besieged settlement, and allow for the location to be almost immediately occupied in the shortest period of time with the least manpower employed to do so, as defensive structures and resources which could aid the enemy in repulsing an incursion would be ablated. This does not mean Soviet units would be without resistance in this hypothetical, large zones of contamination, debris and other factors would create problems for advancing forces, though it must be noted that fighting within a city is generally regarded to be exponentially harder than preparing motorized rifles for fighting within a post nuclear battlefield. Tactical nuclear weapons may be used on the outskirts of a city, where the flank of advancing forces could be exposed to the enemy, as well as the epicenter of the city as to destroy reserves and units in depth. Before nuclear munitions are to be employed it is extremely important that the cities administrative, military, political and economic value be assessed, and that the attitude of its denizens to the Soviet Military be determined.Image
Within a conventional framework, cities become strongholds which require insurmountable resources to contest. Alongside the concern of commitment is the duration of fighting that is expected from such an endeavor, leading to a diminished offensive pace. If an occupied city must be attacked it is important that units are positioned in such a way that varying axis of advance become possible, this will allow for a simultaneous offensive from multiple locations, diminishing the effectiveness of defending forces. Strong advanced detachments (often reinforced motorized infantry battalions) will be employed to locate gaps in the enemies defenses within, and deny reserves the ability to reinforce its interior. Important facilities and highways are to be immediately captured prior to all other elements. These advanced detachments will make great use of fire support from tube artillery and fixed wing aircraft, and should be capable of capturing two quarters of the settlement as the main body approaches. Air Assault forces are to penetrate the rear of the enemy which works to disrupt defending forces as the forward detachment arrives, they will target primarily routes leading to the city. If the advanced detachment is unusually successful the main body will pursue the defenders as they retreat to ensure a lack of organized withdrawal.Image
Read 15 tweets
Dec 2, 2024
A thread discussing the involvement of the Soviet Chemical Defense Troops in the CNPP liquidation efforts: Image
The accident at the CNPP (Chernobyl nuclear power plant) transpired while Colonel-General of the Chemical Troops, V.K. Pikalov, and his Chief of Staff, Major-General V.S. Kavunov, were at a training camp in Lviv. At 10:00 AM, Pikalov was ordered by Marshal S.F. Akhromeyev to fly to Chernobyl immediately. They landed in Kiev and traveled by car to Pripyat. The group arrived on April 27th, where a mobile detachment of Chemical Troops was authorized for airlift to the area of the accident. As they approached the plant, they observed the distinctive glow of Cherenkov radiation, raising concerns about the severity of the situation.

By the time Pikalov reached Pripyat, the mobile detachment had also arrived and immediately began identifying radiation levels in the area of operation and mapping safe routes for troop entry and civilian evacuation. At this time, Pikalov had access to only four patrols: one assigned to operations within the zone and another designated as a reserve. To minimize exposure for those working in contaminated areas, Pikalov personally set out in an RHM alongside a Kazakh mechanic-driver.

The safest route to Reactor 4 was from the eastern side, where radiation levels were as low as 5 R/h, compared to the dangerous southern and western sides, which reached up to 2,300 R/h. Therefore, all equipment and personnel were introduced from this axis. The northern side, with radiation levels between 13 and 140 R/h, was designated as a secondary ingress point for worst-case scenarios.Image
Between 7:00 and 8:00 AM on April 27th, the mobile detachment, with assistance from a separate reconnaissance company, prepared the first contamination map to support the operation. This map was crucial for drafting evacuation plans and determining measures to protect the population from the disaster's effects. As a result, the evacuation was announced and began at 2:00 PM that day.

Due to the inconsistent nature of the contamination, the possibility that fuel rods had been ejected from the reactor arose, making it of utmost importance to locate them. Another critical task was to determine the quantity of plutonium released from the reactor. It was assumed that the fuel rods would produce a distinctive glow, so aerial photo-reconnaissance was employed. Between April 27th and 29th, approximately 20 photographs were taken, revealing traces of fuel elements on black-and-white images.

The next step was to determine the extent of contamination across the region and provide accurate figures for daily emissions from Unit 4. Helicopters were used to roughly estimate the scale of the disaster and track the direction in which combustion products were spreading. As a result, large-scale, ground-based reconnaissance operations could finally be conducted. Some helicopters became contaminated and had to return to base for comprehensive decontamination.Image
Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(