Anybody claiming self-amplifying RNA is not potentially disastrous doesn't understand how it works. Ahem.
Here are my slides for Japan. @ics6tokyo
"Is the risk of recombination with endogenous RNAs going to be assessed? How?”
Updated slide: There have been 32 vials tested by @DJSpeicher to date, including 3 Aussie vials. @dystopian_DU @Double_Christ
And I stand corrected again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Another BS study. Every single kid in this 'study' was injected prior with Pfizer product so there's no actual control group. You can't inject someone with a placebo AFTER they've been injected with a drug and call it a placebo. link.springer.com/article/10.100…
2. Phase I BioNTech sponsored kid dose testing clinical trial compared with the Phase III BioNTech sponsored kid 'boosting' …. Interestingly, no results and no patient data are posted for either on http://clinicaltrials.gov57clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04816… clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04955…
3. The percentage of kids with elevated troponins was higher in the 'placebo' group to begin with! "BNT162b2 or placebo receipt were 0.5% and 0.8% before vaccination" They claim NO myocarditis cases at all in the cohorts included.
"There are two potentially big problems with the proteins being produced in the context of the COVID modmRNA products. The first one is that on-target proteins are being produced with high fidelity. The second one is that off-target proteins are being produced with low fidelity."
"The reason the former is a problem is due amyloidogenic peptides encoded in the spike gene. The reason the latter is a problem is due to the issue of misfolded proteins or otherwise aberrant proteins."
"The former is bad news with regard to amyloids and the latter is bad news with regard to chimeric proteins leading to autoimmunity."[1,2,3]
I am posting this for posterity.
"Question: Were the mRNA-based COVID-19 shots designed to promote cancer/tumorigenesis?
Notes:
1. The expression vectors/plasmids released do not match those found from independent sequencing - T7 promoters were released - SV40 were not.
2. The expression vectors also contain SV40 enhancers that are not required for transcription - they are additives.
3. SV40 enhancers are Nuclear localization sequence/signals (NLS) - "a nuclear localization signal or sequence (NLS) is an amino acid sequence that 'tags' a protein for import into the cell nucleus by nuclear transport". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_l…
January 30th, 2021: "Now that they have entered mass production, that is no longer possible, they have had to switch to lower-cost processes, e.g. using huge quantities of DNA that functions as the substrate to be able to produce the RNA in an in-vitro transcription reaction."
"This is done via bacteria, via the fermentation of transformed bacteria that contain this DNA. The bacteria multiply the DNA in huge amounts, and this leads to new dangers or risks, particularly contamination."
Predicted by Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krueger during her testimony presented at the 37th Hearing of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee on 30th January 2021. @Kevin_McKernan
BNT162b4 not only has mRNA for spike but something new and insane: mRNA encoding nucleocapsid, membrane, and ORF1ab proteins! So not only will T and B cells be aimed against spike, they will also be aimed at these other self-made foreign proteins. cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
Wherever they are made. See the problem? Am I missing something here? How the hell can these designers not know that this is a bad idea? clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study…
They claim, once again, reduction in COVID-19 disease severity and duration caused by circulating or future variants due to polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to diverse epitopes (in animal models), BUT this is the PHASE I exploratory stage. 240 people 18-55. Healthy.