Jessica Rose 🤙 Profile picture
Applied Mathematician | Immunologist | Computational Biologist | Molecular Biologist | Biochemist | Musician | Writer | Logger
Lis 🇺🇸 🐭 Profile picture Myis Profile picture Diane Smith Profile picture Perry Rakoma Profile picture Sam Williams Profile picture 12 subscribed
Sep 20 9 tweets 7 min read
Anybody claiming self-amplifying RNA is not potentially disastrous doesn't understand how it works. Ahem.
Here are my slides for Japan. @ics6tokyo
"Is the risk of recombination with endogenous RNAs going to be assessed? How?”


Image
Image
Image
Image



Image
Image
Image
Image
Mar 19 5 tweets 2 min read
1. Another BS study. Every single kid in this 'study' was injected prior with Pfizer product so there's no actual control group. You can't inject someone with a placebo AFTER they've been injected with a drug and call it a placebo.
link.springer.com/article/10.100… 2. Phase I BioNTech sponsored kid dose testing clinical trial compared with the Phase III BioNTech sponsored kid 'boosting' …. Interestingly, no results and no patient data are posted for either on http://clinicaltrials.gov57clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04816…
clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04955…
Dec 13, 2023 6 tweets 2 min read
"There are two potentially big problems with the proteins being produced in the context of the COVID modmRNA products. The first one is that on-target proteins are being produced with high fidelity. The second one is that off-target proteins are being produced with low fidelity." "The reason the former is a problem is due amyloidogenic peptides encoded in the spike gene. The reason the latter is a problem is due to the issue of misfolded proteins or otherwise aberrant proteins."
Sep 11, 2023 7 tweets 2 min read
Uncanny. Amyloid fibrin. Confirmed. More reproduction of results please... @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @Drs4CovidEthics @Inquiry_Canada @SenRonJohnson @SenatorRennick @SenatorAntic @senatorbabet @MRobertsQLD @RobertKennedyJr
fullmeasure.news
Image Image
May 29, 2023 6 tweets 1 min read
I am posting this for posterity.
"Question: Were the mRNA-based COVID-19 shots designed to promote cancer/tumorigenesis?

Notes:

1. The expression vectors/plasmids released do not match those found from independent sequencing - T7 promoters were released - SV40 were not. 2. The expression vectors also contain SV40 enhancers that are not required for transcription - they are additives.
May 28, 2023 6 tweets 2 min read
January 30th, 2021: "Now that they have entered mass production, that is no longer possible, they have had to switch to lower-cost processes, e.g. using huge quantities of DNA that functions as the substrate to be able to produce the RNA in an in-vitro transcription reaction." "This is done via bacteria, via the fermentation of transformed bacteria that contain this DNA. The bacteria multiply the DNA in huge amounts, and this leads to new dangers or risks, particularly contamination."
May 13, 2023 5 tweets 2 min read
BNT162b4 not only has mRNA for spike but something new and insane: mRNA encoding nucleocapsid, membrane, and ORF1ab proteins! So not only will T and B cells be aimed against spike, they will also be aimed at these other self-made foreign proteins.
cell.com/cell/fulltext/… Wherever they are made. See the problem? Am I missing something here? How the hell can these designers not know that this is a bad idea? clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study…