Imagine the idiotic luxury of being Woke (Marxist or Fascist). Everything reduces to one variable: the rich, the middle class, racism and racists, sexism and sexists, a broad but constrained concept of normalcy, imperialism, whatever. This is truly intellectual decadence. 🧵
When you're Woke, there's always just one explanation for everything, and there's an associated group of people who can be scapegoated for that universal cause (that is, a devil). It's men! It's racists! It's white people! It's capitalists! Damn them!
Not only is there one answer (or a small number of related answers) to the question of what causes any problem, you also get to sound SMART, SOPHISTICATED, and ETHICALLY SUPERIOR for indulging this intellectually vacuous luxury, so long as you mean it and/or have some buzzwords.
But let's get real about this idiot decadence. In reality, problems have different causes and sometimes many causes. That means while you might occasionally hit on a correct critique, usually you'll miss the diagnosis significantly or completely while scapegoating people for it.
By misdiagnosing the problem, you're virtually guaranteed to misprescribe a solution. In fact, you're overwhelmingly likely to fail to work on any real problems and might end up doing nothing more than virtue signaling that you care (wrongly, but more than others) about things.
More specifically, for every possible cause that isn't the ONE CAUSE (the devil), you'll misunderstand the problem and misprescribe its solutions. That is, you'll look smart and superior while failing to solve the problem and creating new ones ("externalities").
As the problem itself festers and externalities multiply, because you only have one diagnosis, one "root cause," for every problem, you will diagnose the resulting increase in problems to the ONE CAUSE (the devil) and perpetuate the cycle of decadent failure.
Moreover, because the theory that tells you the ONE CAUSE (devil) is regarded in Leftism as a "sacred science" (a sociognostic awakening, hence "Woke"), it can't be wrong; it can only be sabotaged by the agents of the devil. You end up with a downward spiral of failure and blame.
This is fundamentally a structural abnormality that defines Leftist analysis (sociognosticism). Leftism will always produce this outcome, even when it appears to be "right wing" (Fascism) in certain superficial characteristics. That is, Woke always generates spirals of failure.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Charles Spurgeon once famously said, "Discernment isn't telling the difference between right and wrong; it's telling the difference between right and almost right."
Lies and evil rarely show themselves as false or wrong. They show up in the guises of true and right enough. 🧵
Many people have heard the warning of incrementalist change being like moving three inches at a time until one day you suddenly realize you're three miles down the road not knowing how you got there and not sure how to go back. It can be more subtle than that.
Imagine you're in a jet flying a thousand miles, and your course bearings are set just 1° off from the direction you should be going. After flying a thousand miles, you'll be over seventeen miles from where you intended to be. Every hundred miles you go, you stray by 1.7+ miles.
Corrupted Christian doctrine together with a deracinated, subverted liberalism, both calling themselves "progressive" at times, worked together to this end. A reactionary church will be summoned as its negation so that the resistance will not find genuine faith in God or country.
Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum have been quite clear for over a decade, as have other organizations working in this manner for roughly a century, that they seek a values shift that's to be accomplished through faith. The future they plan isn't secular at all.
Be cautious with people denigrating "the Enlightenment" to advance some political project (which is invariably Woke, Left or Right). It refers to several things, not all of which agree.
America is based on Scottish Common Sense Realism, not French or German Idealism. 🇺🇸
The post-liberty Right ("Woke Right") tend to talk trash on the Englightenment in a sloppy way so they can attack American Classical Liberalism instead of conserving it. This error is only forgiveable at first. By now, the big players MUST know better because it's been clarified.
It's certainly the case that Communism arises out of the Neoplatonist/Idealist German and French Enlightenment, but American Classical Liberalism, which opposes these and always has, comes from somewhere else, despite some overlaps at the beginning, namely Common Sense Realism.
You may have noticed that people who are wrong, especially when doing wrong, not just factually wrong, often attack people telling the truth. That's Error hating Truth.
Why does Error hate Truth? A borrowed lesson from my friend the Honorable Bob McEwan. 🧵
Imagine we're in an auditorium, and I say the auditorium is 50 feet wide, and you say it's 60 feet, and someone else says it's 80 feet. Obviously, we cannot all be correct (although we could all be wrong).
Now suppose we don't have any way to measure the room but decide it's important to figure out. I sit there and give my best arguments for 50 feet, and you argue for 60, and the other guy argues for 80, and we appeal to this and that and talk and talk and talk.
If you wonder why I don't interact with her, it's because she's dangerously obsessed with me and does this dishonest cluster-B thing all the time. Most of her posts are about me. Most of her streams are about me. It's all unhinged cluster-B provocation. See it?
I spare absolutely zero sympathy for the Groypers, but I think it's kind of funny how she's ingratiating herself with them and doing a borderline elevation of Nick Fuentes to do it, getting them to take her orders and do her bidding. That much is actually kind of hilarious.