There is large ideological asymmetry in the Gold Medal Olympians people choose to tweet about:
- Everyone posts a lot about women, liberals especially so
- There are huge differences in tweets about Olympians by race
- Everyone posts a lot Black women, liberals especially so
Tweeting about women and Black women especially is disproportionate for all groups, but especially so for the most liberal. The extremes are about equally off when it comes to race in general.
But how 'off' people are is hard to qualify, since people medal for different things.
So to get to whether there was ideological bias, the authors who provided this data conducted some other experiments, like one in which people could promote someone to represent a disadvantaged group where one of the three options was Black.
Conservatives weren't biased here.
All the results including those from yet another experiment were convergent, but caveat: some results had nonsignificant or marginal interactions, but the authors didn't really focus on that.
The motive for the liberal-conservative difference seems to be a more-liberal desire to promote underperforming groups.
Amy Wax got in trouble for remarking that she'd not seen a Black student in the top quarter of a Penn Law class.
Thanks to hacked Columbia data, we can see that she was...
Probably right!
In the decade before her statement, there were just two top-25% Black students.
It is *totally* plausible that she never met these students. And it's also plausible that she rarely saw Black students in the top *half*, because each year, the number of them was just 1-4.
But, despite being 8% of the class, they were ~40% of the bottom 10%-ranked students:
Note: Penn is on-par/slightly less elite than Columbia, so it's likely that the Black students there were somewhat *worse*, as the article notes, making her claims more likely.
This all comes from @zagrebbi's latest article. It's well worth a read!
Big day if you think Roe v. Wade was correctly decided.
My favorite part (note that I've only read 150 pages so far) was Thomas explaining that, no, the Founding g Fathers did not adopt the English feudal system.
This fact was clearly lost on the other side.
The Court's reliance on a random remark from a case that ultimately didn't even produce lasting changes raises the question of whether that sort of thing even matters.
Why shouldn't I cite the Dred Scott case as the law of the land?
- His license is suspended
- He was once a soldier for a Mafia family
- He's telling me about his time in Rikers
- He's showing me YouTube videos
- He's telling me his theories about Jews
He's telling me about gang wars he was in ad a kid.
He's wondering why all the Chinese girls are lined up - for an audition?
He says to go to Mother's Ruin for latin prostitutes.
All of this entirely unprompted.
"Yeah, these African guys, yeesh"
"I couldn't fuck that whore because I got the erectile dysfunction."