Joni Askola Profile picture
Sep 25, 2024 26 tweets 10 min read Read on X
1/25 In a world where Realism has been compromised by the deceitful and treacherous views of scholars like John Mearsheimer, there is an urgent need for more Neo-idealism. Image
2/25 Realism today has been largely co-opted by figures like Mearsheimer. Although a respected scholar, Mearsheimer has made increasingly questionable statements that contradict his own theory to defend russia. He also aligns more with neorealism than classical realism. Image
3/25 Neorealism has surpassed classical realism in prominence. It suggests that countries—particularly great powers—operate as black boxes, each seeking to increase their strength relative to others in an anarchic world devoid of a higher authority to resolve conflicts. Image
4/25 In this context, great powers are the key actors seeking to become the strongest in the system, aiming for regional hegemony without nearby threats. Once achieved, they will do everything possible to prevent the rise of another regional hegemon globally. Image
5/25 The common arguments used by people like Mearsheimer contain significant logical flaws, not only ideologically but—more importantly—within the very theory these individuals use to support their claims. Image
6/25 One of Mearsheimer's most astonishing statements is that, according to him, "there is no evidence" that russia has imperial ambitions or desires to conquer Ukrainian territory. Image
7/25 Claiming that russia has no imperial or expansionist ambitions during the ongoing war is similar to saying that Germany had none in the fall of 1939 or 1940. It is clear that russia aims to keep Ukraine within its 'sphere of influence' and exert control over it. Image
8/25 Realism does not grant great powers the right to expand their sphere of influence at will. A common misconception is that russia's interests and demands should all be respected, meaning its effective veto over Ukraine's NATO membership should be considered. Image
9/25 The US and the West as a whole have been, in fact, acting in accordance with this theory in many ways, even if Mearsheimer does not acknowledge it due to being either a useful idiot or a russian asset. Image
10/25 Claiming the war is the West's "fault" due to NATO expansion ironically contradicts realism. From this perspective, the West is not to blame for following the theory's predictions—strengthening its influence over a minor power while weakening russia. Image
11/25 From the perspective of great power competition, the US and NATO's decision to strengthen ties with Ukraine and open NATO's doors was entirely logical. Image
12/25 russia initiated the conflict, not NATO or Ukraine, which were merely seeking security. Mearsheimer's argument is like blaming someone for wanting to set an alarm system to protect their jewelry; while the jewelry may attract burglars, the blame truly lies with the burglar Image
13/25 russia's perception of NATO as a threat doesn't obligate others to comply with its demands. The true threat for Putin lies in former Warsaw Pact countries thriving economically and securely, which endangers the russian regime, not the russian nation. Image
14/25 Mearsheimer also wrongly assumes russia would join the US against china, bolstering US power. Conversely, a US withdrawal from Europe would, per the theory, enhance russia's relative power, incentivizing more aggressive actions in Europe. Image
15/25 The paradox and irony of the narrative lie in the fact that, from a realistic standpoint, the US and the West as a whole are acting as they should by seizing the chance to weaken russia without resorting to military action or deploying American soldiers. Image
16/25 Mearsheimer fell victim to his theory, twisting it to fit his pro-russian narrative. According to realism, the US and the West are acting as predicted by seeking to weaken russia and curb its rise as a regional power in Europe. Image
17/25 When evidence is lacking, societal benefits are low, and the outcomes are grave—such as legitimizing a criminal invasion—academics like Mearsheimer should rethink the topics they choose for their global lectures. Image
18/25 While neorealist figures like Mearsheimer have distorted realism to defend russia's actions, alternative approaches like neo-idealism are gaining prominence. The approach was introduced by @bctallis. Image
19/25 Neo-Idealism is a fresh approach to (geo)politics that is inspired by the strong reactions to russian aggression from leaders like @Zelenskyy_Uaa, @kajakallas, @MarinSanna, @GLandsbergis, @JanLipavsky, and others. Image
20/25 Neo-idealism is a morally grounded approach to geopolitical interests that emphasizes the rights of all democratic states, including smaller nations, to self-determination—such as their ability to join integration spheres and reject spheres of influence. Image
21/25 In contrast to classical realism's focus on power and national interest, neo-idealism argues that moral values and ethical principles should guide international relations, encouraging states to promote global justice and peace alongside their self-interest. Image
22/25 This approach entails costs, yet neo-idealists are resolute in recognizing the price of freedom and are willing to pay it. Even if liberal values have been imperfectly upheld in their nations, they see these values as worth defending and renewing. Image
23/25 Neo-idealists recognize that a liberal order cannot survive without the means to defend itself, including military capabilities. However, without a strong moral foundation or the promise of progress, it cannot truly thrive. Image
24/25 Neo-idealism signals a shift toward an ethically grounded view of international relations, emphasizing cooperation, human rights, and moral considerations to promote a just and peaceful world through state collaboration and international institutions. Image
@Zelenskyy_Uaa @kajakallas @MarinSanna @GLandsbergis @JanLipavsky I tagged the wrong account for @ZelenskyyUa 😅

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joni Askola

Joni Askola Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joni_askola

Jul 2
1/11 🏅🇷🇺 Vatnik Hall of Fame: Part 6

Welcome to part 6 of the Vatnik Hall of Fame - a thread series exposing the loudest Kremlin voices, disinfo pushers, and authoritarian fanboys.

From podcasters to dictators, this batch is especially spicy Image
2/11 Joe Rogan

The biggest podcaster in the world became a pipeline for conspiracy theories and anti-Ukraine propaganda.

Rogan hosts Kremlin apologists, mocks Ukraine, and endorsed Trump in 2024.

One of the Kremlin’s most influential megaphones Image
3/11 Elbridge Colby

A nepo baby turned Pentagon official, now directly responsible for blocking promised aid to Ukraine.

Hates Ukraine-loves russia.

russia’s second best ally in Washington—after Trump Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 2
1/7 Elbridge Colby is one of russia’s best allies in Washington.

He’s a traitor to the US and an enemy of Ukraine.

He must be remembered as the man who helped russia kill more Ukrainian civilians—and the Trump administration for enabling him Image
2/7 Elbridge Colby is not just a nepo baby or a twitter contrarian.

He is now directly responsible for the deaths of Ukrainian civilians.

As Trump’s Pentagon policy chief, he halted shipments of already-promised aid—right as russia launched its biggest strikes of the war Image
3/7 This isn’t just about stockpiles.

The missiles being withheld include AIM-7 Sparrows—which the US doesn’t even actively need.

Colby is on a personal crusade against Ukraine, and his long-standing disdain for Ukrainian sovereignty is now becoming US policy Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 1
1/11 🏅🇷🇺 Vatnik Hall of Fame: Part 5

10 more names added to the list of russia’s most shameless enablers and apologists.

They have one thing in common: they serve the Kremlin’s interests Image
2/11 Calin Georgescu

Romanian politician & conspiracy theorist.

The king of TikTok.

Praises Putin—hates Ukraine and NATO.

A classic far-right populist working on behalf of the Kremlin Image
3/11 George Simion

Georgescu’s backup.

Banned from Moldova and Ukraine.

russia’s candidate in Romania.

Hooligan turned Kremlin propagandist Image
Read 11 tweets
Jun 30
1/5 How to accelerate the end of the war:

If we want russia’s invasion of Ukraine to end faster, we can’t just help Ukraine survive.

We need to make the war costlier for russia.

That means going beyond defense.

Here’s how👇 Image
2/5 Ukraine’s long-range strike capabilities need more funding and technological support.

They must be able to hit the energy infrastructure fueling russia’s war.

This isn’t escalation—it’s deterrence.

russia must feel the cost of its aggression at home Image
3/5 Sanctions must go further—and be enforced much better.

We have made progress on the shadow fleet, but loopholes remain.

Every barrel of oil sold funds missiles.

Every weak sanction is a green light to keep killing Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30
1/11 🏅🇷🇺 Vatnik Hall of Fame: Part 4

Another 10 names added to the list of russia’s most shameless enablers and apologists.

They have one thing in common: they serve the Kremlin’s interests Image
2/11 Nigel Farage

Helped russia achieve Brexit.

Called Putin the world leader he most admires.

Appeared on RT and echoed Kremlin talking points for years.

Still undermining Western unity Image
3/11 Viktor Medvedchuk

Putin’s closest ally in Ukraine.

Traitor.

Handed over to russia in a prisoner swap.

The Kremlin’s dream puppet Image
Read 11 tweets
Jun 29
1/4 The top 3 biggest enablers of russia’s war on Ukraine:

They don’t all wear uniforms—but they all have blood on their hands.

Without them, Putin’s war machine would have collapsed long ago Image
2/4 china and russia’s other allies:

china, iran, north korea, and belarus have kept russia alive—helping it reroute exports, dodge sanctions, and sending weapons, tech, even soldiers.

Without them, russia’s economy and military would be in freefall.

Shame on them! Image
3/4 Western traitors and cowards:

From Trump to Orban to Fico, some Western leaders have slowed aid, softened sanctions, and echoed Kremlin propaganda.

They have sabotaged unity and emboldened Putin.

Their betrayal is costing lives.

Real traitors and cowards Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(