Marcellus Williams, Adnan Syed, Steven Avery, Central Park Five... all of these high profile cases where the guy is obviously guilty, why does the lib insist beyond reason the guy is not guilty and make impassioned moralistic pleas that we all submit to their delusion?
At bottom, despite the trappings of cosmopolitanism, the lib is a provincial, small-minded creature. The lib, for all his openness and presumptions to empathy, cannot see beyond himself, beyond his own inclinations, cannot imagine there are people who are not at all like him
The lib cannot imagine, because the lib is not like this, that people murder, savagely, and then act contrite, sad, can be "just a kid" and simultaneously be a sociopathic lunatic.
They see these men and think, "He is just like me, my son. I wouldn't do that. How could they?"
They see these men and think, "He is just like me, my son. I wouldn't do that. How could they?"
The lib, despite his the accusations of moral relativism, is in fact a universalist. "It is all the same everywhere and the human condition is fixed and true and I am at the center of it."
This is their universalist fiction. This is the deep core of the globohomo worldview.
This is their universalist fiction. This is the deep core of the globohomo worldview.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
