Lara Brown Profile picture
Sep 26 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
The claim Heathcliff was "one of the most famous people of colour in literature" is a fundamentally absurd misreading of Wuthering Heights.

It emerges from a misunderstanding of the Victorian use of the descriptor "dark"

🧵thread on what Brontë (and other writers) meant.
1/ To start with - it's pretty clear that Linton Heathcliff is probably not a "person of colour".

He is described in Ch. 19 as a "pale, delicate, effeminate boy" Image
2/ Earlier, in ch. 3 Brontë claims his face is "as white as the wall behind him" Image
3/ So why does this claim keep popping up?

Heathcliffe is described as a "dark-skinned gipsy in aspect"

(aspect here almost certainly referencing his appearance - not a known fact about his origins, which are a mystery over the course of the novel) Image
4/ Mr Linton also hypothesises Heathcliff might be "a little Lascar, or American or Spanish castaway"

This is a derision of his character - based on Heathcliff's apparent back story as a foundling adopted from the streets of Liverpool Image
6/ Describing a character as "dark skinned" is a clear Victorian shorthand for the Byronic Hero.

Heathcliff is a typical Byronic Hero (as first exemplified in 'Childe Harold's Pilgrimage').

He is at arms length from polite society, wild, and unsettling. Image
7/ Descriptions of Heathcliff as a "gipsy" also centre around status - another way to denigrate a character as an outcast.

George Elliot's Maggie Tulliver is described repeatedly as "like a gipsy". This is not a comment on her race - but her wild instincts and lower status. Image
8/ It is feasible that Heathcliff's mother may have been a gipsy (we don't know who she is!) - but here it's worth noting that Victorian traveller communities were usually English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish (or possibly descended from Romanies in Europe) Image
9/ It's also worth noting that if Heathcliff was discernibly Irish - then Emily Brontë may not have regarded his as "white". Victorian attitudes on this question are worlds apart from modern conceptions.

Heathcliff probably simply had recognisably Mediterranean features.
10/ Probably most importantly - claims that Heathcliff was a "person of colour" forget how stratified Victorian society was.

Heathcliff marries Isabella Linton -a woman from a wealth and respectable society -18th c. Yorkshire was not a place that would have allowed such a union
11/ This isn't to say that Heathcliff being mixed race isn't something one couldn't read into the text, or that films shouldn't cast ethnic minority actors to play him.

But it's fundamentally untrue to say he's definitely canonically "not white" without evidence in the text.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lara Brown

Lara Brown Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lara_e_brown

Aug 20
The devolved Welsh Government has just spent £135,000 of taxpayer money on a guide to "anti-racist libraries".

Short 🧵on this ludicrous report and the chilling impact it may have on freedom of speech in Welsh library collections. Image
Libraries in Wales are chronically underfunded. Jobs in the sector have been reduced from 1,241 (2010) to 979 today.

Library funding is usually less than 1% of local council budgets.

Rather than address this - the Welsh government has chosen instead to 'decolonise' libraries
The two guides - one on training, another on the collections - contain highly divisive and contested language.

It should not be the place of libraries to "challenge the dominant paradigm of whiteness". Image
Read 11 tweets
Aug 14
Are Deliveroo offering illegal migrants a backdoor to the UK economy?

Short 🧵on why the Deliveroo business model seems to be dependent on illegal migrants working for less than half of minimum wage. Image
1/ Deliveroo drivers are paid as little as £2.90 per food delivery.

Drivers report earning around £5.80 an hour.

9.7% of businesses are experiencing labour shortages. So when there's a surplus of minimum wage jobs - who wants to work for deliveroo? Image
2/ The answer: those who don't have a legal right to work in the UK.

42% of riders stopped by the police have been found to be working illegally.

That's nearly half the whole workforce. Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 29
Rachel Reeves claims she has just discovered a £22 billion black hole.

She's announced cuts to major public infrastructure projects which could have driven enormous growth and prosperity.

Short 🧵on wasted public money that could be cut. Image
1/ 15.6 billion a year on Net Zero

Aurora Energy Research have costed Labour's commitment to Net Zero by 2030 at 15.6 bn/year (with a total additional investment of £116 bn over the next 11 years) Image
2/ £11.6 billion in overseas climate aid.

Miliband has confirmed Labour are still committed to spending £11.6 billion in 'International Climate Finance' before 2026. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 26
The National Gallery have taken the decision to brand John Constable's Hay Wain as a "contested" landscape due to his "conservative" attitudes and "privileged" position.

🧵on why we should oppose this sort of politicised curation from a museum funded by the taxpayer Image
1/ The National Gallery is a non-departmental body of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

The collection is free to view and in 2023 the gallery received £30.7 million from the taxpayer.

Their curatorial decisions are therefore in the public interest. Image
2/The Hay Wain is being depicted as a painting produced"conservative" attitudes. In reality - it's a radical artwork.

The portrait was produced in 1821 at the height of the academic hierarchy of artistic genres - with history painting at the top and landscapes much further down. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jul 22
Royal Parks have branded the Albert Memorial as “offensive” as it “reflects a “Victorian view of European supremacy”.

This decision does not meet the rigorous standards set by the Government’s “Retain and Explain Guidance” or Policy Exchange’s “Principles for Change”. Why? 🧵 Image
2/ The Royal Parks website claims that the statue reflects a “Victorian view of the world that differs from mainstream views held today … though the Empire has traditionally been celebrated as a symbol of British supremacy, many today consider this view as problematic”.
3/ These claims are no longer available on the Royal Parks website and seem to have been removed. Do Royal Parks no longer stand by their comments? If so, who made this decision and why has there been no statement retracting the claims?
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(