The claim Heathcliff was "one of the most famous people of colour in literature" is a fundamentally absurd misreading of Wuthering Heights.

It emerges from a misunderstanding of the Victorian use of the descriptor "dark"

🧵thread on what Brontë (and other writers) meant.

https://twitter.com/SketchesbyBoze/status/1838956586242302097

1/ To start with - it's pretty clear that Linton Heathcliff is probably not a "person of colour".

He is described in Ch. 19 as a "pale, delicate, effeminate boy"

The devolved Welsh Government has just spent £135,000 of taxpayer money on a guide to "anti-racist libraries".

Short 🧵on this ludicrous report and the chilling impact it may have on freedom of speech in Welsh library collections. Libraries in Wales are chronically underfunded. Jobs in the sector have been reduced from 1,241 (2010) to 979 today.

Library funding is usually less than 1% of local council budgets.

Rather than address this - the Welsh government has chosen instead to 'decolonise' libraries

Are Deliveroo offering illegal migrants a backdoor to the UK economy?

Short 🧵on why the Deliveroo business model seems to be dependent on illegal migrants working for less than half of minimum wage. 1/ Deliveroo drivers are paid as little as £2.90 per food delivery.

Drivers report earning around £5.80 an hour.

9.7% of businesses are experiencing labour shortages. So when there's a surplus of minimum wage jobs - who wants to work for deliveroo?

Rachel Reeves claims she has just discovered a £22 billion black hole.

She's announced cuts to major public infrastructure projects which could have driven enormous growth and prosperity.

Short 🧵on wasted public money that could be cut. 1/ 15.6 billion a year on Net Zero

Aurora Energy Research have costed Labour's commitment to Net Zero by 2030 at 15.6 bn/year (with a total additional investment of £116 bn over the next 11 years)

The National Gallery have taken the decision to brand John Constable's Hay Wain as a "contested" landscape due to his "conservative" attitudes and "privileged" position.

🧵on why we should oppose this sort of politicised curation from a museum funded by the taxpayer 1/ The National Gallery is a non-departmental body of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

The collection is free to view and in 2023 the gallery received £30.7 million from the taxpayer.

Their curatorial decisions are therefore in the public interest.

Royal Parks have branded the Albert Memorial as “offensive” as it “reflects a “Victorian view of European supremacy”.

This decision does not meet the rigorous standards set by the Government’s “Retain and Explain Guidance” or Policy Exchange’s “Principles for Change”. Why? 🧵 2/ The Royal Parks website claims that the statue reflects a “Victorian view of the world that differs from mainstream views held today … though the Empire has traditionally been celebrated as a symbol of British supremacy, many today consider this view as problematic”.