The crown is lying in the gutter and anyone who presented a reasonable plan for dealing with these invaders could pluck it up with ease
So why won’t existing governments deal with it?
The humiliation and destruction is the entire point🧵👇
Often, mass migration is explained away as an an economic thing
They need more warm bodies and mirror foggers to keep GDP up and to the right and pension plans fully funded so the retired crowd doesn’t riot, or so they say
But that doesn’t pass the smell test. The Danes studied migration and found migrants from the Middle East and North Africa are huge drains on the public treasury. Far from funding pensions, they detract from them in a huge way, to the tune of thousands of euros a year
So why import them? Obviously not for economic reasons…
It’s because they want their native populations humiliated and depressed so they don’t revolt (ours want this too)…and hordes of migrants that commit crimes and can’t be spoken against on pain of imprisonment are a great way to do that
Take England, tooth any Western country has much the same story to tell
What was once the envy of the world, the prosperous lion living on top of Olympus, now has an anemic economy, a peerage and citizenry ruined by punitive taxation, and cities overrun with Muslim migrants that abuse young British girls while living on welfare checks
In any past world, the population would go French Revolution mode on the regime that did such evils to them
But they don’t do that. There’s no French Revolution in England, no Peasants Rebellion. Just occasional small scale rioting
Why?
Decades of humiliation and propaganda have deracinated and demoralized the native population that would be bringing out the pitchforks, and the Orwellian governmental apparatus crushes any small sign of discontent
So they stay at home and watch TV instead
And migrants are a particularly good avenue for creating the humiliation that led to this demoralization
Why?
Because they’re so obviously not meant to be there, much less in positions of power, yet are
these are the colonials that still hasn’t figured out the wheel, much less steam engine, when Britannia showed up, after all, and yet they’re ruling over Britannia now
Further, they commit all manner of horrific crimes, from butchery of soldiers and priests to rampant theft and petty crime, that makes them a menace and means a sane government should deport them.
Yet it doesn’t deport them. Despite their backwardness, drain on the treasury, and constant criminal activity, the regime rolls out the red carpet for them and puts them in positions of power
That’s humiliating, and has demoralized populations. Hence deaths of despair and like activity from once proud populations
And hanging over it all is the fact that these are Scythian archers.
They could be hanged a gun and badge at any moment and told to crush dissent amongst the native population, which they’d do without mercy
A government-funded food pantry in Minnesota is now excluding whites
If you needed yet more evidence that we’re drifting toward the South Africanization of America, or even the Mugabe-style Zimbabwification, this is it
Illinois explain in the 🧵👇
Key to understanding what’s happening in America right now, particularly the blue areas, is understanding the Race Communism of Africa
That ideology is, I think, best seen through the lens of Rhodesia’s transformation into Zimbabwe and the post-1994 destruction of South Africa by the African National Congress and its more honest colleagues in the EFF
So, what is the race communist ideology?
It is very much not the idea that, say, the state really ought care about and work your improve the lives of random blacks living in the slums of Johannesburg
Rather, it’s the idea that *some* blacks ought be raised above *all* whites and that whites ought pay for that, with blood and pain if necessary
Here's what really isn't understood when I say "the South Africanization of America":
It's not just that crime is going up; crime always happens. It's that everywhere turns into a potential scene of crime and bloody murder, with no respite.
It's total war, but with crime 🧵👇
The stabbing at the University of Arizona really shows this
Some girl was going to a school where she thought she'd have fun, but instead, she was attacked by some knife-wielding black woman for no real "reason"
What should be a relatively nice and calm place is instead, now, beset by violent crime and stabbings motivated not even by a desire to steal, but just anti-white hatred and a desire to harm
Were this to happen in some slum in Chicago, burned-out crack house in Detroit, or street corner in East St. Louis, it's not a story. Such things have always and will always happen in such areas; the solution is just to avoid them
But what's new is this happening in nice places; what used to be confined to the slums and "bad areas" has spread to everyone everywhere, with no clear way to avoid it other than to live in some secluded spot where the "fellow classmates" of the world dare not tread
What must be remembered is that this is 100% intentional
Some NGO, thought, "Well I hate the native population of X patch of land, so let's flood it with infinity unassimilable invaders"
And now they're doing exactly that, and it's motivated by hate
A very short 🧵👇
It's one thing when it is economic migration...that's awful and just as bad in reality, but can be hidden under the guise of "well they want to pick fruit for like a dollar a day, so your strawberries are cheaper
All the negative externalities are still there, of course...but it's generally not just open, undisguised hate against the native population. There's a veneer of (false) reasonability to it
That's very much not the case with things like the story at the top...
What will the Comoros Islands do with thousands of Subsaharan invaders? What will Lampedusa, the Italian island, do now that there are more African invaders on it than native Italians?
There's only one answer...those places will die even faster than the rest of the invader-allowing West
Mugabe enthusiasts post ridiculous memes like this on posts about Rhodesia, and how it is a rebuke of modern egalitarianism's ill effects
The thing is, are "Zimbabweans" of whatever class any better off now than they were under Ian Smith and his sort?
No, very much not 🧵👇
First, a quick reminder for those who haven't seen my previous posts:
Rhodesia did not have an apartheid system like South Africa. Rather, it had a property-tied voting system similar to America before Andrew Jackson or England in the 1800s, where to vote, you needed to own a requisite amount of Rhodesian property, such as real estate or a business. One could also qualify via educational attainment
Generally that meant that it was primarily whites voting, but anyone could who was educated and/or propertied
The result was, as they called it, "responsible government" that served the needs of all Rhodesians
The country industrialized, had a thriving agricultural sector that was the breadbasket of Africa, and the government invested heavily in raising the standard of living in tribal villages
So, no one was starving, the country was stable and ruled well, and things continued getting better and better
Because it was a normal Western country typical of the century prior to its destruction, one "more British than the British."
In fact, that's the very reason it was destroyed 🧵👇
Key to Rhodesia's national identity and success was that it wasn't a land of reprobates and freebooters picking their teeth with Bowie knives
Rather, from the time of the Pioneer Column into the Bush War, it was on the hunt for the best men of England. Particularly, it used restrictive immigration policies to ensure only those who would be able to assimilate into its "more British than the British," pink gin sundowner culture would be allowed to immigrate
So, those men who immigrated to Rhodesia were like the Duke of Montrose: gentlemen who wanted to be landowners who used their position to guide the Rhodesian state with a paternalistic hand
The result was a country with a small (250k or so) European population, nearly all of which was English and deeply steeped in English culture
Hunting, pink gin, gentlemanly behavior, modern agriculture on a large scale, national service in a daring and small military: it was the Britain of a century earlier
What six books should you read for an alternative look at history?
I'm known for my alternative views on history, particularly on Rhodesia, so what books do I recommend to start learning the tragic history of the past few centuries in a similar way
I'll show you in the 🧵👇
First up is "The Great Betrayal" by former Rhodesian PM Ian Douglas Smith
It's his autobiography, with a focus on his leadership during the Bush War and how he tried to save the country from the communist and Western-supported rebel attacks
It focuses on how the British and Americans stabbed Rhodesia in the back, throwing their ethnic cousins in Rhodesai to the bloodthirsty, communist wolves in the name of "democracy" and egalitarianism
It also shows Smith's care for the natives of Rhodesia, black and white alike, and how he wanted what was best for them (which wasn't mass democracy), in contrast to the Mugabe-supporting West that just wanted to do what would make it feel good
That is critical to understanding the second half of the twentieth century, as it shows what the Cold War and decolonization were about: not resisting communism, but pushing mass democracy on every patch of Earth in the name of ideological egalitarianism
The book was reprinted as "Bitter Harvest," which is sometimes easier to find. Both are easiest to find on AbeBooks
If you like this one, "Three Sips of Gin" by Tim Bax is superb, as is "Rhodesia Accuses" by Peck
Second is "Defenders of the West" by Raymond Ibrahim
It charts Christian resistance to Muslim aggression, with its key focus being on the few heroes who resisted the advance of Islam, often against great odds
It is critical because it shows the truth about Islam: today, a few fools on the right are trying to present Muslims as allies of true Christians in the fight against degeneracy. Nothing could be further from the truth; where the crescent moon of Islam goes, backwardness and blood-soaked horror always follows. The path out of this abominable world, both in live and after, is true Christianity, the Christianity of the heroes cataloged in the book; not allying with those who have tortured, oppressed, and killed Christians for centuries
@ChivalryGuild has written a great deal about this one, and is worth checking out
If you like this one, another great book on a similar subject is God's Battalions by Rodney Stark.