One of the things about being knowledgeable and informed about science is that it doesn’t mean a lot if our societies are run by people who aren’t or don’t believe in consulting those who do know. Or worse: actively work against scientific understanding
Living in Alberta, I know how this goes. I know that fossil fuels are accelerating our path to unlivable world, protections against infectious disease based in understanding of physics and occupational hygiene are important and that abortions and gender affirming care save lives
But Alberta has a government that doesn’t believe any of that/has decided to remain ignorant/chooses to believe something that is wrong/decided that profit is more important than those realities.
So I don’t get too smug about knowing all these things.
And I think this speaks to the trap in which many left-leaning people and liberals find themselves: merely being right seems like enough, even when the people who are wrong have the power.
So it goes to the reality: we can’t just say that things are “a pandemic of the unvaccinated” or “antivaxxers f around and find out” because it impacts all of us. And in the end, having knowledge doesn’t make us better than others; it just means that we were able to access it.
The other thing is that it is a reminder that science is always political.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s fascinating to see the ways in which our society enforces individualism by using social pressure and conformity, which seems paradoxical on its face. I’ve seen it in the pressure from teachers on kids and parents for them to “stop wearing a mask so you’ll fit in” 1/
Wearing a mask is an act of service to the people around us and a way to be accountable to our commitments by ensuring we can attend and learn. It shows that we think about how we impact others and they impact us. People with these traits often make good friends
2/
Conscientious people help their communities and model good ways of relating to others. We want these folks around and influencing others, rather than changing how they act and what they do. We wouldn’t discourage this unless we lived in a society that doesn’t value community.
3/
A teacher friend has informed me that a teacher FB group is lighting up on a post about a parent donating an air purifier because they remove *Bath and Body Works/AXE/other middle essence body sprays* and vape smells. It’s got thousands of likes and the teachers all want one 👀👀
This is the new angle, clean air advocates
The other concern: the very obvious mold that keeps showing up in their classrooms and making them feel like 💩
Doctors, you agree that a stay in the ICU, with intubation, sedation, everything else that goes along with that severity of illness takes an immense toll on the body, right? So why are patients who start to recover allowed to get covid in the hospital and then have to go back?
Why are patients receiving receiving chemotherapy, radiation, immunosuppressants exposed to covid during their treatments in hospital and in community when they're already enduring this level of suffering to survive?
Why are the conversations about healthcare collapse and short staffing not including this reality as part of causative factors?
This is terrible and horrifying. And this post is indicative of what I’m noticing lately: as a person who follows a lot of people for different reasons, the folks I follow for reasons other than covid are now talking about their covid experiences.
Also a reminder that all of our struggles are linked. When we see the oppression and violence in other places, driven by colonialism and funded by our govts, and then see the ways in which we’ve been failed here, it starts to make a lot of sense why we must connect our resistance
And that the push to ban masks for protest reasons serves a dual purpose: when we are debilitated, it makes us harder to unite against oppression
I find the horseshoeing of antivaxxers and covid aware people fascinating. One side is like, “Here is where to find apple-flavoured horse paste. Viruses were never real” and the other side is, “This @StatCan_eng report shows prevalence of long-term symptoms is 34% after 3 infxns”
“The vaccines have mind control microchips in them! Don’t comply!”
Vs
“The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 is a neurodegenerative and vascular disease due to its affinity to bind to ACE2 receptors, which are found throughout the body”
“I’m doing urine injections to build my immunity”
Vs
“We should use technology that has existed since the 1940s to capture small particles to clean the air. They invented to capture radioactive particulate matter and it clearly works for air pollution and viral aerosols too”
I need someone to explain this to me: the concern was that mandating masks would reduce the confidence that things higher on the hierarchy of controls were not effective. Well, let’s see:
They did not eliminate SARS-CoV-2 from workplaces, so that level is infective 1/
They couldn’t replace SARS-CoV-2 with a less harmful virus, so Substitution is ineffective 2/
They didn’t ensure the ventilation and filtration of air was optimized to remove SARS-CoV-2 and plexiglass barriers installed do not sufficiently block aerosols, so engineering controls are ineffective 3/